Re: [c-nsp] network connection tool

2009-01-22 Thread Dave Kruger
also see hping: http://www.hping.org/ hth Dave Andrew Gristina wrote: netcat http://siliconrust.blogspot.com/2006/04/what-do-you-do-to-emulate-server.html Quick tutorial on how to emulate a server. I guess that is what you are asking. On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 12:46 PM, Ibrahim Abo Zaid

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco licensing

2009-01-22 Thread A . L . M . Buxey
Hi, This refers to: Replacing one release with another without upgrading the feature set. Update to fix a bug or to replace a release that is no longer supported. Updates are free of charge. So reading the above, it would appear that I can update all of my Cisco devices to whatever IOS

Re: [c-nsp] LNS for 500-1000

2009-01-22 Thread Vects
Guys, I appreciate all your posts. Thanks, Alexc. On Sun, 2009-01-18 at 17:12 +0200, Vects wrote: Hello there, I need to install small LNS for 500-1000 concurrent customers in order to implement per user rate limit/ACL assigned by radius. I'm planing to use l2tp. Please advise what minimal

[c-nsp] hssi transmit only

2009-01-22 Thread RAZAFINDRATSIFA Rivo Tahina
Hi all, I have to connect a modem and a 7200 with HSSI used for transmit only, does it need specific cabling/configuration? Kind regards. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp

Re: [c-nsp] cisco-nsp Digest, Vol 74, Issue 67

2009-01-22 Thread Tassos Chatzithomaoglou
This is not always the case (especially when both routers and switches are involved). I have seen many times this A|B|C etherchannels created without any obvious reason. And if you shut/no shut the member interfaces, the normal etherchannel is created fine. -- Tassos Engelhard Labiro wrote

Re: [c-nsp] Hardware limitations on SUP32 with LDP and full routing table

2009-01-22 Thread Marek Tyban
Hi Jose, I think that generally SUP32 isn't suitable for todays full internet routing table. It's due to the hardware limitations (as you wrote). When you have full routes on SUP32 you should see log output as below %MLSCEF-SP-4-FIB_EXCEPTION_THRESHOLD: Hardware CEF entry usage is at 95%

Re: [c-nsp] network connection tool

2009-01-22 Thread Jorge Evangelista
Hi, Not sure what you are looking for, but you could use ossec, it is a hids. http://www.ossec.net/ On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 3:51 AM, Dave Kruger dave.kru...@za.verizonbusiness.com wrote: also see hping: http://www.hping.org/ hth Dave Andrew Gristina wrote: netcat

Re: [c-nsp] Set Virtual-Template 'ip wccp x redirect in' via RADIUS attribute on LNS

2009-01-22 Thread Barry O'Donovan
Alex, all Thanks for that. Someone else suggested something similar offlist. For the record, the following worked: +---+-+---+++ | id| UserName| Attribute | op | Value

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco licensing

2009-01-22 Thread Peter Rathlev
On Wed, 2009-01-21 at 20:11 -0800, Tony wrote: This refers to: Replacing one release with another without upgrading the feature set. Update to fix a bug or to replace a release that is no longer supported. Updates are free of charge. So reading the above, it would appear that I can update

Re: [c-nsp] Hardware limitations on SUP32 with LDP and full routing table

2009-01-22 Thread Marcus.Gerdon
Hi Jose, Hi Marek, I'm facing the same symptom with loosing connectivity on a couple of machines for quite some time. With a DFZ table the TCAM's are simply overloaded. I've been able to track that down but for some weeks now Cisco can't provide any solution. The problem itself isn't that

Re: [c-nsp] hssi transmit only

2009-01-22 Thread Arie Vayner (avayner)
No. A regular cable should be fine. Arie -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of RAZAFINDRATSIFA Rivo Tahina Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 13:32 To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] hssi transmit only

Re: [c-nsp] Hardware limitations on SUP32 with LDP and full routing table

2009-01-22 Thread Rodney Dunn
I'm by no means a TCAM expert but it seems you are asking for the excpetion state when the TCAM gets full to allow the more specific in somehow so that the longest prefix is matched? These exception cases come with all kinds of problems. One customer wants it one way and the next customer wants

[c-nsp] sup720 errors - parity

2009-01-22 Thread Paul Stewart
Anyone come across these before? Someone had mentioned to me bad memory? Jan 22 12:42:46: %SYSTEM_CONTROLLER-SP-STDBY-3-ERROR: Error condition detected: TM_DATA_PARITY_ERROR Jan 22 12:42:46: %SYSTEM_CONTROLLER-SP-STDBY-3-EXCESSIVE_RESET: System Controller is getting reset so frequently Cisco

Re: [c-nsp] Hardware limitations on SUP32 with LDP and full routing table

2009-01-22 Thread Oliver Dewdney
-Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp- boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Rodney Dunn I'm by no means a TCAM expert but it seems you are asking for the excpetion state when the TCAM gets full to allow the more specific in somehow so that the

Re: [c-nsp] Hardware limitations on SUP32 with LDP and full routing table

2009-01-22 Thread Rodney Dunn
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 07:07:13PM +, Oliver Dewdney wrote: -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp- boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Rodney Dunn I'm by no means a TCAM expert but it seems you are asking for the excpetion state when

Re: [c-nsp] Hardware limitations on SUP32 with LDP and full routing table

2009-01-22 Thread Gert Doering
Hi, On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 01:43:46PM -0500, Rodney Dunn wrote: We don't do any kind of RIB compression. Now that would be a fairly nice solution :-) (But I am aware that it is a *hard* task to solve - and that Cisco is driven by short-term financial strategy) gert -- USENET is *not* the

Re: [c-nsp] sup720 errors - parity

2009-01-22 Thread Murphy, Jay, DOH
Paul, If this is related to the OIR (online insertion and removal) of the MSFC or MSFC version 2, I would tread softly wearing a static strap during the seating of these blades. This can occur when static discharge, or other anomalies, i.e., solar flare ups, cosmic radiation, totally, :-)

[c-nsp] training simulator

2009-01-22 Thread Michael Malitsky
Hello, Can anyone recommend a training simulator appropriate for someone studying for CCNA/CCNP? Sincerely, Michael Malitsky ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at

Re: [c-nsp] training simulator

2009-01-22 Thread Cord MacLeod
2 that I've found helpful: http://www.trainsignal.com/Cisco-Training-C1.aspx http://www.cbtnuggets.com/ Although nothing beats hands on experience with gear. On Jan 22, 2009, at 2:31 PM, Michael Malitsky wrote: Hello, Can anyone recommend a training simulator appropriate for someone

Re: [c-nsp] training simulator

2009-01-22 Thread chip
dynamips/dynagen http://dynagen.org/ And some of the CCNP/CCNA study guide work books. --chip On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 5:31 PM, Michael Malitsky malit...@netabn.comwrote: Hello, Can anyone recommend a training simulator appropriate for someone studying for CCNA/CCNP? Sincerely, Michael

Re: [c-nsp] Which QoS/Shaping is actually supported on ME3400?

2009-01-22 Thread Brad Henshaw
Garry wrote: I'm playing with an ME3400 in our Lab, trying to set up some QoS/Shaping stuff ... The only shaping I've been able to configure is somewhat limited, as it only allows either ~60mbit or ~111mbit ... all other commands/settings I've tried are rejected when I try to assign the

[c-nsp] MPLS Question - Applying QoS using MQC

2009-01-22 Thread Andy Saykao
Hi All, I have just have a few questions about MQC and how to use the class-map match command to match incoming traffic from MPLS VPN customers at the PE so that we can apply the correct QoS treatment. 1/ Match Sub-Interfaces ??? For example, we have some MPLS VPN customers that are

Re: [c-nsp] sup720 errors - parity

2009-01-22 Thread Matt Carter
Anyone come across these before? Someone had mentioned to me bad memory? Jan 22 12:42:46: %SYSTEM_CONTROLLER-SP-STDBY-3-ERROR: Error condition detected: TM_DATA_PARITY_ERROR Jan 22 12:42:46: %SYSTEM_CONTROLLER-SP-STDBY-3-EXCESSIVE_RESET: System Controller is getting reset so frequently

[c-nsp] Weird disk0: issues

2009-01-22 Thread Graham Wooden
Hi all, Recently I converted my 6509 Sup2¹s over to native. It¹s been running c6sup22-jk2o3sv-mz.121-27b.E4 for sometime now and now decided to take the leap to the s222 series. The SP and RP both have 256MB RAM so I figured I am somewhat ready to try it out. I went ahead and upgraded RP's

[c-nsp] BGP outbound loadsharing

2009-01-22 Thread Dracul
Hi List, Does anyone have a recommended design (configuration) for BGP to utilize/loadshare all outbound traffic? usually the behaviour i'm getting is that my BGP only utilizes one link for outbound. is OER ( Performance Routing ) recommended? regards, chris

Re: [c-nsp] Weird disk0: issues

2009-01-22 Thread Graham Wooden
Format in the SP? It's not running the CatOS (Hybrid), so I am not operating out of that space anymore - all I have is the RP to run commands like that... Am I missing something here Toby? On 1/22/09 9:33 PM, Toby Glover t...@eintellego.net wrote: I have seen this before, SP and RP use a

Re: [c-nsp] Weird disk0: issues

2009-01-22 Thread Toby Glover
I have seen this before, SP and RP use a different formatting If you format the flash in SP it will be able to read it. #format disk0: -- Toby Glover, RD Network Engineer eintellego Pty Ltd - The Networking Specialists t...@eintellego.net / www.eintellego.net Phone: 1300 753 383, Fax: (+612)

Re: [c-nsp] training simulator

2009-01-22 Thread Dale Shaw
Hi, On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 5:31 PM, Michael Malitsky malit...@netabn.comwrote: Can anyone recommend a training simulator appropriate for someone studying for CCNA/CCNP? On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 9:44 AM, chip chip.g...@gmail.com wrote: dynamips/dynagen http://dynagen.org/ Agreed. While

Re: [c-nsp] training simulator

2009-01-22 Thread Tony
--- On Fri, 23/1/09, Dale Shaw dale.shaw+cisco-...@gmail.com wrote: From: Dale Shaw dale.shaw+cisco-...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [c-nsp] training simulator To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Date: Friday, 23 January, 2009, 3:28 PM Hi, On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 5:31 PM, Michael Malitsky