It has pretty much always been on some flavor of 6748 card, but I
don't know if it has only happened on, for example, SFP blades or
copper blades.
Thanks,
John
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 5:50 AM, Xuhu jstuxuhu0...@gmail.com wrote:
Which line card u r running, I tested previous and found some line
On Jan 15, 2014, at 10:25 PM, Sukumar Subburayan (sukumars)
sukum...@cisco.com wrote:
Error in the DBUS (data bus) header indicates that you have had hardware.
Or that you need to re-seat the linecard(s)/RP(s) in question . . .
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Cisco Security Advisory: Multiple Vulnerabilities in Cisco Secure Access
Control System
Advisory ID: cisco-sa-20140115-csacs
Revision 1.0
For Public Release 2014 January 15 12:00 UTC (GMT
I need to monitor (graph) via snmp, bytes in bytes out of an mpls pw on a
me3600... I think I've found the snmp oid that corresponds to the received
bytes on that pw, but I'm unable to find the snmp oid that is for the sent
bytes. Does anyone know what that would be or how could I find out what
Stop.. my mistake, below are for service policy's
Martin
-Original Message-
From: Martin Moens
Sent: 15 January 2014 18:47
To: 'Aaron'; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] snmp monitoring me3600 mpls pseudowire bytes xmit/rcv
Aaron,
receive oid should be
Aaron,
receive oid should be 1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.166.1.15.1.1.11.x.y
transmit oid should be 1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.166.1.15.1.1.18.x.y
The x and y likely will change between reboots...
gl...
Martin
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
Can anyone give any pointers where to start on DWDM, any good books/blogs
etc?
Ideally looking for a 'idiots guide', I have a good handle of what DWDM can
provide, but I need to be able to understand/explain the components that
form part of a DWDM solution including things like protected
Likely a good place to start:
http://www.nanog.org/meetings/abstract?id=2086
Ciena, Cyan, Adva, Infinera, Cube Optics, even some cisco ONS stuff. All
have their pros and cons...
--chip
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 12:44 PM, st...@itps.uk.net wrote:
Can anyone give any pointers where to start on
On Wednesday, January 15, 2014 04:14:39 PM Eric Van Tol
wrote:
Not trying to beat a dead horse, but there wasn't any way
I could do this - they were core nodes in the ring - for
bi-directional communication across the ring, I needed
them IP-adjacent to other core ring nodes. It's a moot
Could you specify which card is a problem?
Thank you very much.
-Original Message-
From: Sukumar Subburayan (sukumars) [mailto:sukum...@cisco.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2014 10:25 PM
To: PlaWanSai RMUTT CPE IX; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Cc: Panuwat Santukaw; Somphong Pokfai;
Any caveats I should be
aware of in a mixed Juniper/Cisco environment?
Nothing major - the only thing I'd say that might sneak up
on you is to enable Multi-Topology (MT) for IPv6 if IS-IS is
your IGP.
Juniper enable IPv6 in IS-IS by default, and it's Single
Topology (ST) by default.
On Thursday, January 16, 2014 04:28:02 AM Eric Van Tol
wrote:
Cool beans. When we transitioned to ISIS years ago, we
made the decision to go MT, so hopefully we should be
fine.
Yes, if you have MT already, there won't be any nasty
surprises.
And since the ME3600X now has working IPv6
12 matches
Mail list logo
