This Ray Camden blog post may help:
http://www.raymondcamden.com/2014/05/22/Important-note-about-ColdFusion-11-and-CFHTTP
--
Larry C. Lyons
Applications Architect
US Department of the Interior
Office of the Secretary
Office of the Chief Information Officer
--
Hi all,
I'm working
Payments were getting processed but the results
confirmation didn't work. This is on Coldfusion 8.
That was exactly the problem, on CF 9 also.
the certificate needed is the Verisign G5 certificate
In my case, the certificate I got from the Paypal site was a Symantec
certificate.
That is
Verisign certificate products have been taken over by Symantec.
2015-04-03 18:54 GMT+02:00 :
Payments were getting processed but the results
confirmation didn't work. This is on Coldfusion 8.
That was exactly the problem, on CF 9 also.
the certificate needed is the Verisign G5
When I read these messages, I checked one of my old websites that
uses paypal integration services and found that it stopped
working. Payments were getting processed but the results
confirmation didn't work. This is on Coldfusion 8.
Thanks to this thread I found the problem and fixed it..
So then is the symantec certificate newer? Should I also add
that? What is the link to it? They have so many certificates on paypal
Verisign certificate products have been taken over by Symantec.
2015-04-03 18:54 GMT+02:00 :
Payments were getting processed but the results
Best option is to contact PayPal support with that question. They should be
able to point you to the valid certs.
Good luck, Michael
On Friday, April 3, 2015, Al Musella, DPM muse...@virtualtrials.com wrote:
So then is the symantec certificate newer? Should I also add
that? What is the
Paypal support is useless. I contacted them 3 times for another issue
last week and they couldn't help at all
At 04:11 PM 4/3/2015, you wrote:
Best option is to contact PayPal support with that question. They should be
able to point you to the valid certs.
you need to import the certificate to the java
cacerts as a trusted certificate to by-pass the security matching.
That was the trick. I imported the Paypal certificate and now it works.
Thanks a lot.
~|
Order the Adobe
PM, wrote:
Hi,
I have an application under CF 9 with a paiment module using Paypal.
At the end of the process, Paypal acknowledges the paiement and my app
calls a Paypal page to validate the whole operation. This is done with a
CFHTTP call
This application has been working fine for years
: 616-538-5691
Visit our Website: www.spectrumnetdesigns.com
Email: k...@spectrumnetdesigns.com
-Original Message-
From: Michael Grant [mailto:mgr...@modus.bz]
Sent: Wednesday, April 1, 2015 3:29 PM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: Sudden error with CFHTTP and SSL
This sounds like it could
an application under CF 9 with a paiment module using Paypal.
At the end of the process, Paypal acknowledges the paiement and my app
calls a Paypal page to validate the whole operation. This is done with a
CFHTTP call
This application has been working fine for years with no modification, bur
all
If they have disable the older SSL protocols here are two blog posts I did on
how to handle that with CFHTTP and your Java version.
Java Version
http://www.trunkful.com/index.cfm/2014/11/24/ColdFusion-JVM-SSL-CA-CERTS-and-POODLE
CFHTTP and JVM switches
http://www.trunkful.com/index.cfm/2014
of the process, Paypal acknowledges the paiement and my app
calls a Paypal page to validate the whole operation. This is done with a
CFHTTP call
This application has been working fine for years with no modification, bur
all of a sudden starting March 23rd, I get this error:
I/O Exception: peer
Hi,
I have an application under CF 9 with a paiment module using Paypal.
At the end of the process, Paypal acknowledges the paiement and my app calls a
Paypal page to validate the whole operation. This is done with a CFHTTP call
This application has been working fine for years
Hi,
I have an application under CF 9 with a paiment module using Paypal.
At the end of the process, Paypal acknowledges the paiement and my app calls a
Paypal page to validate the whole operation. This is done with a CFHTTP call
This application has been working fine for years
Could be PayPal updated their SSL
It must be the problem, because I have other paiement services and they have no
problem.
I'm trying your suggestion, thanks.
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
to validate the whole operation. This is done with a
CFHTTP call
This application has been working fine for years with no modification,
bur
all of a sudden starting March 23rd, I get this error:
I/O Exception: peer not authenticated
It appears to be an error with the SSL certificate
Here try this. I snipped it out of something I use to build static pages
with CFHTTP. It builds thousands of them based on query output. I wanted
it to run multiple threads at once but not so many it fried CF. So the
code keeps track of how many threads are running and limits their number
Hello Experts!
I have been trying to create a multi-threaded cfhttp request script, but I have
so far failed miserably.
I want to run 10 concurrent threads that call URLS using cfhttp and I want to
store the results (basically cfhttp.filecontent) in an array or a similar
structure that I can
=run aUrl=http://www.google.com; name=t1
cfhttp method=get url=#aUrl# timeout='10' /
cfset thread.rtn = cfhttp.fileContent.length()
/cfthread
cfthread action=run aUrl=http://www.google.com; name=t2
cfhttp method=get url=#aUrl# timeout='10' /
cfset thread.rtn = cfhttp.fileContent.length()
/cfthread
Thanks for the quick response. I don't believe this is helpful. I have the
correct XML to send and it has
been confirmed. The issue is with the web service interpreting my request
and processing the XML. I
believe the issue is in the header that CFHTTP creates.
Actually, take a look
Thanks for the quick response. I don't believe this is helpful. I
have the correct XML to send and it has
been confirmed. The issue is with the web service interpreting my
request and processing the XML. I
believe the issue is in the header that CFHTTP creates.
Actually, take
Hi Dave,
Thanks for the response. I did add the /XMLRPC to the url in cfhttp and that
did the trick.
Donnie Carvajal
Thanks for the quick response. I don't believe this is helpful. I
have the correct XML to send and it has
been confirmed. The issue is with the web service
Hi Steve,
Thanks for the suggestion. I've never used Fiddler before. Are there any
special configurations to watch a cfhttp request?
Thanks,
Donnie Carvajal
If you are doing this on a developer machine, install fiddler. Then
you can watch everything the request and response and look
, October 14, 2014 11:21 AM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: CFHTTP Raw Request
Hi Steve,
Thanks for the suggestion. I've never used Fiddler before. Are there any
special configurations to watch a cfhttp request?
Thanks,
Donnie Carvajal
I think I may be confused. I need to see the raw headers that CFHTTP is
creating. I installed Fiddler on the development and ran it. When I call the
CF page that includes the CFHTTP, I am not seeing any new requests in Fiddler.
I'm not sure how a browser would show me CFHTTP headers
Donnie,
you will need a sniffer on the server to see any HTTP request from CF. If
you are doing local development (where cf is installed on your laptop or
desktop) then that's where your proxy/sniffer needs to live. CFHTTP is
technically not a browser request - just a straight HTTP request
you will need a sniffer on the server to see any HTTP request from CF. If
you are doing local development (where cf is installed on your laptop or
desktop) then that's where your proxy/sniffer needs to live. CFHTTP is
technically not a browser request - just a straight HTTP request using
Ah... so you would have to use the proxy/port attributes of the cfhttp tag.
I see how that would work. On the plugin install it sets that up for you
with the browser. Good to know.
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:dwa...@figleaf.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2014 12:11 PM
, October 14, 2014 12:53 PM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: CFHTTP Raw Request
I think I may be confused. I need to see the raw headers that CFHTTP is
creating. I installed Fiddler on the development and ran it. When I call the
CF page that includes the CFHTTP, I am not seeing any new requests
I'm having an issue with a XMLRPC webservice using CFHTTP. I am getting
text/html responses instead of xml. A successful non-CFHTTP request's raw
header are sends as POST /XMLRPC HTTP/1.0. The CFHTTP request's header sends
as POST / HTTP/1.1. I believe the issue is the missing /XMLRPC
Helpful...? http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/xml/thread.cfm/threadid:108
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 4:08 PM, Donnie Carvajal
donnie.carva...@transformyx.com wrote:
I'm having an issue with a XMLRPC webservice using CFHTTP. I am getting
text/html responses instead of xml. A successful non
Hi John,
Thanks for the quick response. I don't believe this is helpful. I have the
correct XML to send and it has been confirmed. The issue is with the web
service interpreting my request and processing the XML. I believe the issue is
in the header that CFHTTP creates.
Donnie Carvajal
I have a process that is sending xml via cfhttp and I am not getting the
anticipated response from the web service. I would like to see the actual
headers and the body of the request.
Does anyone know if there is a way to track the raw request that is created by
a cfhttp post?
Thanks
...@transformyx.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2014 12:17 PM
To: cf-talk
Subject: CFHTTP Raw Request
I have a process that is sending xml via cfhttp and I am not getting the
anticipated response from the web service. I would like to see the actual
headers and the body of the request.
Does anyone know
Try the getpagecontext or getmetadata functions.
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 17:17 PM, Donnie Carvajal
donnie.carva...@transformyx.com wrote:
I have a process that is sending xml via cfhttp and I am not getting the
anticipated response from the web service. I would like to see the actual
headers
Hi All,
I have a project that requires me to connect to a web server that requires a
request header host value that is different from the URL of the request. For
example...
cfhttp url=http//www.domain1.com method=post
chttpparam type=header name=Host value=www.domain2.com
...
/cfhttpparam
this would be spoofing and is very easy to do. Whether or not you can do it
via cfhttp I do not know, if not then try adding a cfheader as well. You
should certainly be able to do it from the web server, I know on IIS you
can use the URL rewrite tool to change OUTGOING requests as well
Here's a weird one, trying to set up a secure SFTP connection. We can
telnet to it and connect via an ftp client. But cfftp gets refused.
Any ideas?
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
A few questions... first can you show us some code? Second, are you sure it
is SFTP and not FTPS? What happens if you try to use an SSH client like
Putty? Are you able to connect? The SFTP server should be listening on port
22 - your telnet connection uses port 23 and your ftp connection uses
This is specific to our production environment, the exact same code works
fine in our staging environment.. But a putty connection may be worth a
shot.
We did have to install the Java JCE extensions. But again it works in every
other environment but production.
On Sep 11, 2014 3:20 PM, Steve
We got this figured out.. Our apps need to be refreshed when changes are
made to the settings ini file. Our production team didn't refresh.. DOH!!
On Sep 11, 2014 3:30 PM, Scott Stewart webmas...@sstwebworks.com wrote:
This is specific to our production environment, the exact same code
We're using CFHTTP to query a java service. The system basically takes a
piece of text and posts it via CFHTTP to a custom service written in Java.
The problem is occuring because CF doesn't seem to be setting the character
encoding correctly. Consequently special characters like smart quotes
On 5/9/2014 4:13 PM, Edward Chanter wrote:
What am I missing here?
if that java bit is relying on getCharacterEncoding(), i think it gets the
charset from Content-Type (not exactly sure why cfhttp charset param's not
setting that). so maybe try setting it via Content-Type too.
cfhttpparam
on getCharacterEncoding(), i think it gets the
charset from Content-Type (not exactly sure why cfhttp charset param's
not
setting that). so maybe try setting it via Content-Type too.
cfhttpparam type=header name=content-type
value=text/html;charset=utf-8
(HTTPSender ''/pre
Note, this is the error from a webservice call, using CFHTTP generates the
I/O Exception: peer not authenticated.
Restarting the CFService resolves the problem temporarily. I deleted and
re-added the CERT to the cacerts store yesterday with no change...
Just weird right?
Brook
Exception: peer
not authenticated when I try to CFHTTP to the HTTPS address. If I restart
the server, it works again, and then stops working again later in the day.
What the heck could cause that? My other webservers work without an issue.
But this one seems to keep failing. The cert IS in the keystore
When cfhttp is broken, can you drop the URL into your browser and have it
work? Or is it broken there too?
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 12:27 PM, Brook Davies cft...@logiforms.com wrote:
Hey Peeps,
After heartbleed, I had to re-add the EchoSign Cert to our keystore (via
the
keytool) on all
an SSL web service call using CFHTTP but
I cannot seem to get the service to respond with anything other than Peer
Not Authenticated. I have imported the certificates for the servers into
the CF keystore and restarted the CF services. I found a post relating to
a similar issue, but it is an issue
I have written a page that makes an SSL web service call using CFHTTP but I
cannot seem to get the service to respond with anything other than Peer Not
Authenticated. I have imported the certificates for the servers into the CF
keystore and restarted the CF services. I found a post relating
running on my server where I can receive an average ping
response to the host server of 1ms yet when I make a CFHTTP request to
the
host server it takes anywhere from 300-500ms to return a response.
Are you by any chance on Amazon AWS ? Or maybe some other virtualized XEN
solution ?
--
Mack
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 4:57 PM, Craig Brown craigpbr...@gmail.com wrote:
I have an API running on my server where I can receive an average ping
response to the host server of 1ms yet when I make a CFHTTP request to the
host server it takes anywhere from 300-500ms to return a response
I have an API running on my server where I can receive an average ping
response to the host server of 1ms yet when I make a CFHTTP request to
the host server it takes anywhere from 300-500ms to return a response.
Anyone have any ideas what might be causing this latency, and how I
From having a long read about online I think the length of time it is taking
is perhaps down to each cfhttp request having to open a new https connection
(although I'm passing a keep-alive connection request header) and closing the
connection after each request completes?
I know there's
I have an API running on my server where I can receive an average ping
response to the host server of 1ms yet when I make a CFHTTP request to
the host server it takes anywhere from 300-500ms to return a response.
...
From having a long read about online I think the length of time
I have an API running on my server where I can receive an average ping response
to the host server of 1ms yet when I make a CFHTTP request to the host server
it takes anywhere from 300-500ms to return a response.
Anyone have any ideas what might be causing this latency, and how I could
a cfhttp is not the same as a ping
a ping simply sends a packet to the server and gets a response.
cfhttp is requesting a page from the server, that request goes to the web
server, then to cf, the page has to execute and then return all data back
to your server, so the time taken depends on how
a cfhttp is not the same as a ping
a ping simply sends a packet to the server and gets a response.
cfhttp is requesting a page from the server, that request goes to the web
server, then to cf, the page has to execute and then return all data back
to your server, so the time taken depends on how
...@gmail.com wrote:
a cfhttp is not the same as a ping
a ping simply sends a packet to the server and gets a response.
cfhttp is requesting a page from the server, that request goes to the web
server, then to cf, the page has to execute and then return all data back
to your server, so the time taken
I have an API running on my server where I can receive an average ping
response to the host server of 1ms yet
when I make a CFHTTP request to the host server it takes anywhere from
300-500ms to return a response.
Anyone have any ideas what might be causing this latency, and how I could
If you use a centralised storage for all servers in your cluster then it is
easy.
Russ, thanks a lot for your response (somehow I missed it last week). I read
the article you linked to about client variables (good read). Are you aware of
any resources which discuss how one might implement a
I did it once long ago when I was still a developer, it was probably on CF5
or 6.
I will presume Windows is used here, if not, just translate tot he Unix
equivalents.
It is basically just a file server, network attached storage, a SAN or
whatever you have available.
You MAP a drive on your web
Hey Dave,
Thanks a lot for your response. Please see some comments inline below:
Are you using clustering to support a larger number of users than a
single server? Or are you using it to provide failover in case a
server fails? Or both?
The clustering is mainly for supporting a large number
I'm hoping it's the former :) I guess that's what I'm getting at though...
I'm sure you've done many applications that run on
clustered servers, is using sticky sessions a common and accepted practice
for using cfcs in a clustered environment?
Or do larger applications like this just
If you use a centralised storage for all servers in your cluster then it is
easy. You save session data to your san disk. And simply reload it if it
gets lost due to switching servers.
You can also achieve this with replication between local disks too.
Remember the session is stored in a cookie
Lots of people use sticky sessions to solve this problem. That doesn't
provide failover, but if you're not doing something extremely critical
where the user can just go elsewhere (ex: ecommerce) you might not
need failover.
With sticky sessions, in the event that one server crashed, the users on
Lots of people use sticky sessions to solve this problem. That doesn't
provide failover, but if you're not doing something extremely critical
where the user can just go elsewhere (ex: ecommerce) you might not
need failover.
With sticky sessions, in the event that one server crashed, the
to pfx solved the problem for me. (of course you pfx
should contain the full cert chain)
http://jochem.vandieten.net/2008/02/28/cfhttp-and-client-certificates/
Best Regards,
Reto, centinated.com
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion
25, 2013 6:25 PM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: issue with cfhttp and client certificates
it should be noted that the minimum requirement for certs now is 2048bit,
it is not even possible to generate a cert with less than this with most
CSA's, so perhaps this is the issue, maybe 1024 is not even
-Dsun.security.ssl.allowUnsafeRenegotiation=true
)
-Original Message-
From: Russ Michaels [mailto:r...@michaels.me.uk]
Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2013 6:25 PM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: issue with cfhttp and client certificates
it should be noted that the minimum requirement for certs
with cfhttp and client certificates
sorry no idea never tried, you would have to try it and see :-)
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 3:16 PM, Mark A Kruger
mkru...@cfwebtools.comwrote:
Russ,
Would changing the sys property for unsafe renegotiation allow the JVM to
proceed if this was this issue
Ok, so here's the issue. A process that was working just fine on CF9 is
now broken on CF10. We have a service that we call that requires us to
submit a client certificate to the server. In CF9, this worked just fine.
Use the clientcert and clientcertpass attributes of CFHTTP and you're
-
From: Jeff Garza [mailto:j...@garzasixpack.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2013 12:25 PM
To: cf-talk
Subject: issue with cfhttp and client certificates
Ok, so here's the issue. A process that was working just fine on CF9 is
now broken on CF10. We have a service that we call that requires us
with cfhttp and client certificates
Jeff,
What JVM version are you using on CF9 and what do the args look like?
Sometimes it's a matter of the handshake and levels of TLS/SSL - the
error
may be not specific enough to tell. You can enable logging to get a grip
on
it though. That would tell
them.
Not sure I have anything to add.
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Garza [mailto:j...@garzasixpack.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2013 3:45 PM
To: cf-talk
Subject: RE: issue with cfhttp and client certificates
Mark,
On the CF9 Server we're at Java version 1.6.0_17
with cfhttp and client certificates
Ok, so here's the issue. A process that was working just fine on CF9 is
now broken on CF10. We have a service that we call that requires us to
submit a client certificate to the server. In CF9, this worked just fine.
Use the clientcert and clientcertpass
of Java and/or Apache handles client certs... I guess I'm off to
Adobe support to see what they have to say about it.
--
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: Russ Michaels [mailto:r...@michaels.me.uk]
Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2013 2:34 PM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: issue with cfhttp and client
: issue with cfhttp and client certificates
Jeff,
What JVM version are you using on CF9 and what do the args look like?
Sometimes it's a matter of the handshake and levels of TLS/SSL - the
error
may be not specific enough to tell. You can enable logging to get a grip
on
it though. That would
would be able to do it, but the new one can't.
--Jeff
Original Message
From: Mark A Kruger mkru...@cfwebtools.com
Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2013 1:25 PM
To: cf-talk cf-talk@houseoffusion.com
Subject: RE: issue with cfhttp and client certificates
Jeff,
What JVM version are you
Subject: Re: issue with cfhttp and client certificates
Long shot, but what is the key length on the encryption? Could it be an
issue with the encryption capabilities currently set on the new JVM for
CF10?
Explanation: http://www.petefreitag.com/item/803.cfm
On Jul 25, 2013, at 4:44 PM
@houseoffusion.com
Subject: Re: issue with cfhttp and client certificates
Long shot, but what is the key length on the encryption? Could it be an
issue with the encryption capabilities currently set on the new JVM for
CF10?
Explanation: http://www.petefreitag.com/item/803.cfm
On Jul 25
=153807 )
I'm wondering how to override this behavior via cfhttp. My first attempt
was to use:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-thomson-geopriv-http-geolocation-00
...as follows:
cfhttpparam type=header name=Geolocation value=geo:[lat],[lon]
...where [lat],[lon] is elsewhere
to determine your location via IP,
nearby wifi, etc (i.e.
http://support.google.com/maps/bin/answer.py?hl=enanswer=153807 )
I'm wondering how to override this behavior via cfhttp. My first attempt
was to use:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-thomson-geopriv-http-geolocation-00
I understand that Google, etc tries to determine your location via IP,
nearby wifi, etc (i.e.
http://support.google.com/maps/bin/answer.py?hl=enanswer=153807 )
I'm wondering how to override this behavior via cfhttp. My first attempt
was to use:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-thomson-geopriv
=enanswer=153807 )
I'm wondering how to override this behavior via cfhttp. My first attempt
was to use:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-thomson-geopriv-http-geolocation-00
...as follows:
cfhttpparam type=header name=Geolocation value=geo:[lat],[lon]
...where [lat],[lon] is elsewhere
I understand that Google, etc tries to determine your location via IP,
nearby wifi, etc (i.e.
http://support.google.com/maps/bin/answer.py?hl=enanswer=153807 )
I'm wondering how to override this behavior via cfhttp. My first attempt
was to use:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-thomson
Hi Guys,
I've been wrestling with a problem calling a SOAP Web Service using cfhttp. The
endpoint is an https URL to a server IP, not a host name.
We are running MX7.
Initially when I tried connecting I got the usual error response from an
untrusted authority source:
ErrorDetail: I/O
,
I've been wrestling with a problem calling a SOAP Web Service using
cfhttp. The endpoint is an https URL to a server IP, not a host name.
We are running MX7.
Initially when I tried connecting I got the usual error response from an
untrusted authority source:
ErrorDetail: I/O Exception: peer
the site.
--
Jeff
Original Message
From: Ian Chapman ian.chap...@melodimedia.co.uk
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 8:13 AM
To: cf-talk cf-talk@houseoffusion.com
Subject: https connection issues using cfhttp
Hi Guys,
I've been wrestling with a problem calling a SOAP Web
Michaels [mailto:r...@michaels.me.uk]
Sent: 17 January 2013 15:30
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: https connection issues using cfhttp
Is the ssl cert actually for the ip address, the error says it is for hub
Regards
Russ Michaels
www.michaels.me.uk
www.cfmldeveloper.com - Free CFML hosting
...@melodimedia.co.uk
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 8:13 AM
To: cf-talk cf-talk@houseoffusion.com
Subject: https connection issues using cfhttp
Hi Guys,
I've been wrestling with a problem calling a SOAP Web Service using
cfhttp. The endpoint is an https URL to a server IP, not a host name
Regards,
Ian.
-Original Message-
From: Russ Michaels [mailto:r...@michaels.me.uk]
Sent: 17 January 2013 15:30
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: https connection issues using cfhttp
Is the ssl cert actually for the ip address, the error says it is for hub
Regards
Russ Michaels
.
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Garza [mailto:j...@garzasixpack.com]
Sent: 17 January 2013 15:37
To: cf-talk
Subject: re: https connection issues using cfhttp
You are going to have to edit your hosts file and create a pointer for hub
that directs it to 187.141.14.122. Then when you
Ok thanks John. I did search before posting but didn't see that.
-Original Message-
From: John M Bliss [mailto:bliss.j...@gmail.com]
Sent: 17 January 2013 15:48
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: https connection issues using cfhttp
+1 what Jeff said. Dealt with this same issue here:
http
If I recall there is optipn to throw error on timeout on some tags
Regards
Russ Michaels
www.michaels.me.uk
www.cfmldeveloper.com - Free CFML hosting for developers
www.cfsearch.com - CF search engine
On Nov 30, 2012 1:43 AM, Andrew Scott andr...@andyscott.id.au wrote:
Well technically a
I would be guessing this is a page time out, only because there seems to be
a number of cfhttp calls going on. I don't think page time outs fall into
the same category you're thinking Russ.
However I did a bit of research and found the following article by Ben
Nadel.
http://www.bennadel.com
I would be guessing this is a page time out, only because there seems to be
a number of cfhttp calls going on.
Right, the time required for the HTTP calls represents a high percentage of the
total time in the loop, so chances the time limit occurs during the HTTP are
high.
But I still don't
because there seems
to be
a number of cfhttp calls going on.
Right, the time required for the HTTP calls represents a high percentage
of the total time in the loop, so chances the time limit occurs during the
HTTP are high.
But I still don't see why CF cannot throw an error on a time limit
Actually there is a setting in the cfadmin for a pagetodisplay on timeouts.
Thanks. Didn't know that.
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
That is news to me...
--
Regards,
Andrew Scott
WebSite: http://www.andyscott.id.au/
Google+: http://plus.google.com/113032480415921517411
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 3:00 AM, Russ Michaels r...@michaels.me.uk wrote:
Actually there is a setting in the cfadmin for a pagetodisplay on timeouts.
1 - 100 of 2737 matches
Mail list logo
