Re: [ccp4bb] archival memory?

2012-12-14 Thread Richard Gillilan
This is too funny. My wife's new job is scanning Sumerian clay tablets into computer. I kid you not. On Dec 12, 2012, at 5:35 PM, Laura Spagnolo wrote: I would definitely go for babylonian clay... On Dec 12, 2012, at 10:31 PM, Adrian Goldman wrote: I say write them out onto

Re: [ccp4bb] archival memory?

2012-12-14 Thread Boaz Shaanan
@JISCMAIL.AC.UK Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] archival memory? This is too funny. My wife's new job is scanning Sumerian clay tablets into computer. I kid you not. On Dec 12, 2012, at 5:35 PM, Laura Spagnolo wrote: I would definitely go for babylonian clay... On Dec 12, 2012, at 10:31 PM, Adrian Goldman wrote

Re: [ccp4bb] archival memory?

2012-12-14 Thread Artem Evdokimov
In terms of information density clay, paper and suchlike are not likely to be competitive with any modern storage device. However, if there really is a serious need to store relatively large amounts of information for a really long time I see no issues with laser (or afm) engraving on thin gold

Re: [ccp4bb] archival memory?

2012-12-14 Thread yayahjb
Highly redundant self-identifying DNA fragments are probably the way to go, but electron lithography on silicon wafers is a well-supported technology that, even without a protective layer would outlast paper or clay, and with transparent protective encapsulation, would last longer than we are

[ccp4bb] archival memory?

2012-12-14 Thread Richard Gillilan
At risk of lengthening an already silly, off-topic discussion ... there have been good arguments here in the past on why re-processing archived data can yield important new information. But in the very long run I think, protein structures will be all figured out and new technology will allow

Re: [ccp4bb] archival memory?

2012-12-14 Thread Richard Gillilan
[r...@cornell.edu] Sent: Friday, December 14, 2012 5:20 PM To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] archival memory? This is too funny. My wife's new job is scanning Sumerian clay tablets into computer. I kid you not. On Dec 12, 2012, at 5:35 PM, Laura Spagnolo wrote: I would

[ccp4bb] archival memory?

2012-12-12 Thread Richard Gillilan
SanDisk advertises a Memory Vault disk for archival storage of photos that they claim will last 100 years. (note: they do have a scheme for estimating lifetime of the memory, Arrhenius Equation ... interesting. Check it out: www.sandisk.com/products/usb/memory-vault/ and click the Chronolock

Re: [ccp4bb] archival memory?

2012-12-12 Thread Artem Evdokimov
Or... (gasp) store a regular USB drive in a freezer, yes? If the relationship between data decay rate and temperature indeed follows the same good old Arrhenius formula then any old USB drive is virtually endless at -80C and safe for human life span at -20 (i.e. kitchen freezer, sans defrost

Re: [ccp4bb] archival memory?

2012-12-12 Thread Dale Tronrud
Good luck on your search in 100 years for a computer with a USB port. You will also need software that can read a FAT32 file system. Dale Glad I didn't buy a lot of disk drives with Firewire Tronrud On 12/12/2012 1:02 PM, Richard Gillilan wrote: SanDisk advertises a Memory Vault disk for

Re: [ccp4bb] archival memory?

2012-12-12 Thread Richard Gillilan
Ha ha. Brilliant! Maybe we should just send them up to Svalbard to store with the seeds. On Dec 12, 2012, at 4:38 PM, Artem Evdokimov wrote: Or... (gasp) store a regular USB drive in a freezer, yes? If the relationship between data decay rate and temperature indeed follows the same good old

Re: [ccp4bb] archival memory?

2012-12-12 Thread Roger Rowlett
Maybe the memory chips will retain their bits for 100 years, but what about the driver hardware or internal power supply? Anyone had an electrolytic capacitor last for 100 years? Just sayin... I like the image of the USB sticks in the -80 freezer, though. :)

Re: [ccp4bb] archival memory?

2012-12-12 Thread Richard Gillilan
Better option? Certainly not TAPE or electromechanical disk drive. CD's and DVD's don't last nearly that long and James Holton has pointed out. I suppose there might be a cloud solution where you rely upon data just floating around out there in cyberspace with a life of its own. Richard On

Re: [ccp4bb] archival memory?

2012-12-12 Thread Richard Gillilan
I don't think memory sticks have any internal electrolytics or power supplies. Both USB and FAT32 are widely documented standards in this era, so while they might no longer be supported (FAT32 is already very old), information on how to communicate and decode data will still likely be

Re: [ccp4bb] archival memory?

2012-12-12 Thread Dale Tronrud
I don't believe there is a solution that does not involve active management. You can't write your data and pick up those media 25 years later and expect to get your data back -- not without some heroic effort involving the construction of your own hardware. I have data from Brian

Re: [ccp4bb] archival memory?

2012-12-12 Thread Katherine Sippel
You know if you took a dremel to an insulated benchtop cold box to make USB shaped holes, lined the bottom with a layer of desiccant, and used a little vacuum grease to seal it up you might actually have a workable, long term, freezer storage system. Wow, the things you think up when you're

Re: [ccp4bb] archival memory?

2012-12-12 Thread Adrian Goldman
I say write them out onto acid-free paper: should be good for at least 300 years without active management, if there is no fire. If that doesn't work, I believe babylonian clay tablets have an even longer expected life timeā€¦. Dale, I must say I am impressedā€¦ I gave up after the exabyte to DAT

Re: [ccp4bb] archival memory?

2012-12-12 Thread Artem Evdokimov
Given that it's basically a solid state tiny capacitor, temperature should indeed be a huge factor :) I am actually considering storing some flash sticks in a freezer, to see what happens. And in LN2 as well... Artem On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Richard Gillilan r...@cornell.edu wrote: I

Re: [ccp4bb] archival memory?

2012-12-12 Thread Laura Spagnolo
I would definitely go for babylonian clay... On Dec 12, 2012, at 10:31 PM, Adrian Goldman wrote: I say write them out onto acid-free paper: should be good for at least 300 years without active management, if there is no fire. If that doesn't work, I believe babylonian clay tablets have

Re: [ccp4bb] archival memory?

2012-12-12 Thread Artem Evdokimov
encoding into DNA and transforming some long lived critter is the best solution for me. My mind's eye is watering with glee when I imagine how TurtleBank might look -- fields of green grass, populated by herds of gentle grazing turtles, each encoding some priceless tidbit of information. Of

Re: [ccp4bb] archival memory?

2012-12-12 Thread Tom Peat
[mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of Artem Evdokimov Sent: Thursday, 13 December 2012 9:41 AM To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] archival memory? encoding into DNA and transforming some long lived critter is the best solution for me. My mind's eye is watering with glee when I imagine how

Re: [ccp4bb] archival memory?

2012-12-12 Thread George Sheldrick
Punched cards, stored in a sealed dry box, and perhaps irradiated to kill off any bacteria, should long outlive any magnetic or capacitive storage medium. If it is difficult to find a working card reader, they could always be read by eye, though that might be tedious. Their EBCDIC code is not

Re: [ccp4bb] archival memory?

2012-12-12 Thread Dale Tronrud
On 12/12/2012 3:19 PM, Bosch, Juergen wrote: Hey Dale, you really should get your personal RAID with hot swappable discs, since you don't like Firewire, how about Thunderbolt and a Pegasus RAID with 6 bays ? If a drive fails you replace it with a new one. Last summer someone in the lab

Re: [ccp4bb] archival memory?

2012-12-12 Thread Adrian Goldman
Don't get your hopes up too high for ssd. I had one fail within 4 months of buying it - and the company's attitude was 'this sometimes happens'. Yum I think George is right - punched cards in two separate locations. (Hell any form of paper output will do - surely they'll have decent OCR in 100

Re: [ccp4bb] archival memory?

2012-12-12 Thread Frank von Delft
On 13/12/2012 04:13, Adrian Goldman wrote: Don't get your hopes up too high for ssd. I had one fail within 4 months of buying it - and the company's attitude was 'this sometimes happens'. Yum I think George is right - punched cards in two separate locations. (Hell any form of paper output