PS - There are multiple a few cfapplication tags in our system. However, it
uses FuseBox 3 and my understanding was that this could be done in
sub-folders / circuits without confusion. For instance, we use the CFFM
file manager with CKEditor in the cms and that has an application.cfm file
with
Mike,
To answer your question, it seems to be tied to a particular browser (IE 7
or 8) on a particular computer (ie IE 7, 8 work for most users).
Also, re: session variables, looking in CF Admin, it looks like we have Use
J2EE Session Variables as well as Enable Application Variables and
Enable
Not sure what kind of page you're doing, but have you looked at
cfflush? That flushes out the request buffer which can be a
significant overhead, especially in terms of perceived responsiveness,
on long running pages. I don't know for 100% certain but I believe
that that would often trigger a
When doing big batch processing, I will often cfthread and then join the
thread back at the end of the loop. This means that everything tied to the
thread is now able to garbage collected, as the thread has been marked as
expired.
Mark
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 7:40 AM, Ryan Duckworth
Nick,
If the session token is changing on every request then something is
interfering with the setting of the cookie. If it is broken for only
one browser on a computer, then I would suspect a problem with the
browser settings or security software installed on the computer that
only integrates
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Ryan Duckworth
ryanduckworth...@gmail.comwrote:
structDelete on variables and local do *not work* in *ColdFusion 9*.
You aren't really giving any symptoms or errors here. What exactly is the
problem you are seeing? Out of memory errors? Do you have code to
Inside of loops in heavy lifting / long running processes ( scheduled pages
), we would use:
structDelete( variables, foo );
This would, in theory, remove the pointer to the location in memory and
allow for garbage collection.
What makes you think that garbage collection was occurring
I don't know for 100% certain but I believe that that would often trigger a
garbage collection as well.
I don't know either, but I would be extremely surprised if this was true.
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http://www.figleaf.com/
http://training.figleaf.com/
Fig Leaf Software is a
Years ago we moved an App from CF5 to I believe it was CF6 and ran into
issues with one of it's scheduled jobs never being able to finish. This
job 26 or so LDAP calls that brought down 70k or so records and inserted
them into the database and then did some misc other queries after all that.
At
funny you should say that, we still have an old win2k/CF5 server going, and
we never have any problems with it at all. I do not even remember the last
time any customer reported any problems with CF5, it has been going for
years and years without a problem. CF was definitely more stable before it
10 matches
Mail list logo
