On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 4:14 PM, felix winkelmann wrote:
> Just delete the following:
>
> /usr/bin/csc
> /usr/bin/csi
> /usr/bin/chicken-setup
> /usr/lib/chicken
> /usr/share/chicken
>
And
/usr/bin/chicken
of course.
cheers,
felix
___
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 4:27 PM, Peter Bex wrote:
>
> There's a lot more! At least Chicken 3 installs chicken-bug,
> chicken-profile, header files in /usr/include, lib(u)chicken in
> /usr/lib, manpages for all the programs above and some documentation
> that's under share/doc on my system, but may
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 11:54 PM, Jack Trades
wrote:
> (define-syntax def
> (syntax-rules ()
> ((def (name arg ... (opt-arg opt-value) ...) body ...)
> (define (name arg ... #!optional (opt-arg opt-value) ...) body ...
>
> Error: during expansion of (syntax-rules ...) - segment mat
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 1:21 AM, Jack Trades wrote:
> After noticing "Chicken for blub programmers" on the wiki some months ago, I
> decided a good way to learn Scheme would be to produce a similar document.
> It's ~50 pages long and written as one large table with various
> sub-headings. At las
Hello!
I have merged the "irregular" branch into trunk, so PCRE has now been
replaced with Alex' "irregex" regular expression package. That means,
SREs are now supported.
I noticed that regex-compilation into internal representation is relatively
slow, so precompiling the regexes is quite import
On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 12:18 PM, felix winkelmann wrote:
Sorry, wrong button...
>
> I have merged the "irregular" branch into trunk, so PCRE has now been
> replaced with Alex' "irregex" regular expression package. That means,
> SREs are now supported.
>
I wish everybody a very happy new year!
cheers,
felix
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
On Thu, Jan 1, 2009 at 1:06 AM, Jack Trades wrote:
> 1. import, if and define-syntax -- Where do they come from? Can they be
> redefined?
They are currently handled specially (i.e. hardcoded). The proper
way to do it would be to introduce internal special forms and define
the forms you mentio
On Thu, Jan 1, 2009 at 3:43 PM, William Ramsay wrote:
>
> Also the doc for the xlib egg has an error. Freeing a structure is given
> as: (free-) -> C-POINTER
>
> I think it should be:(free- C-POINTER)
>
Thanks - will be fixed.
cheers,
felix
__
Hi!
I'm trying to "fix" the mingw build and have encountered
a problem that leaves me absolutely dumbfounded.
I invoke csi and csc in chicken-install like this:
"c:\home\chicken-trunk\bin\csi" ... ...
(Note the quotes around the pathname)
This works fine in cmd.exe, but fails when using the
sy
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 1:37 AM, Lars Nilsson wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 7:27 PM, Thomas Chust wrote:
>> Ivan Raikov wrote:
>>> [...]
>>>I think the problem is that \ in strings needs to be escaped,
>>> [...]
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I don't think so, unless the escaping problem occurs on the S
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 9:14 AM, felix winkelmann wrote:
>
> - checkout the current svn trunk
> - run "make PLATFORM=mingw PREFIX=c:/home/chicken-trunk DEBUGBUILD=1
> bootstrap"
> (prefix must contain drive letter and use forward slashes)
> - run "make PLATFORM=m
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 2:14 PM, Lars Nilsson wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 3:14 AM, felix winkelmann wrote:
>> The handling of backslashes as escaping characters is not the problem,
>> it seems. If I pass this string (verbatim, just like it is printed here) to
>> syst
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 4:09 PM, Alejandro Forero Cuervo
wrote:
>> I'm not sure I can follow your example completely (I always get
>> quickly confused with these scenarios), but I understand the
>> "weak"/"finalizable" GC-root suggestion. I have to think more about
>> it, but it should be possible
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 11:48 PM, Lam Luu wrote:
> Hello all!
> Given an S-Expression, (here is an example), is there any way to write a
> script to determine whether or not that expression is a procedure-call or a
> macro? If it is a macro call, is there anyway to expand it back to the
> lowest le
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 6:58 PM, John Cowan wrote:
> felix winkelmann scripsit:
>
>> The handling of backslashes as escaping characters is not the problem,
>> it seems. If I pass this string (verbatim, just like it is printed here) to
>> system(3):
>>
>> &qu
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 12:00 AM, Tobia Conforto
wrote:
>
> Have you tried adding an .exe extension to csi?
>
> Like: "c:\home\chicken-trunk\bin\csi.exe"
>
> I know it sounds stupid...
No, it doesn't. But I'm quite sure John is right with his assumption.
>
>
> You could try and translate the firs
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 1:09 PM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
>
> If you put an extra set of quotation marks around the argument, won't
> they effectively cancel the quotation marks added by system()?
>
> That is, pass
>
> ""c:\home\chicken-trunk\bin\csi" -bnq -e "(require-library setup-api)"
> -e "(impo
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 3:26 AM, Heinrich Taube wrote:
> im using chicken 3.0.0 . I have a file with some define-macro in it like
> this:
>
> (define-macro (send place . args)
> (expand-send place args))
>
> I include that file in my main file ChickenBridge.scm
>
> (include "mymacros.scm")
> (dec
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 4:20 AM, Kevin Beranek wrote:
> I've stumbled upon some interesting behavior of number->string. It
> appears that there was previously a ticket filed for a similar bug in
> version 2.6 (http://trac.callcc.org/ticket/160). What I've been
> observing doesn't seem to be exact
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 1:09 PM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
>
> If you put an extra set of quotation marks around the argument, won't
> they effectively cancel the quotation marks added by system()?
>
...Remarkable. It really seems to work.
I found this:
http://sunriseprogrammer.blogspot.com/2007/06/c
Hi!
I think the mingw (non-msys) build could work now. If you checkout the
trunk and do
make PLATFORM=mingw PREFIX=c:/some/path bootstrap # note the forward slashes!
make PLATFORM=mingw PREFIX=c:/some/path CHICKEN=chicken-boot
make PLATFORM=mingw PREFIX=c:/some/path CHICKEN=chicken-boot install
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 4:58 AM, Shawn Rutledge
wrote:
> On 1/6/09, Shawn Rutledge wrote:
>> Now by reading the source I've discovered ##sys#unbound-in-eval. I
>> guess I can get the unbound variable name from there (and expect it to
>> break some day) unless somebody has a better idea...
>
> B
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 1:14 AM, William Ramsay wrote:
Hi, William.
Sorry for responding so late.
>
> I am trying to use macros with a program that requires some C
> functions. But when I "require-extension syntax-case" and extend easyffi I
> get compile errors.If I eliminate either
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 11:03 AM, Alaric Snell-Pym
wrote:
> Peter raised an interesting point on IRC - doesn't stat-regular? et al
> do this? The stat-*? functions all take a file name, call stat, then
> examine the mode of the result to see if it has the specified type.
>
> Which makes them a bit
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 11:57 AM, Alaric Snell-Pym
wrote:
>
> On 16 Jan 2009, at 10:45 am, felix winkelmann wrote:
>
>> Everything should be put into eggs. At some stage we have to
>> strip down the posixunix and put everything not needed for
>> the core system into
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Alaric Snell-Pym
wrote:
> On 16 Jan 2009, at 11:40 am, Alaric Snell-Pym wrote:
>
>>
>> Please may I have svn set up for:
>>
>> posix-extensions
>>
>> - in which I will (at Felix's suggestion) put my posix syscall
>> extensions.
>
> Hold your horses, Kon's pointed
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 3:06 AM, Joshua Griffith
wrote:
> In case anyone is interested, I've mirrored the Chicken repository over at
> GitHub using git-svn:
> http://github.com/hadronzoo/chicken-scheme/tree/master
>
> The clone URL is:
> git://github.com/hadronzoo/chicken-scheme.git
>
> It's curre
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Alaric Snell-Pym
wrote:
> On 16 Jan 2009, at 11:40 am, Alaric Snell-Pym wrote:
>
>>
>> Please may I have svn set up for:
>>
>> posix-extensions
>>
>> - in which I will (at Felix's suggestion) put my posix syscall
>> extensions.
>
> Hold your horses, Kon's pointed
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 12:40 PM, Tobia Conforto
wrote:
>
> Newbie question: can Chicken load and (more importantly) unload/reload a .so
> at runtime? I've never tried to.
>
There is some support for unloading the old instance of a .so, when
reloading it (at least on elf-ish systems), but it's un
On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 1:10 PM, Alaric Snell-Pym
wrote:
>
>
> What do people think of this? Would it be welcome in the chicken core
> once it's proven itself?
>
Sure. The use of strings for binary data is indeed something that should
be reduced. There is also a lot of copying involved. But one h
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 9:41 AM, Jim Ursetto wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 3:03 AM, felix winkelmann wrote:
>> Please try this [finalizer patch].
>
> Hi. I am seeing finalizers fail to execute on recent SVN and I think
> it is the result of this change. I backed out the
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 2:08 PM, Koen Weddepohl wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I'm interested in using Chicken for homebrew game development.
>
> Anyway, I've been trying to get the SDL egg to work with the OpenGL egg.
> However, I can't get any OpenGL graphics to display. I think this is because
> I can'
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 6:49 PM, Adam C. Emerson wrote:
>
> The compile fails with:
>
> /usr/bin/ld: ./libchicken.a(library-static.o): relocation R_X86_64_32 against
> `a local symbol' can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with
> -fPIC
> ./libchicken.a: could not read symbols: Ba
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 10:12 PM, William Ramsay wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Is there a way to do incremental compiling in Chicken?My program is
> getting quite large and has a lot of include files involved. How do you go
> from "csc -vk foo.scm" to
>
> gcc test.c -o foo.o -c -fno-strict-aliasing -D
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 2:49 PM, William Ramsay wrote:
> I put my list of files into a Makefile using the same code you gave below.
> Make runs through each file and compiles it to an object file with no
> problem at all. However, when I try to link it all together with
> csc -o foo a.o.b.o.c.o
>
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 1:57 AM, Ivan Raikov wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> Some time last December, I made a partial port of the Chicken
> build system to Scheme, and I got as far as getting Chicken 3 to build
> under Linux, Mac OS, and Mingw+msys. The code consists mainly of the
> PLT make macro, s
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 7:34 AM, Jim Ursetto wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Kon Lovett wrote:
>> (##sys#slot l 1) -> (%cdr l)
>> (##sys#setslot l 1 x) -> (%set-cdr l x)
>
> I was wondering. The compiler already inlines primitives when
> usual-integrations is in effect. Would it not
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 9:01 PM, Jim Ursetto wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 5:56 AM, felix winkelmann wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 9:41 AM, Jim Ursetto wrote:
>>> I am seeing finalizers fail to execute on recent SVN and I think
>>> it is the result of this chan
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 2:08 PM, Koen Weddepohl wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I'm interested in using Chicken for homebrew game development.
>
> Anyway, I've been trying to get the SDL egg to work with the OpenGL egg.
> However, I can't get any OpenGL graphics to display. I think this is because
> I can'
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 8:32 AM, Alex Shinn wrote:
> When optimizing my Chicken code for speed, I find one of the
> most important things is to write the code so that it gets
> compiled into a single C function with gotos. It's often so
> important to get this that I end up writing very unnatural
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 9:36 PM, John Cowan wrote:
>
>> I don't think "parameterize" is tail-recursive (it uses dynamic-wind),
>> so if you expect procedure calls to be nested deeply, this might not be
>> an option.
>
> It is possible to have dynamic binding and tail recursion at the same
> time,
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 10:51 PM, Eduardo Cavazos
wrote:
>
> --
> (use srfi-4)
>
> (define (make-bytevector n)
> (u8vector->blob/shared (make-u8vector n)))
>
> (define bytevector-length blob-size)
>
> (define (bytevector-ieee-dou
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 4:33 PM, Jörg F. Wittenberger
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I managed to have a finalizer raise an exception. This ran into a tight
> loop in ##sys#force-finalizers. This patch will ignore them.
>
Gee, this got completely lost. Sorry, Joerg.
cheers,
felix
__
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 2:31 PM, felix winkelmann wrote:
>>
>> In interpreted code, the finalizers do not trigger at all, even when
>> you exit csi via (exit).
>>
>
Hi!
I have reverted the original change that caused this for the
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 7:40 PM, Eduardo Cavazos wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Even after R6RS, 'load' is all one can really count on. :-)
>
> Below is a "hacked" version of load that I'm using for Chicken. If an '.so'
> file doesn't exist for the file your loading, the file is compiled and one
> is generat
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 12:51 AM, Koen Weddepohl wrote:
>
> The functions sdl-gl-set-attribute and sdl-gl-get-attribute are recognized,
> but when I call sdl-gl-get-attribute it doesn't seem to return the value
> I've set with sdl-set-attribute. I'm not sure if I'm doing something wrong,
> I haven
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 11:33 PM, Eduardo Cavazos
wrote:
> Here's a screenshot of the fruits of today's labors:
>
> http://proteus.freeshell.org/abstracting-screenshots/game1-turn6-chicken.png
>
> That was produced by a pure Scheme implementation of the ContextFreeArt
> semantics. More info about
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 10:56 PM, Rick R wrote:
> Thanks! This is exactly what I was looking for. I've been playing with
> it a bit, and I've run into a few snags.
>
> 1. crunch.h wasn't created/copied it my std include. I had to
> chicken-setup -keep and go to the directory.
> The file is named "
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 11:44 PM, felix winkelmann wrote:
>>
>> 1. crunch.h wasn't created/copied it my std include. I had to
>> chicken-setup -keep and go to the directory.
>> The file is named "include". I'm guessing that the script expected
>>
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 12:21 AM, John Cowan wrote:
> felix winkelmann scripsit:
>
>> Note that crunch is highly experimental and incomplete. You requirements
>> are tough, and you will not find many functional languages that don't require
>> GC. Stalin and MLton
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 12:16 AM, Nicholas Indy Ray wrote:
> I'm having a problem while trying to profile a program that is taking
> far too long,
>
> The program is structured so that it makes tail calls back to prior
> functions
>
>
> (define (func-a p)
> (if (...)
> (func-a (... p))
>
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 3:19 AM, Jan Baumgart wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Is it possible, to make subsequent calls to CHICKEN_eval from within
> different nonreentrant(!) threads?
No, the chicken runtime system is not thread-safe.
cheers,
felix
___
Chicken-use
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 8:48 PM, Peter Bex wrote:
> The cleanup I'm suggesting does not necessarily have to be major, the
> immediate proposal of this mail is simply to move all the eggdocs to
> a new subdirectory eggref/3, to match eggref/4 and also to match the
> egg structure; eggref/X/Y will
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Drew Hess wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 11:53 PM, Drew Hess wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm able to consistently reproduce a segfault using alist->hash-table
>> with Chicken 3.4.0 on 3 different platforms: Debian unstable x86-64, Mac
>> OS X 10.5.6 x86-64 and Mac OS 10
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 9:48 PM, Peter Bex wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just got bitten by this problem:
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/chicken-users/2008-04/msg00023.html
>
> I'm increasing and decreasing a mutex value based on how many threads
> are doing some work. When they stop working, the mutex
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 4:32 PM, Taylor Venable wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> When building Chicken 3.4.7 and higher (up to 3.5.2) on Ubuntu 8.10
> x86_64 the chicken compiler goes into an infinite recursion. CPU
> usage spikes, memory usage increases boundlessly, and no output is
> ever produced. In Chic
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 6:30 AM, Matthew Welland wrote:
> FYI: The link on the PS-tk egg wiki page seems dead. I did see some docs for
> PS-tk on sourceforge: http://sourceforge.net/projects/pstk
>
> If desired I can cut 'n paste the sourceforge doc into the wiki but no
> promises on keeping all th
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 7:37 AM, Matthew Welland wrote:
> I noticed the "tk" egg minutes after sending my previous email. The tk egg
> seems to have nice documentation and it works on my Nokia n800. However the
> PS-tk egg does not:
>
> snip
> Nokia-N800-50-2:~# csi
>
> CHIC
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 7:10 AM, Eduardo Cavazos wrote:
>
> Here's how I'm defining 'XSetErrorHandler' on the Chicken side:
>
> (define XSetErrorHandler
> (foreign-safe-lambda c-pointer XSetErrorHandler
>(function int (c-pointer c-pointer
>
> And finally, a test error handler:
>
> (define-
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 11:24 PM, Eduardo Cavazos wrote:
>
> In this particular case, like this:
>
>(XSetErrorHandler xerrorhandler)
If you say
(XSetErrorHandler (location xerrorhandler))
does it work, then?
>
> But ideally, the API should work such that you can do flexible stuff like:
>
>
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Taylor Venable wrote:
>
> I have no direct evidence that it was an infinite recursion. It was
> just a guess by the symptoms, but admittedly I have little knowledge
> of Chicken's internals. Sorry for the noise on that. The symptoms
> are that CPU usage increases
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 9:48 PM, Peter Bex wrote:
>
> However, it turns out that an exception thrown in a thread simply
> terminates the thread instead of unwinding the stack. The same does not
> happen in the primordial thread:
>
Ok, here is what Marc Feeley, the author of SRFI-18 has to say
abo
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 7:28 PM, Jim Ursetto wrote:
> I believe this is a bug in Chicken 4. It works in Chicken 3 with the
> syntax-case egg, and in Scheme 48. It looks like an ellipsis form
> matches after just checking the first pattern, without checking
> subsequent patterns.
>
> (define-synta
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 12:34 PM, Peter Bex wrote:
>
> Yup, thanks for asking him. It still sucks, though ;)
>
We are bound to the SRFI-18 spec, but you are free to invent your own API.
cheers,
felix
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nong
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 12:34 PM, Peter Bex wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 08, 2009 at 12:10:39AM +0100, felix winkelmann wrote:
>>
>> Ok, here is what Marc Feeley, the author of SRFI-18 has to say
>> about this:
>
>
>>
>> >Hope that clarifies things.
>>
&g
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Taylor Venable wrote:
>
> The bug becomes more and more phantasmagorical!
>
> When initially compiling chicken-boot with "make PLATFORM=linux
> DEBUGBUILD=yes bootstrap" the bug does not appear.
>
> When using -:d OR -:s500k OR -:s1m the bug does not appear.
>
> Whe
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 9:53 AM, Peter Bex wrote:
>
> This has been implemented now.
>
> For example, you can visit http://chicken.wiki.br/eggref/3/9p to view the
> Chicken 3 documentation for the 9p egg and http://chicken.wiki.br/eggref/3/9p
> to view the Chicken 4 documentation for the egg.
(Sh
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 3:06 PM, Peter Bex wrote:
>
> No problem. Can we do the same thing for the manual, soon?
> I volunteer to do that as well, but would like to know if there are
> gotchas like the Eggs Unlimited 3 page (which is currently broken, it
> links to call/cc.org instead of directly
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 10:12 PM, Alejandro Forero Cuervo
wrote:
Hi, Azul!
> I worked hard (with help from Mario and Felix) to try to make the
> Chicken Eggs repository serve as the central development location for
> most authors of Chicken extensions. Ironically, it doesn't really
> serve this
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 11:23 PM, Eduardo Cavazos
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> cons-wm is a window manager for the X Window System. Features:
>
> * Written in Scheme
> * Runs in Ypsilon, Larceny, and Chicken
> * Minimalist
> * Internals based on dwm 5.4.1
>
> cons-wm aims to be a simple window manager whic
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 8:48 PM, Eduardo Cavazos wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is there a way to define 'define-macro' in terms of the new explicit
> renaming macros of Chicken 4.0? Or is it offered somewhere and I just missed
> it?
>
> I know I know... 'define-macro' is bad. :-) But I have a bunch of code
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 12:21 PM, William Ramsay wrote:
> To whom it may concern,
>
> What happened to the xlib egg? And especially the docs that go with it?
> I'm in the middle of a huge project that uses it!!!
>
What's the problem? It seems to be there.
cheers,
felix
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 10:30 AM, Alaric Snell-Pym
wrote:
>>
>> Cool! (Unfortunately, I'm a Windows user now...)
>>
>
> I have a similar problem, involving Macs!
>
> However, when I had a NetBSD workstation, I liked the ion window
> manager - but I always wanted to do my own, that would better com
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 10:27 AM, Eduardo Cavazos
wrote:
>
> Well, I have some "portable" Scheme code; i.e. code that runs on a few
> implementations. In that code are some macros which intentionally break
> hygiene. So that rules out syntax-rules. Just about everybody supports
> define-macro so i
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Tobia Conforto
wrote:
> I wrote:
>>
>> (import-for-syntax matchable)
>>
>> (define-syntax define-macro
>> (lambda (m . _)
>> `(define-syntax ,(caadr m)
>> (lambda (e . _)
>> (match e
>> (,(cadr m) ,@(cddr m)))
>
> Eduardo, does this
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 7:25 PM, Taylor Venable wrote:
>
> Well I was able to trigger a hang in my build with the debugging
> symbols by setting the nursery stack size to 10k. Debug log from GDB
> is attached. The three entries here were taken from allowing the
> program to run for varying perio
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Tobia Conforto
wrote:
> felix winkelmann wrote:
>>
>> Sorry, but this does not work. An identifier introduced by a previous
>> (hygienic) macro expansion will not be correctly expanded.
>
> Does this mean that you can't mix define-
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Taylor Venable wrote:
>
> Usually when it hangs, I end up sending it ^C when it's inside mark().
> So if I step out to C_reclaim() I can step through from line 2802 (or
> sometimes 2805; in runtime.c) to line 3016. This I do in GDB using
> the "next" command. Whe
Hi!
I think you're right: these are two cases: the 10k stack is already too small
on a 64-bit machine and will continuously GC. The other case is the one
we're looking for. It may be that the irregex integration has a bug.
Could you try to build chicken 4? (possibly twice, building the compiler
Hi!
I just removed the use of "soname" from the build in trunk. It broke
explicit dynamic loading of core libraries. I just mention this in case
you have installed chicken 4 in the same prefix as a still used
chicken 3, because installing chicken 4 will now overwrite the
old libraries.
cheers,
f
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 9:27 PM, Ivan Raikov wrote:
>
> Hi Felix,
>
> This means that we cannot have a Debian package for Chicken 4,
> because Debian insists on having a soname version, so that it can do
> things like installing libchicken 3 and 4 alongside each other. How
> does soname break ex
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 10:16 AM, Tobia Conforto
wrote:
>
> A developer who wants to build against chicken 3 or 4 will install the right
> -dev package, which forces removal of the other versions. But this is a
> developer-only process and a developer is supposed to either be working with
> versi
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 6:55 PM, Taylor Venable wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 10:38:30AM +0100, felix winkelmann wrote:
>> Could you try to build chicken 4? (possibly twice, building the compiler
>> with the compiler built from the bootstrap tarball - so that you are really
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 6:20 PM, Taylor Venable wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 08:48:50AM +0900, Ivan Raikov wrote:
>> I doubt this is the case, since the regex unit is almost identical
>> between Chicken 3 and Chicken 4. Taylor, can you compile Chicken with
>> the attached regex.scm and see i
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 7:46 AM, Kon Lovett wrote:
>
> The chicken compiler uses Unit files.
>
Yes, exactly.
>>
>> I'm also puzzled as to how this can be behaving differently
>> between Chicken 3 and 4 when the irregex.scm file is
>> identical.
>
It might be some glue code in regex.scm. It migh
Hi!
Alex reported that architecture-specific compiler options don't seem
to be passed
by csc on Mac OS X. I massages Makefile.macosx a bit, but can not test it
right now (and could only try the default ppc build, anyway). So if a Mac OS
user would try it out, I'd appreciate it (the order in which
Hi!
The current release candidate can be found at:
http://www.call-with-current-continuation.org/chicken-4.0.0.tar.gz
I tested it on several systems (mingw(+msys), linux), but would
appreciate if others could give it a try. Note that some minor
recent trunk changes didn't make it, due to unclea
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 9:08 PM, Aleksej Saushev wrote:
>
> Error: (import) during expansion of (import ...) - cannot import from
> undefined module: scheme
>
Is the build installed in /usr/pkg/lib, or is this before the install?
cheers,
felix
___
2009/3/25 Ivan Shcheklein :
> Hi Felix,
>
> MSVC+Cygwin's tools. Build failed since both chichen-defaults and
> chicken-config contain something like this:
I don't understand: MSVC + cygwin?
cheers,
felix
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 10:11 PM, Elf wrote:
>
> no. what happened is that the quoting rules are screwed up. i forgot to
> backport the makefile from 3. ill do it in a few.
>
Please don't touch it, unless we have figured out what exactly goes
wrong.
cheers,
felix
__
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 4:24 AM, Taylor Venable wrote:
>
> I get the following when running "make fullcheck" --
>
scripts/makedist.scm is not in the tarball. I should add it...
Thanks.
cheers,
felix
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nong
2009/3/26 Peter Bex :
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 10:19:08AM +0100, felix winkelmann wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 9:08 PM, Aleksej Saushev wrote:
>> >
>> > Error: (import) during expansion of (import ...) - cannot import from
>> > undefined module: scheme
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 1:59 PM, Leonardo Valeri Manera
wrote:
>
> You learn something every day I guess, I never suspected MSYS-make
> would break when used outside of MSYS, though considering the PATH
> mangling MSYS does its not surprising at all.
MSYS does many evil things. MSYS make also sea
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 3:09 PM, John Cowan wrote:
> felix winkelmann scripsit:
>
>> - mingw-msys: you have mingw + msys
>> - mingw: you *DON'T* have msys, just cmd.exe and bare bones mingw
>
> I have never understood why we have both these builds, when it seems th
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 8:11 AM, underspecified
wrote:
>
> I noticed that the Chicken packages in Ubuntu are horribly out of date,
> so I have built the Chicken 3.4 debs hosted on chicken.wiki.br and am
> hosting them on my repository Ubuntu-NLP
> [http://cl.naist.jp/~eric-n/ubuntu-nlp/].
Thanks,
2009/3/27 Leonardo Valeri Manera :
> Ok, admittedly its been ages since I've used MSVC on the commandline, but:
>
> make PLATFORM=msvc PREFIX= ===>
>
> (eventually)
>
> link -nologo -dll -implib:libchicken.lib \
> -out:libchicken.dll library.obj eval.obj data-structures.obj
> ports.obj fil
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 9:25 PM, Shawn Rutledge
wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 2:02 AM, Jim Ursetto wrote:
>> chicken-setup doesn't exist in Chicken 4 (it's called chicken-install
>> now), and tinyclos isn't packaged for Chicken 4 anyway.
>
> Oh that would be why then. What's it going to take
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Leonardo Valeri Manera
wrote:
> I'm aware of that. The rest of the calls to the compiler are properly
> calling cl.
>
> Also, the MSVC makefile uses cat while the mingw and msys ones dont ...
>
Yes, it also uses touch(1) somewhere. I'm going to test and fix the
m
Hello!
I wanted to thank everybody who helped in testing this release.
It is always amazing and rewarding to get so much feedback and
support.
cheers,
felix
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/list
901 - 1000 of 2440 matches
Mail list logo
