Hi guys,
I just wish to confirm this, is it true that 2nd 3rd or 4th attempter has
higher chances than first attempter. Not bcause of experiece now but I heard
the proctor take pity on those has attempted the exams before. What's your view
guys
Ola
Sent from my BlackBerry® Smartphone,
There's no pity involved in the grading process :-)
--
Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 (SP RS)
Senior CCIE Instructor - IPexpert
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 11:05 PM, otunola.aker...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi guys,
I just wish to confirm this, is it true that 2nd 3rd or 4th attempter has
higher
just to make sure that my email is being received by the group, just
started preparations
Regards and good luck for all
Regards,
Zaid,
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 11:05 AM, otunola.aker...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi guys,
I just wish to confirm this, is it true that 2nd 3rd or 4th attempter
has
I have heard that rumor and I do not know how much truth is in it. Since the
proctor is the final authority on your grade and the proctor is human, it isn't
too much of a stretch to suspect that empathy could play a role. However, any
evidence that someone could offer showing leniency is given
Hello FRIENDS
ATLAST I CLEARED THE BEAST
CLEARED LAB 7
Thanks to all of them i will be here for help for one week time then BIG
BIG BIG holiday i will take
Thanks once again
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
Its CVL question yes there is a trick to it if u can from pstn to hq u will
get RQNT and if u call from HQ to PSTN u wont or vise versa i checked with
them its normal behaviour
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 4:42 AM, Gurpreet Singh Kukreja
tycoononway1...@gmail.com wrote:
Chase,
Where do you
I have a question that may really just come down to a matter of preference.
However, I want to make sure there is something that I am not missing. For
those who want to read along my question stems from IPexpert's One Week Lab
Experience lab 2. I also think i have seen a similar question in the
Hi Bill,
When you ask for callers ahead of you, you should go with
ContactsWaiting+decrement step, because position in Queue is your position
and when nobody else is in the queue you will hear a - 1 after the
decrement, don't know whether there is also an increment step.
At the end it is your
Sounds like either way works, so as long as it works, it really doesn't
matter how you get it, just as long as the proctor gets what he is supposed
to hear.
I know I have used the slightly longer way as it helps me stay organized
but next lab session I am going to try this if I can keep my ducks
Steffen,
Thanks for the reply. Actually, position in queue is the correct reporting
statistic because I want to know how many contacts are ahead of the current
contact. ContactsWaiting gives total number of contacts waiting for a resource
without context for the existing contact. So, if I had
Bill,
You are correct. That variable will never have a value of -1 given that it is
re-initialized during every loop iteration.
I use UCCX to record all prompts for UCCX and BACD. I use CUC for CUC and CUE
prompt manager for its prompts. I haven't practiced doing recordings in CUC
(other than
Best guess as to the reasons more people pass as they take more exams:
1. More comfortable with environment, equipment time requirements.
2. More prepared for the level of questions and configurations needed.
3. More relaxed than your previous visits which helps you on the exam.
4.
Hi Bill,
I had my first attempt in November, but failed because I don't read
some question corectly
in every detail.
I had this problem with -1 in some of my lab sessions (not proctor
labs) and it worked with contacts waiting for me. I tested it with 3
call-in users and all get an indivudually
Best explanation for the factor.
Regards,
Abel Mateo
CCIE28546 - RS/Voice
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 7:07 PM, Bill Lake whl...@gmail.com wrote:
Best guess as to the reasons more people pass as they take more exams:
1. More comfortable with environment, equipment time requirements.
2.
Hi All,
I am wondering which would be the best interface to bind for transcoders ,
gateways , cfbs and for sccp configurations I know loopback is the best for
binding but with like to clarify with the example below...
For example...
R3#sh ip int brief
Interfacenbsp;nbsp; IP-Addressnbsp;nbsp;
Generally it doesn't matter to which you bind your media resources. But
maybe the question ask you for a specific binding.
The only thing you never should do is to bind Cube and Gatekeeper to the
same Interface.
Regards
Steffen
Am Samstag, 1. Dezember 2012 schrieb virajith :
Hi All,
I am
16 matches
Mail list logo