On 13/Mar/18 18:47, adamv0...@netconsultings.com wrote:
> Ok you’re still missing the point, let me ty with the following example.
>
> Now suppose we both have:
> pe1-cluster-1 sending prefix X to rr1-cluster1 and rr2-cluster1 and these are
> then reflecting it further to RRs in cluster2
2018-03-13 2:09 GMT+01:00 Skyler Blumer :
> Some additional background - We contract with a third party for our
> CMTS/Modem NMS that our CSRs use. It's mostly SNMP. based, but they do have
> limited read-only ssh access to screen-scrap a few things. I only say this
>
It seems to me, that upgrading ENCS to 3.7.1 solved this issue...
On Tue, 13 Mar 2018, BALLA Attila wrote:
Hello,
I have just received an ENCS5412 for testing, I have installed an ISRv and
connected the ENCS to an external MPLS router.
The routing and LDP is working fine between them, but
Well in some of the earlier guides (16.5 and below) it is explicitly stated
that MST only supported on EVC tagged ports:
"Untagged EVCs do not participate in MST loop detection"
16.6 and 16.7 Documentation, doesn't mention this restriction.
So I guess to run STP with the client facing ports -
Hello Gauthier,
Thanks for your feedback.
I'll find out another way then.
Regards,
Mouniri
Envoyé par BlueMail
Le 13 mars 2018 à 14:28, à 14:28, Gauthier DOUCHET
a écrit:
>Hello Mouniri,
>
>I met the same problem with a GRE tunnel on ARS920.
>At this moment, I
Ok you’re still missing the point, let me ty with the following example.
Now suppose we both have:
pe1-cluster-1 sending prefix X to rr1-cluster1 and rr2-cluster1 and these are
then reflecting it further to RRs in cluster2
Now in your case:
rr1-cluster2 receives prefix X from both
Howdy,
This is SUP2T, I am just playing with this in a lab (I realize sup2t is dead).
I notice that if I enable a CoPP policy and then do clear ipv6 ospf process 1
(yes) the process gets stuck forever in EXSTART until I remove the
service-policy and then instantly It connects and begins
On 13/Mar/18 13:04, adamv0...@netconsultings.com wrote:
> Keeping RR1s separate from RR2s is all about memory efficiency,
That memory saving could now be entering the real of "extreme", but hey,
your network :-)...
>
> The same rationale is behind having sessions between RRs as
Hello Mouniri,
I met the same problem with a GRE tunnel on ARS920.
At this moment, I haven't found a working solution.
I tried to play with MTU values but didn't seem to have an impact.
Gauthier
2018-03-12 21:24 GMT+01:00 Mouniri Md :
> Hello all,
>
> I tested gre
A few off-net replies let me know that attachments don't work on this
list, but I will provide them off list if anyone is willing to help.
On 3/12/18 9:09 PM, Skyler Blumer wrote:
Hello,
In the past two weeks, we've had 4 different UBR10Ks with PRE4s crash
for unknown reasons. They're all on
Keeping RR1s separate from RR2s is all about memory efficiency,
I go with the premise that all I need is a full mesh between RR1s in order to
distribute all the routing information across the whole backbone.
The exact mirror of RR1s’ infrastructure (same topology, same set of prefixes)
but
Hello,
I have just received an ENCS5412 for testing, I have installed an ISRv
and connected the ENCS to an external MPLS router.
The routing and LDP is working fine between them, but the baby giant
frames are dropped somewhere: it means that 1500-byte long packets
with two labels and DF-bit
12 matches
Mail list logo