Really? That deffinately sounds like CFMAIL is the issue but I've never
heard of it doing that? Is this MX? Anyone else ever heard of that
happening?
Dan Phillips
www.CFXHosting.com
1-866-239-4678
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Dave Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
If it was a customer logged in and running through, yes, then session scope
makes sense, but we have 5 phone reps running this thing, and placing a
bunch of garbage in and out of session scope just in case of an order after
customer lookup is taxing, right, versus just doing the query? So best
Hassan if you have access to the CFDOCS there is a good example in the Developing
ColdFusion Applications section.
Hth.
Kind Regards - Mike Brunt
Original Message ---
Hi all:
I'm trying to implement an application authentication security scenario
with cfLogin tag.
If not, other sites can steal them
I have no idea what that even means!
Regardless, it is worth noting that problems caused by the lack of
locking (CF4.x and CF5) can be slow and gradual. On a shared box you may
see memory corruption problems (do to the lack of locking) even if your
app has no
Scott,
I've been with CT for several years now and until this last
episode have had nothing but good experiences. However, the past
few days have been a completely different story. My emails to
support are often ignored and the techs I've communicated with
all repeat the same story (i.e. the
switch hosting providers... the ball is in your court. If you get the BS
runaround, say see ya later.
I used hostmysite exclusively now and have never had any problems with them.
Mike
- Original Message -
From: Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday,
Rodrigo,
We had this problem too. We solved it by doing 2 queries. There might be a better way,
but this is what we do.
cfquery name=getUserTicketCount
SELECT id
FROM Tickets
/cfquery
cfquery
SELECT *
FROM Tickets
WHERE id = #ListGetAt(ValueList(getUserTicketCount.id), MyBeginningRow)# AND
OK, I'm Trying the suggestions provide by Jochem and Dina. Having a strange
error I can't get a bead on.
My real SQL
cfquery name=MDTQuery datasource=STPR
SELECT
MDL.R_MDL_INSTID,
MDL.R_MDL_DRAWDTE,
MIN(MDL.R_MDL_DRAWDTE - B.R_MDL_DRAWDTE)
You have a point in ColdFusion, or at least some close enough. You just
don't use cfoutput to loop over your recordset you use cfloop.
You can reference your 1000 row recordset with array notation.
cfset x=10
cfset y=20
cfoutput
cfloop from=x to=y index=i
#query.field1[i]#
I think they are referring to this way of 'stealing' data:
cfapplication name=some other guys apps
cfset myCopy = duplicate(application)
cfapplication name=original name of application
All this will do is copy over the other app's application data. I
_think_ I wrote a UDF for this on cflib.org.
I assumed that too. But locking will not prevent that. Nothing will. If
two apps have the same application name then they share scopes, simple
as that.
Unless you are running multiple CFs, that is.
--- Ben
-Original Message-
From: Raymond Camden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
The problem is he is still pulling all 1000 records from the DB, which is a lot of
traffic, especially is more records are added. The method I described pulls only a
single fields (which is fast) and then only pulls the entire data for the specified
range. Whereas your query pulled 1000
Ian,
the problem is, that i dont want to return all 1000 rows on every page.
This cause a performance degradation, so i look for another way to solve my problem...
Thanks,
Rodrigo Cohen.
~|
Archives:
At 10:19 AM 7/3/03 -0700, Dave Jones wrote:
Dan,
The emails are going out when supposed to, but occasionally are
scrambled with junk data, in both the header and body. Mail going
out with CDONTS does not exhibit the problem. At some point,
CFMAIL stopped working altogether, and when the service
So are you saying that all I have to do to get another application's
information is to do that copy? Isn't this a security hole that those
of us on shared servers and saving CC numbers need to worry about?
- Matthew Small
-Original Message-
From: Ben Forta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 12:46 PM 7/3/03 -0400, Dan Phillips wrote:
Yes shared variables. If not, other sites can steal them and it makes
for a very fun possible server crash. However, we have only had to tell
people to use CFLOCK if their site was not well coeded and they are
generating lots of traffic.
How do you
Exactly. If you are on an ISP and worry about stuff like that, your only
option is to just store the stuff encrypted... just don't store the key
in the application scope as well. ;)
===
Raymond Camden, ColdFusion Jedi Master
At 02:09 PM 7/3/03 -0400, Ben Forta wrote:
I assumed that too. But locking will not prevent that. Nothing will. If
two apps have the same application name then they share scopes, simple
as that.
I hadn't thought of that - would it be prudent when running CF5 on a shared
server to give your
If he method is post there is no effective limit, but to be safe I'd test
it on the target browser anyway.
But 150kb is piddling - remember that files uploaded in forms are passed as
fields - and you can easily do any size file (if your server will wait for
it). You should have no problem
You don't return them every page, return the records once at the beginning,
store it in memory (session,client,application,server) then after that just
display the part of the record set you want.
Just a suggestion.
--
Ian Skinner
Web Programmer
BloodSource
Sacramento, CA
-Original Message-
From: Dave Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 12:23 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: CrystalTech says ALL variables must be locked
Hi,
I'm trying to resolve a problem for an application hosted at
CrystalTech which sporadically starts sending
Cedric,
i will try your sugestion.
Thanks.
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribeforumid=4
FAQ:
Thanks Mike !!!
Regards
--
M. Sc. Hassan Arteaga RodrÃguez
Microsoft Certified System Engineer
WEB Programmer. Network Admin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.enmicuba.com
-Original Message-
From: Mike Brunt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 1:00 PM
To: CF-Talk
-Original Message-
From: Ben Doom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 12:30 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CrystalTech says ALL variables must be locked
And I'm wondering what kind of performance their shared servers are going
to
get if they have their clients
Why would you save a CC number in the application scope? Typically this
would be session specific. The code sample I work would allow you to
copy a session, but only YOUR session, ie, the data YOU helped make on
the other site.
Is this MX?
CF5
Dave Jones
NetEffect
Anyone else ever heard of that
happening?
Dan Phillips
www.CFXHosting.com
1-866-239-4678
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Dave Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 1:59 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CrystalTech
At 02:09 PM 7/3/03 -0400, Ben Forta wrote:
I assumed that too. But locking will not prevent that.
Nothing will. If
two apps have the same application name then they share
scopes, simple
as that.
I hadn't thought of that - would it be prudent when running
CF5 on a shared
server
Your CF instance is shared. Stuff in SERVER (which you generally should
not be using anyway) is shared by all applications. Stuff in APPLCIATION
is shared by all instances of the same CFAPPLICATION NAME. Stuff in
SESSION is shared by all requests containing the same session
identifiers. So yes, if
Form-Type: [List-Manager-Commands]
Command: [auth 7b03959b]
Command: [subscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Command: [end]
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription:
Definitely prudent. ISPs should probably assign application names, and
make sure that they are being used properly.
Having said that, shared hosting is not a bad thing, but it is
inherently risky (this is nothing to do with CF, if you were using ASP
or PHP or Perl or whatever it would be just as
Rodrigo,
I see you're using oracle. I haven't done it, but can you make
it a procedure and pass it the rownum values for the next or previous
pages? Should be fairly simple. That should make the DBA feel better.
Let me know if you need a start writing it.
Greg
-Original Message-
Hi Ian !
I cant store in any type of ColdFusion memory because i work with a large amount of
data and users...
So i dont want to overload my server...
Thanks !
~|
Archives:
You're right, I'm not storing this stuff in an application scope. I was
thinking that it was stealing all of the variables in an application - I
overthought this problem.
Thanks,
Matt Small
-Original Message-
From: Ben Forta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 2:25
Interesting. Good to know. Those are some nasty bugs. A couple more
questions:
1. What's the best way to copy a cfc into the application scope? I've
seen people do this in different ways? Structcopy? Duplicate?
2. What's the release date for Red Sky (if there is one)?
Thanks for your response,
1. What's the best way to copy a cfc into the application
scope? I've seen people do this in different ways?
Structcopy? Duplicate?
You can't duplicate a CFC. Well, you can, but you don't end up with a
CFC. You can, however, write your own Duplicate function. However, the
easier solution
At 01:25 PM 7/3/03 -0500, Raymond Camden wrote:
Depends. If you don't disable cffile/cfdirectory, I can look around and
find your application name. If you enable client variables, I'm pretty
sure I can search for that in the registry. If your app ever threw any
errors, I could look in the log file
HI,
I can't seem to get the below to work on my server?
applet code=allaire.cfide.CFNavigationApplet
codebase=/CFIDE/Classes/ name=TreeControl id=TreeControl width=325
height=275 id=TreeControl
PARAM NAME=ApplicationClass
Ok... so how is locking ap vars going to prevent that??
-Original Message-
From: Raymond Camden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 1:03 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CrystalTech says ALL variables must be locked
I think they are referring to this way of 'stealing'
You should NOT be saving any user data in the application scope - that's not
what it's for anyway.
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Small [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 1:19 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CrystalTech says ALL variables must be locked
So are you
Well - since CF doesn't have an end of session event I store all user
information in a customized application scope. I manage the time outs
myself so that I can collect the information gathered during the visit
(clickstream, client resolution, etc).
Jim Davis
-Original Message-
From:
Ian Skinner wrote:
Is there any problem mixing FROM ... JOIN clauses with WHERE joins?
No.
A question about part of the WHERE clause. Does this piece EXTRACT (MONTH
FROM d.date) = #month# have anything to do with getting the days since last
drive piece? Or, is it as I assume the code
Dina Hess wrote:
Just in case your database doesn't support some of that cool stuff Jochem
uses, try this.
It should all work in Oracle, as long as it is 9i.
SELECTs.id, s.sponsor, d.date, MIN(datediff(day, dp.date, d.date)) as
daysSince
FROM drive d left outer join sponsor s on
No one said it would, I believe.
===
Raymond Camden, ColdFusion Jedi Master for Mindseye, Inc
(www.mindseye.com)
Member of Team Macromedia (http://www.macromedia.com/go/teammacromedia)
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Blog
Thanks Jim,
At least thats not a brick wall to this client solution. Apparently these guys
generate statistics every other day or so, and somehow locally export them to html
that is tagged with a Front Page 4.0 generator tag. Then they want to paste same into
an ActivEdit window.
If I can't
Ian Skinner wrote:
cfquery name=MDTQuery datasource=STPR
SELECT
MDL.R_MDL_INSTID,
MDL.R_MDL_DRAWDTE,
MIN(MDL.R_MDL_DRAWDTE - B.R_MDL_DRAWDTE) AS
R_MDL_DRAWDTEDIFF,
MDL.R_MDL_RID,
MDL.R_MDL_MOBLID,
I prefer to store everything in the DB (as obviously you do as well) - but a
lot of folks find that storing files on the file system and then linking the
filename in the database works well.
At the very least it would improve DB performance if that's you're main
concern.
Personally I'd rather be
a lot of folks find that storing files on the file system and
then linking the filename in the database works well.
Yes, when I got hit with this first thing this morning that was one of the quick-fix
options I gave them. As you surmised I would much, much rather store everything in
the db
-- Original Message --
From: Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've been with CT for several years now and until this last
episode have had nothing but good experiences. However, the past
few days have been a completely different story. My emails to
support
I just installed a beta email program and I'm receiving double emails from
this listserv only...can anyone verify that it's the list and not my new
program? TIA-
Tyler
~|
Archives:
Cedric,
i tryed and it worked very well !
But i have two questions:
1 - I have to put an 'order by id' in first query, right ?
2 - If i have 1.000.000 of returned rows, how can i pass the ids from first query,
over pages and look for them in listGetAt ?
Form Fields can store more than 1.000.000
MessageThis is exactly what I am intending to build. I can be reached anytime @
214-228-1646.
Thanks Michael!
Clint
- Original Message -
From: Michael Tangorre
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 3:09 PM
Subject: flash and form design
Clint,
As Jay
In order to make my thread seem more interesting, I'll reply to
myself. ;)
Anyway, I made the mods that I mentioned, as well as removed the
cfmodule template=request.cfm thing. I also added the fancy
URLSessionFormat() function to the custom tag, and my URLs and
cf_location calls are nice 'n'
Has anyone done any work with CF and either the OAG Airlines system or PC-Miler? We
have a client who may need some help building connectivity/interfaces to get
information out of these systems.
Kind Regards - Mike Brunt
~|
its your email program
its your email program
:)=
tony weeg
uncertified advanced cold fusion developer
tony at navtrak dot net
www.navtrak.net
office 410.548.2337
fax 410.860.2337
-Original Message-
From: Tyler Silcox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 4:16 PM
To:
Dave,
Thanks for starting this thread. I know it ended up in a whole different
place, but it got me thinking, and fed my blog today. :-)
http://www.forta.com/blog/index.cfm?mode=eentry=855
--- Ben
-Original Message-
From: Dave Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 03,
Greg,
i am making a procedure and sending a resultset from a cursor to ColdFusion.
The problem is the query from my procedure... :)
I am using the Cedric suggestion and it is working well...
But i am still trying to find another way...
Thanks !
Whoa! You lost me. You're making a procedure? If you post the query and
or cursor, I'm sure we'd all have a better idea of what you need. This
query that's returning a million rows, can you compile it as a stored
procedure, and then call it passing a startrow and endrow to compare to
rownum in the
Ben Forta wrote:
Regardless, it is worth noting that problems caused by the lack of
locking (CF4.x and CF5) can be slow and gradual. On a shared box you may
see memory corruption problems (do to the lack of locking) even if your
app has no shared scope variables at all. How? If another app
To be honest, I have no idea where to even begin with this one -- whether
it's a Solaris issue, an Apache issue, a Cold Fusion issue, or a JRun issue.
The problem is this: we have as part of our website a Spanish class, which
requires students to input their replies in a form by entering
Point taken! :-)
Yes, there is an 80MB or so hit per instance. It is not for every little
site, no question about it.
-Original Message-
From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 4:39 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CrystalTech says ALL variables
I had a similar issue on win2k and added the following to my
Application.cfm file : cfcontent type = text/html; charset =
ISO-8859-1 and it solved all my foreign euro-accents problems.
dont know if this will help you.
good luck
Gabriel
Richard Crawford wrote:
To be honest, I have no idea
Yes, there is an 80MB or so hit per instance. It is not for
every little site, no question about it.
It doesn't seem at all suitable for a shared hosting environment, which is
what Jochem's getting at, I think.
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http://www.figleaf.com/
voice: (202) 797-5496
Dave,
I agree. For hundreds of sites, nope. For a fewer number, yes. I expect
that we'll soon start seeing both offered, depending on what you need
(and what you'll pay for).
--- Ben
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 5:09 PM
At 04:52 PM 7/3/2003 -0400, Gabriel Robichaud wrote:
I had a similar issue on win2k and added the following to my
Application.cfm file : cfcontent type = text/html; charset =
ISO-8859-1 and it solved all my foreign euro-accents problems.
Thanks for the suggestion. Unfortunately, it didn't work
I agree. For hundreds of sites, nope. For a fewer number,
yes. I expect that we'll soon start seeing both offered,
depending on what you need (and what you'll pay for).
I don't know; it seems that there's little room for it to be a viable shared
hosting solution. If you have the kind of
I don't know - it seems like more hosts offering VPS are limiting themselves
to 4 instances per physical machine (at about $200 a month). I would guess
on the same machine you could host 8-12 instances of MX just as comfortably
for $70-$100 per month (with all the trimmings of course).
Rodrigo,
1) Yes, you would need to order by id if the result didn't come back that way by
default.
2) You wouldn't be passing the id's from the first query over pages... you would call
both queries at the top of each page. So everytime you visit a page, whether it be
page 1 or page 10, you
You also have to look at what the market will bear. You will most likely be
able to charge more for a VPS as they are getting more than just app
isolation. I think the CFMX J2EE benefit would be a hard sell to potential
hosting customers. Therefore, it is not so much your cost per month, but
your
Ben Forta wrote:
Point taken! :-)
Yes, there is an 80MB or so hit per instance. It is not for every little
site, no question about it.
I think CF MX is geting to the point where the relevant question is not
whether it is suited for *every* little site, but whether it is suited
for *any*
I'll just throw in that BlueDragon's runtime costs only 2 MB per instance in
our BlueDragon for J2EE product. And of course you can get all the same
benefits Ben alluded to of using independent instances, etc.
/charlie
-Original Message-
From: Ben Forta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
On Thursday, July 3, 2003, at 12:36 PM, Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX) wrote:
Did he do it though? Is it a total new development by MM or is it a
redevelopment of someone elses work
I wrote the code (it is not based on anyone else's work), but the
concept is based on the JUnit testing framework:
On Thursday, Jul 3, 2003, at 08:24 US/Pacific, Jamie Jackson wrote:
It appears that CF_Location v2.0.1, V1.0 (Jordan Clark). Doesn't work
under CFMX. I could hack it to get it working, but if anyone has the
fixes at their fingertips, would you let me know?
Just out of curiosity, what does
On Thursday, Jul 3, 2003, at 08:53 US/Pacific, Raymond Camden wrote:
It does improve performance. However, I (and others) have found issues
with CFCs that are cached and under load. (And I don't mean big honkin
amazon.com load, just medium level load.) Issues like:
It does improve performance
It uses two CFHEADER tags to pass a 302 HTTP response back to the client so
that cookies will get set, which CFLOCATION doesn't do. It might also allow
for you to select between server and client side redirects, but I don't
know.
something like this:
On Thursday, Jul 3, 2003, at 06:10 US/Pacific, Tony Weeg wrote:
3. this is all well and fine, unless the date falls inside daylight
savings time (any time after the 1st Sunday in April) whereby CFMX adds
1 hour to I guess self correct for DST.
Yes, I have confirmed that when you do a dateAdd()
Hello All,
I'm trying to do a cflocation and there is a jsessionid appended to the
url... but like this LoginPage.cfm;JSESSIONID=80301173431057274626375
the semicolon is causing the page not to be displayed.. how do I get it so
it doesn't append the jsessionid?
Thanks,
AFAIK, addtoken=no in the cflocation tag should do it... At least in CF5
:)
-Original Message-
From: Tim Do [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 4:25 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: unnecessary jsessionid in the url
Hello All,
I'm trying to do a cflocation and there is a
Yes.. That took out the cfid and cftoken.. But the jsessionid is still there
everytime a new browser window is launched.
-Original Message-
From: Costas Piliotis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 4:38 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: unnecessary jsessionid in the url
It was a bug that I thought was supposed to be fixed in Updater 3. Have you
updated your server?
See this post on Sean's blog for more info:
http://www.corfield.org/index.php?fuseaction=blog.archivemonth=2003_02#0002
42
chris
-Original Message-
From: Tim Do [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Kime [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 5:41 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CrystalTech says ALL variables must be locked
You also have to look at what the market will bear. You will most likely
be
Isn't that what I said? ;^)
On Thursday, Jul 3, 2003, at 16:54 US/Pacific, Chris Kief wrote:
See this post on Sean's blog for more info:
http://www.corfield.org/
index.php?fuseaction=blog.archivemonth=2003_02#0002
42
You need:
cfheader statuscode=302 statustext=Temporarily Moved/
cfheader name=Location
If you include labor costs for custom scripting required to deliver a complete
solution, free cm tools or frameworks like Spectra or FarCry can easily cost more
than SparkPlug (which is pretty darn cheap)... I've looked at SparkPlug and I'd say
that its inexpensive price really doesn't have
Blimey, when I read your run-down here I realize I know next to bugger all about what
Tapestry can do.
How do we get these things out of your head and in a format that people can read and
understand?
Kind Regards - Mike Brunt
Original Message ---
If you include labor costs
I'm a little late jumping in here, but I think this is an interesting
idea, so I'll put in my two cents. I actually built something similar
to this as a prototype for the company I used to work for, although I
built it all with DHTML and JSP. I think the principle still applies,
however.
Is there any way to inspect mappings set up on the server without looking in
the CFMX administrator? I'm pretty sure our hosting company has set a
mapping up wrongly but I like to be able to say for sure rather than Hmm do
you think you could check that?
I thought they might be stored in some XML
On Thursday, Jul 3, 2003, at 08:53 US/Pacific, Raymond Camden wrote:
It does improve performance. However, I (and others) have
found issues
with CFCs that are cached and under load. (And I don't mean
big honkin
amazon.com load, just medium level load.) Issues like:
It does improve
Hi all,
I have been replacing all the Repeat Region behaviours we are using on our Forms (the
app is in CF) so that we will provide numbers linking to seperate result pages
(exactly the way Google does) instead of the arrows that DW uses.
The problem is that we do not want to run the SQL
Gee, my brush with fame! ;-)
Dave Jones
NetEffect
At 04:19 PM 7/3/03 -0400, you wrote:
Dave,
Thanks for starting this thread. I know it ended up in a whole different
place, but it got me thinking, and fed my blog today. :-)
http://www.forta.com/blog/index.cfm?mode=eentry=855
--- Ben
On Thursday, Jul 3, 2003, at 21:40 US/Pacific, Raymond Camden wrote:
The bugs I found were confirmed by MACR engineering, however, they were
always stored in the application scope, so maybe that had an impact.
Actually, since it was so easy for me to reproduce the bugs locally
with
a stress
To be honest, I have no idea where to even begin with this one -- whether
it's a Solaris issue, an Apache issue, a Cold Fusion issue, or a JRun
issue.
running mx? if so its usually prudent to use (where xxx is the encoding you
want mx to use):
cfset setEncoding(form,xxx)
cfset
Is there any way to inspect mappings set up on the server
without looking in
the CFMX administrator? I'm pretty sure our hosting
company has set a
mapping up wrongly but I like to be able to say for sure
rather than Hmm do
you think you could check that?
I thought they might be stored in
101 - 191 of 191 matches
Mail list logo
