Re: [c-nsp] IOS-XR BGP RR MCID (Multiple Cluster ID)

2018-03-13 Thread Mark Tinka
On 13/Mar/18 18:47, adamv0...@netconsultings.com wrote: > Ok you’re still missing the point, let me ty with the following example. > > Now suppose we both have: > pe1-cluster-1 sending prefix X to rr1-cluster1 and rr2-cluster1 and these are > then reflecting it further to RRs in cluster2

Re: [c-nsp] uBR10K PRE4-RP Version 12.2(33)SCG6 - PFX Crashes

2018-03-13 Thread Pierre Emeriaud
2018-03-13 2:09 GMT+01:00 Skyler Blumer : > Some additional background - We contract with a third party for our > CMTS/Modem NMS that our CSRs use. It's mostly SNMP. based, but they do have > limited read-only ssh access to screen-scrap a few things. I only say this >

Re: [c-nsp] mpls on isrv

2018-03-13 Thread BALLA Attila
It seems to me, that upgrading ENCS to 3.7.1 solved this issue... On Tue, 13 Mar 2018, BALLA Attila wrote: Hello, I have just received an ENCS5412 for testing, I have installed an ISRv and connected the ENCS to an external MPLS router. The routing and LDP is working fine between them, but

Re: [c-nsp] spanning-tree for local switching on ASR920

2018-03-13 Thread Nick Cutting
Well in some of the earlier guides (16.5 and below) it is explicitly stated that MST only supported on EVC tagged ports: "Untagged EVCs do not participate in MST loop detection" 16.6 and 16.7 Documentation, doesn't mention this restriction. So I guess to run STP with the client facing ports -

Re: [c-nsp] GRE tunnel issue - ASR 903

2018-03-13 Thread Mouniri Md
Hello Gauthier, Thanks for your feedback. I'll find out another way then. Regards, Mouniri ⁣Envoyé par BlueMail ​ Le 13 mars 2018 à 14:28, à 14:28, Gauthier DOUCHET a écrit: >Hello Mouniri, > >I met the same problem with a GRE tunnel on ARS920. >At this moment, I

Re: [c-nsp] IOS-XR BGP RR MCID (Multiple Cluster ID)

2018-03-13 Thread adamv0025
Ok you’re still missing the point, let me ty with the following example. Now suppose we both have: pe1-cluster-1 sending prefix X to rr1-cluster1 and rr2-cluster1 and these are then reflecting it further to RRs in cluster2 Now in your case: rr1-cluster2 receives prefix X from both

[c-nsp] OSPFv3 in CoPP

2018-03-13 Thread Drew Weaver
Howdy, This is SUP2T, I am just playing with this in a lab (I realize sup2t is dead). I notice that if I enable a CoPP policy and then do clear ipv6 ospf process 1 (yes) the process gets stuck forever in EXSTART until I remove the service-policy and then instantly It connects and begins

Re: [c-nsp] IOS-XR BGP RR MCID (Multiple Cluster ID)

2018-03-13 Thread Mark Tinka
On 13/Mar/18 13:04, adamv0...@netconsultings.com wrote: > Keeping RR1s separate from RR2s is all about memory efficiency, That memory saving could now be entering the real of "extreme", but hey, your network :-)... > > The same rationale is behind having sessions between RRs as

Re: [c-nsp] GRE tunnel issue - ASR 903

2018-03-13 Thread Gauthier DOUCHET
Hello Mouniri, I met the same problem with a GRE tunnel on ARS920. At this moment, I haven't found a working solution. I tried to play with MTU values but didn't seem to have an impact. Gauthier 2018-03-12 21:24 GMT+01:00 Mouniri Md : > Hello all, > > I tested gre

Re: [c-nsp] uBR10K PRE4-RP Version 12.2(33)SCG6 - PFX Crashes

2018-03-13 Thread Skyler Blumer
A few off-net replies let me know that attachments don't work on this list, but I will provide them off list if anyone is willing to help. On 3/12/18 9:09 PM, Skyler Blumer wrote: Hello, In the past two weeks, we've had 4 different UBR10Ks with PRE4s crash for unknown reasons. They're all on

Re: [c-nsp] IOS-XR BGP RR MCID (Multiple Cluster ID)

2018-03-13 Thread adamv0025
Keeping RR1s separate from RR2s is all about memory efficiency, I go with the premise that all I need is a full mesh between RR1s in order to distribute all the routing information across the whole backbone. The exact mirror of RR1s’ infrastructure (same topology, same set of prefixes) but

[c-nsp] mpls on isrv

2018-03-13 Thread BALLA Attila
Hello, I have just received an ENCS5412 for testing, I have installed an ISRv and connected the ENCS to an external MPLS router. The routing and LDP is working fine between them, but the baby giant frames are dropped somewhere: it means that 1500-byte long packets with two labels and DF-bit