Re: [c-nsp] VLAN-based EoMPLS

What version were you using if you don't mind to share? It's important to me as I'm just now working on a new MPLS setup with one of the latest 12.2 SE versions! -Original Message- From: Manaf Al Oqlah [mailto:man...@hotmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2010 4:55 PM To: Ziv Leyes;

Re: [c-nsp] VLAN-based EoMPLS

it was a bug!!! I downgraded the ios to 12.2(44)SE6 and everything is working fine now!! -- From: Ziv Leyes z...@gilat.net Sent: Monday, November 01, 2010 11:32 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] VLAN-based EoMPLS I'm answering

[c-nsp] Looking for some rare parts for spares.

Hi, I am looking for some rare parts for spares, Cisco has very poor availability for these items and I haven't even had luck finding any on eBay or gray market either. 12810-CSC 12810-SFC Anyone have any clue where I can get some of these? thanks, -Drew

Re: [c-nsp] VLAN-based EoMPLS

basically it was 12.2(44)SE then I installed 12.2(55)SE but I also faced the same issue. eventually, I returned to 12.2(44)SE6 -- From: Ziv Leyes z...@gilat.net Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 11:51 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re:

[c-nsp] 1841 DHCP CONFIGURATION and NAT NOT WORKING

Hi, I have done dhcp and nat before, But it does not work on an 1841. What have I missed out. The lease is given but the NAT does not work. I do not see the dhcp ip on arp. but see it on the lease pool- Please help ip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.1.254 ! ip dhcp pool grm network

Re: [c-nsp] 1841 DHCP CONFIGURATION and NAT NOT WORKING

No worries Seen my error after writing ip address 192.168.1.254 255.255.255.252 Thanks On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Rocker Feller rocker.rockerfel...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I have done dhcp and nat before, But it does not work on an 1841. What have I missed out. The lease is given

Re: [c-nsp] 1841 DHCP CONFIGURATION and NAT NOT WORKING

On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 05:04:22PM +0300, Rocker Feller wrote: -snip- interface FastEthernet0/1 description Link to LAN ip address 192.168.1.254 255.255.255.252 ip nat inside ip virtual-reassembly duplex auto speed auto Got an equivalent ip nat outside on Fa0/0?

Re: [c-nsp] 1841 DHCP CONFIGURATION and NAT NOT WORKING

I don´t see your nat ¨outside¨ reference; see below for a working config on one of our routers that is doing what you are looking for: ip dhcp excluded-address 10.2.10.254 ! ip dhcp pool INSIDE network 10.2.10.0 255.255.255.0 domain-name comcastbusiness.net dns-server 68.87.77.130

Re: [c-nsp] VLAN-based EoMPLS

basically it was 12.2(44)SE then I installed 12.2(55)SE but I also faced the same issue. eventually, I returned to 12.2(44)SE6 -- From: Ziv Leyes z...@gilat.net Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 11:51 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject:

[c-nsp] SNMP-Check of DMVPN Tunnels?

Hi, we've set up a customer with a DMVPN with multiple sites, including redundant routers and links. Now, using regular Layer3 methods, it's not possible to check whether a DMVPN link is up or not, e.g.: Site A has two Hub routers, Site B has two spoke routers. Both Spoke routers connect to both

Re: [c-nsp] SNMP-Check of DMVPN Tunnels?

Interface status, route tables, throughput, etc. Its all there. -Blake On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 13:08, Garry g...@gmx.de wrote: Hi, we've set up a customer with a DMVPN with multiple sites, including redundant routers and links. Now, using regular Layer3 methods, it's not possible to check

Re: [c-nsp] SNMP-Check of DMVPN Tunnels?

On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 13:08, Garry g...@gmx.de wrote: Hi, we've set up a customer with a DMVPN with multiple sites, including redundant routers and links. Now, using regular Layer3 methods, it's not possible to check whether a DMVPN link is up or not, e.g.: Site A has two Hub

Re: [c-nsp] SNMP-Check of DMVPN Tunnels?

Tunnel Health Monitoring: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/sec_secure_connectivity/configuration/gu ide/sec_dmvpn_tun_mon.html NHRP MIB http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/sec_secure_connectivity/configuration/gu ide/sec_dmvpn_nhrp_mib.html I just know they exist, haven't dug deep into them

Re: [c-nsp] SNMP-Check of DMVPN Tunnels?

On 03.11.2010 20:22, Jonathan Herbert wrote: We just run an IGP and query throughput on the Tu interfaces. If the crypto socket is down, you'll end up with rxbps = 0. Seems to work well. The problem is that both Spoke-Hub connections run through the same DMVPN tunnel interface ... and I would

Re: [c-nsp] SNMP-Check of DMVPN Tunnels?

I would monitor nhrp registrations and routing protocol neighbors on the hubs. If you need to go to the spokes then the same thing from there, they at least will have a smaller count so it will be easier to determine what is happening from their perspective. David -- http://dcp.dcptech.com

[c-nsp] Cisco ME6524 VLAN Translation on 12.2(33)SXI5

Hi, Looking at the release notes for 12.2(33)SXI5 I've noticed that Vlan Translation is listed as a software restriction on the ME6524 platform. Does anyone know if this is likely to be ever resolved (noting it's listed as a 'software' restriction and not 'hardware') ? Short of

[c-nsp] Output drops the same in groups of eight

Looking at the output drops of the interfaces on a WS-X6148-GE-TX module I noticed the output drops were the same in groups of 8 ports (excluding non-connected ports). i.e. 1-8,9-16,17-24, etc http://pastebin.com/kT7XGsVg for those interested. Is this some sort of architecture artifact?

[c-nsp] inter-as multicast

We have a BGP inter-as peering with one of our service provider over a sub-interface of a point to point link. And now we want to run PIM (between us and service provider) using a different sub-interface over a same point to point link. Someone told me that PIM is an intra-as protocol and

Re: [c-nsp] inter-as multicast

On Thursday, November 04, 2010 11:33:49 am Good One wrote: We have a BGP inter-as peering with one of our service provider over a sub-interface of a point to point link. And now we want to run PIM (between us and service provider) using a different sub-interface over a same point to point