Hi,
On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 08:18:02PM -0500, chris wrote:
(in my case a /26). I'm 99% sure I wouldnt want a /31 as my nat outside
which I don't would even think could work at all.
Of course it works. Put ip address negotiated on the dialer1, and
ip nat inside ... interface dialer1 overload
On 12/26/2011 2:23 PM, Randy wrote:
--- On Mon, 12/26/11, Royr.engehau...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Royr.engehau...@gmail.com
Subject: [c-nsp] Telnet session dropped
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.netcisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Date: Monday, December 26, 2011, 1:08 PM
I use RANCID ton a number of
We had a 40-port card fail on an ASR9K and I'm trying to see what
configuration was on those interfaces, but I can't find the right
command. The router has basically decided that the card doesn't exist
for most purposes. I thought that if I did a show running-config I
would see those interfaces
Actually it could also be the telnet prompt timeout settings. The
command interpreter gets done long before you see all the output
(buffered on the devices end) and therefore you get timed out and
disconnected long before the buffer actually drains. Try
setting/increasing the idle timeouts.
On
On 27/12/2011, at 8:08 AM, Roy wrote:
I use RANCID ton a number of routers. About five days ago, it started
failing on three routers. If I manually connect to these routers, it seems
to work for a minute or so and then the telnet session gets disconnected.
The disconnect only occurs
Working on my first video teleconferencing project.
Problem:
Equipment I inherited; Polycom VSX 7000 with a BRI Interface
needs to interface and call out over a 3 Channel PRI ISDN Circuit. Also
received a NT384 device (U Interface) that doesn't seem to work over the
PRI
*Why not using following command on your SVI:*
*ip accounting output*-*packets*
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 12:35 PM, miroku bundaberg44...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
We are experiencing a bit of he said she said between a number of
different clients/service providers. The situation is a remote
On the 2960 the buffer depth is 77 or 78.
On the 2960S the buffer depth is closer to 40 (don't have an exact figure).
The buffers on these are extremely small for a gig/10GE switch (less than 1ms).
LR Mack McBride
Network Architect
-Original Message-
From:
You may do better asking this on cisco-voip vs cisco-nsp
More voice knowledge over there..
http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
- Jared
On Dec 27, 2011, at 10:40 AM, Chris Taylor wrote:
Any assistance is greatly appreciated.
___
Thanks Jared
V/R,
Christopher Taylor | Sayres and Associates Corporation
IT Specialist
chris.tay...@sac-corp.com
-Original Message-
From: Jared Mauch [mailto:ja...@puck.nether.net]
Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2011 12:05 PM
To: Chris Taylor
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re:
Hi
Do any one know what is performance (in pps) of Cisco 819 ? We would
like to replace few old 870 routers (which has according to
routerperformance 25k) with new 819. Unfortunately
http://www.cisco.com/web/partners/downloads/765/tools/quickreference/routerperformance.pdf
is outdated at doesn't
On Tue, 27 Dec 2011, John Neiberger wrote:
We had a 40-port card fail on an ASR9K and I'm trying to see what
configuration was on those interfaces, but I can't find the right
command. The router has basically decided that the card doesn't exist
for most purposes. I thought that if I did a show
Show config rollback last X (or some variant of that) should show you what you
want to see.
--
Sent from my mobile device
On 2011-12-27, at 11:43 AM, John Neiberger jneiber...@gmail.com wrote:
We had a 40-port card fail on an ASR9K and I'm trying to see what
configuration was on those
You are right! My mistake.
--
Sent from my mobile device
On 2011-12-27, at 1:31 PM, Mark Tinka mti...@globaltransit.net wrote:
On Wednesday, December 28, 2011 02:19:24 AM Jason Lixfeld
wrote:
Show config rollback last X (or some variant of that)
should show you what you want to see.
On Wednesday, December 28, 2011 12:43:47 AM John Neiberger wrote:
We had a 40-port card fail on an ASR9K and I'm trying to
see what configuration was on those interfaces, but I
can't find the right command. The router has basically
decided that the card doesn't exist for most purposes. I
On Wednesday, December 28, 2011 02:19:24 AM Jason Lixfeld
wrote:
Show config rollback last X (or some variant of that)
should show you what you want to see.
'sh configuration rollback changes last' to be exact.
But that will only show the OP changes that were applied to
a running
I thought for sure there was a command that would show the
preconfigured interfaces. As soon as I insert the new card, the
preexisting configuration will magically appear again. I just want to
verify what that configuration is. I just found the command show
running-config all-interfaces which at
I have two PIM domains configured with Anycast RPs:
-
|R1 - R2| Anycast RP 1.1.1.1
-
\ /
\ /
\ /
\ /
R3
|
| BGP
|
R4
/ \
/ \
/ \
/ \
-
|R5 - R6| Anycast RP 2.2.2.2
-
On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 6:45 AM, Andriy Bilous andriy.bil...@gmail.com wrote:
I would recommend to isolate this port into queue-set 2, which isn't
used by default, and apply buffers tuning Anton suggested to this
queue-set, so you won't ruin queueing on other ports as they don't
drop anyway.
Are there anything special with MSTP that I should consider in
deploying in a network?
Only thing I can think of is to pre-configure VLANs for future use
since topology will re-converge every time you add a VLAN to the MSTP
instance.
Any other special issues I should be looking out for?
Thanks!
Interactions with legacy gear that does not support MSTP or does not support it
the same way.
That is the biggest headache during transition.
After transition the biggest headache is making vlan changes as you noted.
LR Mack McBride
Network Architect
-Original Message-
From:
We have made a pretty clear decision on sticking with one vendor and
not inter-operate on MSTP level. So we are safe on that front.
Our long term goal is to move to some kind of MPLS Ethernet tunneling
at some point and not rely on STP as much as possible but our budget
does not allow it yet.
I'm trying to turn up some IPv6 peers. Most of them are already IPv4 peers.
I have a peer group defined in the IPv4 world.
I try to do
cr01.lax(config-router)#address-family ipv6 unicast
cr01.lax(config-router-af)#neig 2001:XXX:YY::ZZ remote A
cr01.lax(config-router-af)#neig
John,
You need a second peer group, e.g.: Any2IX-v6
I seem to recall (memory is fuzzy) you can't re-use the same route-maps either,
or it may give you a warning..
- Jared
On Dec 27, 2011, at 6:25 PM, John Brown wrote:
I'm trying to turn up some IPv6 peers. Most of them are already IPv4
You can use the same route-maps provided you don't have any statements that
reference IP addresses (for obvious reasons). Most people use IP addresses for
something or other so they usually aren't compatible.
Mack
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
Yup,
Solved the problem. Thanks Jared and Mack.
Needed a different peer-group for the IPv6 stuff.
I built a new v6 route map to go along with it.
Now I'm off to build happy little IPv6 peering packets.
Mucho thanks
On 12/27/11 5:39 PM, Mack McBride mack.mcbr...@viawest.com wrote:
You can
On Wednesday, December 28, 2011 03:13:35 AM John Neiberger
wrote:
I thought for sure there was a command that would show
the preconfigured interfaces. As soon as I insert the
new card, the preexisting configuration will magically
appear again.
That is the Juniper way :-).
Which is not to
Possible if your intermediate switch can do Q-in-Q ;)
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 4:15 AM, Jeff Kell jeff-k...@utc.edu wrote:
Is it possible to run an RSPAN vlan through (not an endpoint, just
transport) an intermediate switch (specifically Foundry/Brocade FCX
switch)?
I would suspect that mac
Hi guys
Is GRE tunnelling supported on this platform?
I can see no reference to it in any of the configuration guides - but
also no reference to it in the unsupported commands section.
Has anyone tried to do this?
We've a need to run GRE tunnels for a URL filtering solution at our Head
29 matches
Mail list logo
