Andrew,
Thanks for the question regarding string and binary forms of AD attributes.
We will review your question and let you know as soon as our investigation
completes.
Thanks
--
Hongwei Sun - Support Escalation Engineer
DSC
element?
No other protocols , IP only.
Thanks
--
Hongwei Sun - Support Escalation Engineer
DSC Protocol Team, Microsoft
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel: 469-7757027 x 57027
, June 26, 2008 5:21 PM
To: Hongwei Sun
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Specific sockaddr layout in MS-ADTS 7.3.1.7
On Thu, 2008-06-26 at 14:03 -0700, Hongwei Sun wrote:
Hi, Andrew,
Thanks for your question regarding NETLOGON_NT_VERSION_5EX_WITH_IP
flag.
In terms
into the future release of [MS-SMB2]
and [MS-FSCC]. The update of the documents are still in progress.
Please let us know if this provides all the information you need or you need
further clarification in the documents.
Thanks
--
Hongwei
efforts to help us improve protocol documentation.
Thanks
--
Hongwei Sun - Support Escalation Engineer
DSC Protocol Team, Microsoft
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel: 469-7757027 x 57027
with specific GSSAPI calls?
I hope that with the information we can have a resolution soon. Thanks for
your patience.
Thanks
--
Hongwei Sun - Support Escalation Engineer
DSC Protocol Team, Microsoft
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel: 469
only when you use AES keys
Thanks
--
Hongwei Sun - Support Escalation Engineer
DSC Protocol Team, Microsoft
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel: 469-7757027 x 57027
---
-Original Message
Andrew,
I will be working on this request. I will let you know once I complete my
investigation.
Thanks
--
Hongwei Sun - Support Escalation Engineer
DSC Protocol Team, Microsoft
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel: 469-7757027 x 57027
the correct section of the
code and create a testing environment that will be more helpful for finding the
problem.
Thanks!
Hongwei
-Original Message-
From: Stefan (metze) Metzmacher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2008 10:36 AM
To: Hongwei Sun
Cc: Andrew Bartlett
--
Hongwei Sun - Support Escalation Engineer
DSC Protocol Team, Microsoft
[EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel: 469-7757027 x 57027
---
-Original Message
them for
your review once they are ready.
Thanks !
Hongwei
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Bartlett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 8:17 PM
To: Hongwei Sun
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Stefan (metze) Metzmacher
Subject: Re: [Pfif] [cifs-protocol
Andrew,
I will be working on this request and I'll let you know when I have the
information for you. Thanks !
Hongwei
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andrew Bartlett
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2008 8:31 PM
To: Interoperability
.
We appreciate your help to improve the protocol documents.
Thanks
--
Hongwei Sun - Sr. Support Escalation Engineer
DSC Protocol Team, Microsoft
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel: 469-7757027 x 57027
Windows servers and clients.
Thanks
--
Hongwei Sun - Sr. Support Escalation Engineer
DSC Protocol Team, Microsoft
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel: 469-7757027 x 57027
---
-Original Message
for any message type other than 0x03, it would be
really helpful.
Thanks
--
Hongwei Sun - Sr. Support Escalation Engineer
DSC Protocol Team, Microsoft
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel: 469-7757027 x 57027
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Bartlett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, September 07, 2008 7:07 PM
To: Hongwei Sun
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Other types of Kerberos messages on SamLogon Generic
On Sun, 2008-09-07 at 17:01 -0700, Hongwei Sun wrote
as its DNS server.
Thanks !
Hongwei
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Bartlett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 8:37 PM
To: Hongwei Sun
Cc: Stefan (metze) Metzmacher; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Pfif] Other types of Kerberos messages
to reproduce the problem , as Richard indicated
in his mail below.
Thanks
--
Hongwei Sun - Sr. Support Escalation Engineer
DSC Protocol Team, Microsoft
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel: 469-7757027 x 57027
of the remote realm
Please let us know if you need further clarification on this subject.
Thanks
--
Hongwei Sun - Sr. Support Escalation Engineer
DSC Protocol Team, Microsoft
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel: 469-7757027 x 57027
To: Hongwei Sun
Cc: Andrew Bartlett; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [cifs-protocol] Session keys are not always 16 bytes long
Hongwei Sun schrieb:
Metze/Andrew,
The subkey in the EncAPRepPart of the AP-REP should be used as the session
key when the mutual authentication is enabled
the calls in your test.
We also found that the other tests(wrong length, corrupted data, bad
signature etc) performed by Smbtorture failed as expected.
Please let us know if what we found is correct.
Thanks
--
Hongwei Sun - Sr
-Original Message-
From: Stefan (metze) Metzmacher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 10:57 AM
To: Hongwei Sun
Cc: Andrew Bartlett; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [cifs-protocol] Session keys are not always 16 bytes long
Hongwei Sun schrieb:
Metze
--
Hongwei Sun - Sr. Support Escalation Engineer
DSC Protocol Team, Microsoft
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel: 469-7757027 x 57027
---
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED
?
Thanks
--
Hongwei Sun - Sr. Support Escalation Engineer
DSC Protocol Team, Microsoft
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel: 469-7757027 x 57027
---
-Original Message-
From: Andrew
.
Thanks
--
Hongwei Sun - Sr. Support Escalation Engineer
DSC Protocol Team, Microsoft
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel: 469-7757027 x 57027
---
-Original Message-
From: Andrew
: Sunday, November 30, 2008 8:53 PM
To: Hongwei Sun
Cc: Stefan (metze) Metzmacher
Subject: RE: [cifs-protocol] Session keys are not always 16 bytes long
On Tue, 2008-11-25 at 15:52 -0800, Hongwei Sun wrote:
Andrew,
As per our discussion during conference call, I would like to run testing
questions. We really appreciate
your suggestion.
Thanks!
Hongwei
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Bartlett [mailto:abart...@samba.org]
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2009 3:45 PM
To: Hongwei Sun
Cc: Stefan (metze) Metzmacher; cifs-proto...@samba.org; p...@tridgell.net
Subject: RE
Zachary,
Thanks for your question. We will start working on it and let you know as
soon as our investigation is complete.
Thanks!
Hongwei Sun - Sr. Support Escalation Engineer
DSC Protocol Team, Microsoft
hongw
it is available. Please let us
know if you have any more questions.
Thanks!
Hongwei Sun - Sr. Support Escalation Engineer
DSC Protocol Team, Microsoft
hongw...@microsoft.com
Tel: 469-7757027 x 57027
.
Hongwei Sun - Sr. Support Escalation Engineer
DSC Protocol Team, Microsoft
hongw...@microsoft.com
Tel: 469-7757027 x 57027
-
-Original Message-
From: Steve French [mailto:smfre...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 01
]
Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 1:34 AM
To: Hongwei Sun
Cc: tri...@samba.org; p...@tridgell.net; cifs-proto...@samba.org
Subject: Re: [cifs-protocol] RE: CAR - problem with MS-ADTS docs on
possibleInferiors
On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 16:03 -0700, Hongwei Sun wrote:
Tridge,
Thanks for pointing
Tridge,
Thanks for your request. We will work on it and let you know as soon as we
complete the investigation.
Thanks!
Hongwei Sun - Sr. Support Escalation Engineer
DSC Protocol Team, Microsoft
hongw...@microsoft.com
Andrew,
Thanks for the information. It fixed the problem. Now I don't receive any
error other than the expected ones.
Hongwei
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Bartlett [mailto:abart...@samba.org]
Sent: Monday, August 03, 2009 2:39 AM
To: Hongwei Sun
Cc: Nick Meier; Sebastian
+informatique.sa...@matws.net]
Sent: Saturday, August 01, 2009 4:40 AM
To: Hongwei Sun
Cc: Andrew Bartlett; Nick Meier; p...@tridgell.net; cifs-proto...@samba.org;
Sebastian Canevari; Interoperability Documentation Help
Subject: Re: [cifs-protocol] Clarify reserved bytes that are in fact used
Hi, Jeremy,
Thanks for the information! I will start working on this. I will let you
know if I have any question.
Hongwei
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Allison [mailto:j...@samba.org]
Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 4:47 PM
To: Interoperability Documentation Help
Cc:
Andrew,
Richard has left our team and I have taken the ownership of this request. In
the last a few weeks, We have been actively working on updating documentation
for this broad issue to improve our documentation. We will finish the update
soon. I will let you know as soon as the detail
Jeremy,
Just a quick update. I have duplicated the exactly same behavior as you
reported, which makes live debugging possible. We are actively working on it.
I will keep you posted.
Thanks!
---
Hongwei Sun - Sr. Support
have any information or requests, please let us
know. We will also let you know as soon as we get the root cause on the issue.
Thanks!
Hongwei
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Allison [mailto:j...@samba.org]
Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 11:28 PM
To: Hongwei Sun
Cc: Jeremy Allison; p
Metze,
Thanks for your question. I will be working on this request. I will let
you know as soon as I complete the investigation.
Thanks!
Hongwei Sun - Sr. Support Escalation Engineer
DSC Protocol Team, Microsoft
hongw
!
Hongwei Sun - Sr. Support Escalation Engineer
DSC Protocol Team, Microsoft
hongw...@microsoft.commailto:hongw...@microsoft.com
Tel: 469-7757027 x 57027
-
-Original Message-
From: Stefan (metze) Metzmacher
Andrew,
I just want to make sure that you have received all the information for this
request. As Bill already indicated, how the OS version specified in
NETLOGON_WORKSTATION_INFO is translated into the operatingSystemVersion
attribute is documented in 2.2.1.3.16 of MS-NRPC
.
We will update the document with the correct references to the related
statements in the MS-NRPC document.
Thanks!
Hongwei
-Original Message-
From: Stefan (metze) Metzmacher [mailto:me...@samba.org]
Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 12:15 AM
To: Hongwei Sun
Cc: p...@tridgell.net
!
Hongwei Sun - Sr. Support Escalation Engineer
DSC Protocol Team, Microsoft
hongw...@microsoft.com
Tel: 469-7757027 x 57027
-
-Original Message-
From: cifs-protocol-boun...@cifs.org [mailto:cifs
E1 41 62 09 B2 3E 57 51
Thanks!
Hongwei
-Original Message-
From: Stefan (metze) Metzmacher [mailto:me...@samba.org]
Sent: Monday, September 14, 2009 7:31 PM
To: Hongwei Sun
Cc: p...@tridgell.net; cifs-proto...@samba.org; Nick Meier
Subject: Re: [Pfif] MS-NRPC: AES Schannel
.
Thanks!
Hongwei
-Original Message-
From: Stefan (metze) Metzmacher [mailto:me...@samba.org]
Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 11:17 AM
To: Hongwei Sun; p...@tridgell.net; cifs-proto...@samba.org; Nick Meier;
Guenther Deschner
Subject: Re: [Pfif] MS-NRPC: AES Schannel problems
Hi Hongwei
: Thursday, September 17, 2009 11:17 AM
To: Hongwei Sun; p...@tridgell.net; cifs-proto...@samba.org; Nick Meier;
Guenther Deschner
Subject: Re: [Pfif] MS-NRPC: AES Schannel problems
Hi Hongwei,
Nick just told me that Windows seems to have a bug there and I tried to
reproduce this bug in our code
Tridge,
Thanks for your question. I will take the ownership of this request and I
will let you know once I complete the investigation.
Thanks!
Hongwei Sun - Sr. Support Escalation Engineer
DSC Protocol Team, Microsoft
To: Hongwei Sun
Cc: p...@tridgell.net; cifs-proto...@samba.org
Subject: Re: Group Policy questions
Hello Hongwei,Matthieu,
Thank you for the answers. I have a few more questions:
After testing, I think that I have some information to help you resolve
all the problems.
Problem #1
-
From: Hongwei Sun
Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 4:46 PM
To: tri...@samba.org; Interoperability Documentation Help
Cc: cifs-proto...@samba.org; p...@tridgell.net; me...@samba.org
Subject: RE: repsFromTo blob format (WSPP CAR)
Tridge,
We finished the investigation regarding the different
will change when any new content is added to MS-DRSR and MS-DRDM in the
future. Section titles would probably work much better than section numbers.
If you have any more questions regarding this issue, please let us know.
Thanks!
Hongwei
-Original Message-
From: Hongwei Sun
Sent
in the future
release on MSDN.
Thanks!
Hongwei
-Original Message-
From: Kamen Mazdrashki [mailto:kamen.mazdras...@postpath.com]
Sent: Friday, October 23, 2009 3:51 AM
To: Hongwei Sun; tri...@samba.org
Cc: p...@tridgell.net; cifs-proto...@samba.org
Subject: RE: [cifs-protocol] DRS option
Message-
From: tri...@samba.org [mailto:tri...@samba.org]
Sent: Friday, October 23, 2009 2:05 AM
To: Hongwei Sun
Cc: cifs-proto...@samba.org; p...@tridgell.net
Subject: RE: DRS option bits
Hi Hongwei,
PE (DRS_PREEMPTED): Replication attempt is preempted by a higher
priority
know if it resolved your issue.
Thanks!
Hongwei
-Original Message-
From: Hongwei Sun
Sent: Monday, October 26, 2009 6:14 PM
To: Matthieu Patou; cifs-protocol@cifs.org; p...@tridgell.net
Subject: RE: [cifs-protocol] Group Policy questions
Matthieu,
Matthieu,
The attached GPMC log
[mailto:tri...@samba.org]
Sent: Monday, November 09, 2009 6:58 PM
To: Hongwei Sun
Cc: cifs-proto...@samba.org; h...@highlandsun.com
Subject: RE: limits on rDN size in AD ?
Hi Hongwei,
We're back to the old question of rDN size limits again!
I just got a DRS replication reply from w2k8-r2 with a CN
Steven,
I am now working on this issue. I am wondering what program you ran to
create the network trace attached in your e-mail. Is it Samba smbtorture ?
If we can duplicate the behavior, it may be easier for us to debug it.
Thanks!
Hongwei
From: Steven Danneman
, you can easily explain what shows in your network
trace.We will add the logic to the SMB protocol document. Please let us
know if you have further questions regarding this behavior.
Thanks!
Hongwei Sun - Sr. Support
07, 2009 9:03 PM
To: Hongwei Sun; cifs-proto...@samba.org; p...@tridgell.net
Subject: RE: SMBv1 LockAndX return status on lock conflict
Hey Hongwei,
That's very interesting and indeed explains the behavior I've seen.
I can understand the motivation for delaying a small timeout for locks
Andrew,
I have been actively working with the product team on your request. This
one requires more effort than schema and display specifiers. Considering the
holiday schedule of the product team and support team, including myself, the
progresses will be delayed. I will be on vacation
documenting the
logic for ACE OI and CI flags.
Thanks!
Hongwei
-Original Message-
From: Matthieu Patou [mailto:mat+informatique.sa...@matws.net]
Sent: Friday, December 18, 2009 4:01 PM
To: Sebastian Canevari
Cc: Hongwei Sun; Interoperability Documentation Help; cifs-proto...@samba.org
Andrew,
Most of the issues mentioned in your mail have been fixed in the latest
released MS-ADSC or MS-ADA3. The following is a summary.
1. cn: Computer - Schema pulled from Windows 2008R2 shows two additional
attributes for systemMayContain msTSSecondaryDesktopBL, msTSPrimaryDesktopBL.
Hello Matthieu,
Thanks for your question. We will investigate it and let you know if we need
any additional clarification.
Best Regards,
Hongwei Sun
Email: hongw...@microsoft.com
Phone: +1 (469) 7757027
Time zone: (UTC-06:00) Central Time (US and Canada)
-Original Message-
From
Tridge Andrew,
I am owning this request now. I will investigate it and let you know. Bt
the way, I already responded to the initial questions from Andrew in a separate
mail.
Thanks!
Hongwei
-Original Message-
From: cifs-protocol-boun...@cifs.org
schemaFlagsEx: FLAG_ATTR_IS_CRITICAL
Thanks!
Hongwei
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Bartlett [mailto:abart...@samba.org]
Sent: Monday, January 11, 2010 2:42 PM
To: Hongwei Sun
Cc: p...@tridgell.net; cifs-proto...@samba.org; Andrew Tridgell
Subject: RE: [cifs-protocol] FW: FW: Inconsistencies
...@samba.org [mailto:tri...@samba.org]
Sent: Monday, January 11, 2010 3:13 PM
To: Hongwei Sun
Cc: Andrew Bartlett; cifs-proto...@samba.org
Subject: RE: [cifs-protocol] FW: FW: Inconsistencies in ad-schema docs and text
files SRX090109601490
Hi Hongwei,
For adminDescription and adminDisplayName
Matthieu,
This process is described in one of the open protocol document ([MS-BKRP]:
BackupKey Remote Protocol Specification
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc224123(PROT.13).aspx ).
The following KB article might be useful for understanding DPAPI too
Hi, Tridge,
Thanks for your question. One of our team member will work on your
request and get back to you when the investigation is done.
Thanks!
Hongwei
Hongwei Sun - Sr. Support Escalation Engineer
DSC Protocol
.
Hongwei
-Original Message-
From: tri...@samba.org [mailto:tri...@samba.org]
Sent: Friday, January 15, 2010 8:55 PM
To: Hongwei Sun
Cc: Andrew Bartlett; erick.nogueira.nascime...@gmail.com;
cifs-proto...@samba.org
Subject: repadmin.exe crashing - TTT trace
Hi Hongwei,
Erick Nogueira has
Tridge,
How did you generate the UserParameters you mentioned in the e-mail ? I got
a little bit different result. The steps I used are
(1) Open Avtive Directory Users and Computers - User - select a user
such as Administrator
(2) In Properties windows , select Sessions tab and then
Andrew,
We finished the investigation on your request. We will update the MS-ADTS
as follows.
Section 3.1.1.2.2.2 LDAP Representations
Changed footnote on attributes of String(OID) to:
††† Values of attributes of syntax String(OID) are accepted in either
the numericoid (numeric
Tridge,
Could you please take a look at my question below so I can proceed with this
request ? If you are busy, we can always come back to visit it whenever it
is good time for you.
Thanks !
Hongwei
-Original Message-
From: Hongwei Sun
Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2010 9:31 PM
Andrew,
I just want to check with you to see if you have any questions regarding the
request and our response below. If not, I will resolve this case for now.
Thanks!
Hongwei
-Original Message-
From: Hongwei Sun
Sent: Monday, January 18, 2010 6:27 PM
To: 'Andrew Bartlett'
Cc: p
Message-
From: Andrew Bartlett [mailto:abart...@samba.org]
Sent: Friday, February 12, 2010 5:58 PM
To: Hongwei Sun
Cc: tri...@samba.org; CIFS Protocol
Subject: RE: [cifs-protocol] FW: FW: Inconsistencies in ad-schema docs and text
files SRX090109601490
On Fri, 2010-02-12 at 22:55 +, Hongwei Sun
From: Matthieu Patou [mailto:mat+informatique.sa...@matws.net]
Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2009 3:56 PM
To: Hongwei Sun
Cc: Sebastian Canevari; cifs-proto...@samba.org; p...@tridgell.net
Subject: Re: FW: [cifs-protocol] Group Policy questions
On 23/12/2009 00:47, Hongwei Sun wrote
: Hongwei Sun
Sent: Friday, February 26, 2010 6:34 PM
To: 'Matthieu Patou'
Cc: Sebastian Canevari; p...@tridgell.net; cifs-proto...@samba.org; MSSolve
Case Email
Subject: RE: [REG:110020183056252] - Inconsistencies in ACLs
Matthieu,
Ok from the reading of the DS flags it's not obvious that all
Matthieu,
I just want to check with you to see if you have any further questions on
this issue. If not , I will consider this case closed. Again, if you have
related questions in the future, we can always revisit this case.
Thanks!
Hongwei
-Original Message-
From: Hongwei Sun
Andreas,
Thanks for your question. One of our team member will work on your question
and let you know when the investigation is done.
Thanks!
Hongwei Sun - Sr. Support Escalation Engineer
DSC Protocol Team, Microsoft
Tridge,
I just want to check with you to see if you have any question regarding the
newly added documentation for this attribute. If not, I will close this CAR.
Thanks!
Hongwei
-Original Message-
From: Hongwei Sun
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 2:49 PM
To: 'tri...@samba.org'
Cc
Nadya,
Active Directory is supposed to apply the requirements to any security
descriptors maintained by a DC, as described in section 7.1.3. ACE ordering is
one of the requirement. If forest functional level is DS_BEHAVIOR_WIN2003 and
fDontStandardizeSDs is false, the ACEs in the ACLs
-Original Message-
From: Nadezhda Ivanova [mailto:nadezhda.ivan...@postpath.com]
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 2:30 AM
To: Hongwei Sun
Cc: MSSolve Case Email; cifs-proto...@samba.org
Subject: Re: [REG:110041557300829] RE: [cifs-protocol] Questions regarding
7.1.3.1 ACE Ordering Rules
Hi
Kamen,
For your question regarding the algorithm used in UpdateObject() , as
documented in 4.1.10.6.9 of MS-DRSR, I think that the RemoveObj() was
performed after PerformModifyOperation just to ensure the attributes on the
deleted object conform to the invariants of a tombstone or
...@cynapses.org]
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2010 9:45 AM
To: Hongwei Sun
Cc: p...@tridgell.net; cifs-proto...@samba.org; MSSolve Case Email
Subject: Re: [REG:110052070326491] [cifs-protocol] MS_RRP: Question on Symbolic
Links
On Monday 24 May 2010 23:58:34 Hongwei Sun wrote:
Andreas,
When you open
: Friday, May 14, 2010 6:12 PM
To: Hongwei Sun
Cc: tri...@samba.org; p...@tridgell.net; cifs-proto...@samba.org; MSSolve Case
Email; Michael Ströder
Subject: Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:110011477385004] RE: userParameters attribute
On Tue, 2010-04-13 at 18:18 +, Hongwei Sun wrote:
Tridge,
I just
To: Hongwei Sun; Andreas Schneider
Cc: p...@tridgell.net; cifs-proto...@samba.org; MSSolve Case Email
Subject: Re: [Pfif] [REG:110052070326491] [cifs-protocol] MS_RRP: Question on
Symbolic Links
Hi Hongwei,
Andreas Schneider wrote:
On Monday 24 May 2010 23:58:34 Hongwei Sun wrote:
Andreas
Message-
From: Andrew Bartlett [mailto:abart...@samba.org]
Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2010 6:19 PM
To: Hongwei Sun
Cc: tri...@samba.org; p...@tridgell.net; cifs-proto...@samba.org; MSSolve Case
Email; Michael Ströder
Subject: RE: [cifs-protocol] [REG:110011477385004] RE: userParameters attribute
[mailto:ob...@samba.org]
Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2010 4:17 AM
To: Hongwei Sun
Cc: Michael Adam; Andreas Schneider; p...@tridgell.net;
cifs-proto...@samba.org; MSSolve Case Email
Subject: Re: [Pfif] [REG:110052070326491] [cifs-protocol] MS_RRP: Question on
Symbolic Links
Hi Hongwei,
Hongwei Sun wrote
Hi, Matthieu,
We have completed the investigation for your questions below.
* in which order the domain should be returned ? if any (ie. first
lower domain like samba.corp then au.samba.corp then brisbane.au.samba.corp)
ANS: The domain referral must include names for the local domain and
Proposed Request:
Matthieu,
I am working on the following issue you reported.
110080418016869
[MS-BKRP] 3.1.4.1.3 -- version field and a GUID field no documented
Also I've got questions of what is explained in the document.
First in paragraph 3.1.4.1.3, it
--- Fixed the minimal editor mistake.
Matthieu,
I am working on the following issue you reported.
110080418016869
[MS-BKRP] 3.1.4.1.3 -- version field and a GUID field no documented
Also I've got questions of what is explained in the document.
First in
Andrew,
Since Bill is out of office, I have taken over the ownership of this case.
I have been actively working on this case. I will update you as soon as I
have any new status.
Thanks for your patience.
Hongwei
-Original Message-
From: cifs-protocol-boun...@cifs.org
...@samba.org]
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2010 7:30 PM
To: Hongwei Sun
Cc: Andrew Bartlett; cifs-proto...@samba.org; MSSolve Case Email
Subject: [REG:110081752971983] RE: How to RODCs get their membership of the
ENTERPRISE_RODCs group
Hi Hongwei,
You mentioned that all the documentation talks
with that too.
Thanks!
Hongwei
-Original Message-
From: Hongwei Sun
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2010 6:37 PM
To: 'tri...@samba.org'
Cc: Andrew Bartlett; cifs-proto...@samba.org; MSSolve Case Email
Subject: RE: [REG:110081752971983] RE: How to RODCs get their membership
documents.
Thanks!
Hongwei
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Bartlett [mailto:abart...@samba.org]
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 3:51 PM
To: Hongwei Sun
Cc: tri...@samba.org; cifs-proto...@samba.org; MSSolve Case Email
Subject: RE: [REG:110081752971983] RE: How to RODCs get
Matthias,
Thanks for raising this issue with us. First, We will add the missing
definitions for UF_PARTIAL_SECRETS_ACCOUNT (0x400) to 2.2.1.13 MS-SAMR,
USER_PARTIAL_SECRETS_ACCOUNT (0x0010) to 2.2.1.12 MS-SAMR and
DOMAIN_GROUP_RID_READONLY_DCS(0x0209) to 2.2.1.14 MS-SAMR. In
...@samba.org; Interoperability Documentation Help; Darryl Welch;
Hongwei Sun
Subject: Re: backup protocol
Hi Sebastian,
I made more investigation this night and after realizing that the guid of the
certificate was stored in reverse order in different fields like serialNumber
field
Help; Darryl Welch;
Hongwei Sun
Subject: Re: backup protocol
Hi Sebastian,
I made more investigation this night and after realizing that the guid of the
certificate was stored in reverse order in different fields like serialNumber
field in the certificate I tried to give a try and reverse
up with a document update request. Hopefully this should not
affect interoperability.
Thanks!
Hongwei
-Original Message-
From: Matthieu Patou [mailto:m...@samba.org]
Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 9:46 PM
To: Hongwei Sun
Cc: Sebastian Canevari; cifs-proto...@samba.org
of office or so.
As of this issue, could you give a little more description about the
blackbox test which reproduces the behavior ?
Thanks!
Hongwei
-Original Message-
From: Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer [mailto:m...@samba.org]
Sent: Monday, October 11, 2010 11:29 AM
To: Hongwei Sun
Andrew,
One of our team member will work on this case and let you know when the
investigation is done.
Thanks!
Hongwei
-Original Message-
From: cifs-protocol-boun...@cifs.org [mailto:cifs-protocol-boun...@cifs.org] On
Behalf Of Andrew Bartlett
Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2010
Andrew,
There is only one bit defined for this value. That is bit
POLICY_KERBEROS_VALIDATE_CLIENT (0x0080). All other bits SHOULD be set to
0 and ignored upon receipt. I will file a request to add the actual hex value
to POLICY_KERBEROS_VALIDATE_CLIENT.
Thanks!
Hongwei
Andrew,
The request opened is still pending. I will follow up with the corresponding
product teams. I will keep you posted.
Thanks!
Hongwei
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Bartlett [mailto:abart...@samba.org]
Sent: Sunday, May 22, 2011 10:50 PM
To: Hongwei Sun
Cc: p
1 - 100 of 154 matches
Mail list logo
