You are describing something I ran into last week when I did some testing with
Juniper ACX1100 and SRX300's, and a Cisco 7301 in our lab. I realize that the
7301 is a far cry from a 6500, but perhaps the anecdote will help.
A Cisco 7301 was our P router in the lab, and had LDP propagation
Hi All,
We are having some serious issue with one customer circuit.We are using
eompls vlan based & we are unable to pass traffic over eompls (l2)tunnel
between Cisco 3550 switches if we use specifically Cisco 6503 ,Cisco 6504 &
6506 etc. If we use Cisco switch 6524 instead of Cisco 6503 it is
Hi,
we're using 7280SR as the full BGP routing edge with a great success, on
many POPs. 2-3 full BGP feeds from eBGP neighbors (with VERY complex
route-maps), a few iBGP peers, sFlow..
The biggest limitation is that it can handle just ~2M routes in RIB so
you can not receive more than 3
On 12/1/16 10:25 AM, Azher Mughal wrote:
On 12/1/2016 12:28 AM, Adrian Minta wrote:
Thanks Gert & Peter. I’m going to look into the 9001. We have a
bunch of Arista in the core doing ospf/ospfv3, the rep there
suggested their 7280SR, which is 48 SFP+, 6 QSFP, and they claim it’s
stable as a
On 12/01/2016 06:25 PM, Azher Mughal wrote:
On 12/1/2016 12:28 AM, Adrian Minta wrote:
Thanks Gert & Peter. I’m going to look into the 9001. We have a
bunch of Arista in the core doing ospf/ospfv3, the rep there
suggested their 7280SR, which is 48 SFP+, 6 QSFP, and they claim it’s
stable as
On 12/1/2016 12:28 AM, Adrian Minta wrote:
>> Thanks Gert & Peter. I’m going to look into the 9001. We have a
>> bunch of Arista in the core doing ospf/ospfv3, the rep there
>> suggested their 7280SR, which is 48 SFP+, 6 QSFP, and they claim it’s
>> stable as a BGP router with limitations of
Lukas Tribus wrote:
> NCS550x series goes in that direction, 5501 being QumranMX based
> and 5502/5508 being Jericho based.
Yeah, but "competitively priced":
http://itprice.com/cisco-gpl/NCS-5502
There would want to be very compelling technical reasons to want to fork
out $72.00, where
> Lukas Tribus
> Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2016 11:23 PM
>
> > The QSFP shaped ports can take either QSFP28 (100G) or regular QSFP
> > (40G) transceivers. Also, it's "about 1.2M" ipv4 routes. This is a
> > deep buffer broadcom jericho based box, so shows interesting
> > potential, but will
On 12/01/2016 01:22 AM, Lukas Tribus wrote:
NCS550x series goes in that direction, 5501 being QumranMX based
and 5502/5508 being Jericho based.
Also there is the Tomahawk based NCS 5011.
BRKSDN-2063 [1] has those infos, including port configuration at page 19.
Lukas
[1]]
Thanks Gert & Peter. I’m going to look into the 9001. We have a bunch of
Arista in the core doing ospf/ospfv3, the rep there suggested their 7280SR, which
is 48 SFP+, 6 QSFP, and they claim it’s stable as a BGP router with limitations of
1.2M ipv4 / 768k ipv6 routes, simultaneously, no
10 matches
Mail list logo
