Agreed, but what are the alternatives in a multi instance session aware
application? Other than sticky sessions from an HWLB which are probably more
evil.
This e-mail is from Reed Exhibitions (Gateway House, 28 The Quadrant,
Richmond, Surrey, TW9 1DN, United Kingdom), a division of Reed
Sean,
I must admit too, I am not excited about serialization either. Only because
it doesn't work the way I thought it would, but I guess because CF is what
it is, how java and .net use it would be too dificult to implement.
On 5/11/07, Sean Corfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/9/07,
How did you expect it to work?
This e-mail is from Reed Exhibitions (Gateway House, 28 The Quadrant,
Richmond, Surrey, TW9 1DN, United Kingdom), a division of Reed Business,
Registered in England, Number 678540. It contains information which is
confidential and may also be privileged. It is
Offsite forms can be submitted to use your email templates as
Here's the header you'd have to include.
Referer: http://mywebsite.com/
Not too much to that, is there?
Not if they are able to figure it out, which someone determined enough would
probably eventually do. Fortunately my
Sean Corfield wrote:
Why are so many people so excited about this?
Because the PHB wants to be buzzword compliant.
How many people are actually using replication and what is your
justification for it?
We have an application where people connect to get survey data and a
Flash movie, then
On Friday 11 May 2007, K Simanonok wrote:
What would be a better way to solve this problem?
Asking them a simple math question seems to be working well at the moment.
--
Tom Chiverton
Helping to advantageously repurpose edge-of-your-seat metrics
on: http://thefalken.livejournal.com
On Friday 11 May 2007, Jochem van Dieten wrote:
We have an application where people connect to get survey data and a
Flash movie, then spend an hour filling out the survey in the Flash
movie and submit the result. It is quite important that their session is
still alive when they submit the
On Friday 11 May 2007, Will Tomlinson wrote:
Yeah, there's so much jargon and unnecessary info that doesn't have
anything to do with me, I ended up chasing my tail for a while in those
docs.
I found
http://svnbook.red-bean.com/nightly/en/svn.intro.quickstart.html
perfectly good myself.
--
How? Sticky sessions; which are probably a greater evil.
-Original Message-
From: Tom Chiverton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 May 2007 11:16
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Scorpio
On Friday 11 May 2007, Jochem van Dieten wrote:
We have an application where people connect to get survey
At some stage this will be the only true solution:
http://zapatopi.net/afdb/
On 5/11/07, K Simanonok [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Offsite forms can be submitted to use your email templates as
Here's the header you'd have to include.
Referer: http://mywebsite.com/
Not too much to that, is
On Thursday 10 May 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
commit the file to prod when I commit the dev file. This allows me to
save and test away on dev and once I have the working version, I can then
commit and send it to prod in one stroke.
Same as us.
We're setup to allow anonymous checkout, but
Will,
I just read your suggestions and tips, I think you have misunderstood what
Subversion is all about. Here is what you have written, followed by my
comments.
=
*THE MOST IMPORTANT STEP
7. COMMIT! Now, whenever you make changes
On Thursday 10 May 2007, Peterson, Chris wrote:
Well, there is nothing you can do to make Google stop spidering someone
else's site, but you can always email them and link to a page showing
them how to disable debugging.
Just do it via an anonymous remailer or three, from a throw away one-shot
On Friday 11 May 2007, Casey Dougall wrote:
On 5/11/07, Tom Chiverton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I found
http://svnbook.red-bean.com/nightly/en/svn.intro.quickstart.html
perfectly good myself.
Yeah if you are running Linux.
The SVN command line client runs perfectly well on any modern O/S.
Ah, but what ye say about when you need session awareness within an
application? Store them in a DB?
-Original Message-
From: Tom Chiverton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 May 2007 11:48
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Scorpio
On Friday 11 May 2007, Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX) wrote:
How?
Tom Chiverton wrote:
On Friday 11 May 2007, Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX) wrote:
How? Sticky sessions; which are probably a greater evil.
Not have sessions at all.
People connect, get some data and the movie.
Later, people connect and send some data.
If both times you passed some sort of
On Friday 11 May 2007, Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX) wrote:
How? Sticky sessions; which are probably a greater evil.
Not have sessions at all.
People connect, get some data and the movie.
Later, people connect and send some data.
If both times you passed some sort of authentication information
On 5/11/07, Tom Chiverton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I found
http://svnbook.red-bean.com/nightly/en/svn.intro.quickstart.html
perfectly good myself.
Yeah if you are running Linux.
CONFIDENTIALITY
This email is intended only for the use of the addressee named above and
may be confidential
Ali,
Just upload the image as usual to whatever directory you'll be using.
If it's multiple images with multiple cffile's, and you're using MX7,
use the result attribute which lets you specify your own variable name
for each image.
result=file1.serverfile
result=file2.serverfile
If you are going to have the general public uploading files, I'd
suggest not allowing as many as 10 images per page - you are likely to
get timeout problems. I'd suggest only 5 or even as few as 3 images
per page.
What I've found on my pages is that if users just take the picture off
their
On Friday 11 May 2007, Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX) wrote:
Ah, but what ye say about when you need session awareness within an
application? Store them in a DB?
I'd make each part of the process (fetch data+movie, send data) an atomic
Service-level operation. State would be kept in the client
Jochem's example aside how would you keep state for say an administration
process which requires session awareness? i.e. a secure login to a forum or
beta side ala labs.adobe.com
What mechanisms would you put in place. This is an interesting topic I
feel.
-Original Message-
From: Tom
If you are going to have the general public uploading files, I'd
suggest not allowing as many as 10 images per page - you are likely to
get timeout problems. I'd suggest only 5 or even as few as 3 images
per page.
What I've found on my pages is that if users just take the picture off
their
Tom said State would be kept in the client where it belongs.
How do you maintain client state for AOL or TOR or multi-proxy users in
a cluster? Do you just append url tokens to every single form and link?
This hits close to come as I am designing an app that requires session
state, and I still
I have a forum in which users can subscribe to particular threads. When other
users make replies, all users who are subscribed to the thread will receive an
email (basic stuff, I know).
My question is regarding what the best practice for handling this mailing
should be.
Currently, I am
Tom,
In an earlier discussion about this, Sean had this to say:
On 5/3/07, Peterson, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
May I ask how you maintain session state?
Session variables. And session affinity on the load balancer.
Are you using the built in cluster
capability in Coldfusion, or a
On Friday 11 May 2007, Peterson, Chris wrote:
Tom said State would be kept in the client where it belongs.
How do you maintain client state for AOL or TOR or multi-proxy users in
a cluster?
If each client has a unique token, that's good enough, right ? As long as the
server can turn tokens
On Friday 11 May 2007, Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX) wrote:
Jochem's example aside how would you keep state for say an administration
process which requires session awareness? i.e. a secure login to a forum or
beta side ala labs.adobe.com
Client-side token, such as a cookie.
And yes, it's a very
On Thursday 10 May 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
commit the file to prod when I commit the dev file. This allows me
to
save and test away on dev and once I have the working version, I can
then
commit and send it to prod in one stroke.
Same as us.
We're setup to allow anonymous
It is pretty simple to do. On your form tag you need to add
enctype=multipart/form-data to be able to upload files to the server, and use
the type=file for the input field. On the server side, use the cffile
action=upload tag to put the file in the directory of your choice. The
cffile tag
Why are so many people so excited about this? Session
replication is not needed on the vast majority of sites - it
just causes network chatter and it still has latency so if a
session does failover due a server going down, you might
still get a request into a new server instance before
Session variables. And session affinity on the load balancer.
Isn't this sticky sessions?
This e-mail is from Reed Exhibitions (Gateway House, 28 The Quadrant,
Richmond, Surrey, TW9 1DN, United Kingdom), a division of Reed Business,
Registered in England, Number 678540. It contains
I am going to take a stab in the dark, but I think its update one server and
it replicates to the others. I guess others will tell me I am wrong if I
am..
On 5/11/07, Robert Rawlins - Think Blue [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Would someone mind giving me a quick 'synopsis' or what replication is
Yea, session replication is so your session variables are copied over to
other instances you are running inside of a coldfusion cluster. Now,
someone correct me if I'm wrong, but the issue everyone is speaking
about is: simple variables would replicate, but objects would not
replicate (user
At some stage this will be the only true solution:
http://zapatopi.net/afdb/
Hah! Indeed it will
But until they make the model with the plastic-wrap inner-lining... there
are plenty of transparent methods to try. Quite a few people have solved
their spamming problem with a simple hidden
Hi Joel
This would no doubt cause some delay on your mail spool, I do recall that CF
used to have a limit of 40 on the cc/bcc fields but I think this was fixed
in version 5 upwards.
I guess you could test it and see what happens, say to a gmail account.
If you did go down the route of looping
Just like with query caching and CFQUERYPARAM.
And thank goodness this one has been fixed in Scorpio, along with caching
now being supported for cfstoredproc calls.
--- Ben
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2007 10:13 AM
To: CF-Talk
Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX) wrote:
Jochem's example aside how would you keep state for say an administration
process which requires session awareness? i.e. a secure login to a forum or
beta side ala labs.adobe.com
Keeping state is a two part process:
- identifying an HTTP request as part of a
I would like to ask a question though, as I have no experience come
clusters..
But isn't sticky sessions better, and if so that makes the serialize
redundant does it not.
~|
Macromedia ColdFusion MX7
Upgrade to MX7 experience
Hello,
Can anyone suggest the best way to achieve multi-column output in Spry, similar
to CF like in the following? Thanks!
table
tr
cfoutput query=q
td#q.name#/td
cfif q.CurrentRow MOD 4 IS 0
/tr
tr
/cfif
/cfoutput
/tr
/table
There's a step-by-step tutorial on my site at
http://afpwebworks.com/Index.cfm?pid=111335
It doesn't do precisely what you want, but ought to get you through
the tricky parts.
Incidentally limiting the file size wont help you with the timeout
problem, because if a file's too big, it's uploaded
Agreed... to an extent. We are dealing with web apps here and probably the
simplest language around. I do agree that you donÂt go change a letter, save
and commit. That's just bloating the repo for no reason. I believe my
explanation to Will was that you need to commit often. If you aren't
At the moment, I'm on Godaddy shared, so I'm not sure. However, I am going to
be going the dedicated route soon and will be using mx7.
You don't need to delay the emails anymore... What version of CF are you
using?
On 5/11/07, Joel Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While CF is not a compiled language, the old version control maxim Don't
Break the Build still applies.
Commits should represent a logical unit of work, and shouldn't leave the app
in a broken state. Version control is not meant as a backup system, or an
uber undo function - it's intended as a
Jose--
Thanks for the response. Creating a deliberate delay on the cfmail (with the
udf you suggested), I assume, would be to keep the server from getting
overloaded, correct?
As to the heaviness of the email, it would be extremely light, containing
only the text which the user has posted in
There is also a fantastic tutorial for all of this on Aaron West's blog
http://www.trajiklyhip.com/blog/index.cfm/2007/3/12/Configuring-a-Development-Environment-with-Apache-Subversion-TortoiseSVN-and-Subclipse
Very in depth, pertinent, and easy to understand step by step setup,
configure and
I would be doing a loop, and I would also ask what version of CF if its
CFMX6+ then cfmail its ok to use. But god forbid, I wouldn't use more than
one email address for something like this in any one field To:, CC: or even
BCC:
The reason being and its very simple, you could be seen as a mass
A while back someone was having a problem with using cfhttp to login to an ASP
site.
There was huge debate on why this was happening. I haven't re-read it but I bet
there are some extra methods in there for defeating offline form posts ( maybe
even spam bots?)
I think this was the post:
Not if one server goes down with half of your users on it. With
session replication, those users will hit one of the other servers
with their sessions in tact (well, as long as there wasn't too much
latency in the replication) and they won't know that the server
crashed at all.
On 5/11/07, Andrew
You don't need to delay the emails anymore... What version of CF are you
using?
On 5/11/07, Joel Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jose--
Thanks for the response. Creating a deliberate delay on the cfmail (with
the udf you suggested), I assume, would be to keep the server from getting
cheers guys that makes perfect sense..
On 5/12/07, Dave Watts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But isn't sticky sessions better, and if so that makes the
serialize redundant does it not.
Sticky sessions don't provide session failover. If you're using a server,
and the server goes down, your
It depends on their spam rules, some isp's spam filters can see it as a mass
mailout and consider you as a spammer. Its very rare but it can happen...
Same as multiple email address in the fields can also be flagged as being
spam as well.
On 5/11/07, Joel Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave, Andrew, and anyone else who has installed Eclipse on Vista...
Gave it another try...and once again problems (big shocker)...
When I was unpacking the file I downloaded from Eclipse.org, I got an
error saying that a source file name(s) were too long. I think it was
referring to
Hi,
I am new to this forum. I have been researching on this subject but could not
find an answer. I need to create a single sign on application in Asp.net. On
this application I create a cookie which is encrypted. Now I need to read the
cookie which I created in ASP.Net application from
That error is comming from the package you use to unzip...
I use winRar from rarLabs..
On 5/12/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Dave, Andrew, and anyone else who has installed Eclipse on Vista...
Gave it another try...and once again problems (big shocker)...
When I was
Yep cfcookie, not sure of the attributes but the docs will give you more
from eclispe or dw or whatever your using.
but you should be able to reference it by its name (cookie name)
On 5/12/07, Venkatesh Raman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am new to this forum. I have been researching on
Well said...
There are tools on the java development side that test for build breaks
against the repository too, and I tell you know any of our Java guys submits
code that will break the build has to put $5.00 in a kitty.
But this is rare as Unit testing provided you have written tests to cover
It's the one built into vista ultimate...
Eric
That error is comming from the package you use to unzip...
I use winRar from rarLabs..
On 5/12/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Dave, Andrew, and anyone else who has installed Eclipse on Vista...
Gave it another try...and
Andrew--
That is a very good point; I had not thought of that. Why would an ISP block
an email sent from a loop, if each to: field is unique and the cc: and bcc:
are blank?
Just curious, as I have very little knowledge of those issues.
Thanks!
I would be doing a loop, and I would also ask
Yep cfcookie, not sure of the attributes but the docs will give you more
from eclispe or dw or whatever your using.
but you should be able to reference it by its name (cookie name)
On 5/12/07, Venkatesh Raman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for you reply. But the cookie in ASP.net is encrypted.
On Friday 11 May 2007, Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX) wrote:
How is a client side cookie secure? Isn't that rife for abuse etc?
Our app, for instance, runs over SSL, and the cookie expires when the browser
is closed.
We also tie it to whatever IP the user appears to be coming from for extra
Would someone mind giving me a quick 'synopsis' or what replication is all
about? Presumably this is so you can run two identical setups with a network
load balancer in the middle?
I'm sure that blind guess is complete wrong though :-D just trying to learn
something new.
Thanks guys,
Rob
How is a client side cookie secure? Isn't that rife for abuse etc?
This e-mail is from Reed Exhibitions (Gateway House, 28 The Quadrant,
Richmond, Surrey, TW9 1DN, United Kingdom), a division of Reed Business,
Registered in England, Number 678540. It contains information which is
confidential
I believe that is correct. Currently, there is no way to pass a complex
variable/object like a CFC to another server in this manner. The new
serialization features allow this so that if a server goes down, you do
have the ability to continue the session on the new server without even a
blip.
On Friday 11 May 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I was unpacking the file I downloaded from Eclipse.org, I got an
error saying that a source file name(s) were too long. I think it was
What were you unpacking with ? And it was onto a local NTFS file system, yes ?
--
Tom Chiverton
Helping
OK, this is something stupid simple.
I have used transfer, and in the past I just created a transfer object,
and then did transfer.getTransfer(user.user,1).
Well, I have MG:Unity build 2.0.284 installed. Its running great, and I
have my transfer adapter configured right:
0ms CoreThis
Again, I think there is a huge difference when it comes to versioning Java or
C++ applications vs. web apps like CF.
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2007 10:23 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Subversion Tutorial Posted
Well said...
Tom,
I was setting cookies, and tried session stickiness, and AOL was still
busted. =( I think I would have to code the cfid / cftoken into every
blessed link.
Chris
-Original Message-
From: Tom Chiverton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2007 10:32 AM
To: CF-Talk
No there isn't... The methodology should be the same, write a task, test it.
Does it pass all unit tests, no then find the problem. Does it pass all unit
tests. Yes then does it rely on something else to work? No then commit to
the repository.
This is more important in Team situations but
I was using the built in compression software on Vista...and yes...ntfs...
On Friday 11 May 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I was unpacking the file I downloaded from Eclipse.org, I got an
error saying that a source file name(s) were too long. I think it was
What were you unpacking with
At least you have URLSessionFormat() :)
-Original Message-
From: Peterson, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2007 9:43 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Scorpio
Tom,
I was setting cookies, and tried session stickiness, and AOL was still
busted. =( I think I would have
And what do you do when the client comes along and says we want to see what
has been done?
The easiest thing in that case, would be to export from the SVN because you
know it is going to be the latest stable build. And I would prefer to have a
happy client, than a sad client that is going to jump
You are correct. In previous version, only object which supported the
serialization method like strings and query objects would replicate to
the other instances in the cluster. CFC's and XML documents (which Ben
said are stored in the same way) would not serialize and therefore would
replicate
Hey All, I have a new manager for a current project and he wants to see
me do unit tests for form interfaces for an existing web application.
I have an idea of what a Unit Test is for code classes, but I have no
idea how this is to be done for a web interface? Does anyone have any
explanation or
Yeah CF!
-Original Message-
From: Mike | NZSolutions Ltd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2007 8:21 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Coldfusion site wins top award
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/section/story.cfm?c_id=5objectid=10439061
Thought you guys may be interested.
mike
Well, when all else fails I guess dig through the doc ;) I was trying
to add it to the view itself (bad me), and I needed to add as a
message in my controller.
Thanks anyone who started to reply ;)
(From the doc)
A Basic Generic Read
To perform a basic read on a Contact table, the following
On Friday 11 May 2007, Peterson, Chris wrote:
I was setting cookies, and tried session stickiness, and AOL was still
busted. =( I think I would have to code the cfid / cftoken into every
blessed link.
It's harder to implement that sort of SOA when your front end is just HTML.
--
Tom
Do you see any fail-safe way around this to accomplish what I need to do? Or
is it rare enough that the vast majority of my clients will be unaffected?
Thanks
It depends on their spam rules, some isp's spam filters can see it as a mass
mailout and consider you as a spammer. Its very rare but
Which CF 8 is slated to support correctly! lol
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2007 9:13 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Scorpio
Just like with
query caching and CFQUERYPARAM.
All that sounds good and all, but I swear sometimes we make more work
for ourselves to simply avoid sharing sessions. Isn't the motto of CF
It just works? Shouldn't clustered instances and replicated sessions
just work and not require all the hassle. If I wanted hassle, I would
code directly in
This isn't just Vista - I've run into this on XP as well.
Just put the zip file in the root of your C: drive and unzip it there.
It's the combination of the paths and filenames in the zip and the
additional path information from the location of the zip file that gets too
long and causes the
You sound jaded. :) I am setting up my clusters to use session
replication because sticky sessions wreak havoc on my load balancing
distribution. We have a heavily-used internal site with a very small
number of unique users (around 300 right now) and very long average
session lengths (8 hour
On Friday 11 May 2007, Doug Bezona wrote:
While CF is not a compiled language, the old version control maxim Don't
Break the Build still applies.
I disagree.
I'd much rather people checked in a local chuck of finished work (like, say, a
new Flex client wigit), irrespective of having finished
Cookies are client side, within the browser, and are domain specific. If
you set a cookie with ASP you should still be able to access the cookie
from CF using the COOKIE scope, as long as you know the name. Do a
cfdump of the COOKIE scope in your CF template, after setting the
cookies from
But isn't sticky sessions better, and if so that makes the
serialize redundant does it not.
Sticky sessions don't provide session failover. If you're using a server,
and the server goes down, your session will be lost - and depending on your
load balancer configuration you might even be sent
Sean might be the best to answer or someone else who knows...
But I believe so if you use the new serialize in Scorpio.
On 5/11/07, Peterson, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yea, session replication is so your session variables are copied over to
other instances you are running inside of a
I agree - I think with a non-compiled language like CF, you need to be even
MORE disciplined. With a compiled language, you know really darn fast if
something is broken - often it won't compile.
With CF, it may take a while to stumble upon the error, and the further you
get from where the
I guess that depends on how you encrypted it... :)
Steve Cutter Blades
Adobe Certified Professional
Advanced Macromedia ColdFusion MX 7 Developer
_
http://blog.cutterscrossing.com
Venkatesh Raman wrote:
Yep cfcookie, not sure of the attributes but the docs will give
yes, Decrypt() is one method of doing this but it will depend on the method
used to encrypt it
On 5/12/07, Venkatesh Raman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yep cfcookie, not sure of the attributes but the docs will give you more
from eclispe or dw or whatever your using.
but you should be able to
Thanks for your reply. I tried the CFDUMP. All I see is CFsession and CFID. I
did not see any cookie. The cookie I created in ASP.net is encrypted. Can we
still read the encrypted cookie in CF?
~|
Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion
I trid that and it didn't work :-(
Eric
This isn't just Vista - I've run into this on XP as well.
Just put the zip file in the root of your C: drive and unzip it there.
It's the combination of the paths and filenames in the zip and the
additional path information from the location of the
Warning, only tested on Firefox, but try something like this:
div id=xmlData spry:region=xmlData style=display:table
div style=display:table-row;
span spry:repeat=xmlData spry:choose=spry:choose
div style=float:left; spry:when={ds_RowID} % 4 != 0;
{ds_RowID}
/div
No... Simply just do a cfloop around your cfmail and use the spool attribute
and away you go.
I doubt you will have a problem with your isp, but if you do then you can
always ask them to filter your traffic through... But that is extreme case
gone bad, which I doubt will happen.
On 5/12/07,
has to put $5.00 in a kitty.
I don't know about Australia, but over here, our cats wouldn't
appreciate that very much.
M!ke
~|
ColdFusion MX7 and Flex 2
Build sales marketing dashboard RIAâs for your business. Upgrade now
I disagree.
I'd much rather people checked in a local chuck of finished work (like,
say, a
new Flex client wigit), irrespective of having finished the server half of
the feature.
The build being broken will be picked up,
Yup - the breakage will be picked up, and will waste someone elses
Tom said State would be kept in the client where it belongs.
How do you maintain client state for AOL or TOR or
multi-proxy users in a cluster?
If each client has a unique token, that's good enough, right
? As long as the server can turn tokens into users.
Having a token is not the
I had this same error on my Ultimate system, but Eclipse seems to run
perfectly anyway.
Rob
-Original Message-
From: Tom Chiverton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 May 2007 15:33
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Eclipse on Vista
On Friday 11 May 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I was
*lol*
Wrong kitty
On 5/12/07, Dawson, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
has to put $5.00 in a kitty.
I don't know about Australia, but over here, our cats wouldn't
appreciate that very much.
M!ke
~|
Macromedia
Look for HTMLUnit and HTTPUnit.
Also you might want to look for a product called selinium as well, but it
all going to boil down to what or how much you want / need to test.
There is also JSUnit for javascript as well
On 5/12/07, Ben Nadel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey All, I have a new
Hi All
I am using flash forms for the first time and so far everything seems to be
working OK, well until I got to having to display radio buttons and
checkboxes.
I am creating a update form where I read in data from an existing table.
Basically I have in the program:
cfset
1 - 100 of 214 matches
Mail list logo
