On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 5:40 PM, CiscoNSP_list CiscoNSP_list
cisconsp_l...@hotmail.com wrote:
We currently use 3750x stack to terminate pairs of 2960S(TOR's) - Our
traffic is quite bursty, and we are getting hit with the small buffers
(output drops)...any suggestions on alternative platforms?
Saku Ytti wrote:
I have been looking at IP SLA and was wondering whether there are any
appliances around which emulate Ciscos IP SLA so that you can use it as a
responder, or even better, the transmitter end?
Have you found any? I'd be very interested in commercial solution also.
On (2012-11-19 09:48 +0100), Christophe Fillot wrote:
I've written a small responder that handles TCP connect, UDP echo
and UDP jitter operations (for IPv4/IPv6),
but unfortunately I don't know if I can publish it for the reasons
you gave below.
The protocol is easy to decode anyway.
Hi all I have configured the belowR1#sh run | sec ip dhcpip dhcp pool TEST
network 192.1.12.0 255.255.255.0 domain-name cisco.com option 26 hex 0578
Am trying to send the mtu interface vlaue through the DHCP offer but it's not
happening578 hex = 1400
Any ideas?
Thanks
Saku Ytti wrote:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-cisco-sla-protocol-04
http://www.juniper.net/us/en/local/pdf/app-notes/3500145-en.pdf
I wonder if those implicitly mean that you are allowed to build responder
or not. The Cisco draft is not really what we're seeing in real-life
(real-life
Sent from a mobile device
On 19/11/2012, at 20:36, M K gunner_...@live.com wrote:
Hi all I have configured the belowR1#sh run | sec ip dhcpip dhcp pool TEST
network 192.1.12.0 255.255.255.0 domain-name cisco.com option 26 hex 0578
Am trying to send the mtu interface vlaue through the DHCP
On (2012-11-19 11:08 +0100), Christophe Fillot wrote:
About the packet handling, since I only support TCP/UDP probes, I
use the classic socket
API.
It is not using AF_PACKET to support some strange probes, it only supports
UDP jitter for Cisco.
It is using AF_PACKET so it can see full header
thanks Christain,
you help me alot. thanks
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Christian Kratzer ck-li...@cksoft.dewrote:
Hi,
On Sun, 18 Nov 2012, s m wrote:
thanks Juergen
what i've got from your words is: for connecting modem to cisco we should
reverse send and receive while for
Just for future reference if someone runs into the same issues:
The hw revision of the M132XP that had no problems: 1.7
The hw revision of the M132XP that failed: 1.5
The hw revision of the spare card that had no problems: 2.3
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP)
amsoa...@netcabo.pt
I had an odd situation where I did a software upgrade on one box
successfully. On the 2nd box the VLAN Configurations were arbitrarily
missing, which was frustrating
As we thought immediately that the vpc was down for other reasons. Not sure
if this had anything to do with the m1, (I did do an
Hi Guys,
Is it possible to use IPAM to manage the local ip pool on BRAS and GGSN?
At this moment for the wireline user (BRAS) we are using PPP and for the
wirelless user (GGSN) I need to confirm if we are using PPP, DHCP or GTP.
What are the main considerations to use IPAM for Service Provider
What upgrade did you make ? In my case it was from 5.2.3a to 5.2.7. The
5.2.3 EPLD was already installed.
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP)
amsoa...@netcabo.pt
http://www.ccie18473.net
-Original Message-
From: Neil Barnett [mailto:interarchet...@gmail.com]
Sent:
Hello,
We had a similar sitatuation. We have two n7k in a vpc domain with vdc
feature as well. The upgrade of the first switch was without any issue,
but we upgraded the second one too, and the M1 card failed to boot, this
caused that VDC couldn't start... After removing the failed card the
I Was upgrading to 6.1(1) from a Software Standpoint, which required a
requisite 6.1(1) EPLD Image Upgrade.
EPLD Image upgrade took a significant amount of time to upgrade, which is
standard.
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Antonio Soares [mailto:amsoa...@netcabo.pt]
Sent: Monday,
Is there any way to get ingress QoS working on LACP on ASR 1000 series? Either
by physical interfaces or on the bundle. Is there any logical workaround for
this besides moving from the bundle to the next largest interface?
Thanks.
___
cisco-nsp
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 10:18:46AM -0600, Dikkema, Michael (Business
Technology) wrote:
Is there any way to get ingress QoS working on LACP on ASR 1000 series?
What do you mean with ingress QoS exactly?
I'd be interested to learn about any QoS surprises on ASR1k.
Best regards,
Daniel
--
Hello.
We went with PHPIpam in the end.
Only other competitor for us was Efficentips system.
Bästa hälsningar / Best regards,
Gustav Uhlander
Communication Infrastructure Engineer
Steria AB
Kungsbron 13
Box 169
SE-101 23 Stockholm
Sweden
Tel: +46 8 622 42 15
Fax: +46 8 622 42 23
Mobile:
I'm testing a new Ethernet circuit, and need to verify that MPLS labelled
frames are being forwarded correctly.
Unfortunately I can't think of a simple test between the two directly
connected routers which doesn't involve production traffic. (The current
link is costed-out from an OSPF
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 03:21:39PM -0500, Tim Durack wrote:
Any non-invasive bright ideas?
Well, there's this thing with static MPLS labels... I'm not sure how
I'd use it to test a single link (without building a full measurement
infrastructure), but it should be doable... potentially
I cannot assign a service-policy input statement to an LACP port-channel
interface on an ASR 1002 router. The console gives an error saying it's not
possible. I have found documentation from Cisco stating that it's not supported
under any current software. Putting the service policy onto the
Thanks, that gives me something to look at. (C6K running 12.2(33)SXI6.)
Have you looked at 15.1SY yet? Looks half-way decent. Even got ssh keys
finally.
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Gert Doering g...@greenie.muc.de wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 03:21:39PM -0500, Tim Durack wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 03:55:23PM -0500, Tim Durack wrote:
Thanks, that gives me something to look at. (C6K running 12.2(33)SXI6.)
Has static labels but not static crossconnect, which you might
need to get out of the tunnel again. Well, maybe not, you could just
point your static label
Yes , there are other methods to do so , but I have an old setup and i need to
do it this way if applicable
CC: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
From: and...@2sheds.de
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] DHCP option 26
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 21:22:05 +1100
To: gunner_...@live.com
Sent from a mobile
Hi,
Yes, ASR does not support ingress/egress QOS on portchan subints - It will be
supported (apparently) in 15.3S/3.8.0S (Which I believe will be available by
EOY?) - there is a work-around though.
1. Upgrade to 15.2(4)S1, and issue port-channel load-balancing vlan-manual,
and you will then
It's late and I'm tired, so maybe I'm missing something, but after a
reload into 15.1SY, our testing sup270 failed to take the mdt commands
under VRFs:
mdt default 239.254.1.2
^
% Invalid input detected at '^' marker.
The VRFs are all new format vrf definition if that matters, but an
Thanks Andrew - The Nexus do look nice...The 5010/5020 are EOL'd correct?(But
still able to get smartnet on them?)Is there a significant price point
difference between these and the 5548(P?)
If the Nexus are heinously expensive, I might look at the 4500's as you
suggest.or
Hi,
Does anyone has any experience of running MSTP between SRX110 and Cisco
(particularly Cisco2970)?
I have deployed a pair of SRX110 connected to a pair of Cisco2970, in a way
that both the SRX100s are connected to both the Cisco2970 switches through
trunk links.
If I try to set the priority
The command should be under the IPv4 address family...
Router(config)#vrf definition test
Router(config-vrf)#address-family ipv4
Router(config-vrf-af)#md
Router(config-vrf-af)#mdt ?
dataMDT data trees
default The default group
log-reuse Event logging for data MDT reuse
Gustav,
Thak you for the information.
We are thinking in a commercial solution ( I will check the features of
EfficentIP software)
About the GGSN (wireless user), PPP is the method to provide the IP to the
end user.
I am not an expert on IPAM Tool, but according to Infoblox Guy, they can
not
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 9:56 AM, CiscoNSP_list CiscoNSP_list
cisconsp_l...@hotmail.com wrote:
Thanks Andrew - The Nexus do look nice...The 5010/5020 are EOL'd
correct?(But still able to get smartnet on them?)Is there a significant
price point difference between these and the 5548(P?)
Just one clarification. The 5548UP is around the same price as the 5010 was.
The 5520 is a 2u model which closer the 5596UP.
Sent from handheld.
On Nov 19, 2012, at 6:28 PM, Andrew Miehs and...@2sheds.de wrote:
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 9:56 AM, CiscoNSP_list CiscoNSP_list
Thanks Andrew (And apologies for not replying inline, stupid Hotmail make it
nigh on impossible)
We currently only require 1G(SFP), but would like the flexibility to go to 10G
when required...so, something like:
2 x 4500-e with Sup7e + WS-X4748-RJ45-E + WS-X4612-SFP-E ?
Or 2 x 4500x with
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 11:34 AM, CiscoNSP_list CiscoNSP_list
cisconsp_l...@hotmail.com wrote:
2 x 4500-e with Sup7e + WS-X4748-RJ45-E + WS-X4612-SFP-E ?
Or 2 x 4500x with similar ports as 4500-e
Or 2 x Nexus 5548
Is there a big price difference between these?
Contact your Cisco
If you seriously have 10G on the roadmap, 4500X looks sweet, you can get
it in a 16-port version, SFP / SFP+ you upgrade as you are ready. A
pair of them in a VSS deployment is going to be pretty steep however,
especially if you need smart layer-3 (Enterprise).
Otherwise perhaps a 4507E+R with a
Now that the price list appears to be updated on CCX and netformx, it seems the
4500X is a pretty good choice. I didn't have the same experience with steep
pricing on the ent version, at least not when compared to the LAN base - IP
base - Ent upgrade pricing for the 4500E.
-ryan
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Jeff Kell jeff-k...@utc.edu wrote:
If you seriously have 10G on the roadmap, 4500X looks sweet, you can get
it in a 16-port version, SFP / SFP+ you upgrade as you are ready. A
pair of them in a VSS deployment is going to be pretty steep however,
especially
On 11/19/2012 8:38 PM, Andrew Miehs wrote:
The OP seemed to be having an issue with bursty traffic, which is why
I would push him away from the 37xx product line.
Yes. I continue to be disappointed at 2960/3560/3570 buffer performance
(so much to the extent that we're currently deploying
Thanks - Yes, all our trunk ports only allow certain vlans.
From: rob...@custodiandc.com
To: cisconsp_l...@hotmail.com; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2012 09:44:44 +
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] vlan limit hit...but havent?
Hi - also check all your trunk ports and make sure
No, Its a C2960G-48TC-L (44Gig copper + 4 SFP)
From: a.l.m.bu...@lboro.ac.uk
To: cisconsp_l...@hotmail.com; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] vlan limit hit...but havent?
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2012 09:15:12 +
24 port with couple of SFP ports?
I've got a sneaking suspicion
thanks Robert - vtp pruning is not enabled (And switch was reloaded recently
when IOS was updated)
sh vlan br | count act reports 254 though:
Number of lines which match regexp = 254
Any idea where the switch is getting the existing vlan number of 220?
Number of existing VLANs : 220
That's right, using QinQ the provider will tag all frames (customer's
various VLAN ID frames) using the same VLAN ID at all edges.
Thanks Iftikhar - The provider also offers a service where we do the QinQ(we
control all client(tails) vlans)would we configure the Agg port connecting
to
Hi guys,
I've just tried to configured a SNMP community string in IOS-XR 4.1.2
without success I got the follow error:
snmp-server community %test)
RP/0/0/CPU0:ex-RR1(config)#snmp-server community %test)
^
% Invalid input detected at
Maybe Ethernet CFM at both ends?
adam
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
43 matches
Mail list logo
