Re: [c-nsp] Pointer to PPPoE docs for 887 CPE?

2010-12-20 Thread Jason Gurtz
This requires pppoeoa support / configuration on BRAS. You can configure pppoeoa on CPE but it will not negotiate as ser ver will be expecting PPPoA encap and you are sending PPPoE. Thank you Vikas and Brian, I'm pretty sure the BRAS is set up in this way as other operational dsl configs we

[c-nsp] ATM Subinterface QoS

2010-12-20 Thread Dave Weis
I'm trying to get QoS on a subinterface of an OC3 to work correctly. I have been able to get it working for PPPoA interfaces in the past but the same method isn't working for me. This is how I have things declared: class-map match-all VOIP-TRAFFIC match access-group name MY-VOICE ! !

Re: [c-nsp] ATM Subinterface QoS

2010-12-20 Thread Michel Grossenbacher
Hi Dave AFAIK, you have to configure Traffic Shaping on ATM Interfaces over the vbr-nrt or vbr-rt command on the PVC instead of Traffic Shaping in the MQC: vbr-nrt Enter Variable Bit Rate (pcr)(scr)(bcs) vbr-rt Enter Variable Bit Rate (pcr)(average) best

Re: [c-nsp] ATM Subinterface QoS

2010-12-20 Thread Brian Turnbow
Trying to add service-policy output MAP-1536-OUT to the subinterface gives me the error GTS : Not supported on this interface If I add it to the PVC I get the error GTS : Not supported over ATM VCs Hi Dave Short answer Can't apply it to a ubr interface(default) use ABR/VBR/CBR For a

[c-nsp] c3750x upgrade to 12.2(55)SE1 takes forever

2010-12-20 Thread Nick Hilliard
Just a heads-up for those planning to upgrade to 12.2(55)SE1 on the 3750X platform: this version includes both a bootloader upgrade and a hardware microcode upgrade. I did a upgrade on a C3750X stack several days ago, which took fully 38 minutes of nail-scratching downtime before all stack

[c-nsp] Outbound Load balancing using eBGP

2010-12-20 Thread RAZ MUHAMMAD
Hi all, I would like to find out how one can use BGP to load balance outbound traffic, while multi homed to 2 transit providers or ISPs and getting full routing tables, no default routes? The BGP peer at the client end is a non Cisco router, so would not be able to use the multipath feature. The

Re: [c-nsp] ATM Subinterface QoS

2010-12-20 Thread Tony
Hi Dave, As others have suggested the shaping is done by the ATM sub-interface and so you don't need the parent shaper policy (and as you've found out, you cannot apply this setup). The correct config for you would be: interface ATM4/0.605 point-to-point pvc 5/45 vbr-nrt 1536 1536