Correct. It's not free as in free software free, and that's what
matters if we're talking about ripping out it's functionality. Cost
is irrelevant, since if it's free software that costs money, as long
as someone was willing to buy it, then it could be integrated into
CFE.
cheers,
barneyb
On
This is correct... we discussed the usefulness of the line-wrapping
feature and basically it come down that most coders didnt use it
(personally I turn it off in most editors)
Being a semi-democratic plugin, it isn't a feature that will appear
until the great masses tell us otherwise
Of
This is correct... we discussed the usefulness of the line-wrapping
feature and basically it come down that most coders didnt use it
(personally I turn it off in most editors)
Being a semi-democratic plugin, it isn't a feature that will appear
until the great masses tell us otherwise
And
Sean Corfield wrote:therwise
And the real core problem is that it would impact line
numbering and code collapse so you might get word wrap but no
line numbers and no code collapse (i.e., if it happens at
all, it may be an option that disables those other two features).
It won't impact line
On 8/19/05, Barney Boisvert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
XMLBuddy isn't free.
Not entirely correct. There is, in fact, a free version of XMLBuddy
available at http://xmlbuddy.com/. However, since it's copyrighted
code, I doubt it would be legal to rip their code.
That being said, I do vaguely
When it was discussed on the CFE lists, a number of people protested
against line wrapping (myself included) - hence the low priority.
Spike et-al can correct me if I am wrong...
~|
Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help
XMLBuddy already has this feature. I wonder if they have looked into
extracting it from XMLBuddy.
Johnny
From talking to Spike a while back, this is a feature that Eclipse
(not CFEclipse) doesn't support, and building it into CFEclipse would
basically mean rewriting a large chunk of the
XMLBuddy isn't free.
On 8/19/05, Johnny Le [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
XMLBuddy already has this feature. I wonder if they have looked into
extracting it from XMLBuddy.
Johnny
--
Barney Boisvert
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
360.319.6145
http://www.barneyb.com/
Got Gmail? I have 50 invites.
Never seen a performance degradation really - maybe sometimes when Java does
it thang but even on 1K lines - it runs AOK.
-Original Message-
From: Kazmierczak, Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 August 2005 18:06
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFEclipse 1.2
Hmmm, any file for me over
PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 August 2005 20:53
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFEclipse 1.2
syntactical waste.
code bloat whatever.
2000 lines of logic isnt CRAZY.
i understand not recommended, but an IDE should have some fuzzy line where
its performance gets dumb, and under that its ok.
thats wrong.
homesite works
From talking to Spike a while back, this is a feature that Eclipse
(not CFEclipse) doesn't support, and building it into CFEclipse would
basically mean rewriting a large chunk of the Eclipse-provided editor
controls. So a lot of work for a pretty small benefit. Not that it
won't get done, of
No, I must've missed it. That's got to be my problem. I'm still on
3.0.2. I'll upgrade the platform and see if that gets me on track. Thanks!
--Ferg
Michael Traher wrote:
Hi Ken, Did you pick up on the earlier mention that the tag closing only
works with eclipse 3.1 and not on earlier
Hey, that was it! I got 3.1 installed and it seems to be working
perfectly now. I'm going to use it all day today and see if I find
anything troubling.
--Ferg
Ken Ferguson wrote:
No, I must've missed it. That's got to be my problem. I'm still on
3.0.2. I'll upgrade the platform and see if
On Wednesday 17 August 2005 14:09, Ken Ferguson wrote:
Hey, that was it! I got 3.1 installed and it seems to be working
perfectly now. I'm going to use it all day today and see if I find
anything troubling.
AFAIK the only reason to not have 3.1 is if you need to use IBM's Laszlo
plugins
Also, if you use the PHPEclipse plugin, I don't think the final release
is avail for the 3.1 platform. I do think there's a preview release out
for that though.
Thomas Chiverton wrote:
On Wednesday 17 August 2005 14:09, Ken Ferguson wrote:
Hey, that was it! I got 3.1 installed and it seems
On Wednesday 17 August 2005 15:06, Johnny Le wrote:
doesn't work correctly. For example, if I typed cfinclude and space, it
doesn't give me any attribute hint. When I start typing something else, it
Works here.
Have you tried playing with the options ?
--
Tom Chiverton
Advanced ColdFusion
My concern is whether I played with the options too much and messed it up :-(
I don't get the closing tag either. Basically I have to type everything
manually now.
On Wednesday 17 August 2005 15:06, Johnny Le wrote:
doesn't work correctly. For example, if I typed cfinclude and space, it
Maeby the value of insight Delay is setted to high.. I set this value to 0
, and the Tag hit appears instantly.
-Mensaje original-
De: Johnny Le [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviado el: Wednesday, August 17, 2005 10:55 AM
Para: CF-Talk
Asunto: Re: CFEclipse 1.2 code hint problem?
My
glad you got it working - you'll never look back! Mike
On 8/17/05, Ken Ferguson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey, that was it! I got 3.1 installed and it seems to be working
perfectly now. I'm going to use it all day today and see if I find
anything troubling.
--Ferg
Ken Ferguson wrote:
Hi , I have found that I have to have the 'auto close tags' ticked for the
insight to work as I expect.
It seems to work if you type cfinclude [cursor] (with CFE putting in the
'') for you.
These options (as I expect you know) are under windows preferences
CFEclipse Auto-insertion and
could this be because I am using CFEclipse 3.0?
Hi , I have found that I have to have the 'auto close tags' ticked for the
insight to work as I expect.
It seems to work if you type cfinclude [cursor] (with CFE putting in the
'') for you.
These options (as I expect you know) are under windows
Hi everybody,
As Rob mentioned earlier, I'm on the road at the minute and only have
limited access to email, so I haven't been able to keep up with this thread.
I'll summarize some answers to the questions that I've seen and try to get
full answers next week when I get back home.
* Eclipse
Update! I found the solution. All I need to do is upgrading my Eclipse to
Eclipse 3.1 and all problems are fixed. I thought I share it so if anyone has
the same problem, so you know what to do.
Johnny
Hi,
I just upgraded my CFEclipse to 1.2, and I noticed that my code hint
doesn't
* Large files causing problems - Large files should not
cause problems. No matter what anyone may think about
the optimal size of a .cfm file the IDE should help you,
not hinder you. If you are having a problem with
performance let us know and we will fix it. Ideally if
you can post the file
On 8/17/05, S. Isaac Dealey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
big time snip
exit hastily...
Isaac... buddy... have another drink. And if you're sober, find youself a
bottle of tequila. Quick. You need a shot!
--
--mattRobertson--
Janitor, MSB Web Systems
mysecretbase.com http://mysecretbase.com
For CFEclipse 1.2 - How do you wrap text?
~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking
application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a
client with Logware today. Try
On 8/17/05, S. Isaac Dealey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
big time snip
exit hastily...
Isaac... buddy... have another drink. And if you're sober,
find youself a bottle of tequila. Quick. You need a shot!
Just trying to see if I could get... Ihrig or Griefer? To shoot milk
through his nose
We're told that feature is not yet available and on the list of future upgrades.
On 8/17/05, Che Vilnonis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For CFEclipse 1.2 - How do you wrap text?
~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient
Is anyone having problems with tag closing in 1.2? I checked just to
make sure and I DO have auto insert a closing tag checked, but it just
doesn't ever insert the closing tag. I type cfoutput and it does
nothing. Anybody else seen the problem???
Thanks,
Ferg
Tony Weeg wrote:
NEVERMIND :)
or how about VERY sluggish performance?
maybe its just the large file i have opened, but damn it appears to be
running slow?
tw
On 8/16/05, Ken Ferguson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is anyone having problems with tag closing in 1.2? I checked just to
make sure and I DO have auto insert a closing
Slow, nah...fast as you like here...what JVM you running?
-Original Message-
From: Tony Weeg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 August 2005 13:46
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFEclipse 1.2
or how about VERY sluggish performance?
maybe its just the large file i have opened, but damn
No, mine's working really well except for the closing tag bit.
Tony Weeg wrote:
or how about VERY sluggish performance?
maybe its just the large file i have opened, but damn it appears to be
running slow?
tw
On 8/16/05, Ken Ferguson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is anyone having problems with
] wrote:
Slow, nah...fast as you like here...what JVM you running?
-Original Message-
From: Tony Weeg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 August 2005 13:46
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFEclipse 1.2
or how about VERY sluggish performance?
maybe its just the large file i have
]
Sent: 16 August 2005 15:08
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFEclipse 1.2
nealio...
my eclipse, is doing this...
if i open a file, and arrow down to a line, and hit the end key, and
then wait, and then hit the enter key... there is a 2 sec pause before
the line shifts down.
thats just annoying as helll
Ferguson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 8:20 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFEclipse 1.2
No, mine's working really well except for the closing tag bit.
Tony Weeg wrote:
or how about VERY sluggish performance?
maybe its just the large file i have opened, but damn it appears
)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Slow, nah...fast as you like here...what JVM you running?
-Original Message-
From: Tony Weeg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 August 2005 13:46
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFEclipse 1.2
or how about VERY sluggish performance?
maybe its just
Still haven't said what JVM you are using on your machine...
-Original Message-
From: Tony Weeg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 August 2005 15:31
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFEclipse 1.2
cfeclipse view
i only have it for that reason :)
smaller files, no problem, larger lined files
Still haven't said what JVM you are using on your machine...
-Original Message-
From: Tony Weeg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 August 2005 15:31
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFEclipse 1.2
cfeclipse view
i only have it for that reason :)
smaller files, no problem, larger lined files
-Talk
Subject: Re: CFEclipse 1.2
cfeclipse view
i only have it for that reason :)
smaller files, no problem, larger lined files, lots of it.
maybe its a sign make your pages more compact
:) tw
On 8/16/05, Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm, I must admit I have
There was a bug where #s where not closed but this definately fixed now in
1.2.
Silly question but you don't still have the older CFE plugin folder on disc
do you? I mean 1.2.0 is the only version available right?
On 8/16/05, Ken Ferguson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is anyone having problems
, 1.4.2_03
Kevin.
-Original Message-
From: Matt Osbun [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 10:27 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFEclipse 1.2
Same deal here. Doesn't auto close tags, #'s, quotes, or insert close
tags.
Hope that's something easily fixable. I'm so used
were near unworkable with cfeclipse
1.2. But I did like the sql highlighting.
We have tried JVM versions: 1.5.0_04, 1.4.2_03
Kevin.
-Original Message-
From: Matt Osbun [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 10:27 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFEclipse 1.2
Same
, 1.4.2_03
Kevin.
-Original Message-
From: Matt Osbun [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 10:27 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFEclipse 1.2
Same deal here. Doesn't auto close tags, #'s, quotes, or insert close
tags.
Hope that's something easily fixable. I'm so used
ones.
I bet they'll get it fixed up soon.
Kevin.
-Original Message-
From: Ken Ferguson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 12:59 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFEclipse 1.2
Man, my only trouble is the failure to insert closing tags. I've got a
7400 line file open
Wow... is that a view-source dump or did somebody actually give you
that greek tragedy to edit?
Man, my only trouble is the failure to insert closing
tags. I've got a
7400 line file open with no performance problems (even
when scrolling
wildly), but I'm about to go back to HS+ if I can't get
Yeah... 7400 is too long I think.. beyond a few hundred I get a headache.
-Original Message-
From: S. Isaac Dealey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 12:52 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFEclipse 1.2
Wow... is that a view-source dump or did somebody actually give you
what it does on slower
ones.
I bet they'll get it fixed up soon.
Kevin.
-Original Message-
From: Ken Ferguson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 12:59 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFEclipse 1.2
Man, my only trouble is the failure to insert closing tags
-Original Message-
From: Mark A Kruger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yeah... 7400 is too long I think.. beyond a few hundred I get
a headache.
With the new code collapsing in DW8 it won't be a problem anymore ;-)
--
Damien McKenna - Web Developer - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Limu Company
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 12:59 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFEclipse 1.2
Man, my only trouble is the failure to insert closing tags. I've got a
7400 line file open with no performance problems (even when scrolling
wildly), but I'm about to go back to HS+ if I can't
My answer would be that the editor is fine and the code needs to be
written in smaller chunks.
Hmmm, any file for me over 500 lines gets slow. I type
for a bit, then
the editor catches up. If I put a newline in, I get an
echo of the line
while it moves down the editor. It would scroll
Yeah... 7400 is too long I think.. beyond a few hundred I get
a headache.
With the new code collapsing in DW8 it won't be a problem anymore ;-)
Have you ever tried opening a 7400 lines file in DW? I doubt it would be a
pleasant experience :-))
Massimo Foti
From: Ray Champagne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MT, you have links for more pics? send 'em offline to me!
Ray
Sorry Ray, meant to send this to ya over the weekend!
http://www.cfreloaded.com/herbie/new%20baby/index.html
Now, if I could get some sleep :-)
Mike
sorry guys.. meant to send that offlist. Ugh.
-Original Message-
From: Tangorre, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 2:46 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFEclipse 1.2
From: Ray Champagne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] MT, you have
links for more
pics
no no... after it refreshed the cache and put and then got... then created
some notes and stuff I bet it would open right up (lol)
-Original Message-
From: Massimo, Tiziana e Federica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 1:43 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFEclipse
-Original Message-
From: Mark A Kruger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yeah... 7400 is too long I think.. beyond a few
hundred I get a headache.
With the new code collapsing in DW8 it won't be a
problem anymore ;-)
Code collapsing or otherwise ... I generally think of a 500+ line
ok. so that makes a lot of sense. sure. conform your development to
the editor...
SURE!
homesite has no problems.
sounds like the editor.
tw
On 8/16/05, S. Isaac Dealey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My answer would be that the editor is fine and the code needs to be
written in smaller chunks.
No, but then I avoid even opening a 74 line file in DW. I don't use it,
EVER, for ANY reason. I have given DW it fair consideration on a couple
of occasions and have come to the conclusion that I'd rather use crayons
and tablet paper. Anyway, for me, the 7400 line file worked just fine in
both
... and thus the Pipes were born
the Scottish Rogues
-Original Message-
From: Tangorre, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 02:53 pm
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFEclipse 1.2
Importance: Low
sorry guys.. meant to send that offlist. Ugh.
-Original
and I would agree with you theremore or less - with a few exceptions.
-Original Message-
From: S. Isaac Dealey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 1:59 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFEclipse 1.2
-Original Message-
From: Mark A Kruger [mailto:[EMAIL
Ken,
I wrote a blog on this very topic last week:
http://mkruger.cfwebtools.com/index.cfm?mode=aliasalias=Dreamweaver%20issue
s
-Original Message-
From: Ken Ferguson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 2:29 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFEclipse 1.2
No, but then I
ok. so that makes a lot of sense. sure.
conform your development to the editor...
SURE!
homesite has no problems.
sounds like the editor.
tw
Well no... that's not why I advocate not making files larger than 500
lines... I advocate not making these hideously large files because
they
syntactical waste.
code bloat whatever.
2000 lines of logic isnt CRAZY.
i understand not recommended, but an IDE should have some fuzzy line where
its performance gets dumb, and under that its ok.
thats wrong.
homesite works fine with the file.
dreamweaver works fine with the file.
cfeclipse
Hi Ken, Did you pick up on the earlier mention that the tag closing only
works with eclipse 3.1 and not on earlier versions?
Mike.
On 8/16/05, Ken Ferguson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, but then I avoid even opening a 74 line file in DW. I don't use it,
EVER, for ANY reason. I have given
syntactical waste.
code bloat whatever.
2000 lines of logic isnt CRAZY.
I really hope I never have to work with any of those files...
I would certainly never do so by choice.
What task is so irreducibly complex that it can't be done in less than
2000 lines?
s. isaac dealey 954.522.6080
be
totally avoided and IDE's should be flexible enough to handle them.
Kevin
-Original Message-
From: S. Isaac Dealey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 3:35 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFEclipse 1.2
ok. so that makes a lot of sense. sure.
conform your development
Message-
From: Tony Weeg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 August 2005 20:53
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFEclipse 1.2
syntactical waste.
code bloat whatever.
2000 lines of logic isnt CRAZY.
i understand not recommended, but an IDE should have some fuzzy line where
its performance gets dumb
Message-
From: Tony Weeg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 August 2005 20:53
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFEclipse 1.2
syntactical waste.
code bloat whatever.
2000 lines of logic isnt CRAZY.
i understand not recommended, but an IDE should have some fuzzy line where
its performance gets dumb
Why do we have any error catching tools?
If we all wrote perfect code we wouldn't
need them, but at least cf is flexible
enough to provide them. Sure we should
keep our code small, but the ide should
be able to handle it regardless. Just
because you shouldn't run into a problem
doesn't
Out of curiosity I checked my very largest template in my CMS. 68k and 2181
lines. I could slice it into smaller pieces but that would introduce
managability issues. I prefer to have the actions taken by a template within
that same template (at the top in a switch). Not fragmented into (in this
Isaac,
I respect your opinion, but I just don't agree.
Kevin.
-Original Message-
From: S. Isaac Dealey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 8/16/2005 6:59 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFEclipse 1.2
Why do we have any error catching tools?
If we all wrote perfect code we wouldn't
Isaac,
I respect your opinion, but I just don't agree.
Kevin.
okay
s. isaac dealey 954.522.6080
new epoch : isn't it time for a change?
add features without fixtures with
the onTap open source framework
http://www.fusiontap.com
http://coldfusion.sys-con.com/author/4806Dealey.htm
Out of curiosity I checked my very largest template in my
CMS. 68k and 2181
lines. I could slice it into smaller pieces but that would
introduce
managability issues. I prefer to have the actions taken by
a template within
that same template (at the top in a switch). Not
fragmented into (in
Sweet Jesus - fist to cuffs :)
If you open a large file in CFE and it behaves funny we'd like to know
about it. Sending us the file (if possible) will help quite a bit.
Also what OS and specs your system has might help. CFE should (and
does the last time I checked) open large file 2000 lines
i typically write a LARGE file that does most if not all functionality.
then ill break that up as i see it fit. reuse where i can.
cfc where it makes sense, and then move on to the next project.
a lot of times im under the gun to get something turned out, and thats just fast
for me.
i should
Well, its the template that controls a boatload of editing functionality in
my cms. Nothing top secret or especially brilliant in it but kinda on the
proprietary side. You can look if you like after reading the following.
I *know* I could shorten it up by separating out the action section at
Congratulations Rob!
--
--mattRobertson--
Janitor, MSB Web Systems
mysecretbase.com http://mysecretbase.com
~|
Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support
efficiency by 100%
DAMN!!! I just got my CFE all updated... This is pure greatness! Strong
work guys! The ONE and only thing I was really missing was the file
explorer view like Homesite has. I now have absolutely no reason to use
any other IDE! CFE 1.2 is freakin' awesome and you guys rock.
--Ferg
The
Hello,
Where can I download this plugin from? I only see 1.1.17.2?
Thanks,
- Charles
On 8/14/05 10:28 AM, Spike [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The CFEclipse crew is pleased to announce the immediate availability of
CFEclipse 1.2.
This is the first full release of CFEclipse since late last year.
http://www.cfeclipse.org/go/project/downloads
You can also use the eclipse update feature, register a remote site using
http://www.cfeclipse.org/update
On 8/15/05, Charles Heizer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Where can I download this plugin from? I only see 1.1.17.2?
Thanks,
- Charles
15, 2005 11:20 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFEclipse 1.2
http://www.cfeclipse.org/go/project/downloads
You can also use the eclipse update feature, register a
remote site using http://www.cfeclipse.org/update
~|
Logware
Thanks!
I'm new to Eclipse, but I do have a question how is www.cfeclipse.org and
cfeclipse.tigris.org different?
Thanks,
- Charles
On 8/15/05 11:19 AM, Patrick Burm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.cfeclipse.org/go/project/downloads
You can also use the eclipse update feature,
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 15, 2005 11:20 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFEclipse 1.2
http://www.cfeclipse.org/go/project/downloads
You can also use the eclipse update feature, register a
remote site using http://www.cfeclipse.org/update
1.2 manually, but I just wanted to check to see if
others were experiencing the same thing.
Thanks,
Christian
-Original Message-
From: Patrick Burm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 15, 2005 11:20 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFEclipse 1.2
http
-Talk
Subject: Re: CFEclipse 1.2
Thanks!
I'm new to Eclipse, but I do have a question how is www.cfeclipse.org
and
cfeclipse.tigris.org different?
Thanks,
- Charles
On 8/15/05 11:19 AM, Patrick Burm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.cfeclipse.org/go/project/downloads
You can also use
That worked for me. Thanks.
Christian
I was having the same problem. I removed the old site and
added the new one linked to http://www.cfeclipse.org/update.
Then it found the update fine.
~|
Discover CFTicket - The
Neither sites show 1.2 for me
-Original Message-
From: Greg Morphis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 15 August 2005 19:40
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFEclipse 1.2
I was having the same problem. I removed the old site and added the new one
linked to http://www.cfeclipse.org/update
I found it only saw the update if I changed the location to
http://www.cfeclipse.org/update.
-Original Message-
From: Christian Cantrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 15, 2005 11:33 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFEclipse 1.2
For some reason, Eclipse isn't seeing
The tigris site is the project site that gives us the ability to have a
few mailing lists, track bugs and features, be an easy place to find
info about CFEclipse and also provide our CVS server.
The CFEclipse.org site is the new home of the project. We are attempting
(if it's slow, it's my
Ok I think i am gunna give cfeclipse another whirl after watching how Sean
works his in with DW.
The only thing that has really kept me from using it is that there isn't a
design view which I find invaluable in DW when I am doing cssp, is there any
plans for that in the future?
Also, if
I got an error that says unable to instantiate
editor:com.rohanclan.cfml.editors.CFMLEditor
org.eclipse.core.runtime.CoreException: Plug-in com.rohanclan.cfml was unable
to load class com.rohanclan.cfml.editors.CFMLEditor. when I try to open a file.
I followed the direction at the bottom of the
Dave,
For css, xhtml, etc plugins, check my blog post about the Eclipse web
tools project:
http://www.dopefly.com/techblog/entry.cfm?entry=83
(hurry, while the site is still up!)
For actionscripting, there are a number of flash coders moving to
Eclipse, check out FAME, I googled this:
Subject: Re: CFEclipse 1.2
Dave,
For css, xhtml, etc plugins, check my blog post about the Eclipse web
tools project:
http://www.dopefly.com/techblog/entry.cfm?entry=83
(hurry, while the site is still up!)
For actionscripting, there are a number of flash coders moving to
Eclipse, check out
Sweet! I just pulled down the update, looks good so far.
Rob Munn
The CFEclipse crew is pleased to announce the immediate availability of
CFEclipse 1.2.
This is the first full release of CFEclipse since late last year.
Full details available on the CFEclipse website - http://www.cfeclipse.org
Hi Dave, For SQL we use SQLExplorer
http://www.eclipse-plugins.info/eclipse/plugin_details.jsp?id=613
Can't remember exactly why, but I tried several and this one worked best at
the time and still does a good job for any DB with a JDBC driver.
Mike
On 8/15/05, dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Subject: Re: CFEclipse 1.2
Hi Dave, For SQL we use SQLExplorer
http://www.eclipse-plugins.info/eclipse/plugin_details.jsp?id=613
Can't remember exactly why, but I tried several and this one worked best at
the time and still does a good job for any DB with a JDBC driver.
Mike
On 8/15/05, dave wrote
Seems like the new stable release (1.2) doesn't show up as an upgrade to the
bleeding-edge release (1.1.19), since bleeding-edge and stable are
listed as different plugins.
need to add new features using the CFEclipse upgrade site, not just
upgrade current. (maybe disable current, first?)
-
thank you... got it all installed, and am using it tonight.
answer me one question, if you will... :)
is there a way to say, control+shift+' makes a surround with #'s action happen?
basically like keyboard shortcut?
thanks!
tony
On 8/14/05, Spike [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The CFEclipse crew
NEVERMIND :)
http://www.spike.org.uk/cfeclipse/space/Keyboard+shortcuts
google is the shit!
tw
On 8/16/05, Tony Weeg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
thank you... got it all installed, and am using it tonight.
answer me one question, if you will... :)
is there a way to say, control+shift+'
The CFEclipse crew is pleased to announce the immediate
availability of CFEclipse 1.2.
Congrats, I know a lot of people have been looking forward to this.
--
Damien McKenna - Web Developer - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Limu Company - http://www.thelimucompany.com/ - 407-804-1014
#include stdjoke.h
Congratulations !
I am very excited about cfeclipse. I am probing 1.2 right now.
regards
On 8/14/05, Damien McKenna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The CFEclipse crew is pleased to announce the immediate
availability of CFEclipse 1.2.
Congrats, I know a lot of people have been looking
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
