Claes,
Does anyone have a clue about the state of IRB/BVI on MOD80 (Typhoon)
linecard? It's not listed as supported in the release notes (4.2.1), but
ipv4 unicast seems to be working just fine, but not multicast as far as
i have tried. Have someone else tested this?
Hmm, it should work, I have
On Wed, 26 Sep 2012, Claes Jansson wrote:
And if i can't get BVI's to work, my only other option is to use a
loop cable between two ports, one that has l3 subinterfaces on one
side, and the other l2transport subinterfaces connected to the l2vpn
bridge-domains?
If this includes MPLS and
Hello,
we have migrated one 7206 VXR NPE - G2 to ASR 1001 but we have noticed the
CPU always showing 0 - 1% ( 7206 VXR 40 - 70%)
CPU utilization for five seconds: 0%/0%; one minute: 0%; five minutes: 0%
PID Runtime(ms) Invoked uSecs 5Sec 1Min 5Min TTY Process
69 312909
Hello Claes
I also thought so, but i am unable to find any official document stating
this fact for ASR 9000 series. All i can found is this following link
which says that BNG feature on ASR can be enabled with A9K-BNG-LIC-8K
licence
On 26/09/2012 10:01, ibogzipper iboge wrote:
is it normal to have 1% cpu with 800 Mbps duplex ? just pure routing QOS
. is there any other OID's we can monitor ?
the asr1k is a hardware forwarding platform. In practice this means that
the forwarding mechanism on the router is separate to the
Use the following to get a better idea.
*show platform software status control-processor brief
*
--
Tassos
On 26/9/2012 10:51 ??, Nick Hilliard wrote:
On 26/09/2012 10:01, ibogzipper iboge wrote:
is it normal to have 1% cpu with 800 Mbps duplex ? just pure routing QOS
. is there any other
Last time i checked, you had to buy packs of 8k.
Probably there will be new packs (Nx8k) after a while, like in asr1k.
--
Tassos
On 26/9/2012 10:32 πμ, Frank Norman wrote:
Hello Claes
I also thought so, but i am unable to find any official document stating
this fact for ASR 9000 series. All
Thanks for the information,
Anyone graphing the ESP / RP cpu any hint for the OID .
Regards,
Ragu
I think following links havinging good information ,
https://supportforums.cisco.com/thread/2133112
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps9343/products_tech_note09186a0080af2d14.shtml
On Wed, Sep
Well, what I'm trying to do is to route multicast traffic coming from an
upstream iptv supplier.
And i might be doing something very wrong here, this is my first time
configuring an ASR9k :-)
In short, recieve it on bvi400 (the peering interface gi0/0/0/9
l2transport connected to a l2vpn
Try 1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.715.1.1.6.1.14.9027.3 for the ESP Quantum Flow processor.
That's the one that does all the work.
Paul Lustgraafgr...@iastate.edu
Change is inevitable. Progress is not.
Network Engineer, Iowa State University IT Services
If you have two ASR9k in a cluster, both with one 8k license, take one
node in the cluster down, can the other one still take 16k users or is
there an actual enforcement of this license?
Kind regards,
Sibbi
On 26.9.2012 09:13, Tassos Chatzithomaoglou ach...@forthnetgroup.gr
wrote:
Last time i
i'm seeing devices downstream on these 2 pw's seeing each others' stp conf
bpdus'ssince one of the devices is locking in on the other as root
bridge. I thought pw's didn't allow for certain types of forwarding between
them by defaultrecall something related to shg's (split horizon groups
I think this explains it...
By default, split horizon is enabled for pseudowires under the same VFI.
However, in the default configuration, split horizon is not enabled on the
attachment circuits (interfaces or pseudowires).
Anyone know of the cisco equivlant?
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Hi
Is there a mib for the following statistic? (drop per queue)
sh queueing interface g3/xx
...
Packets dropped on Transmit:
queue dropped [cos-map]
-
120600 [0 ]
2 620 [1 2 ]
3
Can anyone tell me the requirements for rack clearances in all directions
when building server rooms (too small for datacenter size)
I seem to remember 3 feet in any direction? Of course you have equipment
loading and unloading so front and back clearances
may be different?
Mike
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Cisco Unified Communications Manager Session Initiation Protocol Denial of
Service Vulnerability
Advisory ID: cisco-sa-20120926-cucm
Revision 1.0
For Public Release 2012 September 26 16:00 UTC (GMT
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Cisco IOS Software Session Initiation Protocol Denial of Service Vulnerability
Advisory ID: cisco-sa-20120926-sip
Revision 1.0
For Public Release 2012 September 26 16:00 UTC (GMT
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Cisco IOS Software Malformed Border Gateway Protocol Attribute Vulnerability
Advisory ID: cisco-sa-20120926-bgp
Revision 1.0
For Public Release 2012 September 26 16:00 UTC (GMT
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Cisco IOS Software DHCP Denial of Service Vulnerability
Advisory ID: cisco-sa-20120926-dhcp
Revision 1.0
For Public Release 2012 September 26 16:00 UTC (GMT)
+-
Summary
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Cisco IOS Software Intrusion Prevention System Denial of Service Vulnerability
Advisory ID: cisco-sa-20120926-ios-ips
Revision 1.0
For Public Release 2012 September 26 16:00 UTC (GMT
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Cisco Catalyst 4500E Series Switch with Cisco Catalyst Supervisor Engine 7L-E
Denial of Service Vulnerability
Advisory ID: cisco-sa-20120926-ecc
Revision 1.0
For Public Release 2012 September 26 16:00 UTC (GMT
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Cisco IOS Software Tunneled Traffic Queue Wedge Vulnerability
Advisory ID: cisco-sa-20120926-c10k-tunnels
Revision 1.0
For Public Release 2012 September 26 16:00 UTC (GMT
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Cisco IOS Software Network Address Translation Vulnerabilities
Advisory ID: cisco-sa-20120926-nat
Revision 1.0
For Public Release 2012 September 26 16:00 UTC (GMT)
+-
Summary
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Cisco IOS Software DHCP Version 6 Server Denial of Service Vulnerability
Advisory ID: cisco-sa-20120926-dhcpv6
Revision 1.0
For Public Release 2012 September 26 16:00 UTC (GMT
On Wed, 26 Sep 2012, harbor235 wrote:
Can anyone tell me the requirements for rack clearances in all directions
when building server rooms (too small for datacenter size)
I seem to remember 3 feet in any direction? Of course you have equipment
loading and unloading so front and back clearances
On 9/26/12 8:41 AM, harbor235 wrote:
Can anyone tell me the requirements for rack clearances in all directions
when building server rooms (too small for datacenter size)
I seem to remember 3 feet in any direction? Of course you have equipment
loading and unloading so front and back clearances
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 10:04:57AM -0700, Seth Mattinen wrote:
3' in back and 4' in front.
Those being inch, yard, feet, or what?
I guess it's feet... so roughly 1m, right?
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
On 9/26/12 10:17 AM, Gert Doering wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 10:04:57AM -0700, Seth Mattinen wrote:
3' in back and 4' in front.
Those being inch, yard, feet, or what?
I guess it's feet... so roughly 1m, right?
My apologizes, ' is an alternate abbreviation for foot.
Hi,
Is there a general problem with Cisco and DHCP? Did get a lot of SA's
regarding DHCP and nearly any OS!
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at
I have 15.2(4)S on my me3600x so I'm ready to test 6vpe.
I'm seeing that there isn't really a way to enable ipv6 under the regular
vrf definition ip vrf one syntax.. But I do see that vrf definition one
has address-family v4 and v6 under it..
I didn't know how to migrate vrf structures of
Not sure I quite understand what you're asking, but I'll share some ME3600/6VPE
related foo from a similar exercise I went through last week.
I found that I had to use 'vrf upgrade-cli multi-af-mode non-common-policies'
to get the v6 address-family configurable within a VRF instance.
Not sure
Hi,
Is there a general problem with Cisco and DHCP? Did get a lot of SA's
regarding DHCP and nearly any OS!
Just starting at IOS 12.5 aehm 15.0 ,
They claim that the 12.0 12.2 12.3 12.4 based releases are not affected.
Juergen.
___
cisco-nsp
On Wed, 2012-09-26 at 15:03 -0500, Aaron wrote:
I didn't know how to migrate vrf structures of ip vrf one to vrf
definition one so I just went at it to see how smoothly I could make
this happen. someone please tell me if there was a better way or if
anything I mentioned is misunderstood on my
That's exactly what I was asking! Thanks Jason
*** not shown here , I reverted my vrf one definition back to the legacy
mode so I could see this process run through very nice...one thing I see
is that it added an additional helper under my svi's ... why ?
ip helper-address global
Yep, works and no pings dropped when I ran it
Thanks Peter
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Peter Rathlev [mailto:pe...@rathlev.dk]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 3:23 PM
To: Aaron
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 6vpe - me3600x
On Wed, 2012-09-26 at 15:03
On Wed, 2012-09-26 at 15:44 -0500, Aaron wrote:
*** not shown here , I reverted my vrf one definition back to the
legacy mode so I could see this process run through very
nice...one thing I see is that it added an additional helper under my
svi's ... why ?
ip helper-address global
1000BASE-BX-U connects to 1000BASE-BX-D, no problem there.
Is there a general standard for installation, like 1000BASE-BX-U is
installed in the Upstream equipment, 1000BASE-BX-D is installed in the
Downstream equipment?
That would make sense, but I'd rather not find out I'm deploying these
the
Yep that's exactly what u and d mean and why they are used.
-Blake
On Sep 26, 2012 4:06 PM, Tim Durack tdur...@gmail.com wrote:
1000BASE-BX-U connects to 1000BASE-BX-D, no problem there.
Is there a general standard for installation, like 1000BASE-BX-U is
installed in the Upstream equipment,
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 5:09 PM, Blake Dunlap iki...@gmail.com wrote:
Yep that's exactly what u and d mean and why they are used.
That's what I figured, but I've not found a reference anywhere.
Didn't want to find out later that most people took U as meaning
facing towards Upstream or something
On Wed, 2012-09-26 at 17:13 -0400, Tim Durack wrote:
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 5:09 PM, Blake Dunlap iki...@gmail.com wrote:
Yep that's exactly what u and d mean and why they are used.
That's what I figured, but I've not found a reference anywhere.
Didn't want to find out later that most
Sweet, you can go backwards too! No pings dropped
noc-3600#conf t
noc-3600(config)#no vrf upgrade-cli multi-af-mode non-common-policies vrf
two
You are about to downgrade to the single-AF VRF syntax commands.
You will lose any IPv6 address configured on interfaces
belonging to downgraded VRFs.
Hi,
I have had a lot of similar feedback. I have found
* Changing the IP precedence via ip local policy route-map doesn't
directly set the COS - the locally generated traffic doesn't have a 802.1q
header to contain the 802.1p bits. Depending on the platform (and
probably other stuff) the IP
Hi,
Does anyone know if it is possible to configure local connect on the
ME3600X? The closest I have found is hairpinning
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/metro/me3600x_3800x/software/release/15.2_4_S/configuration/guide/swevc.html#wp1051612
This uses bride domains and seems to have
Hi,
My experience is that any ME3600Xs ordered with licences have come with
the license pre installed.
Ivan
Hey folks, I'm trying to get the straight scoop on the licensing issue
I received an ME 3600x from my reseller, without the Advanced Metro
license. I
did order the license from
Connect does exist but you can't use it with a bridge domain.
The connect command is only used for two service instances. If you need
to link three or more that traffic must be switched, so then just use a
bridge-group.
Connect example
Switch (config)# interface gigabitethernet0/2
Switch
Just connecting 2 service instances is all I would like to do. What IOS
are you running. I am unable to you the connect command. I am using
me360x-universalk9-mz.152-4.S
interface GigabitEthernet0/11
switchport trunk allowed vlan none
switchport mode trunk
service instance 1 ethernet
Hi list,
In an enterprise network I have a core of 4900Ms with a few ASR1ks hanging off
to handle upstream connectivity. As an example:
Upstream1 - [ASR1k]--[4900M]--[4900M]--[ASR1k] - Upstream2
||
||
Servers
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 5:47 PM, Peter Rathlev pe...@rathlev.dk wrote:
On Wed, 2012-09-26 at 17:13 -0400, Tim Durack wrote:
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 5:09 PM, Blake Dunlap iki...@gmail.com wrote:
Yep that's exactly what u and d mean and why they are used.
That's what I figured, but I've not
On 17/09/2012, at 9:41 PM, Nikolay Shopik wrote:
Hey,
Just wondering does ASR routers need advanced ip services to route IPv6
traffic? Feature navigator report mostly says yes, as IPv6 support on
base image is pretty much limited or better say non-existent.
Can anyone confirm/deny?
We
Why not use selective advertisement of the default based on receiving a
specific route from your carrier or an upstream you know to be stable.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_3/iproute/command/reference/ip2_n1g.h
tml#wp1037042
David
--
http://dcp.dcptech.com
-Original Message-
Is there a specific order in which BGP updates are sent/exchanged/processed?
The concern I have with tracking upstream routes is that the route tracked
would need to be one of the last routes received (if not the last) to ensure
that the router has full visibility. This seems quite
52 matches
Mail list logo
