You read my mind, lol
-Original Message-
From: Leigh [mailto:cfsearch...@yahoo.com]
Sent: 26 May 2011 21:50
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: (ot) Shameful
I know about ColdFusion, and I know about firearms,
purely through the
accident of having worked with both occasionally
cfif isdefined(session.lockedandload) and
BIGlen(session.lockedandloaded)
cfdoubletap centermass=true /
/cfif
-Original Message-
From: John M Bliss [mailto:bliss.j...@gmail.com]
Sent: 26 May 2011 21:56
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: (ot) Shameful
cfdoubletap centermass=true /
On Thu, May
You read my mind, lol
Haha. Looking into my crystal ball I suddenly see Dave being treated with much
more deference in the workplace ...
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
Btw - it should be fixed now.
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 5:56 PM, Bryan Stevenson
br...@electricedgesystems.com wrote:
Next time report your issue with the Adobe website to...ummm...Adobe ;-)
On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 15:33 -0400, Irvin Gomez wrote:
Really? You come in here with the intention to
I've had problems yesterday and today loading the AIR demo. I tried FF4,
Chrome 11 and IE8 on two different internet connections. The modal opens
and the player appears but the movie never starts. If I click play, the
movie turns dark gray and stops.
Also, the cfspreadsheet demo has a dark
Nope, it didn't work for me. I had to click the link and view it in my
browser. If Adobe were truly committed to CF, I wouldn't need to
actually click the link. Rather, uniformed penguins in sequin jackets
would deliver the demos to me on feather-stuffed pillows while
simultaneously singing a
Interesting way to introduce your self in a forum where nearly
everyone is making their living from what you call a comatose product.
Still, since the demos all work for me and have done since they were
put up on the web site, i guess that tells us volumes about your
judgement. We can
Really? You come in here with the intention to insult and raise ire and act
like you were innocently conveying a message. Geek please.
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Irvin Gomez ir...@pixel69.com wrote:
Nope, it didn't work for me. I had to click the link and view it in my
browser. If
Really? You come in here with the intention to insult and raise ire and act
like you were innocently conveying a message. Geek please.
Keep blindly defending the unwarranted attack. I posted facts and all the
groupies ganged up on me. Childish and pathetic.
Please take this offline or to another more appropriate list.
-Original Message-
From: Irvin Gomez [mailto:ir...@pixel69.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2011 3:33 PM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: (ot) Shameful
Really? You come in here with the intention to insult and raise ire and
act
like you
Irvin, allow me to fix you original post so that you avoid reaction you
received.
The Adobe Coldfusion 9 demos do not work and have not worked for who knows
how long. Anyone else seeing this?
See the difference? Your version made it seem as though you didn't even
care to have a tech discussion
Sorry to say so, but even CF has its fanboys... May this be a lesson of
humility to some, amen!
On 17 May 2011 21:37, Gerald Guido gerald.gu...@gmail.com wrote:
Really? You come in here with the intention to insult and raise ire and act
like you were innocently conveying a message. Geek
All,
1. Please try to ask questions without combative language. A polite question
gets a faster and more informative response.
2. If someone does post with combative language, please try to find the
actual question (if it exists) from within the post and address that.
3. Please avoid the urge to
as you can see from others, I'm not the only one. Please, behave with more
maturity. You're a nice guy, and the assh*ole suit does not look good
on you. Really.
As ye sow, so shall ye reap.
When you first asked the question, you asked it in a way that couldn't
have been more expected to get
My reply was meant in jest. But as Dave has said, this is not the
place to report bugs on Adobe.com. Any large site is going to have
bugs in it. If you found a typo on the Flex product page would it
imply a lack of support for Flex? Shoot - I'm sure I've got more than
one broken demo on my site.
Next time report your issue with the Adobe website to...ummm...Adobe ;-)
On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 15:33 -0400, Irvin Gomez wrote:
Really? You come in here with the intention to insult and raise ire and act
like you were innocently conveying a message. Geek please.
Keep blindly
I've had problems yesterday and today loading the AIR demo. I tried FF4,
Chrome 11 and IE8 on two different internet connections. The modal opens
and the player appears but the movie never starts. If I click play, the
movie turns dark gray and stops.
Also, the cfspreadsheet demo has a dark
perhaps try re-installing Air ?
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Jason Durham jqdur...@gmail.com wrote:
I've had problems yesterday and today loading the AIR demo. I tried FF4,
Chrome 11 and IE8 on two different internet connections. The modal opens
and the player appears but the movie
No, there is an issue with the SWF. I have the debug version of Flash
player, and I get the following error (Chrome 11)
TypeError: Error #1009: Cannot access a property or method of a null object
reference.
at fs.media.player::SWFPlayer/onLoadComplete()
at
The AIR demo appears to just be a Flash movie demonstrating integration with
CF. :) I've tried to update my Flash plugin but, alas, Adobe says updates
happen automatically.
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 8:33 AM, Russ Michaels r...@michaels.me.uk wrote:
perhaps try re-installing Air ?
On Wed,
The AIR demo appears to just be a Flash movie demonstrating integration with
CF. :) I've tried to update my Flash plugin but, alas, Adobe says updates
happen automatically.
Since you mention having the Flash debug version, I'll pass on a tidbit I
discovered just yesterday. The regular Flash
Sorry for the off-topic questions, but everyone here is so helpful, and if
you saw my posts, you know that I am under the gun.
1) How do I remove Server: Microsoft-IIS/7.5 from the response headers?
2) Have any of you ever user IIS7 caching for a CF site? I am assuming it
will be applicable
Robert,
bookmark this site, you will find most of your answers here
http://www.iis.net/
search for caching and you will find plenty of info on that topic.
here is a solution for the IIS headers.
On 5/11/2011 8:37 PM, Jason Durham wrote:
CF. :) I've tried to update my Flash plugin but, alas, Adobe says updates
happen automatically.
i've had nothing but trouble using chrome (dev 12) w/flash debug player. had to
go back to the built-in one firefox for flex/AIR debugging.
The Adobe Coldfusion 9 demos do not work and have not worked for who knows how
long. I guess that's the best way to show Adobe's commitment to its comatose
product.
http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/demos/
~|
Order
They work for me. Chrome latest version. What browser are you using?
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 7:03 PM, Irvin Gomez ir...@pixel69.com wrote:
The Adobe Coldfusion 9 demos do not work and have not worked for who knows
how long. I guess that's the best way to show Adobe's commitment to its
Interesting way to introduce your self in a forum where nearly
everyone is making their living from what you call a comatose product.
Still, since the demos all work for me and have done since they were
put up on the web site, i guess that tells us volumes about your
judgement. We can apply
Works on this end. Mac and PC. IE and FF.
ID ten T error by chance??
Curious -G!
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Irvin Gomez ir...@pixel69.com wrote:
The Adobe Coldfusion 9 demos do not work and have not worked for who knows
how long. I guess that's the best way to show Adobe's
works for me also, are you sure your browser is not comatose ?
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 1:30 AM, Gerald Guido gerald.gu...@gmail.comwrote:
Works on this end. Mac and PC. IE and FF.
ID ten T error by chance??
Curious -G!
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Irvin Gomez ir...@pixel69.com
Nope, it didn't work for me. I had to click the link and view it in my
browser. If Adobe were truly committed to CF, I wouldn't need to
actually click the link. Rather, uniformed penguins in sequin jackets
would deliver the demos to me on feather-stuffed pillows while
simultaneously singing a
Now, that's funny
- Sent from my Droid
On May 10, 2011 9:26 PM, Raymond Camden rcam...@gmail.com wrote:
Nope, it didn't work for me. I had to click the link and view it in my
browser. If Adobe were truly committed to CF, I wouldn't need to
actually click the link. Rather, uniformed penguins
Ray is that some sarcasm. Just wondering. I've heard about sarcasm.
On May 10, 2011 10:26 PM, Raymond Camden rcam...@gmail.com wrote:
Nope, it didn't work for me. I had to click the link and view it in my
browser. If Adobe were truly committed to CF, I wouldn't need to
actually click the
Ooo...that sounds like fun Ray hehehe
-Original Message-
From: Raymond Camden [mailto:rcam...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2011 09:26 PM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: (ot) Shameful
Nope, it didn't work for me. I had to click the link and view it in my
browser. If Adobe were truly
singing a cappella versions of Metallica songs.
There. I fixed it for you.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HSpuVsLnl1k
G!
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 10:25 PM, Raymond Camden rcam...@gmail.com wrote:
singing a cappella versions of 1980 TV show theme
songs.
--
Gerald Guido
See.. .this is how flames get started ... although justly deserves it seems
:)
-Original Message-
From: Raymond Camden [mailto:rcam...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2011 9:26 PM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: (ot) Shameful
Nope, it didn't work for me. I had to click the link and view
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HSpuVsLnl1k
I must say... That kazoo solo ROXORZ
Down for the count,
G!
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 10:48 PM, Gerald Guido gerald.gu...@gmail.comwrote:
singing a cappella versions of Metallica songs.
There. I fixed it for you.
Can you get a screen shot of what you're seeing when you try to run the
demo? If the ColdFusion pages are not being processed then the demos might
be outside the web path or something like that.
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Irvin Gomez ir...@pixel69.com wrote:
The Adobe Coldfusion 9
Just a small request to not let this thread (or others) drift to far away
from the technical nature of this list.
Thanks
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
Sounds like short between the chair and keyboard.
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 5:30 PM, Gerald Guido gerald.gu...@gmail.com wrote:
Works on this end. Mac and PC. IE and FF.
ID ten T error by chance??
Curious -G!
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Irvin Gomez ir...@pixel69.com wrote:
The
Quick question: Does the 64 bit Windows server 2k3 (and CF server 8.x 64
bit) use enough extra RAM than the 32 bit version for it to be significant?
I am looking @ a Windows server 2k3 VPS with one gig of ram and was
wondering if getting the 64 bit version would make any difference in terms
of
64-bit OS only comes into play if you are going to be taking advantage
of a lot of ram. If you are doing under 4 gigs for the box, there is
no reason for a 64-bit OS, go with 32-bit.
Judah
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 4:08 PM, Gerald Guido gerald.gu...@gmail.com wrote:
Quick question: Does the 64
Thanx Judah.
This list = awesome!
G!
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 7:15 PM, Judah McAuley ju...@wiredotter.com wrote:
64-bit OS only comes into play if you are going to be taking advantage
of a lot of ram. If you are doing under 4 gigs for the box, there is
no reason for a 64-bit OS, go with
It would depend what you want to achieve.
on 32bit you can only give 1GB or so to CF, with 64bit you can give a lot
more.
But if you are only going to have 1GB RAM anyway then there is no point as
you will only really be able to give 512mb to CF anyway.
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 12:15 AM, Judah
Thanx Russ,
It is just an el-cheapo VPS for my dev and hobby sites so it is no big deal.
Thanx
G!
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 7:23 PM, Russ Michaels r...@michaels.me.uk wrote:
It would depend what you want to achieve.
on 32bit you can only give 1GB or so to CF, with 64bit you can give a lot
Hi All,
Just a notice to possibly help save someone some grief if you host at
Hosting.com (formerly HostMySite.com before the merger).
Make sure that they have your account up to date!!
They have a policy where if they find a database who's name is not found
on anyone's account - they blindly
To be honest, after HMS became part of Hosting.com, their service went
so far downhill so fast that I moved everything to other hosting
companies. HMS used to be awesome when Lou and Neil were in charge but
after the acquisition I had nothing but problems and once Lou and Neil
left things really
Sean,
let me add that I have written code that not only accesses ALL the application
scopes running on a shared server, but I can also wrote code that can access
all the session scopes inside each application.
Shared hosting is not a safe secure option for a business.
Wil Genovese
Sr.
Yes I saw the samejust wasn't going to rant as we are already in the
processing of moving to Viviotech ;-)
+1 on the no shared hosting.in our case it was a small DB left
behind after we went VPS at HMS.
It's truly sadevery awesome host I've ever dealt with has gone
through a merger
I moved my blog out of there a while ago, I found Allurium
http://alurium.com/clients/aff.php?aff=011
I couldn't beat the price.
As an FYI, they're running Railo, if your code is running anything
specific to ACF then you'll need to make changes.
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Bryan Stevenson
Kym,
That is a very specific tld, most are not like that and are registeted
instantly with no checks. We have been registering domains for many years
and have a fully automated site. So I am under no disillusion how they work,
try out godaddy.com if you want to see for yourseld how it works.
Russ,
are you trying to get every woman on this List offside? If you are then
you are succeeding very well, two or maybe three in a day.
The OP was about a specific domain namespace, not a TLD, you came back
with a completely irrelevant comment about TLDs. We all know there are
no checks on
are you trying to get every woman on this List offside? If you are then
you are succeeding very well, two or maybe three in a day.
I find it useful, when reading mailing lists, to keep in mind that
most participants have good intentions, even if they don't express
those intentions that well.
What does this thread have to do with gender? Did I miss something?
On Apr 24, 2011 8:51am, Dave Watts dwa...@figleaf.com wrote:
are you trying to get every woman on this List offside? If you are then
you are succeeding very well, two or maybe three in a day.
I find it useful, when
Kym,
I actually did not know you were female, and I would say that is irrelevant.
What do you honestly expect when starting a reply with sorry to
disillusion you
Ditto to Dave's response.
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 3:05 PM, jqdur...@gmail.com wrote:
What does this thread have to do with
I actually didn't know you were female either. And I don't think that Russ
is treating you any different than he does anyone else. You just need to
know how to take Russ' disposition. He tries hard to be helpful if nothing
else.
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 9:00 AM, Kym Kovan
On 25/04/2011 12:36 AM, Michael Grant wrote:
I actually didn't know you were female either. And I don't think that Russ
is treating you any different than he does anyone else. You just need to
know how to take Russ' disposition. He tries hard to be helpful if nothing
else.
He does and I
Email is generally emotionless (unless you are clearly ranting or flaming),
and people tend to add their own perceived emotions to them and will then
respond according to that perceived emotion.
Unless you go out of your way to add extra soothing words to sway any
perceived emotions to the
Looks like you're on a roll, Russ, lol
Twice in one day you reply to a topic without bothering to read the original
thread, wtg!
-Original Message-
From: Russ Michaels [mailto:r...@michaels.me.uk]
Sent: 24 April 2011 16:02
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: OT question - is this real or phishing
thread, wtg!
-Original Message-
From: Russ Michaels [mailto:r...@michaels.me.uk]
Sent: 24 April 2011 16:02
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: OT question - is this real or phishing?
Email is generally emotionless (unless you are clearly ranting or flaming),
and people tend to add their own
]
Sent: Sunday, April 24, 2011 12:25 PM
To: cf-talk
Subject: RE: OT question - is this real or phishing?
Looks like you're on a roll, Russ, lol
Twice in one day you reply to a topic without bothering to read the original
thread, wtg!
-Original Message-
From: Russ Michaels [mailto:r
lol .. you're funny ;)
-Original Message-
From: Russ Michaels [mailto:r...@michaels.me.uk]
Sent: 24 April 2011 22:22
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: OT question - is this real or phishing?
Pot, kettle, you got in a strop because you don't like being wrong, get over
it.
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011
I wish all countries followed Australia's example.
-Original Message-
From: Kym Kovan [mailto:dev-li...@mbcomms.net.au]
Sent: 21 April 2011 02:32
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: OT question - is this real or phishing?
On 21/04/2011 09:49, Russ Michaels wrote:
anyone can register any domain
There could be so many reasons for this, I would suggest you start with
www.iis.net, you will most likely find your answer here in their faq.
On 22 Apr 2011 05:29, Nathan Chen nathan.c...@cu.edu wrote:
All:
I have a site that runs on Win 2008, IIS 6 with CF 8. I upgraded it to
CF 9. On
All:
I have a site that runs on Win 2008, IIS 6 with CF 8. I upgraded it to
CF 9. On that site there are html and cfm pages mixed together. After
the upgrade, cfm pages are fine but none of the html pages get
displayed; it simply said page not found. Can someone give me some
pointers on how
Has anyone received emails like this for any of their domains? I'm trying to
decide if this is some far fetched phishing expedition or a serious inquiry. I
do own the domain in question and it's also registered as business in the state
of Minnesota under my name.
I may reply to this anyways,
It screams scam...
Especially considering China is hardly known for caring about intellectual
property rights.
It couldn't hurt to contact them back and say No, I don't know them. And
then see what happens. My guess is this email was step one in a scam to
solicit money from you.
=]
--
Alan
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 6:27 PM, Wil Genovese jugg...@trunkful.com wrote:
Has anyone received emails like this for any of their domains? I'm trying
to decide if this is some far fetched phishing expedition or a serious
inquiry. I do own the domain in question and it's also registered as
We get them all the time for several B-to-B domains that are popular in
China. Just DELETE and move on. It's spam.
On 4/20/2011 6:37 PM, Casey Dougall wrote:
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 6:27 PM, Wil Genovesejugg...@trunkful.com wrote:
Has anyone received emails like this for any of their
Think about it this way. Do a CBA:
What is the most you lose if you don't answer the email. What is the most
you could lose if you do.
Probably nothing, but chances are that this email is of nefarious origin.
My $0.02 and worth every penny.
G!
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 6:47 PM, Jason Fisher
anyone can register any domain, it is an automated system, seriously, do you
think someone manually checks every single domain to see whether it might
be infringing on anyone else's name or copyright.
It is a scam, just like the letters you get from Domain registrar of America
telling you your
It is fake...NO registrar works in this manner.
For fun I have followed up with the senders asking for proof that the
other company is really asking to do what they sayonly had one guy
actually reply...and it didn't go well for him ;-)
In the end, anyone can register any domain they
They are just trying to get you to register all versions of your domain
with them to block this fictitious other company
On Wed, 2011-04-20 at 18:37 -0400, Casey Dougall wrote:
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 6:27 PM, Wil Genovese jugg...@trunkful.com wrote:
Has anyone received emails like this
I highly suspected this as a phishing expedition. I did find out that Meihua
Holdings Group is a maize processing company in China. The make corn based
products. I doubt they are getting in the the Christian Music business.
I've seen a lot of spam and phishing emails, but this one was the
It is fake...NO registrar works in this manner.
I got one of these too. I offered to sell them the domain in question
for $25,000 US if they wanted it. Even offered to take four equal
payments over the period of a year.
Needless to say, they didn't go for it!!!
On 21/04/2011 09:49, Russ Michaels wrote:
anyone can register any domain, it is an automated system, seriously, do you
think someone manually checks every single domain to see whether it might
be infringing on anyone else's name or copyright.
sorry to disillusion you but that is exactly what
sorry to disillusion you but that is exactly what happens in some
countries, not everyone is a casual as the USA :-) Try registering a
.com.au without a registered company name in Australia, you'll be
questioned by the registrar as to your bona-fides.
But that's not really just a matter of
Hi list, I know this
is off topic, but is s.o.
here who knows of a tool
similar to fusion-reactor
but for LAMP-servers ?
Uwe
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
Hi,
This comes up from time to time and it's truly been a pain to
stop completely. I'm wondering what some of you are doing that could help me
fight this type of fraudulent activity.
I've got checks in place for ipAddress, use of similar names on or addresses
on multiple decline attempts,
Are you using AVS (address verification system)?
Brook
-Original Message-
From: Casey Dougall [mailto:ca...@uberwebsitesolutions.com]
Sent: February-25-11 9:22 AM
To: cf-talk
Subject: (ot) People using your shop cart to test credit cards.
Hi,
This comes up from time to time and it's
All different names and addresses and credit card numbers but similar enough
to know it was same person.
The part where you say and credit card numbers is a bit scary. How do you
know that unless you're keeping the unencrypted card numbers somewhere?
Robert B. Harrison
Director of
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Robert Harrison rob...@austin-williams.com
wrote:
All different names and addresses and credit card numbers but similar
enough to know it was same person.
The part where you say and credit card numbers is a bit scary. How do
you know that unless you're
Do you think they're manually entering cards into your forms or using a
script?
If it's some sort of automated process possibly checking the time
between steps in the checkout as well as protecting against CSRF might help.
http://cfformprotect.riaforge.org/
http://www.google.com/search?q=csrf
This may or may not help you, but we do not process new transactions from
strangers. We run a SaaS site, and when a new customer signs up for our
site, we store the information encrypted in the database, but do not process
the transaction. Our sales staff is immediately alerted via email that a
I have some Javascript code below that restricts a user from typing in letters,
but they can type in numbers.
Is there a way I can allow one character that is not a number? How can I edit
the code to allow the : character only as well as numbers?
Thanks.
RO
HWW
SCRIPT LANGUAGE=JavaScript
Yay!...just got it in after waiting for several weeks as it was on back
order on Borders.com.must be a popular book ;-) Thank for the tip Sean.
Eric
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
Have fun!
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Eric Roberts
ow...@threeravensconsulting.com wrote:
Yay!...just got it in after waiting for several weeks as it was on back
order on Borders.com.must be a popular book ;-) Thank for the tip Sean
: Sean Corfield [mailto:seancorfi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, February 12, 2011 5:23 PM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: (ot) Seven Languages in Seven Weeks..
Have fun!
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Eric Roberts
ow...@threeravensconsulting.com wrote:
Yay!...just got it in after waiting for several
I've been doing this too... going to take longer than 7 weeks maybe (ha)...
but it will serve as a good blog series I think.
As an aside I'm finding the pragmatic series to be pretty good
overall. I picked up the 7 weeks book but it will be a while before
I time to dive in. Since I've
I know this is more of an HTTP question than it is a CF question but...
So, there are (at least) three ways of performing a redirect:
(For each of the following, start.cfm has a href=redirect.cfm)
start.cfm - [click link] - redirect.cfm (with 301 / 302 / cflocation) -
destination.cfm (where
-williams.com/unplugged
-Original Message-
From: John M Bliss [mailto:bliss.j...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2011 9:57 AM
To: cf-talk
Subject: (ot) redirect and referer
I know this is more of an HTTP question than it is a CF question but...
So, there are (at least) three ways
Whoops... left in dots. Should be:
cfif (Find(destination.cfm, cgi.http_host) is true and Find(start.cfm,
cgi.http_referer) is false)
cflocation url=GOHERE addToken=no statusCode=301
/cfif
Robert B. Harrison
Director of Interactive Services
Austin Williams
125 Kennedy Drive, Suite
/unplugged
-Original Message-
From: Robert Harrison [mailto:rob...@austin-williams.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2011 11:53 AM
To: cf-talk
Subject: RE: (ot) redirect and referer
Whoops... left in dots. Should be:
cfif (Find(destination.cfm, cgi.http_host) is true and Find(start.cfm
, February 08, 2011 11:53 AM
To: cf-talk
Subject: RE: (ot) redirect and referer
Whoops... left in dots. Should be:
cfif (Find(destination.cfm, cgi.http_host) is true and
Find(start.cfm, cgi.http_referer) is false)
cflocation url=GOHERE addToken=no statusCode=301 /cfif
Robert B
Oh. I took destination.cfm to mean a literal file... do this if its that file
and did not come from here.
Is there a way to write redirect.cfm with 301/302/cflocation so that, on
destination.cfm, cgi.http_referer is not start.cfm?
I'm not sure I understand that question. I think you are
Right.
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Robert Harrison rob...@austin-williams.com
wrote:
Oh. I took destination.cfm to mean a literal file... do this if its that
file and did not come from here.
Is there a way to write redirect.cfm with 301/302/cflocation so that, on
destination.cfm,
I know this is more of an HTTP question than it is a CF question but...
So, there are (at least) three ways of performing a redirect:
(For each of the following, start.cfm has a href=redirect.cfm)
start.cfm - [click link] - redirect.cfm (with 301 / 302 / cflocation) -
destination.cfm
Thanks. That's what I suspected. I can't get into detail but we'd prefer to
do a 301/302 but we can't have starting URL visible in referer on
destination page.
On Feb 8, 2011 1:26 PM, Dave Watts dwa...@figleaf.com wrote:
I know this is more of an HTTP question than it is a CF question but...
Thanks. That's what I suspected. I can't get into detail but we'd prefer to
do a 301/302 but we can't have starting URL visible in referer on
destination page.
If that's your goal, you could redirect to an intermediate page, then
have that redirect to the final destination. The referrer seen
Right but if all redirects in the chain are 301/302, original referer
remains unchanged. And meta-refresh - 302 - destination doesn't solve our
issue.
On Feb 8, 2011 2:05 PM, Dave Watts dwa...@figleaf.com wrote:
Thanks. That's what I suspected. I can't get into detail but we'd prefer
to
do a
Right but if all redirects in the chain are 301/302, original referer
remains unchanged. And meta-refresh - 302 - destination doesn't solve our
issue.
I didn't know that. In that case, there isn't anything you can do with
redirects only.
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
501 - 600 of 16805 matches
Mail list logo
