We /already had this/. In the distant mists of time, we had something called
'eggdoc' which could convert to svnwiki format and Texinfo for proper
navigation. But it was too hard to use, and it made community participation
more difficult. It is an evolutionary dead end. It was a good decision
Elf,
Not to prolong this discussion further, but w3m is lightweight and
automatically shells out to your editor of choice for forms, and
works fine with the wiki. I'm sure elinks works similarly.
On 2/14/08, Elf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
in a brief response to other posts: im not on a machine
Thanks for the script Peter, I had been looking for a way to generate local
html from svnwiki source for ages (particularly while developing
eggdoc-svnwiki). The complexity and dependencies weren't worth figuring
it out, though. To this point w3m or cut/paste has worked acceptably.
On 2/14/08,
Select all in the preview window, cut and paste to Emacs or Vim, edit, and
paste the text back to the wiki. I do it all the time, and it solves every one
of these issues. (Modern browsers handle most of them, too.) You can also use
`svn up` for the import step, but the preview window is still
Hi,
It appears that authorized, legitimate wiki edits to random pages are causing
simultaneous commits to the 'index' page, which consists of spam in the
form of an SVN merge conflict.
Check `svn log index` and notice that quite a few recent commits follow this
pattern.
For example,
svn diff
This makes sense. However, since spam is apparently bypassing authorization
--the index page can't be edited anonymously--and also logging, I was concerned
there is a more critical underlying problem. It might even affect more than
the index page.
On 2/16/08, felix winkelmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 2/16/08, Kon Lovett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 16, 2008, at 6:55 PM, Matt Gushee wrote:
Nonetheless, I've gotten accustomed to a world where datatypes are
used very precisely to model the semantics of your problem domain.
So when I see a function behaving in a way that implies
Just a comment: in eggdoc the name of the procedure / syntax etc. is taken as a
plain string -- e.g. (stream-xcons a b). For HTML output, it is used
verbatim. For texinfo output, which has special directives to mark functions,
this input is deconstructed into procedure name and arguments using
I was wondering if these could be placed in a separate namespace
(e.g. http://chicken.wiki.br/sym/stream-xcons or
http://chicken.wiki.br/sym:stream-xcons). The reason being that
with an influx of procedure names the potential for collision
goes way up with a flat namespace.
If this could be done
Yes. The toplevel directory is for release 2 only, and will
probably be renamed later to release/2, but has not yet
been to retain backwards compatibility.
On 2/17/08, Shawn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Should all new eggs be created in chicken-eggs/release/3 instead of
the toplevel chicken-eggs/
, returning:
...
On 2/17/08, Jim Ursetto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For example, procedure sig=(stream-xcons a b) ... /procedure.
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
On 2/17/08, Ivan Raikov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, it is not clear to me how to convert ... symbol-table formatting
elements to wiki format.
Ivan,
The symbol-table is essentially a nod to aesthetics--it just alters the
appearance of the table (mainly, the 'symbol' column is monospaced).
I'll also update eggdoc-svnwiki with the new proc syntax (or whatever final
form it takes) once that gets put in the wiki.
And in that vein:
The four types of definitions in eggdoc are procedure,
macro, record and parameter, with an extra signature type which
is used when you want to name a new
proc and macro look good. The wiki pages use either
'''procedure:''' (proc a b) or
[procedure] (proc a b)
depending on the author, so the rendering is up to you.
On 2/19/08, Alejandro Forero Cuervo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
parameggdoc:doctype/param
Is this meant to be used as in
On 2/19/08, Alejandro Forero Cuervo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alright. I suppose I'll highlight the procedure name and make sure it
gets typeset in monospaced font, as:
[procedure] {{('''proc''' a b)}}
I would like it if that line were wrapped in a div e.g.
div class=definition.../div so that
On 2/19/08, Jim Ursetto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
signature type=stringdoctype:xhtml-1.0-strict/signature
Thinking about this a little more, it strikes me that
definition or def is probably a better tag than signature.
So:
def type=stringdoctype:xhtml-1.0-strict/def
for unusual definitions we
Yes please. Quick procedure lookup is the capability of Info I most miss.
A plain index page would also be just as good for my purposes.
On 2/21/08, Alejandro Forero Cuervo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While this will continue to work, I think what I'll do is, once I have
the procedure and similar
On 2/24/08, Heinrich Taube [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
im sure this must be something stupid but i dont understand why it
crashes if its not float data
C_word w = C_u_i_car( lyst );
if (C_truep( C_flonump( w ) )) {
Heinrich,
Try if (C_truep(C_blockp(w)) C_truep(C_flonump(w))) {...}
and see
On 2/27/08, Graham Fawcett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Personally, I don't use Spiffy; I wrote a custom framework instead.
Would you mind expanding a little on your custom framework and
whether it resides behind another webserver via mod_proxy, scgi,
fastcgi, cgi, or is itself the main webserver?
Absolutely correct, feel free to update the wiki to reflect this.
On 2/29/08, minh thu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- http:write-response-header should be write-response-header
- and before calling it, the current-request parameter should be
changed to the request argument.
Unit SRFI-18:
Blocking I/O will block all threads, except for some socket operations (see the
section about the tcp unit). An exception is the read-eval-print loop on UNIX
platforms: waiting for input will not block other threads, provided the current
input port reads input from a console.
On
Shawn:
Did you try using rlwrap? It works fine here.
$ rlwrap csi
#;1 (use srfi-18)
#;2 (thread-start! (lambda () (let loop () (printf loop~%) (thread-sleep! 1)
(loop
#thread: thread0
#;3 loop
loop
loop
loop
On 3/4/08, Shawn Rutledge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you do
(use readline)
Error: (open-input-file) can not open file - No such file
or directory: objc.egg
On 3/6/08, Ivan Raikov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Jim,
Can you try r9257? I have committed some fixes to chicken-setup
that would hopefully solve your problems.
Jim Ursetto [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
John,
If this behavior is causing you problems, and you can't work around it, I
believe you could use the codewalk egg with your own (nonhygienic)
macroexpander to keep track of the latest binding for an identifier and
select the correct one, even taking into account lexical shadowing (which
you
On 3/19/08, John Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
minh thu scripsit:
That's right. Of course, if you use a GPLed egg, you have to
distribute
Scheme source for your whole app. C source is obfuscated and doesn't
count for GPL purposes.
It seems to me that you both say the opposite. I
On 3/19/08, John Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jim Ursetto scripsit:
Does this mean fp is now GPL?
Yes, it is, or rather it would be if the copy of silex.scm in the silex egg
were under the GPL. But it is not; there is neither copyright nor license
anywhere on it. As I said before
Let's say I have two callback handlers registered and within the handlers I do
a thread-sleep! or thread-yield!. The C caller is the same for both (it's a
busy handler), they are just invoked with different data. Now this sequence of
events occurs:
thread 1 enters the callback
thread 2 enters
On 4/5/08, Jim Ursetto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm seeing some odd behavior when using dynamic-wind within a thread.
If an error occurs during the thunk, the 'after' portion is never
called nor are any subsequent statements.
The same happens for scripts with only 1 (primordial) thread
As is seconds-time. Using SVN 10369.
#;1 (thread-sleep! 1) ; sleeps for 1 second
#;2 (thread-sleep! (seconds-time 1)) ; returns immediately
#;3 (thread-sleep! (milliseconds-time 1000)) ; returns immediately
Looks like the contents of the time structure doesn't match what
On 4/7/08, Graham Fawcett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 1:47 PM, Jim Ursetto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I need to do this?
(thread-sleep!
(milliseconds-time (+ 500 (time-milliseconds (current-time)
Just this:
(thread-sleep! 0.5)
That would be the easy
Graham,
There is a thread entitled thread-sleep! for less than a second from 12 Jan
2007 which discusses this issue. Basically it was an either/or thing and the
current way won. I just was not aware of the proper usage. I used Daishi's
shorter solution and just made a local procedure in the
On 4/11/08, felix winkelmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 8:10 PM, Jim Ursetto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Uh oh... This is a case that should probably be avoided. I couldn't even
say what exactly happens, but you will have to do some locking because
the Scheme thread-context
On 4/7/08, felix winkelmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh no, not at all. Wait until you've seen it and until the moment comes
when 50% of all eggs break and you have to migrate spiffy...
A small price to pay. I would gladly do the drudge work to migrate as many
eggs as possible.
On 4/15/08, Lui Fungsin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you set SIGPIPE to the chicken equivalent of SIG_IGN, any error
message writing to the pipe will be returned by write(2) instead,
I'm not sure I followed you here. What's chicken's equivalent of SIG_IGN?
(set-signal-handler! signal/pipe
On 4/16/08, Jim Ursetto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/15/08, Lui Fungsin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not sure I followed you here. What's chicken's equivalent of SIG_IGN?
(set-signal-handler! signal/pipe #f)
Come to think of it, there's no way to set SIG_DFL. What about adding
(set-default
Heinrich,
One option is below. Normally the quickest way to suss this stuff out is to
look at runtime.c, library.scm and chicken.h. For example, in library.scm,
string-length is defined as
(define (string-length s) (##core#inline C_i_string_length s))
We can find the definition of
This is really neat and very straightforward.
I have one question so far. The core units (srfi-1.scm) have associated import
libraries (srfi-1.import.scm) but they are not wrapped in module definitions.
So when used, their definitions are automatically visible at toplevel, in
addition to being
Oh, I guess I had another question. Is it too early to make an
empty chicken-eggs/release/4 and slowly begin to populate it?
On 5/25/08, Jim Ursetto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is really neat and very straightforward.
I have one question so far
!)
(prefix (only scheme list-vector vector-list vector-fill!)
%))
and then used %list-vector as the core version. This worked
fine. But I'm not sure if it's correct.
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 7:02 AM, Jim Ursetto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Attached are my first stabs
I ported miscmacros (attached) to the hygienic branch and had a couple
questions.
First, is anyone using miscmacros? I was wondering about the following
proposed change to the anaphoric macros:
Current - Proposed
(if* x y z) - (if* (it x) y z)
(while* test body) - (while*
On 5/28/08, felix winkelmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2) Throw something like (display foobar), where foobar is unbound,
into your module and at runtime it will actually display #unbound
value without throwing an error. If a procedure is unbound, it
similarly complains about 'Error:
On 5/28/08, Kon Lovett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I use the anaphoric forms but not in anger. Yeah, the above is
more Scheme-ish but I suggest leaving it.
OK, I changed it back in my copy. The totally hygienic versions are
still in there, just commented out.
Anyway, hygienic if* is basically
On 5/29/08, felix winkelmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 6:05 AM, Kon Lovett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That will be unworkable for the user.
Hey, implementing this is not easy!
Don't think for a moment we're taking this for granted -- I just want to point
out any issues I
Out of curiosity, did you rebuild chicken-setup with the hygienic branch
after building it the first time with your regular compiler?
On 6/12/08, John Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you ask to set up anything, you get the usual prompt that it's not
installed and then crash with Error:
On 6/16/08, Kyle R. Burton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[felix wrote]
Well, why don't you make eggs from the stuff? I'd be delighted
to add it to the repository and can give you commit rights, if
you like.
I'd be delighted to. If we want that to happen sooner rather than
later, I'll request
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 4:49 AM, felix winkelmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don't be afraid to report bugs and offer critique! If I come over grumpy
at times, it's just because the module- and macro stuff stresses my
programming
abilities to the limit...
Hi Felix. The behavior below doesn't
Works great now. Sorry for the delay in feedback, I was out of town
for a couple weeks. I will dive in again shortly.
This module stuff is complicated, isn't it.
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 7:48 AM, felix winkelmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 9:38 PM, Jim Ursetto [EMAIL
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 9:54 PM, Kon Lovett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) When there is a one to one mapping between a Scheme variable/constant a
C variable/macro-constant/constant/enum should the Scheme symbol naming
mirror the C naming? Should the C 'SOME_C_LIBRARY_MACCONST' identifier be
Hi,
Try `make clean` first.
My guess is you compiled directly inside the tutorial code
directory--but there's already a binary there which will not be
updated with `make`. Basically, you're running the old binary. I'll
remove it from the download tree.
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 10:50 AM,
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 2:44 PM, felix winkelmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 7:24 AM, Shawn Rutledge
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now for the next problem with this same egg: it requires eggdoc (the
.meta file has (needs eggdoc ...)). I don't really want to install
that on
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 9:53 AM, Jörg F. Wittenberger
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It assumes that it can call read on a port when peek-char
returns #\( and assumes that, once read read the expression, can
continue to read from the port right after the corresponding #\) .
Unfortunately chicken's
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 2:28 PM, Jörg F. Wittenberger
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please find attached a self contained program, which is supposed to run
a useless thread for 3 seconds, kill it (logging a notice about an
exception being caught), create some garbage (logging a notice before
and
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 9:30 PM, Ivan Raikov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The program also ran fine on my system (Linux, Chicken
3.3.4), but when I compiled with csc -O2 I get this [crash]
As an additional data point, compiling -O2 on my system does NOT
crash. System again:
$ csc -V
Version
As a comparison, Felix's solution performs equivalently to my alist
example when compiled, but runs much faster from the REPL. It also
uses 9MB instead of 13MB. It's also simpler.
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 4:06 AM, felix winkelmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This should perform much better and
Note that your solution effects a mapping of x - y, not from x - y
- #t. That gets the job accomplished correctly, but doesn't reflect
the original Perl code. For a fair comparison, you have to change the
perl code to match, and then it runs in 1/3 of the memory and 1/2 the
time of the original
There's a bit of a corner case I found with hygienic named let.
#;3 (module foo (bar)
(import scheme)
(define-syntax bar (syntax-rules ()
((_) (let loop ((x 3)) x)
#;4 (module baz () (import foo) (bar))
Warning: reference to
On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 2:34 AM, felix winkelmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 7:28 AM, Jim Ursetto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
#;3 (module foo (bar)
(import scheme)
(define-syntax bar (syntax-rules ()
((_) (let loop ((x 3
Style question: the Chicken 3 version of base64 consists of two
procedures: base64:encode and base64:decode. For the modularized
version in Chicken 4, should the prefix simply be stripped (encode,
decode), or should they be more descriptive, such as base64-encode
and base64-decode?
I'm leaning
I will work on a fix now.
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 5:57 PM, felix winkelmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 2:51 PM, Graham Fawcett
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The current base64 egg for Chicken 3 builds, but gives me incorrect
results. The non-working version is by Bailey,
I updated the Chicken 3 egg and will update the Chicken 4 version
shortly. In the meantime the really brain-dead patch is attached.
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 2:51 PM, Graham Fawcett
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The current base64 egg for Chicken 3 builds, but gives me incorrect
results.
Drake,
I duplicated your issue with 3.4.0 and I believe it is still an issue
in the latest builds. This only occurs on Linux (because
NEEDS_RELINKING is only set to 'yes' in Makefile.linux). The
installed files in /usr/local are not affected -- only executables in
the build directory itself.
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 2:11 AM, felix winkelmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 4:52 AM, Matt Gushee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But anyway, I have previously worked through various tutorials and developed
a few simple programs w/ Chicken, and I'm now attempting to create an
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 3:03 AM, felix winkelmann bunny...@gmail.com wrote:
Please try this [finalizer patch].
Hi. I am seeing finalizers fail to execute on recent SVN and I think
it is the result of this change. I backed out the patch and it works
okay again.
On Version 3.4.10 - SVN rev.
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 5:56 AM, felix winkelmann bunny...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 9:41 AM, Jim Ursetto zbignie...@gmail.com wrote:
I am seeing finalizers fail to execute on recent SVN and I think
it is the result of this change. I backed out the patch and it works
okay again
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 12:06 PM, Jörg F. Wittenberger
joerg.wittenber...@softeyes.net wrote:
I'm confused (about chicken/trunk):
the current manual contains:
[procedure] (string-match REGEXP STRING [START])
[procedure] (string-match-positions REGEXP STRING [START])
my usage (from pcre
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 12:06 PM, Jörg F. Wittenberger
But worst regex.scm:
(define (string-match-positions rx str)
That performs an anchored match against the beginning and end of the
entire string. If you want to provide a range to search in, use:
(string-search-positions rx str #!optional
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Kon Lovett klov...@pacbell.net wrote:
(##sys#slot l 1) - (%cdr l)
(##sys#setslot l 1 x) - (%set-cdr l x)
I was wondering. The compiler already inlines primitives when
usual-integrations is in effect. Would it not be possible to tell it,
with a new
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 6:56 AM, Rafael Ibraim ibraim...@gmail.com wrote:
sendfile.c:10:21: chicken.h: No such file or directory
If this is the original error, it means it can't find your Chicken
installation at all, a bigger problem than just a missing #define.
Can you build any other eggs?
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 2:07 AM, Sven Hartrumpf
sven.hartru...@fernuni-hagen.de wrote:
I am building chicken from svn and stumbled across
the fact that chicken-setup will not be build any more
(since around 2008-09-25?).
Are you building Chicken 4? It's called chicken-install now.
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 7:48 PM, Ivan Raikov ivan.g.rai...@gmail.com wrote:
For the time being, I have reverted srfi-18.scm to that of Chicken
release 3.4.0. This fixes the issues you reported with srfi-18 and
srfi-27.
I have restored the latest version of srfi-18 and fixed some bugs and
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 12:48 PM, Peter Danenberg pe...@ck12.org wrote:
Should we just pull it down from:
https://galinha.ucpel.tche.br/svn/chicken-eggs/chicken/branches/chicken-3/
or are you going to make a release?
It will make it into 3.5.2, but it doesn't contain any functionality
or
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 3:12 PM, William Ramsay ramsa...@comcast.net wrote:
This may seem like a strange question, but I'm confused about the use of
set!. It may be a holdover from my pre-scheme days, but it seems I should
be declaring a variable before using it with set!
William,
Check
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Jim Ursetto zbignie...@gmail.com wrote:
You might prefer, for style or portability, to have a dummy definition
at toplevel, such as (define foo #f) or just (define foo), prior to
performing the set!.
Whoops. To be clear, (define foo) is a Chicken extension
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 9:05 AM, Derrell Piper d...@electric-loft.org wrote:
objc egg's blowing up under 10.5. Is there a fix?
objc-support.m:460:17: error: ffi.h: No such file or directory
Hi,
Did you install libffi?
See http://chicken.wiki.br/objc#requirements. Try libffi-20071207 on
I believe this is a bug in Chicken 4. It works in Chicken 3 with the
syntax-case egg, and in Scheme 48. It looks like an ellipsis form
matches after just checking the first pattern, without checking
subsequent patterns.
(define-syntax foo
(syntax-rules () ((_ (a b) ...)
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 12:28 PM, Jim Ursetto zbignie...@gmail.com wrote:
It looks like an ellipsis form matches after just checking
the first pattern, without checking subsequent patterns.
This wasn't quite correct. It seems that, if you have a pair in your
pattern followed by an ellipsis
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 3:48 PM, Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl wrote:
However, it turns out that an exception thrown in a thread simply
terminates the thread instead of unwinding the stack. The same does not
happen in the primordial thread:
$ csi
#;2 (dynamic-wind (lambda () (print BEFORE))
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 8:25 PM, Eduardo Cavazos wayo.cava...@gmail.com wrote:
extern Status XQueryTree(
Window** /* children_return */,
);
(c-function Status XQueryTree (... (c-pointer (c-pointer unsigned-long)) ...)
I can allocate enough storage for a pointer via:
(define
You can use locations for your other vars as well -- in this case it
should work even for 64-bit values.
(let-location
((root unsigned-long)
(parent unsigned-long)
(children (c-pointer unsigned-long))
(nchildren unsigned-long))
(XQueryTree dpy win
(location root)
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 3:16 AM, Jim Ursetto zbignie...@gmail.com wrote:
You can use locations for your other vars as well -- in this case it
should work even for 64-bit values.
Urgh. I read the header files. Window is typed as unsigned long on
32-bit systems and unsigned int on 64-bit systems
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 3:18 AM, felix winkelmann bunny...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 9:27 PM, Ivan Raikov ivan.g.rai...@gmail.com wrote:
This means that we cannot have a Debian package for Chicken 4,
because Debian insists on having a soname version, so that it can do
things
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 2:20 AM, Shawn Rutledge
shawn.t.rutle...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm trying it on the Mac (Leopard):
[mini][12:18:32 AM] chicken-setup tinyclos
chicken-setup doesn't exist in Chicken 4 (it's called chicken-install
now), and tinyclos isn't packaged for Chicken 4 anyway.
2009/4/9 lowly coder lowlyco...@huoyanjinjing.com:
Wait ... the Apple Developer Agreement has strict requirements against GC?
Perhaps not. All I can find is a note that the Objective-C runtime
does not support GC, but it doesn't say you can't implement it
yourself.
In a low-memory environment,
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 6:57 PM, felix winkelmann bunny...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 2:51 PM, Graham Fawcett
graham.fawc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi folks,
The current base64 egg for Chicken 3 builds, but gives me incorrect
results. The non-working version is by Bailey, ported by
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 6:26 PM, Nathan Thern nth...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello all-
It seems cond-expand is not recognized inside module declarations. I
have the following file saved as extra.scm:
(module
extra
(when unless)
(cond-expand (plt) (else
You forgot to (import scheme).
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 2:40 AM, Shawn Rutledge
shawn.t.rutle...@gmail.com wrote:
With Chicken 3, (use egg) can load a compiled egg.so in the cwd. This
is especially handy during egg development - you can compile and test
repeatedly without having to install. Chicken 4 doesn't seem to do
2009/4/22 Stephen Eilert spedr...@gmail.com:
Hi peeps,
I'm trying to install intarweb on my machine
uri-generic installs fine, however:
uri-generic version: 1.12
It installs version 1.12 and intarweb requires 2.0. I've been told on IRC
2009/4/22 nefi...@gmail.com:
Thank you, Thomas and John, for the kind replies.
I'm using Chicken 4.
So, I imagine I can stick with syntax-rules until I run into a situation
where I need something else, at which point I can either try define-macro
(if I use this, do I need to explicitly
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 11:28 AM, John Cowan co...@ccil.org wrote:
Alex Shinn scripsit:
52 eggdoc
19 openssl
6 iconv
5 utf8
4 tcp-server
3 format
6 sendfile
2 graph-scc
These have already been ported.
They aren't in
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 2:15 PM, Jim Ursetto zbignie...@gmail.com wrote:
A situation not mentioned above where you may prefer something else,
even if not breaking hygiene, is when your macro would be better off
written in procedural style
Forgot to mention, pattern matching is available
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Jim Ursetto zbignie...@gmail.com wrote:
Forgot to mention, pattern matching is available in explicit renaming macros
via the matchable extension; the foreigners egg is an example.
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 3:55 PM, Jordan Cooper nefi...@gmail.com wrote:
Explicit
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Stephen Eilert spedr...@gmail.com wrote:
I'll have to run against the repository. Passing the version seems to work -
for the specific egg. It breaks again when dependent eggs are installed.
That is correct, however, as far as I know only base64 and uri-generic
You don't happen to be using 3.5.0 or 3.5.1, are you?
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 4:36 PM, William Ramsay ramsa...@comcast.net wrote:
Hi again,
Are there any real world examples of threading in Chicken Scheme? The docs
for SRFI-18 are too obscure for poor me to understand.
When I try matching
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 2:59 PM, William Ramsay ramsa...@comcast.net wrote:
Can you be a little more explicit in what you mean? Adding that just
produces more errors.
John Cowan wrote:
(lambda body rename compare)
(define s (car body))
(define ff (cdr body))
Change this:
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 10:28 AM, Michele Simionato
michele.simion...@gmail.com wrote:
Does require-for-syntax work with Chicken 4?
As an exercise, I was trying to define a simple define macro as follows:
(require-for-syntax 'matchable)
You want
(require-library matchable)
(import-for-syntax
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 5:29 PM, Alejandro Forero Cuervo
a...@freaks-unidos.net wrote:
No, I'm not volunteering my time to fix this mess.
Could you at least fix the part where the wiki search engine still
returns results for deleted pages?
Jim
___
2009/5/4 Anthony Carrico acarr...@memebeam.org:
I didn't indent the module (this will make it easier to check my work
with svn diff).
It seems that it is useful not to indent the module body, as
definitions aligned at left works better with emacs and
scheme-complete. So that is perfectly fine.
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 4:06 AM, Alejandro Forero Cuervo
a...@freaks-unidos.net wrote:
For example, searching for mario domenech goulart on Google
lists http://chicken.wiki.br/mario%20domenech%20goulart as the
second result. This result used to work, redirecting to the
correct page. Now
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 5:29 PM, Alejandro Forero Cuervo
a...@freaks-unidos.net wrote:
For example, searching for mario domenech goulart on Google lists
http://chicken.wiki.br/mario%20domenech%20goulart as the second
result. This result used to work, redirecting to the correct page.
Now it
The manual implies that require-extension is the same as a
require-library followed by an import, but this is not so.
require-extension does not work for a source module that has no
corresponding import file on disk.
#;1 (require-extension tadm)
Error: (import) during expansion of (import ...) -
1 - 100 of 363 matches
Mail list logo
