Re: cfc vs php rule of thumb

2003-08-26 Thread Christian Cantrell
On Monday, August 25, 2003, at 11:51 AM, Patricia G. L. Hall wrote: I've seen you talk about the ini way of doing things before and I thought it was an interesteing way to carry on. I'm pretty sure you've mentioned ini on your blog, but have you ever blogged its use specifically? I

Re: cfc vs php rule of thumb

2003-08-26 Thread Paul Hastings
and simple to write and parse (using the getProfileSections and getProfileString functions). They are much less verbose than XML and they don't handle unicode, too bad as they would make provide pretty good substitutes for resource bundle functionality. cf really needs something like

Mach II was RE: RE: cfc vs php rule of thumb

2003-08-26 Thread Mauricio Giraldo
http://www.mach-ii.com/ I've been clicking around the mach-ii site over the past days but haven't understood it completely (yet). Downloading PDFs right now. Are the UML diagrams made with gModeler? I suggest a question for the Mach-II FAQ: What is Mach-II? I've read a lot of blogs telling

Mach II was RE: RE: cfc vs php rule of thumb

2003-08-26 Thread Mauricio Giraldo
http://www.mach-ii.com/ I've been clicking around the mach-ii site over the past days but haven't understood it completely (yet). Downloading PDFs right now. Are the UML diagrams made with gModeler? I suggest a question for the Mach-II FAQ: What is Mach-II? I've read a lot of blogs telling

RE: cfc vs php rule of thumb

2003-08-26 Thread Barney Boisvert
PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 7:21 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: cfc vs php rule of thumb and simple to write and parse (using the getProfileSections and getProfileString functions). They are much less verbose than XML and they don't handle unicode, too bad as they would make

Re: cfc vs php rule of thumb

2003-08-26 Thread Paul Hastings
know a little java. If you don't, Benoit Hediard wrote a couple UDFs to do similar things (probably based on the java classes). I'm not sure exactly noipe, same approach as me. ~| Archives:

Re: Mach II was RE: RE: cfc vs php rule of thumb

2003-08-26 Thread Sean A Corfield
On Monday, Aug 25, 2003, at 12:40 US/Pacific, Mauricio Giraldo wrote: http://www.mach-ii.com/ I've been clicking around the mach-ii site over the past days but haven't understood it completely (yet). Downloading PDFs right now. Are the UML diagrams made with gModeler? I suggest a question

RE: cfc vs php rule of thumb

2003-08-26 Thread Barney Boisvert
Either put them in a superclass of your CFCs (which may or may not be possible), or put a CFINCLUDE tag in your init() method that sets all the variables. You might be able to put it in the constructor (outside any method body), but I'm not sure. --- Barney Boisvert, Senior Development Engineer

Re: cfc vs php rule of thumb

2003-08-26 Thread Paul Hastings
You can easily use the native Java resource bundle handling classes if you know a little java. If you don't, Benoit Hediard wrote a couple UDFs to do never been able to get them to work via mx (probably too little java know-how). i have my own udf--now cfc, its easy enough to read a properties

Mach II was RE: RE: cfc vs php rule of thumb

2003-08-26 Thread Mauricio Giraldo
Do my Mach II pages help? http://www.corfield.org/index.php?fuseaction=machii.why http://www.corfield.org/index.php?fuseaction=machii.concepts They certainly do. Thanks a lot - mga ~| Archives:

RE: cfc vs php rule of thumb

2003-08-25 Thread Raymond Camden
There are a couple of different answers to this question. What follows are just a few ideas, and may not always work best depending on your situation. 1) One way to have a CFC read in 'config' information is to simply define them as probably always did, application variables, and read them from

Re: cfc vs php rule of thumb

2003-08-25 Thread Critz
oi Mauricio!! cfcomponent cfinclude template=blah.config cffunction cffunction /cfcomponent ? -- Currently Playing: Jimmy Buffett - Son of a Son of a Sailor Monday, August 25, 2003, 1:52:20 PM, you wrote: MG Hello MG When developing in

RE: cfc vs php rule of thumb

2003-08-25 Thread Barney Boisvert
: Monday, August 25, 2003 10:59 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: cfc vs php rule of thumb There are a couple of different answers to this question. What follows are just a few ideas, and may not always work best depending on your situation. 1) One way to have a CFC read in 'config' information

Mach II was RE: RE: cfc vs php rule of thumb

2003-08-25 Thread Mike Brunt
Mauricio, I suggest you take a look at Mach II at. http://www.mach-ii.com/ There is a .pdf file there that explains Mach II well also the Mach II infrastructure and some sample code/apps. Kind Regards - Mike Brunt Original Message --- There are a couple of different

Mach II was RE: RE: cfc vs php rule of thumb

2003-08-25 Thread Mauricio Giraldo
http://www.mach-ii.com/ I've been clicking around the mach-ii site over the past days but haven't understood it completely (yet). Downloading PDFs right now. Are the UML diagrams made with gModeler? I suggest a question for the Mach-II FAQ: What is Mach-II? I've read a lot of blogs telling

RE: cfc vs php rule of thumb

2003-08-25 Thread Raymond Camden
Didn't quite understand the INI suggestion (Raymond Camden) CF has the ability to read ini files, which are standard (on Windows) file formats that look kinda like this [sectionA] settingOne=foo settingTwo=goo [sectionB] Etc XML files are probably preferable, but ini files are easy enough to

RE: cfc vs php rule of thumb

2003-08-25 Thread Patricia G. L. Hall
I've seen you talk about the ini way of doing things before and I thought it was an interesteing way to carry on. I'm pretty sure you've mentioned ini on your blog, but have you ever blogged its use specifically? -Patti Didn't quite understand the INI suggestion (Raymond Camden) CF has the

RE: cfc vs php rule of thumb

2003-08-25 Thread Raymond Camden
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 9:52 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: cfc vs php rule of thumb I've seen you talk about the ini way of doing things before and I thought it was an interesteing way to carry on. I'm pretty sure you've mentioned ini on your blog, but have