Re: [c-nsp] switch for SAN

Honestly I wouldn't do anything line rate servers on 3XXX. YMMV, if you don't push them hard enough you won't have problems. On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 10:00 AM, Michael Malitsky wrote: > Biggest issue is buffer space. 3750X has 2750KB shared between 24 GE ports. > Switch

Re: [c-nsp] A switch with huge number of Mac address

> Hi everybody > We want to purchase a switch with 1G/10G ports (at least 96 ports) which > can support up to 192k of Mac addresses. > Is there any product in market which can provide this flexibilty? Rack unit > is alao a factor An interesting (brand-) new platform is the Cisco NCS 5000 series.

Re: [c-nsp] A switch with huge number of Mac address

Perhaps check out Arista. If you’re willing to run two switches as a stack, the 7280 would work great for this. 256k MAC/ARP and 128k IPv6 neighbor cache with 48 SFP+, but depending on model, you have QSFP+/QSFP100/MXP ports that you can use to gain more 10gig ports, so potentially up to 72

Re: [c-nsp] A switch with huge number of Mac address

Lukas Tribus wrote: > The datasheet [1] doesn't mention mac limits (or route limits), but its is > certainly not the box you would use as mpls edge (carrying the full table). from what I gather, NCS5001 uses broadcom trident 2 or 2+ and ncs5002 uses bcom tomahawk. On that basis, I'd speculate

Re: [c-nsp] ASR 1001-x rock solid code?

On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 01:50:42PM -0800, Scott Voll wrote: > I'm just getting a couple ASR's and do not have any in production, but have > to move to production in short order. Can someone give me some idea of the > most rock solid code for these guys right now? I'm just routing packets on > a

Re: [c-nsp] switch for SAN

--- Begin Message --- On 9/01/2016 3:53 AM, Chuck Church wrote: What are your needs? 10GE? Layer 3 capable? There are a lot of small Cisco switches. The main difference between the 3650 and 3850 is the wireless controller thing to my knowledge. Not really beneficial to a SAN switch.

[c-nsp] ASR 1001-x rock solid code?

I'm just getting a couple ASR's and do not have any in production, but have to move to production in short order. Can someone give me some idea of the most rock solid code for these guys right now? I'm just routing packets on a wan internally so nothing big. Came with 3.13.2S but the only MD is

Re: [c-nsp] switch for SAN

On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 3:44 PM, Adam Greene wrote: > I know running Catalyst switches for SAN backbone fabric is not the best > idea, due to limited buffers. > > > > However, we have been doing just that with a 3750X and Dell Equallogic > 6100/4100s for quite some time,

Re: [c-nsp] switch for SAN

Biggest issue is buffer space. 3750X has 2750KB shared between 24 GE ports. Switch models starting with 29XX are similar or worse. 3650 and 3850 show 12MB shared between 48 ports (http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/switches/catalyst-3650-series-switches/qa_c67-729531.html). I

Re: [c-nsp] ISDN on 15.1M on 7200?

Hey Gert, > So, in the end, I used an 1803 with 12.4T on it, which does all I need > there (IPv4 and IPv6 VRF, IPv4 NAT, ISDN!)... You wanna stick to that release. The 1800 series [180x/181x] halts and catches fire when collecting entropy from the hardware encryption module (>= 15.1(4)M3) on

Re: [c-nsp] switch for SAN

On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 1:44 AM, Adam Greene wrote: > I know running Catalyst switches for SAN backbone fabric is not the best > idea, due to limited buffers. > > > However, we have been doing just that with a 3750X and Dell Equallogic > 6100/4100s for quite some time, with

Re: [c-nsp] ISDN on 15.1M on 7200?

Hi, On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 11:41:50AM +0100, Gert Doering wrote: > possibly naive question to the room... does ISDN BRI still work with > 15.1M, as in "is it working for one of you"? > > I have a 7200 with 15.1(4)M9 here that I try to make ISDN calls on a > PA-8B-S/T, and it refuses cooperation

Re: [c-nsp] How many maximum routes does Cisco 2900 router support?

Our 2921 with a full routing table, 2GB RAM, and around 60M aggregate throughput hovers around 40-50% CPU utilization, with occasional higher spikes. When we were pushing >100M aggregate through it, the CPU was regularly spiking to near 100%. We have another one with multiple BGP sessions, 512MB

[c-nsp] switch for SAN

Hi all, I know running Catalyst switches for SAN backbone fabric is not the best idea, due to limited buffers. However, we have been doing just that with a 3750X and Dell Equallogic 6100/4100s for quite some time, with no issues. We are putting in a NetApp FAS3160 and need to add a

Re: [c-nsp] A switch with huge number of Mac address

On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 5:05 PM, Alireza Soltanian wrote: > We want to purchase a switch with 1G/10G ports (at least 96 ports) which > can support up to 192k of Mac addresses. > Is there any product in market which can provide this flexibilty? Rack unit > is alao a factor >

Re: [c-nsp] IOS CSRv1000 Power script error

On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 5:32 PM, Alireza Soltanian wrote: > To be exact the version is 3.13 this version works fine with 2.5GB of RAM. > I Also have same issue with 3.15 > I dont have issue with 3.16 but it takes 4GB of RAM which I have problem > Strange, it's CSR on my

Re: [c-nsp] switch for SAN

What are your needs? 10GE? Layer 3 capable? There are a lot of small Cisco switches. The main difference between the 3650 and 3850 is the wireless controller thing to my knowledge. Not really beneficial to a SAN switch. Since Cisco tends to not publish buffer sizes for a lot of these small

Re: [c-nsp] IOS CSRv1000 Power script error

To be exact the version is 3.13 this version works fine with 2.5GB of RAM. I Also have same issue with 3.15 I dont have issue with 3.16 but it takes 4GB of RAM which I have problem On Jan 8, 2016 7:58 PM, "Robert Hass" wrote: > Which CSR version ? I'm running couple of CSR

Re: [c-nsp] switch for SAN

The 3850 will perform better as it has larger buffers than the 3750X. 3850 is an upgrade in everyway. -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Adam Greene Sent: Friday, January 08, 2016 7:44 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject:

Re: [c-nsp] A switch with huge number of Mac address

MLXe is more of a core router, even if it can do some heavy switching. I suggest you take a look at the VDX switchs that could better match you needs. Best regards. > Le 8 janv. 2016 à 17:44, Alireza Soltanian a écrit : > > Thank you I will check these devices >> On Jan

[c-nsp] A switch with huge number of Mac address

Hi everybody We want to purchase a switch with 1G/10G ports (at least 96 ports) which can support up to 192k of Mac addresses. Is there any product in market which can provide this flexibilty? Rack unit is alao a factor Thank you for your help and support.

Re: [c-nsp] How many maximum routes does Cisco 2900 router support?

On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 3:23 PM, Adam Greene wrote: > Our 2921 with a full routing table, 2GB RAM, and around 60M aggregate > throughput hovers around 40-50% CPU utilization, with occasional higher > spikes. When we were pushing >100M aggregate through it, the CPU was >

Re: [c-nsp] IOS CSRv1000 Power script error

Which version of VMWARE and Windows? I am using Windows 10 home and VMware 12 On Jan 8, 2016 8:11 PM, "Robert Hass" wrote: > On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 5:32 PM, Alireza Soltanian > wrote: > > > To be exact the version is 3.13 this version works fine with

[c-nsp] IOS CSRv1000 Power script error

Hi I am trying to run CSRv1000 on VMWare Workstation 12. The problem is whenever the machine is started I got an error about failing to run a power script. This also causes preventing the suspension of machine. The machine works fine but this error is annoying. Do you know what should I do about

Re: [c-nsp] IOS CSRv1000 Power script error

Which CSR version ? I'm running couple of CSR s1000V in production and LAB (all in few different versions). Never had problems like you mentioned. But I'm always deploying on ESXi, although it shouldn't be important as VM Workstation should be also supported. Did you deployed CSR from OVA ? Rob

Re: [c-nsp] A switch with huge number of Mac address

Thank you I will check these devices On Jan 8, 2016 8:03 PM, "Robert Hass" wrote: > On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 5:05 PM, Alireza Soltanian > wrote: > >> We want to purchase a switch with 1G/10G ports (at least 96 ports) which >> can support up to 192k of Mac