Networkers mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Tuesday, August 28, 2007
12:02 AM:
On 8/27/07 1:33 AM, Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Networkers wrote on Monday, August 27, 2007 2:02 AM:
OK I've been looking at this all day. I got it half working.
your config looks
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 02:14:56PM -0500, Zhao, Wenmei (Sarah) wrote:
I have a MultiLinkPPP session up. Everything is working,
traffic is flowing and I am able to ping the remote side of the link,
If you have anti-spoofing filters (or uRPF) configured, this is intentional.
Reason: on a
On Tue, 2007-08-28 at 09:33 +0200, Gert Doering wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 02:14:56PM -0500, Zhao, Wenmei (Sarah) wrote:
I have a MultiLinkPPP session up. Everything is working,
traffic is flowing and I am able to ping the remote side of the link,
If you have anti-spoofing
Hi all
A recommendation on preferred method of achieving the following
scenario:
[AS Y BGP Router]---[AS Z transit router][AS Z BGP
router]
AS Y router config
Neighbor BGP-Z-loopback as Z
Neighbor BGP-Z-loopback ebgp-multihop 10
Ip route x.x.x.x.
Hi William,
you cant have a router in the middle with less routing information than the
routers at the edge because as you say it doesnt know where to send the traffic.
If you dont want/cant run BGP on the transit router then a viable alternative
would be to have the transit router have a
Hi list,
from the QA:
Q. Will the Cisco Catalyst 3750 Series Switches forward traffic at wire
rate for all frame sizes at Layer 2 and Layer 3?
A. These switches will forward traffic at wire rate for all frame sizes
on all ports, except for Cisco Catalyst 3750G-24TS, 3750G-24TS-1U,
3750G-48TS,
Stephen Wilcox wrote:
Hi William, you cant have a router in the middle with less routing
information than the routers at the edge because as you say it doesnt
know where to send the traffic.
Sure you can.
MPLS.
Or, GRE tunnels (admittedly not pretty, quite the hack job at that).
pt
Sure... hopefully this comes out on the list ok...;)
SnmpMib = arrisMtaDevProvMethodIndicator.0 gupi
SnmpMib = arrisCmDevHttpWanAccess.0 advanced
SnmpMib = arrisCmDevHttpLanAccess.0 basic
SnmpMib = arrisCmDevDhcpNoSvcImpact.0 dontSend
UpgradeServer = xx.xx.xx.122
UpgradeFileName =
Hello,
Is there any way I can keep full routing tables in my GRP-B but
only send aggregate/filters routes + default to my line cards? My
GRP-B has enough memory to handle full tables but I may run out of
memory on some GE-GBIC-B cards soon. Is there anyway to get a
static router to
I agree with Stephen that you should try to avoid this router in the middle
(KISS). But if it really has to be there, is a GRE tunnel between AS-Y and
AS-Z-BGP-Router such an obscene idea?
Vincent
you cant have a router in the middle with less routing information than
the routers at the edge
Hi Gert,
That explains. The Cisco doesn't have anti-spoofing configured,
but I think the other end does.
Thanks a lot!
Regards,
Sarah Zhao
http://www.geocities.com/redoakland/
-Original Message-
From: Gert Doering [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2007 3:33 AM
To:
Paul:
That looks all good...I would turn on the various repl commands on the eMTA
(I can send them to you, offline) and watch the action while telneted to
SSHed in.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Stewart
Sent: Tuesday, August
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 09:43:37AM +0200, olivier boulat wrote:
Hello,
I would like to have a feedback concerning this issue because I have the
same on my environment.
I have had 3 cards fail in 3 seperate 6509 chassis (WS-SUP720-3B).
we had a similar issue.
Matthew Crocker wrote on Tuesday, August 28, 2007 3:17 PM:
Hello,
Is there any way I can keep full routing tables in my GRP-B but
only send aggregate/filters routes + default to my line cards? My
GRP-B has enough memory to handle full tables but I may run out of
memory on some
Masood Ahmad Shah wrote:
Can someone describe the functions and difference between CPU SDRAM and
Packet SDRAM for platform 7500. Also the difference of SRAM and DRAM for
same platform.
The CPU SDRAM will serve to hold things such as the Linecard's running
microcode datastore and the
Hi,
Is MLPPP over ATM supported on the Cisco 6400? If so, does anyone have
a known working configuration to get this going? I'm trying to set this
up with Covad as the provider and not having much luck.
Thanks,
evt
___
cisco-nsp mailing list
On Tue, 28 Aug 2007, Eric Van Tol wrote:
Hi,
Is MLPPP over ATM supported on the Cisco 6400? If so, does anyone have
a known working configuration to get this going? I'm trying to set this
up with Covad as the provider and not having much luck.
I recently had to go through this, although
comments inline..
sukumar
On Tue, 28 Aug 2007, Phil Mayers wrote:
On Tue, 2007-08-28 at 09:33 +0200, Gert Doering wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 02:14:56PM -0500, Zhao, Wenmei (Sarah) wrote:
I have a MultiLinkPPP session up. Everything is working,
traffic is flowing and I am able to
Not sure if this was answered already.
What is the config register set to?
Can you get the output of 'show bootvar' and 'remote command switch show
bootvar'
Also, at what point is the [ctrl-break] not working? Does it not work as
you bootup (when the rommon image banner is printed)? Or does
All is possible with IPSec/GRE... after GRE tunnel is up, the issue is only
routing...
Rgds.
On 8/28/07, Gaurav Sabharwal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 08/28/2007 04:51 AM matthew zeier said the following:
I have a remote office in China that wants to split traffic such that
domestic routes
We just stuck a WIC-1DSU-T1 removed from service on a different
router into a 2801. The router says this upon bootup:
%CFG-3-CARD_NOT_SUPPORTED: Slot 3: Unrecognized cookie format for card!sslinit
fn
The version info is:
Cisco IOS Software, 2801 Software (C2801-ADVSECURITYK9-M), Version
Has anyone took a channelized DS3 circuit using a (PA-MC-T3) and place a
T1 IMA circuit for dsl aggregation on that same circuit filling up four
full T1 slots? Would this be a layer 2 local switching setup on the
pa-mc-t3 card?
Otis
___
cisco-nsp
PA-MC-T3 cards won't do IMA.
That said... Does anyone have any suggestions for scaling NxDS0 circuits
muxed to ChDS3 in a 7206 chassis beyond 12 DS3's?
Joe
On 8/28/07, OCOSA ListAcct [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone took a channelized DS3 circuit using a (PA-MC-T3) and place a
T1 IMA
Ok. I spoke with ATT earlier they said that they have other customers
taking some T1 IMAs over a channelized DS3 into the same router I was
like how they said they would have a tech contact me I was ok. I thought
maybe take the DS3 circuit into some sort of mux and split the signal
from the
If they're dropping IMA T1's to an M13 mux on each end of the ChDS3, and
going into an IMA card on the router, then that will work.
The PA-MC-T3 cards and variants can't do ATM in any flavor, though.
Joe
On 8/28/07, OCOSA ListAcct [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok. I spoke with ATT earlier they
We need to take jumbo frames from a Redback for our LNS.
How do I configure the 3560G to be a higher (1600) MTU and then pass it
down.
The link from the Redback to the 7200 is a trunk with GE on the 3560G and
100mb on the Redback.
Then there is a trunk from the 3560G to the 7200G2.
.Skeeve
I've got it all... thanx... My Cisco website foo was lacking... the flu
doesn't help!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Skeeve Stevens
Sent: Wednesday, 29 August 2007 1:40 PM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] Jumbo Frames from
I have a situation with one of our upstreams that I'm trying to fix. We
peer with Level3 (3356), specifically we peer with 19094 which is the
old Telcove (Adelphia) infrastructure that L3 bought and is slowing
migrating to 3356. I'm having trouble pushing traffic to that circuit.
The
Do you receive any MED values from your upstream providers?
Also as-prepend on the Cox circuit would do the trick as well.
Cheers
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Justin Shore
Sent: Wednesday, 29 August 2007 2:24 PM
To: 'Cisco-nsp'
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 11:24:22PM -0500, Justin Shore wrote:
a typical prefix advertised over L3 arrives at my border with 19094
3356 and other ASNs whereas Cox may still have the same number of
backend ASNs but only 22773 once it enters the Cox AS.
Does anyone have any suggestions
Is it a WIC-1DSU-T1? And you need a WIC-1DSU-T1-V2 for the 18xx/28xx/38xx
series ... if it came out of an older router this is likely the case.
On 8/28/07, Ed Ravin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We just stuck a WIC-1DSU-T1 removed from service on a different
router into a 2801. The router says
31 matches
Mail list logo
