[c-nsp] ip vrf autoclassify source - loss of connectivity to hosts

5.255.1/32 receive Bundle1 10.145.255.2/32 attached Bundle1 10.145.255.220/32attached Bundle1 10.145.255.255/32receive Bundle1 - Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco Supply Chain issues in Amsterdam?

We had a supply chain issue a while back with Cisco we use more Juniper gear now.:| ...options are good - Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 3750G backplane throughput

but while I'm thinking about it... What in the heck are you doing using a 3750 for uplink to provider!! LOL (Just kidding, I couldn't resist) - Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco ONS TCC2P Question

We are doing every 5 min. Running 10.6.2. Also we are not doing anything but amplification. On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 8:57 PM, Brandon Applegate wrote: > In a former life we had this happen all the time (initially). We were > polling the nodes via SNMP and this seemed to run

Re: [c-nsp] ospf database size - affects that underlying transport mtu might have

site, and my cisco asr9006 at my core... everything in the middle was 3 different 3rd parties transporting my 901 and 9k via layer 2 ) -Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp

[c-nsp] ospf database size - affects that underlying transport mtu might have

to cause some sort of initial database packet to be larger than that underlying 3rd party mtu is providing -Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http

Re: [c-nsp] cisco ip nat question

You may be able to accomplish it with proxy arp and not have to nat I recall proxy arp will allow hosts to arp for everything, and the router to arp reply to any and all arps on the subnet with its own mac address -Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list

Re: [c-nsp] Juniper MX240 & MX480

there. We needed CGNAT also. We decided to go with MXX960's with MS-MPC's in them. MPC-7E linecards with QSFP28 interfaces for building a 100 gig mpls core I liked the Juniper CGNAT better than the Cisco ASR9000 VSM-500 - Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing

Re: [c-nsp] Juniper MX240 & MX480

... hey, y'all started it , lol -Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

[c-nsp] 100Gb Optics

We’re doing 100 gig dwdm on several platforms. I assume you are looking no for Grey optics. On Monday, October 2, 2017, Mark Mason > wrote: > Educate me community. What are you guys doing for and with 100Gb LR >

Re: [c-nsp] config example xconnent between ASR9K and 6500

Please send this output... show run l2vpn bridge group BG_MST_VALLE bridge-domain BD_MST-VALLE-VLAN-70 - Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] config example xconnent between ASR9K and 6500

An the ASR9k, send the error during commit and then also the "show configuration failed" output. That looks like a manual ldp-based vpls config Are you trying to do manual ldp vpls on a 6500 ? -Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list

Re: [c-nsp] config example xconnent between ASR9K and 6500

What is Smart Edge ? -Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] config example xconnent between ASR9K and 6500

drama, soft (control plane) and hard (fwd’ing plane). -Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] config example xconnent between ASR9K and 6500

Thanks Curtis, Are you saying that mtu’s only matter if you force a static mpls label ? -Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail

Re: [c-nsp] config example xconnent between ASR9K and 6500

l2 vc interface g0/5 detail sh mpls l2 vc interface g0/5 detail | in MTU - Aaron Gould ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] ISIS/BFD Monitoring

Kiwi syslogd or maybe splunk -Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] OSPF equal cost load balancing

In my mpls cloud I usually would lag dual gige's together to feed my PE boxes with more bandwidth. Worked well for me -Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http

Re: [c-nsp] OSPF equal cost load balancing

is consisting of the destination network. If parallel paths exist this does not provide load balancing, as only one path would be used. …. -Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive

Re: [c-nsp] OSPF equal cost load balancing

your output to protect the innocent... Show ip route a.b.c.d Show ip arp of next hop If it goes via L2 Show mac-address-table address .. -Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman

Re: [c-nsp] cisco 3850 eigrp - sending goodbye - can't ping any 224.0.0.10

yed stable for over 3 minutes (previously, the goodbye eigrp teardown was happening every 80 seconds) I don't have access at the moment, it's the customer gear and they allow me remote access only when they need my help. I told them to take my findings and call the cisco t

[c-nsp] cisco 3850 eigrp - sending goodbye - can't ping any 224.0.0.10

on the vlan Router eigrp 1 configs are same - Aaron Gould ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] nfSen / nfDump

netflow -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Phil Mayers Sent: Friday, August 4, 2017 3:08 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] nfSen / nfDump On 03/08/17 22:53, Aaron Gould wrote: > I do 1/512 sample rate on

Re: [c-nsp] nfSen / nfDump

We run Nfsen 1.3.6 - Aaron -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Nick Cutting Sent: Tuesday, August 1, 2017 4:00 PM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] nfSen / nfDump Slightly off topic, however related to the solarwinds

Re: [c-nsp] nfSen / nfDump

I do 1/512 sample rate on my asr9k's and usually multiple numbers gathered in nfsen by 512 to normalize -Aaron -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Patrick Cole Sent: Tuesday, August 1, 2017 6:17 PM To: Nick Cutting <nc

Re: [c-nsp] Basic IP to Port finding question on Cisco 3850

Yes 3750#sh ip arp 10.101.15.21 Protocol Address Age (min) Hardware Addr Type Interface Internet 10.101.15.21 147 001c.5779.d841 ARPA Vlan4000 -Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https

Re: [c-nsp] Nexus 7707 as Internet Edge Router?

Please let me know what y'all mean by this comment regarding *policing on LAG's*. I'm thinking about doing this and would like to know what you mean by that. -Aaron Gould "We have refused to use the ASR9000 as an edge router because of how Cisco implement policing on LAG's, in general. Ho

Re: [c-nsp] Basic IP to Port finding question on Cisco 3850

- 0013.8039.eac1 ARPA Vlan4000 Internet 10.101.15.21 185 001c.5779.d841 ARPA Vlan4000 3750#sh mac address-table dynamic | in 4055.3970.f265 40004055.3970.f265DYNAMIC Gi1/0/26 -Aaron -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun

Re: [c-nsp] ASR9k LC fib programming problem

the outbound acl to the interfacecommit Fixed. Yeah, seemed like a stuck entry somewhere. I hope you find your stuck routing issue -Aaron Gould ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp

Re: [c-nsp] ASR9K - 6PE packets punted to RP

:| -Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] ASR9K - 6PE packets punted to RP

and punting issues. -Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] STM-1 over MPLS using ASR920

This it ? http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/routers/asr920/configuration/guide/mpls /mp-basic-xe-3s-asr920-book/mp-basic-xe-3s-asr920-book_chapter_0111.html#GUI D-BF893529-A91C-499C-AE8F-7B13A4AA9A3F - Aaron -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net

[c-nsp] timers on ipv6 routes in IOS

[200/0] via :::10.101.0.9 (nexthop in vrf default), 00:09:49 C2468:2468:0:8::f:8000/127 is directly connected, 2y42w, TenGigE0/1/0/1 L2468:2468:0:8::f:8001/128 is directly connected, 2y42w, TenGigE0/1/0/1 RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:stlr-9k# -Aaron Gould

Re: [c-nsp] Matching EXP bits in ME3600

You might be able to "show ip access-list EF-CLASS-ACL" and see which line is taking hits Also, would be curious to see what this shows also... sh policy-map interface g0/24 -Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether

Re: [c-nsp] ASR9010 problem - CRC ERROR - DATA PATH FAILED

created multiple cases about this same problem, I'm pretty sure I have. - Aaron Details RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:blcn-9k#sh ver | in Chassis Mon Jun 5 07:00:18.129 CDT ASR-9010 DC Chassis RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:blcn-9k#show platform Mon Jun 5 06:58:03.807 CDT NodeType State

Re: [c-nsp] ASR9010 problem - CRC ERROR - DATA PATH FAILED

arded message -- > From: Randy <randy_94...@yahoo.com <javascript:;>> > To: Aaron Gould <aar...@gvtc.com <javascript:;>>, "'cisco-nsp'" < > cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net <javascript:;>> > Cc: > Bcc: > Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2017 23:47:10 +

[c-nsp] ASR9010 problem - CRC ERROR - DATA PATH FAILED

27]: %PLATFORM-DIAGS-3-PUNT_FABRIC_DATA_PATH_FAILED : Clear|online_diag_rsp[233590]|System Punt/Fabric/data Path Test(0x204)|failure threshold is 3, (slot, NP) failed: (0, 0) (0, 1) - Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@p

Re: [c-nsp] RSP failover vs Chassis failover for switch/router clusters

sis routing-engine | grep "uptime|model" Model EX4550-32F Uptime 1441 days, 17 hours, 54 minutes, 48 seconds Model EX4550-32F Uptime 1441 days, 18 hours, 15 minutes, 40 seco

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco ASR vs Juniper

...i re-read some of your criteria... ummm, so I use MX104's and ACX5048's with MP-iBGP for just learning my internal core routes, not big table for world routes... so for what I use those boxes for, they are nice. -Aaron -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco ASR vs Juniper

hit a bug with VPLS that requires a vpls routing-instance bounce to revive, but JTAC just told me the PR is hitting D20 software and fixed in D25 still need to test that. But all in all, I like the ACX5048's. -Aaron -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco ASR vs Juniper

Hi James, I haven't done much with QoS on the ACX5048 yet. When I do, I don't think we will be doing as much as you described with the ME3600. I hardly did any QoS with my ME3600's occasional policer or shaper on efp here and there. -Aaron

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco ASR vs Juniper

its boxestesting it on MX104 now. - Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] NCS4200 - re-badged ASR920 / ASR900 ?

NCS code ? Going off what I know of the NCS5x00 it runs IOS XR 6.x So I guess that would be different from the 920 since I recall it ran XE -Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco

Re: [c-nsp] NCS4200 - re-badged ASR920 / ASR900 ?

Maybe it's to generate more sales... Like the reese's peanut butter cup was good, but wait til you try the reese's peanut butter egg. ... LOL -Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo

Re: [c-nsp] NCS4200 - re-badged ASR920 / ASR900 ?

-products/pathway-pages/hardware/qfx-series/qfx5100.html -Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] Broadband Aggregation/Termination

Thanks Andrew, yes we have logs (dhcp/cgnat) for subpoena/law enforcement stuff. We use hsrp for first hop redundancyand I think v6 RA's have first-hop redundancy built-in... however for faster failover times, I may opt for v6-hsrp... we'll see.. - Aaron

Re: [c-nsp] Broadband Aggregation/Termination

I don't have google problems via my cgnat... Yessir, v6 is on the heels of my cgnat deployment... and I love the idea of moving v4 load (to v6) off the nat's when I do this and thus freeing up my vrf's and nat's for more public v4 throws into the nat environment... Thanks Jared -Aaron

Re: [c-nsp] Broadband Aggregation/Termination

did have a problem with our out-sourced email provider about the too-many-requests-from-one-ip thing you mentioned…. Junos cgnat tricks worked to fix that problem… I could dig in to the actual junos commands if you need them -Aaron ___ cisco-nsp

Re: [c-nsp] Broadband Aggregation/Termination

cpuload and carry over 100,000 translations at peak time and about ~2 gbps of traffic -Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco

Re: [c-nsp] Broadband Aggregation/Termination

fine point comes to mind now that I had to change something in a profile on the occam (calix) B6 series dslam to allow v6 RA's (router advertisements) to flow correctly... I recall that basic first-hop routing wasn't working until I did that. - Aaron -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp

Re: [c-nsp] Broadband Aggregation/Termination

have to track customer counts to match sufficiently sized subnets/dhcp pools. It's an on-going task, but has recently been relaxed with rolling out cgnat for all 7,000 dsl customers since now I can throw plenty of 10.x.x.x address space at each dsl vlan and forget about it -Aaron

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco and ISIS topology

Make the metric 1 more on the second link. On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 9:57 AM, Olivier CALVANO wrote: > Hi > > i am search to know if it's possible on a cisco 7301 to put a priority at a > link in the ISIS ? > > We have two interface, actually ISIS said for a lot of

Re: [c-nsp] cisco and juniper - virtualization (sdr, psdn, lsys)

sco SDR is supported on any versions of XR or ASR9000/ASR9900 or NCS5x00 ? Or is SDR only supported on GSR and CRS ? - Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.

[c-nsp] cisco and juniper - virtualization (sdr, psdn, lsys)

system domains) Are juniper psdn's more comparable to cisco sdr ? Or are juniper lsys's more comparable to cisco sdr and juniper psdn is something different? Someone please elaborate on these. -Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp

Re: [c-nsp] Understanding A9K Power Status

XR 4.1.2 incase it helps... RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:9k#admin show environment power-supply Thu Feb 2 16:30:13.194 CST R/S/I Modules CapacityStatus (W) 0/PM0/* hostPM 2100Ok 0/PM1/* hostPM 2100Ok 0/PM2/*

Re: [c-nsp] Dual Cisco 7609-S for sale

Ok, sorry, I guess I'll delete the draft email for the tricycle I was trying to get rid of. LOL Again, sorry -Aaron -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Tom Hill Sent: Thursday, February 2, 2017 4:13 PM To: cisco-nsp

Re: [c-nsp] NCS-5501 & 5502 Experiences?

my cisco account team bring one for lab testing. When I looked at a NCS5000 last year the PE functions weren't working. But now I am in the market for a pure P box and might take another look at it. -Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.ne

Re: [c-nsp] NCS-5501 & 5502 Experiences?

I too am looking at the NCS55xx as a potential P-only fast label swapping core box. ... Is segment routing/spring something you/we should be concerned with ? -Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman

[c-nsp] Dual Cisco 7609-S for sale

details if you are serious, at aar...@gvtc.com <mailto:aar...@gvtc.com> -Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] 2 port 100 gig module - ASR9000

. I have ASR9006 with A9K-RSP-4G -Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] 2 port 100 gig module - ASR9000

Thanks Adam, you lost me with that. Please elaborate. -Aaron -Original Message- From: adamv0...@netconsultings.com [mailto:adamv0...@netconsultings.com] Sent: Thursday, January 5, 2017 4:18 PM To: 'Aaron' <aar...@gvtc.com>; 'Tom Hill' <t...@ninjabadger.net>; cisco-nsp@puc

Re: [c-nsp] 2 port 100 gig module - ASR9000

uired." ..fully compatible with all rsp's.. that would seem like all rsp's meaning all. from 4g up to 880 or whatever the newest is. Just want to make sure this is true that this (2) port 100 gig module will work with A9K-RSP-4G

[c-nsp] 2 port 100 gig module - ASR9000

-services-routers/datasheet_C78-662709.html - Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] Segment Routing

that if I learn about RSVP-TE and what I can accomplish with it, that I should NOT move in that direction, but spend time deploying SR and then benefit from the easier TE ? Thanks again Mark, -Aaron From: Mark Tees [mailto:markt...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 3, 2017 10:42 PM

Re: [c-nsp] Segment Routing

by moving towards a segment routed mpls network ? -Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] Ode to the old days

when Y2K crashed everything right ? y'all remember right ? when we all bought bunkers and dehydrated meals and generators and prepared for a worldwide blackout??LOL - Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https

Re: [c-nsp] Ode to the old days

or called in sick ! sw0.s.4503#sh ver | in uptime sw0.s.4503 uptime is 8 years, 28 weeks, 1 day, 8 hours, 4 minutes - Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http

Re: [c-nsp] DDOS Attacks Mitigation

Thanks Gert, I read this too https://ripe71.ripe.net/presentations/42-zendesk-ddos.pdf I read that FastNetMon can forward to a scrubbing center... but I don't read anywhere that FastNetMon or its suite of apps can do the scrubbing. Someone let me know if I'm misunderstanding this - Aaron

Re: [c-nsp] DDOS Attacks Mitigation

Can fastnetmon scrub ? I mean can fastnetmon redirect attack traffic through it and scrub out bad and forward the good ? - Aaron -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Pavel Odintsov Sent: Monday, November 7, 2016 7:27 AM To: Gert

Re: [c-nsp] Loop Prevention in VPLS

On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 9:20 AM, Zahid Khan wrote: > I have issues in VPLS network where we get loop sometimes because of mac > flood from customer side and sometimes because of media loop in last mile. > Being a service provider what are the best practices which I could

[c-nsp] cisco ios dhcp server - option 60 assistance needed

402: DHCPD: creating ARP entry (10.0.12.10, c057.bc23.fe41). *Aug 31 22:51:16.406: DHCPD: unicasting BOOTREPLY to client c057.bc23.fe41 (10.0.12.10). - Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.n

Re: [c-nsp] lacp over mpls pw

Ethernet port. rather, I want the lacp state to terminate on that asr9k so that the 2 pw's appear as lacp bundle group. -Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http

[c-nsp] lacp over mpls pw

Anybody know if you can take a couple mpls pseudowires from 2 remote pe's and land them into one asr9k and at that asr9k perform lacp bundeling over those 2 pw's ? in other words. can you take 2 mpls pw's and bundle them together into an lacp bundle group ? - Aaron

Re: [c-nsp] route processor redundancy basics (RPR)

The other issue is that you mentioned that the RPs have different versions of code. They should be running the same version otherwise the the line cards have to download the code.. On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 6:01 AM, murchison link wrote: > Lukas, > thank you very much. > > On

Re: [c-nsp] asr920 - push two vlans

nonegotiate service instance 1000 ethernet encapsulation dot1q 1000 second-dot1q 100 rewrite ingress tag pop 2 symmetric l2protocol tunnel xconnect 10.101.0.15 1 encapsulation mpls mtu 1500 -Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp

Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 vlan pass through

Does that config work greg ? looks like it should. - Aaron -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Greg Antic Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2016 10:02 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] ASR920 vlan pass through Forgive

Re: [c-nsp] IOS XR and Netconf Operational Data

There are some changes in the config with 5.3.3. Try this as a basic setting control-plane management-plane out-of-band interface MgmtEth0/RSP0/CPU0/0 allow SSH allow SNMP allow NETCONF ! interface MgmtEth0/RSP1/CPU0/0 allow SSH allow SNMP allow NETCONF !

Re: [c-nsp] IOS XR OSPF redistribute to eBGP

Sure... I did... here it is again... RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:grdn-9k#sh run prefix-set send-to-isp Fri Apr 22 18:30:47.346 CDT prefix-set send-to-isp 1.2.3.0/19, 2.4.6.0/20, end-set - Aaron -Original Message- From: Ahmed Sharif [mailto:ahmed.sha...@ericsson.com] Sent: Friday, April 22

Re: [c-nsp] IOS XR OSPF redistribute to eBGP

sp... route-policy ipv4-allow-in pass end-policy ! - Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] mpls and etherchannel

No. per-packet would be enabled with "per-flow" , lol Aaron -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Adam Vitkovsky Sent: Friday, April 22, 2016 8:22 AM To: Mark Tinka <mark.ti...@seacom.mu>; Lukas Tribus <luky...

Re: [c-nsp] mpls and etherchannel

Mike, I'm using lacp etherchannel like crazy all over my mpls network and have been seeing very nice loadbalancing for years. Asr9k and me3600. Aaron -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Mike Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2016 11:52 AM

[c-nsp] csr1000v - GNS3 - i only see aux port console

elp Description of the interactive help system terminal Set terminal line parameters - Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] List dead?

Backhole season. Everyone is working. On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 4:30 PM, Mike wrote: > > No messages from cisco-nsp for a few days, just wondering if it's just > me...? > > ___ > cisco-nsp mailing list

Re: [c-nsp] blackholed traffic on ether-channel

On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 4:14 AM, Holemans Wim wrote: > https://bst.cloudapps.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCuy25743 > C6880-X-LE: Contiguous 4 10G ports goes down and cannot be brought up > > As an solution the page points to 3 new software releases : > Known Fixed

Re: [c-nsp] blackholed traffic on ether-channel

into a somewhat similar port-channel issue on 6880 15.2(1)SY1a. BU told us symptoms were possibly related to CSCuw08272/CSCuy25743. That issue is slated to be fixed in 15.2(1)SY2. -Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.ne

Re: [c-nsp] blackholed traffic on ether-channel

Aaron > On Apr 6, 2016, at 10:55 AM, selamat pagi <keti...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Setup: > 4 port LACP channel, C6880 <-> Nexus 7k > > Recently we had the issue that most (not all) traffic was black-holed on a > C6880. > No interface counters, nor the por

[c-nsp] enf_broker log message - asr9000

IOS XR 4.1.2 ASR9010 Is this a problem ? RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:Mar 14 09:32:18.958 : enf_broker[199]: Could not enqueue disconnect fd 1073741857 for 35046 RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:Mar 14 09:32:37.619 : enf_broker[199]: Could not enqueue disconnect fd 1073741856 for 35046 RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:Mar 14

Re: [c-nsp] DWDM Passive or Active Multiplexing

We are running dwdm with just splitters and amplifiers at 100 GE with no issues. The most we have on at the end is currently 10 wavelengths. Aaron On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 7:04 PM, Jeremy Bresley <b...@brezworks.com> wrote: > On 3/9/2016 6:45 PM, Josh Karki wrote: > >> Hmm

Re: [c-nsp] PBA best practices

Are you talking about cgnat ? if so, Why do you only see blocks 512 and 1024 ? I see 8 - 4096 Where do you see these settings ? I see bulk-port-alloc but I don't see anything about max-blocks-per-user, active-block-timeout, overall mapping-timeout, address sharing ratio ?? Mon Feb 29

Re: [c-nsp] IOS XR vrf export route-policy

will drop out of the route-map logic, and this will not be advertised since there isn't a route-target export statement in the vrf. Cool. Aaron -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Aaron Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 4:40 PM To: cisco

[c-nsp] IOS XR vrf export route-policy

connected, 00:05:53, BVI200 Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] Sup720: dumb question

Assuming you have the correct pinouts (rolled) or the correct console cable. Have you tried a different cable? Do you have any issues connecting to another cisco device? Try to rule out bad cables/connectors/usb-to-serial, etc. On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 3:21 PM, Dave McGuire

Re: [c-nsp] Newbie traceroute question

I think the simplest answer to the question is how "mpls ip propagate-ttl" is configured. "no mpls ip propagate-ttl forwarded" will hide the mpls structure from customers. On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 3:25 PM, Nitzan Tzelniker wrote: > Take a look on this > > >

Re: [c-nsp] NCS-5001 - sweet...got one in the lab

James, I just got info from my account SE that the NCS-5001/2 on Release XR 6.0.0 does not have RSVP-TE support. I asked him previously about something else that isn't supported at the moment (MPLS L3VPN) and he said it's coming at the end of the month. So we will see how that goes. Aaron

Re: [c-nsp] NCS-5001 - sweet...got one in the lab

protocols -Original Message- From: Gert Doering [mailto:g...@greenie.muc.de] Sent: Tuesday, February 2, 2016 1:02 AM To: Aaron <aar...@gvtc.com> Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] NCS-5001 - sweet...got one in the lab Hi, On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 03:52:00PM -0600,

Re: [c-nsp] NCS-5001 - sweet...got one in the lab

Yeah, I just cut a PO for (6) Juniper ACX5048 boxes I gotta have options... I can't just be cisco only. Aaron -Original Message- From: Gert Doering [mailto:g...@greenie.muc.de] Sent: Tuesday, February 2, 2016 8:31 AM To: Aaron <aar...@gvtc.com> Cc: 'Gert Doering' <g...@green

Re: [c-nsp] NCS-5001 - sweet...got one in the lab

More ncs5k info... http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/routers/network-convergence-system-5000-series/products-installation-and-configuration-guides-list.html Aaron -Original Message- From: Robert Blayzor [mailto:rblayzor.b...@inoc.net] Sent: Tuesday, February 2, 2016 9:02 AM To: Aaron

Re: [c-nsp] NCS-5001 - MPLS L3VPN Issue

JTAC over Cisco TAC ? Just looking for your experience since I'm about to embark on that path. Aaron -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of James Bensley Sent: Tuesday, February 2, 2016 7:16 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re

[c-nsp] NCS-5001 - sweet...got one in the lab

wow, check out the interface names at the bottom of the list, yeah the names that start with "H" !! RP/0/RP0/CPU0:eng-lab-5001-1#sh ip int br Mon Feb 1 15:37:16.489 CST Interface IP-Address Status Protocol Vrf-Name Loopback0 10.101.12.244 Up Up default TenGigE0/0/0/0 unassigned Shutdown Down

[c-nsp] NCS-5001 - MPLS L3VPN Issue

UP NSHUT RP/0/RP0/CPU0:eng-lab-5001-1# Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >