select * from b where id not in (select id from a)
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 12:37 PM, Jenny Gavin-Wear
jenn...@fasttrackonline.co.uk wrote:
Two tables each containing a shared primary key ID.
I am trying to create a query that lists records from table B that are not
in table A.
Many
if your tables are large, you'll probably see a better performance from
select id from TableA a
where not exists
(select 1 from TableB b
where a.id = b.id)
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 12:41 PM, John M Bliss bliss.j...@gmail.com wrote:
select * from b where id not in (select id from a)
On Tue,
Thanks John and Greg :)
-Original Message-
From: Greg Morphis [mailto:gmorp...@gmail.com]
Sent: 21 June 2011 18:45
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: SQL Query Problem
if your tables are large, you'll probably see a better performance from
select id from TableA a
where not exists
(select 1
How about:
select b.*
from b
left outer join a on b.id = a.id
where a.id is null
Carl
On 6/21/2011 10:37 AM, Jenny Gavin-Wear wrote:
Two tables each containing a shared primary key ID.
I am trying to create a query that lists records from table B that are not
in table A.
Many thanks,
I would do it this way :
select b.*
from b
where b.id not in (select a.id from a)
How about:
select b.*
from b
left outer join a on b.id = a.id
where a.id is null
Carl
On 6/21/2011 10:37 AM, Jenny Gavin-Wear wrote:
~|
That looks familiar! :-)
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 1:09 PM, Stephane Vantroyen s...@emakina.com wrote:
I would do it this way :
select b.*
from b
where b.id not in (select a.id from a)
How about:
select b.*
from b
left outer join a on b.id = a.id
where a.id is null
Carl
On
Looks like I went with the vote, lol
Many thanks for all replies, and fast too :)
Some payments from Paypal transactions, some manually entered on profiles.
Legacy code :/
Jenny
select * from tbl_members
where
(datepart(m,paid) = #session.month# and datepart(,paid) = #session.year#
AND
Off topic, but the Select * made me shudder.
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Jenny Gavin-Wear
jenn...@fasttrackonline.co.uk wrote:
Looks like I went with the vote, lol
Many thanks for all replies, and fast too :)
Some payments from Paypal transactions, some manually entered on
+420
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Michael Grant mgr...@modus.bz wrote:
Off topic, but the Select * made me shudder.
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Jenny Gavin-Wear
jenn...@fasttrackonline.co.uk wrote:
Looks like I went with the vote, lol
Many thanks for all replies, and fast
She didn't provide column names...
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Michael Grant mgr...@modus.bz wrote:
Off topic, but the Select * made me shudder.
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Jenny Gavin-Wear
jenn...@fasttrackonline.co.uk wrote:
Looks like I went with the vote, lol
Many
I was waiting for a comment on that.
It's a very small table :)
-Original Message-
From: Michael Grant [mailto:mgr...@modus.bz]
Sent: 21 June 2011 19:46
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: SQL Query Problem
Off topic, but the Select * made me shudder
, Jenny Gavin-Wear
jenn...@fasttrackonline.co.uk wrote:
I was waiting for a comment on that.
It's a very small table :)
-Original Message-
From: Michael Grant [mailto:mgr...@modus.bz]
Sent: 21 June 2011 19:46
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: SQL Query Problem
Off topic, but the Select
Hi Michael,
The (very old) web site is about to be completely redeveloped, so I'm really
not too worried.
Appreciate your concern though :)
Jenny
-Original Message-
From: Michael Grant [mailto:mgr...@modus.bz]
Sent: 21 June 2011 23:27
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: SQL Query Problem
: Michael Grant [mailto:mgr...@modus.bz]
Sent: 21 June 2011 23:27
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: SQL Query Problem
Right, but if that table grows and columns are added, the overhead on
your
query will grow. Having a small table makes it even easier to define the
columns in your select list
With ColdFusion 9, we ended up replacing all the wildcard selects with actual
column names, among other fortifications. We did not experience this issue on
6.1.
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
This might be an issue I've had to deal with before.
Do something to change the fingerprint (no idea what the correct term
would be) of the query - or restart cf. By change the fingerprint, it
could be something as simple ad swapping p.* and pt.* (swapping as
in their ordinal position in the
On 2/1/2011 1:23 PM, Debbie Morris wrote:
What am I overlooking?
The evil of using * in SELECT clauses.
When that is done, database drivers are know to cache the columns and
datatypes of the SQL queries. Then somebody comes along and changes the
database structure, like you adding a field.
On 2/1/2011 2:21 PM, Charlie Stell wrote:
I assume this is something on CF's side -
as restarting the CF service also fixes it.
Not ColdFusion itself, but the database drivers used by ColdFusion and
the cached (pooled) data source settings.
Changing the Datasource to not used pooled settings
The evil of using * in SELECT clauses.
I'm with Ian on this 100%. Often times developers think that using * will be
faster, and easier and allow more flexibility. However that couldn't be
further from the truth as you are seeing now. Take Ian's advice and define
each column you want from your
, so I'll tackle this
again in the morning. Thanks for the help!
Debbie
-Original Message-
From: Michael Grant [mailto:mgr...@modus.bz]
Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2011 5:41 PM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: SQL query question
The evil of using * in SELECT clauses.
I'm with Ian on this 100
The proper solution would be a separate table that contains the state
codes with their desired sort order. That table is joined to the main
table. This is probably best if you have to list all 50+ states.
If you only need to list three states, then I would use CASE as Azadi
suggested.
In
DBMS is MySQL 5. I have a report that is generated for cities within
several states. The states are designated by their two letter postal
abbreviations and are in a certain order. For example:
1. NY
2. CA
3. FL
I would like the records of the report sorted by the original state order,
then
Mike,
the way i read OP's question is that the order of states is not fixed,
but user-defined: i.e. a user selects several states in several select
lists and the data returned must be in the order of selected states. but
in case of pre-defined order of states, your suggestion will be perfect.
that's very neat, chris! i didn't think one could use FIND_IN_SET in
ORDER BY clause - live and learn!
Azadi Saryev
Sabai-dee.com
http://www.sabai-dee.com/
Chris Blackwell wrote:
You can do this in a very easy and elegant manner with MySQL. No need
for join or nasty case statements
SELECT *
Michael,
Thanks. That worked perfectly.
Jim
- Original Message -
From: Dawson, Michael m...@evansville.edu
To: cf-talk cf-talk@houseoffusion.com
Sent: Monday, January 26, 2009 8:07 AM
Subject: RE: SQL query sorting problem
The proper solution would be a separate table that contains
rty a UNION query generated inside a cfloop:
cfquery ...
cfloop from=1 to=#listlen(states)# index=j
(SELECT *, #j# AS sortcol
FROM cities
WHERE state = '#listgetat(states, j)#')
cfif j lt listlen(states)UNION /cfif
/cfloop
ORDER BY sortcol, city
/cfquery
you could also probably build a dynamic
Cool, yeah I never remember until I do it when an aggregate query is going to
want HAVING vs WHERE. Glad it's working for you!
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to
date
Get the Free
- Original Message -
From: Jason Fisher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cool, yeah I never remember until I do it when an aggregate query is going
to want HAVING vs WHERE. Glad it's working for you!
This bites me too when I'm not paying attention. Just remember that the
WHERE applies to the
In MS SQL Server it's ISNULL(), but can't speak for other platforms. Can't
recall what it is in Oracle, might just be NULL().
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to
date
Get the Free
In MS SQL Server it's ISNULL(), but can't speak for other platforms.
Can't recall what it is in Oracle, might just be NULL().
IIRC in Oracle it is NVL. There is also COALESCE, which is usually a safe bet
with most databases.
didn't work, got an error. changed the isnull to ifnull, got a invalid use of
a group function error... I don't even know how to fix that...=(
Try this, I think it's what you're looking for:
SELECT SUM(ISNULL(o.qty, 0)) as sold, p.sku, p.name, p.points, p.
short_description, p.quantity,
NM, got it... changed the where clause to having and moved it below the group
by... seems to be working so far!
Thanks!
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to
date
Get the Free Trial
Try this, I think it's what you're looking for:
SELECT SUM(ISNULL(o.qty, 0)) as sold, p.sku, p.name, p.points,
p.short_description, p.quantity, p.image
FROM tblproducts as p LEFT JOIN
tblorder_list as o ON p.sku = o.sku #can_afford#
WHERE SUM(ISNULL(o.qty, 0)) p.quantity
GROUP BY p.sku
i believe the correct function to use is IFNULL(), not ISNULL()...
Azadi Saryev
Sabai-dee.com
http://www.sabai-dee.com/
Jason Fisher wrote:
Try this, I think it's what you're looking for:
SELECT SUM(ISNULL(o.qty, 0)) as sold, p.sku, p.name, p.points,
p.short_description, p.quantity,
On Wednesday 10 Oct 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i want to create a SQL query with a LIMIT option but it will produce an
error.
What error ?
On what database ?
--
Tom Chiverton
Helping to proactively iterate scalable markets
on: http://thefalken.livejournal.com
Stivn .. wrote:
i want to create a SQL query with a LIMIT option but it will produce an error.
What is the correct syntax for a SQL query with LIMIT option
That depends on your database. With MS databases you need to use TOP,
with Oracle rownum, with MySQL and PostgreSQL LIMIT. The syntax
thanks to everyone who replied, problem solved.
Jenny
-Original Message-
From: Rafael Marquez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 04 April 2007 21:06
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: SQL Query Help
Well, it's not a brain fart. That query is kinda kinky.
Use this as an example, replacing your
Maybe something like this (which I cannot test):
SELECT
c.id,
c.name,
i.*
FROM
customer c
LEFT OUTER JOIN
(
-- Get max (most recent) id (assuming pkey) of
-- each invoice as grouped by client.
Assuming the invoice numbers increase each time, you can use MAX() and
GROUP BY to get what you need.
SELECT customer, MAX(invoiceNum) AS lastNum
FROM table
GROUP BY customer
If invoices are not numbered sequentially, hopefully you have a date
field that you can add to the grouping.
M!ke
Need more info: What would the query be to return the last invoice for a
single customer?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2007 8:58 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: SQL Query Help
having brain fart here ... ughh
scenario:
(T.Deleted = 0) AND (T.Status 'Pending') AND (T.AccountType =
'Customer')
GROUP BY T.CustomerID, T.TransactionDate, T.ID
Hope this helps.
-Original Message-
From: Gaulin, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2007 3:39 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: SQL Query Help
Mik Muller wrote:
select left(datetime,11), count(*) as dt
from sitelog
where datetime = '2007-02-03 00:00'
group by left(datetime,11)
order by left(datetime,11) desc
Well, now that I look at it, the order by is ordering by jan 1 2006 etc in
This is how I'm doing it for now...
select count(*) as dt cfif url.stats eq bar-day, left(datetime,11) as
datetime/cfif
from sitelog
where datepart(year,datetime) = '#theyear#'
and datepart(month,datetime) = '#themonth#'
cfif listLen(url.datestat,/) eq 2
and datepart(year,datetime) =
Hi Pete,
could it be that one of the advertisers is in more than one category? Just dump
the query and look at the repeating entries. There will be some of the columns
that change from record to record. Even though you think they are identical.
Gert
Hi there
I have a query that I have
Anyone have ideas on this?
!//--
andy matthews
web developer
ICGLink, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
615.370.1530 x737
--//-
-Original Message-
From: Andy Matthews [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 09, 2006 9:35 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: SOT:
Outside of a query you could do something like...
- Loop through all your delimiters getting the first index of each. So . may
be at index 29, ! at index 40 and ? at index 18.
- Use the lowest one in your query below to denote the end of the first
sentence.
In a query, how about...
- Replace
Elena Aminova wrote:
id DateQty Dollars
1605/30/2003 4 890.00
2707/28/2004 1 300.00
2901/17/2003 4 108.00
5501/21/2002 1 105.00
5609/20/2003 7 700.00
5609/16/2003 0 0.00
56
Ewok wrote:
this is by far the easiest way to link tables.
No... Its the only way to link tables that's why we do it.
Not at all, you can link tables in many ways: you just have to do
it all by hand instead of using the features that are provided by
the database.
It seems that you are
S.Isaac Dealey wrote:
I would expect in this case that having a primary key on the table he
described wouldn't change the sql syntax much (if at all).
It wouldn't change the syntax at all. For all we know it has a
primary key and if not, how about the following one:
ALTER TABLE ADD PRIMARY
, May 22, 2005 3:10 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: SQL Query Question
Ewok wrote:
this is by far the easiest way to link tables.
No... Its the only way to link tables that's why we do it.
Not at all, you can link tables in many ways: you just have to do
it all by hand instead of using
My impression from his description was that the actID was a sequential
number associated with the crID so in his case he would always know
that there would be only one record with a given actID for any given
crID which is a foreign key to another table -- and as he wanted all
data on that row,
Ewok wrote:
Use distinct and order descending by crid. In the future, I highly recommend
a unique key (PK) or at least a date/time field to decide which are the
latest records
The datamodel is fine, crID and actID function nicely as
composite primary key.
Jochem
How so with duplicates of both?
-Original Message-
From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, May 21, 2005 10:13 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: SQL Query Question
Ewok wrote:
Use distinct and order descending by crid. In the future, I highly
recommend
a unique key
#
/cfoutput
/pre
-Original Message-
From: Ewok [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 20, 2005 10:40 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: SQL Query Question
Use distinct and order descending by crid. In the future, I highly recommend
a unique key (PK) or at least a date/time field to decide
Ewok wrote:
How so with duplicates of both?
Because combined they are a unique identifier.
Jochem
~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking
application. Start tracking and documenting hours
having trouble with would be less trouble than it'
already not if they existed here.
-Original Message-
From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, May 21, 2005 2:41 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: SQL Query Question
Ewok wrote:
How so with duplicates of both?
Because
Ewok wrote:
I guess that痴 one way of looking at it... I think creating the need to
combine them is more work than its worth or would ever need to be. Valid or
invalid, I still recommend something a little more easier to differentiate
records with such as a single unique key per record.
I
van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, May 21, 2005 6:27 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: SQL Query Question
Ewok wrote:
I guess that痴 one way of looking at it... I think creating the need to
combine them is more work than its worth or would ever need to be. Valid
or
invalid, I still
If your not getting uptight... I'll drop it here anyway
because... well... pro-longed exposure to me tends to
make people that way :)
Droids don't tear peoples arms out of their sockets if they... oh
nevermind... :)
s. isaac dealey 954.522.6080
new epoch : isn't it time for a change?
add
After all, what hes having trouble with would be less
trouble than it' already not if they existed here.
I would expect in this case that having a primary key on the table he
described wouldn't change the sql syntax much (if at all). I still
like to have a primary key on these sorts of tables,
. Isaac Dealey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, May 21, 2005 8:04 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: SQL Query Question
After all, what hes having trouble with would be less
trouble than it' already not if they existed here.
I would expect in this case that having a primary key on the table he
True, more would be helpful. But a unique identifier would
serve the purpose
of deciding which was entered last which I believed he
asked... but only he
could clarify that and since he's not responding with any
input... :)
you calling Jochem a wookie? hehe
Actually it was a mangled
Use distinct and order descending by crid. In the future, I highly recommend
a unique key (PK) or at least a date/time field to decide which are the
latest records
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Chastain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 20, 2005 9:59 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: OT:
1) if it doesn't exist yet, create a plan table in your schema. You can do this
by running the script
$ORACLE_HOME/rdbms/admin/utlxplan.sql
2) use the EXPLAIN PLAN command:
EXPLAIN PLAN
SET STATEMENT_ID = 'sampleplan'
FOR
select count(*) from blobtest;
Others will probably come up with a better way, but my first thought was a
series of unions.
SELECT DISTINCT values
FROM
(
SELECT DISTINCT v1 AS values
FROM table
UNION
SELECT DISTINCT v2 AS values
FROM table
UNION
SELECT
Ian,
Thanks!!! That put me on the right track. I had never used a Union before
and didn't even think about it. The resultant query looks like:
SELECT DISTINCT v1 AS V_values
FROM table
UNION
SELECT DISTINCT v2 AS V_values
FROM table
UNION
Duncan I Loxton wrote:
SELECT *
FROM LibraryBooking
WHERE lib_item = #attributes.lii_id#
AND (
(lib_StartDate = #startDate# AND lib_StartDate = #startDate#)
OR
(lib_EndDate = #endDate# AND lib_EndDate = #endDate#)
Jason Smith wrote:
This code works fine with a access database, since converting the entire cf
application to a live SQL database it has been the beginning of a
nightmare. I'm not real familiar with access but it seems they have some
really strange ways to check dates and whatnot.
table
On Fri, December 10, 2004 2:44 pm, Jason Smith said:
This code works fine with a access database, since converting the entire
cf
application to a live SQL database it has been the beginning of a
nightmare. I'm not real familiar with access but it seems they have some
really strange ways to
After some work and some more work I have the administration side of the
cold fusion application working correctly but now when I am adding a
product I have come across a problem that appears to be with how the query
in access worked vs sql. The following is the query if anyone has any
ideas
Multiple ways heres one:
SELECT CustID
FROMCustomers
WHERE CustID NOT IN (Select CustID From Orders)
Adam
On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 12:01:30 -0500, Che Vilnonis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Say I have two simple queries:
cfquery name=getCustsFromCusts datasource=#DSN#
SELECT CustID
FROM
How about this?
Select CustID from customers where custID not in (select custid from
orders)
-dov
-Original Message-
From: Che Vilnonis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2004 12:01 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: SQL Query question. Please help...
Say I have two simple
Sometimes using NOT can have performance issues
You can also do:
SELECT a.CustID
FROMCustomers a,Orders b
WHERE a.CustID = b.CustID
-Original Message-
From: Adam Haskell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2004 11:06 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: SQL Query question
, November 30, 2004 11:05 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: SQL Query question. Please help...
Sometimes using NOT can have performance issues
You can also do:
SELECT a.CustID
FROMCustomers a,Orders b
WHERE a.CustID = b.CustID
-Original Message-
From: Adam Haskell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
-Original Message-
From: Adam Haskell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2004 11:06 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: SQL Query question. Please help...
Multiple ways heres one:
SELECT CustID
FROMCustomers
WHERE CustID NOT IN (Select CustID From Orders)
Adam
On Tue, 30
You can also do:
SELECT a.CustID
FROMCustomers a,Orders b
WHERE a.CustID = b.CustID
-Original Message-
From: Adam Haskell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2004 11:06 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: SQL Query question. Please help...
Multiple ways
Adam/Dov
Using your query my recordcount is off.
Actual # of customer ids from my customers table = 865.
Actual # of customer ids from my orders table = 596.
Using your query, the difference = 335.
865 - 596 should = 269. What am I missing? Debug info is below.
Under your math you are assuming a 1 to 1 relationship between orders
and Custromers. Unless you are running a scam, where no customer would
ever by from you twice, that is not case, the whole reason you have 2
seperate tables. Hope thats makes sense.
Adam H
On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 12:18:23 -0500,
You have multiple Orders for some customers.
What is count for:
SELECT DISTINCT Custid from Orders
-Original Message-
From: Che Vilnonis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2004 12:18 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: SQL Query question. Please help...
Adam/Dov
I see. Haven't had my lunch yet. Thanks for your help.
Che
-Original Message-
From: Adam Haskell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2004 12:23 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: SQL Query question. Please help...
Under your math you are assuming a 1 to 1 relationship
At 12:22 PM 11/30/2004, Adam Haskell wrote:
Under your math you are assuming a 1 to 1 relationship between orders
and Custromers. Unless you are running a scam, where no customer would
ever by from you twice, that is not case, the whole reason you have 2
seperate tables. Hope thats makes sense.
Thanks for this, it is really a great help, I may get a good nights
sleep now!
-Original Message-
From: Taco Fleur [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 18 November 2004 19:50
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: SQL Query using 'FOR XML' Coldfusion
Here
This is excellent, can't believe it could be so simple! Why didn't I
think of that? Many thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 18 November 2004 19:14
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: SQL Query using 'FOR XML' Coldfusion
http://216.239.57.104/search?q
Thanks for this, it is really a great help, I may get a good nights
sleep now!
-Original Message-
From: Taco Fleur [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 18 November 2004 19:50
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: SQL Query using 'FOR XML' Coldfusion
Thanks for this, it is really a great help, I may get a good nights
sleep now!
-Original Message-
From: Taco Fleur [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 18 November 2004 19:50
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: SQL Query using 'FOR XML' Coldfusion
Rob, quick query, when I use the following code
'Document root element is missing' any idea why?
I think the xml should be something like this,
root
itemsomething1/item
itemsomething2/item
itemsomething3/item
itemsomething4/item
/root
which it doesn't look like it is... Ie the only element is the root one
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 18 November 2004 19:50
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: SQL Query using 'FOR XML' Coldfusion
Rob, quick query, when I use the following code
cfxml variable=xmldoc
root
cfloop from=1 to=#xmltest.recordcount#
index=xcfoutput#xmltest[xmltest.columnlist][x]#/cfoutput/cfloop
Can you remember at all how you handled the column names? i.e.
'XML_F52E2B61-18A1-11D1-B105-00805F49916B'.
-Original Message-
From: Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 17 November 2004 17:42
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: SQL Query using 'FOR XML' Coldfusion
Yes, you have to loop over
November 2004 8:27 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: SQL Query using 'FOR XML' Coldfusion
Can you remember at all how you handled the column names?
i.e. 'XML_F52E2B61-18A1-11D1-B105-00805F49916B'.
-Original Message-
From: Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 17 November 2004 17
Email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Website: www.scout7.com
-Original Message-
From: Taco Fleur [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 18 November 2004 12:58
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: SQL Query using 'FOR XML' Coldfusion
The only way I found to do this is actually get an ADO stream, I wrote
an SP
handled the column names? i.e.
'XML_F52E2B61-18A1-11D1-B105-00805F49916B'.
-Original Message-
From: Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 17 November 2004 17:42
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: SQL Query using 'FOR XML' Coldfusion
Yes, you have to loop over the query columns and build
November 2004 17:42
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: SQL Query using 'FOR XML' Coldfusion
Yes, you have to loop over the query columns and build a new string
with the columns data.
The way you go about it is pretty wacky and I forget the syntax, but I
(and others) have posted how to do
u know we're getting old when we forget the time...
LOL
~|
Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Gold Sponsor - CFHosting.net
http://www.cfhosting.net
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:184801
November 2004 11:08 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: SQL Query using 'FOR XML' Coldfusion
Thanks, I am definitely interested! This would be of a great
help to me.
Andy McShane
Head of Development
Scout7 Ltd,
324a Lichfield Road,
Mere Green,
Sutton Coldfield
West Midlands
United
Yes, you have to loop over the query columns and build a new string
with the columns data.
The way you go about it is pretty wacky and I forget the syntax, but I
(and others) have posted how to do it to the list at one point so it
should be in the archive (it was like a year ago though)
On Wed,
2.) Can someone please suggest a good book on SQL syntax that will clear
thing up for me.
Other beginner resources:
1) http://www.sqlcourse.com/ http://www.sqlcourse.com/
2) http://sqlcourse2.com/ http://sqlcourse2.com/
3) http://www.freeprogrammingresources.com/sql.html
Thanks Umer Others,
You guys have been of great help.
Will try the query today..
Regards,
Mark
- Original Message -
From: Umer Farooq [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 11, 2004 8:17 PM
Subject: Re: SQL Query Help Please.
Here you.. go.. returns
2.) Can someone please suggest a good book on SQL syntax
Teach Yourself SQL in 10 Minutes by Ben Forta.
ISBN 0-672-32128-9
___
Do you Yahoo!?
Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today!
http://vote.yahoo.com
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
Hi,
http://www.techonthenet.com/access/queries/joins1.htm
For beginner I would suggest.. SAMS SQL in 21 Days..
and Google.. :-)
Nomad wrote:
Hello!
I am trying to create a join of four tables to get data from a db in the
format I want.
The Database tables and fields are:
Orders
Here's a start, though you'll have to explain your tables and your
calculations further.
SELECT
c.Customername,
a.Orderid,
a.Orderdate,
( where is this being stored? AmountReceived maybe this could be
d.PaymentReceivedAS AmountReceived ? ),
( put your formula for calculating AmountDue
1 - 100 of 299 matches
Mail list logo
