[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Grading

2012-11-30 Thread otunola . akerele
Hi guys, I just wish to confirm this, is it true that 2nd 3rd or 4th attempter has higher chances than first attempter. Not bcause of experiece now but I heard the proctor take pity on those has attempted the exams before. What's your view guys Ola Sent from my BlackBerry® Smartphone,

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Grading

2012-11-30 Thread Marko Milivojevic
There's no pity involved in the grading process :-) -- Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 (SP RS) Senior CCIE Instructor - IPexpert On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 11:05 PM, otunola.aker...@gmail.com wrote: Hi guys, I just wish to confirm this, is it true that 2nd 3rd or 4th attempter has higher

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Grading

2012-11-30 Thread Zaid Ahmed
just to make sure that my email is being received by the group, just started preparations Regards and good luck for all Regards, Zaid, On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 11:05 AM, otunola.aker...@gmail.com wrote: Hi guys, I just wish to confirm this, is it true that 2nd 3rd or 4th attempter has

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Grading

2012-11-30 Thread William Bell
I have heard that rumor and I do not know how much truth is in it. Since the proctor is the final authority on your grade and the proctor is human, it isn't too much of a stretch to suspect that empathy could play a role. However, any evidence that someone could offer showing leniency is given

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] DONE DONE DONE 7

2012-11-30 Thread quiene pereira
Hello FRIENDS ATLAST I CLEARED THE BEAST CLEARED LAB 7 Thanks to all of them i will be here for help for one week time then BIG BIG BIG holiday i will take Thanks once again ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] S: G/rt missing in MGCP trace

2012-11-30 Thread armoura dsouza
Its CVL question yes there is a trick to it if u can from pstn to hq u will get RQNT and if u call from HQ to PSTN u wont or vise versa i checked with them its normal behaviour On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 4:42 AM, Gurpreet Singh Kukreja tycoononway1...@gmail.com wrote: Chase, Where do you

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX Prompt Question

2012-11-30 Thread William Bell
I have a question that may really just come down to a matter of preference. However, I want to make sure there is something that I am not missing. For those who want to read along my question stems from IPexpert's One Week Lab Experience lab 2. I also think i have seen a similar question in the

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX Prompt Question

2012-11-30 Thread Steffen Bruening
Hi Bill, When you ask for callers ahead of you, you should go with ContactsWaiting+decrement step, because position in Queue is your position and when nobody else is in the queue you will hear a - 1 after the decrement, don't know whether there is also an increment step. At the end it is your

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX Prompt Question

2012-11-30 Thread Bill Lake
Sounds like either way works, so as long as it works, it really doesn't matter how you get it, just as long as the proctor gets what he is supposed to hear. I know I have used the slightly longer way as it helps me stay organized but next lab session I am going to try this if I can keep my ducks

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX Prompt Question

2012-11-30 Thread William Bell
Steffen, Thanks for the reply. Actually, position in queue is the correct reporting statistic because I want to know how many contacts are ahead of the current contact. ContactsWaiting gives total number of contacts waiting for a resource without context for the existing contact. So, if I had

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX Prompt Question

2012-11-30 Thread William Bell
Bill, You are correct. That variable will never have a value of -1 given that it is re-initialized during every loop iteration. I use UCCX to record all prompts for UCCX and BACD. I use CUC for CUC and CUE prompt manager for its prompts. I haven't practiced doing recordings in CUC (other than

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Grading

2012-11-30 Thread Bill Lake
Best guess as to the reasons more people pass as they take more exams: 1. More comfortable with environment, equipment time requirements. 2. More prepared for the level of questions and configurations needed. 3. More relaxed than your previous visits which helps you on the exam. 4.

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX Prompt Question

2012-11-30 Thread Steffen Bruening
Hi Bill, I had my first attempt in November, but failed because I don't read some question corectly in every detail. I had this problem with -1 in some of my lab sessions (not proctor labs) and it worked with contacts waiting for me. I tested it with 3 call-in users and all get an indivudually

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Grading

2012-11-30 Thread Abel ...
Best explanation for the factor. Regards, Abel Mateo CCIE28546 - RS/Voice On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 7:07 PM, Bill Lake whl...@gmail.com wrote: Best guess as to the reasons more people pass as they take more exams: 1. More comfortable with environment, equipment time requirements. 2.

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Interface for binding?

2012-11-30 Thread virajith
Hi All, I am wondering which would be the best interface to bind for transcoders , gateways , cfbs and for sccp configurations I know loopback is the best for binding but with like to clarify with the example below... For example... R3#sh ip int brief Interfacenbsp;nbsp; IP-Addressnbsp;nbsp;

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Interface for binding?

2012-11-30 Thread Steffen Bruening
Generally it doesn't matter to which you bind your media resources. But maybe the question ask you for a specific binding. The only thing you never should do is to bind Cube and Gatekeeper to the same Interface. Regards Steffen Am Samstag, 1. Dezember 2012 schrieb virajith : Hi All, I am