Dne 8.7.2011 17:33, Nick Ryce napsal(a):
Hi,
Does anyone know if the 4948 has the ability to be able to graph traffic
transiting the SVI of a vlan? I know the 3550/3560's are unable to do this?
Nick
Hi Nick,
it's disabled by default. You have to add statement 'counter' into SVI
config.
Thanks for the tip, but I am already at the most current ROMMON revision
that I am aware of:
From my RP:
Cisco IOS Software, s72033_rp Software (s72033_rp-ADVENTERPRISEK9_WAN-M),
Version 12.2(33)SXJ1, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2)
Technical Support: http://www.cisco.com/techsupport
Copyright (c)
Well, I can see the similitude, we both try to put a grin on people's face...
-Original Message-
From: Van Der Meulen, Mark [mailto:mark.vandermeu...@travelex.com.au]
Sent: Monday, July 11, 2011 7:31 AM
To: Ziv Leyes; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] OT: Following Up on
On 09/07/2011 17:22, Derick Winkworth wrote:
The ASA I think can support up to 500 contexts now, but with contexts enabled
I'm hearing there is no crypto support. I'm not sure this is an impediment
for
us but I can see it being an issue for folks.
In multiple context mode, there is no
On 11/07/2011 6:00 PM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
On 09/07/2011 17:22, Derick Winkworth wrote:
The ASA I think can support up to 500 contexts now, but with contexts enabled
I'm hearing there is no crypto support. I'm not sure this is an impediment for
us but I can see it being an issue for folks.
I have configured NetFlow on Catalyst 6500 but i only received packet being
proceed by CPU (SNMP, PIM...). Is it normal?
I need to see full transit packets in all SVI.
ip route-cache flow configured on interface seems not enough.
Can you please share your Netflow experience on 6500?
I am using
On Mon, 2011-07-11 at 12:20 +0200, Manu Chao wrote:
I have configured NetFlow on Catalyst 6500 but i only received packet being
proceed by CPU (SNMP, PIM...). Is it normal?
I need to see full transit packets in all SVI.
ip route-cache flow configured on interface seems not enough.
We use
In multiple context mode, there is no support for:
- dynamic routing
Wow, I knew that crypto was dead when you enable it for vFW, and this was a
show stopper for us, but I did not know that dynamic routing was axed as
well when you did this. Glad we decided to go the Fortinet route. Why one
would
The ASA VPN in 8.x has an IPsec Client Update feature built-in that I was
looking over.
Basically it will do a version check and you can provide a URL to download new
software,
for Windows (general), Win 95/98/ME, WinNT/2000/XP, MacOS, and LInux.
There appear to be no provisions for WIndows
Not wanting to be rude by following up my own posting, but I had several
queries about this, public and private. Here are some reference URLs amd
quotes for each, all referring to 8.4 software - although this is also true
for all previous software versions.
Nick
On 11/07/2011 09:00, Nick
Hi,
Am having the following scenario which I need assistance in solving.
I have two Internet service providers each of which has provided a /29 set of
public IP addresses.
I would like to use Link A (ISP A) as the main link and Link B (ISP B) as my
back up.
I would like to do this
You could use a combination of NAT and IP SLAs with static routes and track
statements.
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of jacob miller
Sent: Monday, July 11, 2011 9:59 AM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
One issue that you will run into is that because you will be changing IP
address if the user moved over to the other provider due to a failure etc all
existing connections would be severed and sometimes cookies would be invalid
and users would have to log back into certain services.
As long as
On 11 Jul 2011, at 14:59, jacob miller wrote:
I have two Internet service providers each of which has provided a /29 set of
public IP addresses.
I would like to use Link A (ISP A) as the main link and Link B (ISP B) as my
back up.
I would like to do this automatically such that users
LOL... I was thinking the same. Maybe a google link in a sigline?
-Hammer-
I was a normal American nerd
-Jack Herer
On 07/11/2011 09:12 AM, Peter Hicks wrote:
On 11 Jul 2011, at 14:59, jacob miller wrote:
I have two Internet service providers each of which has provided a /29 set of
Hmmm...After generating some IPv6 traffic, then running the walk, it doesn't
seem to know about this OID:
[root@marchingmenfs ~]# snmpwalk -v 2c -c x
inscc-rtr-core-a1-2.redhorn CISCO-IETF-IP-MIB::cInetNetToMediaTable
Cannot find module (CISCO-IETF-IP-MIB): At line 0 in (none)
Hi All ,
Can someone clarify , how will the OSPF behave when neighbor on a p2p link
goes down , although the ethernet interface state still remain in up state.
Will it trigger an SPF calculation ? If so is it after 40 seconds ?
Thanks,
Ranjith
___
Hi List,
I've been Google'ing around for the answer but I can't find it. I
logged into a switch today and this is a snippet of the output from
'show etherchannel summary';
Group Port-channel ProtocolPorts
--+-+---+-
2 Po2(SU) LACP Gi0/45(P)
On 11/07/2011 17:54, Ranjith R wrote:
Can someone clarify , how will the OSPF behave when neighbor on a p2p
link goes down , although the ethernet interface state still remain in
up state. Will it trigger an SPF calculation ? If so is it after 40
seconds ?
It will assume that the neighbor
On 07/11/2011 05:39 PM, Tom Ammon wrote:
Hmmm...After generating some IPv6 traffic, then running the walk, it
doesn't seem to know about this OID:
[root@marchingmenfs ~]# snmpwalk -v 2c -c x
inscc-rtr-core-a1-2.redhorn CISCO-IETF-IP-MIB::cInetNetToMediaTable
Cannot find module
Hi Nick ,
Thank you for the mail , under what scenario does the LSA refresh (30
minutes ) is significant .
Thanks,
Ranjith
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 10:30 PM, Nick Hilliard n...@foobar.org wrote:
On 11/07/2011 17:54, Ranjith R wrote:
Can someone clarify , how will the OSPF behave when
...and the first thing that stands out in the release notes:
These features are not supported in Release 12.2(50)SY:
•Per-VLAN Spanning Tree (PVST) mode
Note Release 12.2(50)SY supports these spanning tree protocols:
—Rapid Spanning Tree Protocol (RSTP) is enabled by default;
—Multiple
On Mon, 2011-07-11 at 10:39 -0600, Tom Ammon wrote:
Hmmm...After generating some IPv6 traffic, then running the walk, it
doesn't seem to know about this OID:
[root@marchingmenfs ~]# snmpwalk -v 2c -c x
inscc-rtr-core-a1-2.redhorn CISCO-IETF-IP-MIB::cInetNetToMediaTable
Hello Nick,
Playing with OSPF hello/dead timers is possible but not the best approach.
If you need fast dead peer detection, BFD is much better option. It uses
less CPU and allows much better detection time than OSPF timers.
HTH
Serguei
-Original Message-
From:
On Mon, 2011-07-11 at 18:30 +0100, James Bensley wrote:
Group Port-channel ProtocolPorts
--+-+---+-
2 Po2(SU) LACP Gi0/45(P) Gi0/46(P)
3 Po3(SD) PAgP Gi0/13(D) Gi0/14(I)
4 Po4(SD) PAgP Gi0/15(I)
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 07:14:41PM +0100, Phil Mayers wrote:
...and the first thing that stands out in the release notes:
These features are not supported in Release 12.2(50)SY:
?Per-VLAN Spanning Tree (PVST) mode
Note Release 12.2(50)SY supports these spanning tree protocols:
On 07/11/2011 07:24 PM, Peter Rathlev wrote:
On Mon, 2011-07-11 at 10:39 -0600, Tom Ammon wrote:
Hmmm...After generating some IPv6 traffic, then running the walk, it
doesn't seem to know about this OID:
[root@marchingmenfs ~]# snmpwalk -v 2c -c x
inscc-rtr-core-a1-2.redhorn
Hi,
...and the first thing that stands out in the release notes:
These features are not supported in Release 12.2(50)SY:
•Per-VLAN Spanning Tree (PVST) mode
Note Release 12.2(50)SY supports these spanning tree protocols:
—Rapid Spanning Tree Protocol (RSTP) is enabled by default;
On 07/11/2011 07:26 PM, Gert Doering wrote:
(Mmmh. Is this IOS? Or IOS XE? I thought the Sup2T was supposed to
ship with something modularish?)
IOS. I've seen a load of roadmap presentations on this thing, and Cisco
have consistently said it would run IOS, and not any of the new variants.
On 07/11/2011 07:32 PM, Alan Buxey wrote:
gulp.
we use rapid-pvst - is that also not supported??
Well, precisely!
Digging further, the IOS config guide does mention rapid-PVST:
On 11/07/2011 19:24, Serguei Bezverkhi wrote:
Playing with OSPF hello/dead timers is possible but not the best approach.
If you need fast dead peer detection, BFD is much better option. It uses
less CPU and allows much better detection time than OSPF timers.
This then devolves into a
On Mon, 2011-07-11 at 20:26 +0200, Peter Rathlev wrote:
find out, what does 'stand-alone' mean and why would these ports say
that? Can anyone here explain why?
The I means independent here. It means that you configured an
etherchannel protocol on this devices, but the neighboring device is
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 07:35:25PM +0100, Phil Mayers wrote:
On 07/11/2011 07:26 PM, Gert Doering wrote:
(Mmmh. Is this IOS? Or IOS XE? I thought the Sup2T was supposed to
ship with something modularish?)
IOS. I've seen a load of roadmap presentations on this thing, and Cisco
have
Hi
As already indicated, remember to add the mls netflow commands.
And watch this video
http://www.plixer.com/blog/network-problem-resolution/cisco-catalyst-6509-rap-mix-master-mitch-strikes-again/
Jon Harald Bøvre
Sent from my iPad
On 11. juli 2011, at 12:20, Manu Chao
This may not be a Cisco specific question but today our network is virtually
100% Cisco so I am throwing this out to this group for input.
Our statewide network with 1,800+ CE routers is currently a legacy ATM backbone
with primarily ATM IMA or Frame Relay for last mile connections with a
Hi all , is there a way i can find cisco CTI OS Toolkit?
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at
Thanks for the heads-up! There's some more technical information about
the Supervisor 2T in the White Papers section:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/customer/products/hw/switches/ps708/prod_white_papers_list.html
--
Simon.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list
Good call. Using the numeric OID works, so that confirms what the problem is.
I'm going to show some SNMP ignorance here, but how do I translate a name like
CISCO-IETF-IP-MIB to a numeric OID? I have read through mib files before but
have never been able to figure out how to translate them
On 07/11/2011 10:26 PM, Tom Ammon wrote:
Good call. Using the numeric OID works, so that confirms what the
problem is.
FWIW, the netdisco source contains a comprehensive set of MIBS; it's
where I get my mib files from, as the guy who assembles them fixes them
up so the load in net-snmp
On Mon, 2011-07-11 at 23:19 +0200, Simon Leinen wrote:
Thanks for the heads-up! There's some more technical information about
the Supervisor 2T in the White Papers section:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/customer/products/hw/switches/ps708/prod_white_papers_list.html
Yeah...:
The Supervisor
The 6708 card isn't mentioned elsewhere on the page. Specifically not in
Table 6. DFC4 Field Upgradable Linecard. Anybody know what that means?
Do we have to buy new 6908 cards instead? Or will there be a field
upgrade?
As 6708 is DFC-only (same as 6716) and cannot work in CFC due to lack
of
dfc-based linecards will require dfc4 to function in sup2t chassis (if
supported by software). any 6700-series cards supported in sup2t will
need this upgrade.
6708 linecard cleverly omitted from upgrade path -- this, as stated,
will need to be replaced with 6908 line-rate card -- or used in
On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 00:00 +0200, Robert Hass wrote:
The 6708 card isn't mentioned elsewhere on the page. Specifically
not in Table 6. DFC4 Field Upgradable Linecard. Anybody know what
that means? Do we have to buy new 6908 cards instead? Or will there
be a field upgrade?
As 6708 is
On (2011-07-12 00:00 +0200), Robert Hass wrote:
As 6708 is DFC-only (same as 6716) and cannot work in CFC due to lack
of some bus ASICs. You cannot it use with 2T due to incompability DFC4
to DFC3. DFC4 is not supported at all at 67xx linecards. But there is
special TMP program for 6708
On Tuesday, July 12, 2011 04:31:02 AM Rick Martin wrote:
We advertise 4
full class B networks as /16's and one as two /17's. Our
IP assignments are geographically distributed based on
the Internet connection the customer will be using.
Classful routing is long dead.
So the correct notation
On Tuesday, July 12, 2011 05:52:29 AM Peter Rathlev wrote:
The Supervisor 2T provides backward compatibility with
the existing WS-X6700 Series Linecards (with the
exception of the WS-X6708-10G, which will be replaced by
the new WS-X6908-10G, discussed later), as well as
select WS-X6100
Having read through the SUP2T architecture, it seems to be
shaping up to outperform a 7600 with an RSP720 + ES line
cards, assuming everything works as advertised :-).
Some of the line card compatibility madness may put a few
customers off if they want to move to this new supervisor,
but
You may also find this page helpful:
http://tools.cisco.com/Support/SNMP/do/BrowseOID.do?local=en
-Bruce
On Jul 11, 2011, at 2:26 PM, Tom Ammon wrote:
Good call. Using the numeric OID works, so that confirms what the problem is.
I'm going to show some SNMP ignorance here, but how do I
Dear user of puck.nether.net,
We have received reports that your account was used to send a huge amount of
spam messages during the last week.
Probably, your computer had been infected and now runs a trojaned proxy server.
We recommend that you follow the instructions in order to keep your
49 matches
Mail list logo
