>
> Office of Information Technology
> The University of Alabama in Huntsville
> Network Engineering
>
> On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 8:07 AM Alex K. wrote:
> >
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > I was thinking, throughout last design sessions with my customers, those
&g
Hello everyone,
I was thinking, throughout last design sessions with my customers, those
vendors are really pushing hard for their "SDN something" solutions
adoption.
SD WAN, SD access, Software defined everything, are all closed standards,
aren't they? I was wondering why will we abandon the
ver encountered any problem.
Thanks.
Regards,
Alex
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
1150227974 1562000721
ATM3/1/3 55PVP 3258701461 2284739876
ATM3/1/3 155 PVP 1617074216170742
Regards,
Alex
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman
Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software
IOS (tm) LS1010 WA4-5 Software (LS1010-WPK2-M), Version 12.1(12c)EY,
EARLY DEPLOYMENT RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
TAC Support: http://www.cisco.com/tac
Copyright (c) 1986-2002 by cisco Systems, Inc.
Compiled Fri 02-Aug-02 09:13 by eaarmas
Image text-base:
Hello everyone,
A customer of mine's interested in acquiring some NCS boxes, in order to
aggregate all their servers with few NCSes as possible and p2p connect
between them (actually between few small DCs), using VxLAN.
On paper it looks good. NCS seems to offer good port density, reasonable
tress
>
> Gert Doering - Munich, Germany
> g...@greenie.muc.de
> ___
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
--
Alex Moya
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
ty to both the management interface and
all other router interfaces (i.e. router forwarding matrix). Hence leaving
the possibility of routing between the two, open.
Theory aside, can this routing occure in the first place? With the help
say, of rogue employee?
Thank you,
Alex.
בתאריך יום א׳, 21 באפר' 2019,
Sat, 20 Apr 2019, 12:46 Alex K., wrote:
>
>>
>> An interesting question I got from one of my customers - how secure Cisco
>> ASR management interface is? Meaning, how really *separate* it is.
>>
>>
> Its not the vector you describe below but the linked CVE
Hello everyone,
An interesting question I got from one of my customers - how secure Cisco
ASR management interface is? Meaning, how really *separate* it is.
Since after all, ASR CPU is connected to both the management interface and
router forwarding matrix, hence providing at least theoretical
%PLATFORM-4-ELEMENT_WARNING:Switch 1 R0/0: smand: 1/RP/0: Used Memory value
91% exceeds warning level 90%
It's a known bug (CSCvd45973). See
https://quickview.cloudapps.cisco.com/quickview/bug/CSCvd45973
Consider upgrade to e.g. 16.4
Regards,
Alex
I'm too, not aware of such a solution even exists, on Cisco
gear. And after in depth research, I wasn't being able to find it, I turned
to community wisdom.
Have a great day,
Alex.
בתאריך יום ב׳, 1 באוק' 2018, 13:00, מאת :
> > Alex K.
> > Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2018 11:41 AM
&
Hello everyone,
Does Cisco gear (ASRs specifically), have container LSPs (similar to
Juniper, aka MPLS TE++)?
After a lot of research, I was unable to find something similar, while it
can benefit a particular network.
In addition, I'll be glad to hear everyone, on the MPLS TE++ matter.
Anything
/isis-support-mtr.html
Thanks in advance,
Alex.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
me traffic, expected to be caught by your crypto ACL (110).
Alex.
בתאריך יום ג׳, 1 במאי 2018, 20:27, מאת Scott Miller <sc...@ip-routing.net>:
>
> Both sides show the same.
> cpe-rpa-kal-gw-01#show cry isa sa
> IPv4 Crypto ISAKMP SA
> dst src state
lated to your no-nat configuration, but in
my humble opinion, you can safely put it aside, till VPN reached so-called
QM_IDLE state.
Alex.
בתאריך יום ג׳, 1 במאי 2018, 19:02, מאת Scott Miller <sc...@ip-routing.net>:
> I'm trying to create a VPN on two Cisco 3825's, on the same ISP in order to
This will be great.
Especially documenting real world scenarios - IS-IS over MACSec, MPLS and
IP. Putting PCAPs is also very good idea.
I'm speaking for myself, but I think many here will agree - such
documentation will really address current state of affairs.
Thank you.
Alex.
בתאריך יום ג׳
l - on Cisco
website.
Thank you very much for sharing your thoughts.
Alex.
בתאריך יום ו׳, 20 באפר' 2018, 9:47, מאת James Bensley <jwbens...@gmail.com
>:
> On 20 April 2018 at 06:55, Graham Bartlett (grbartle)
> <grbar...@cisco.com> wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > A few o
pretty much on your own
trying to figure out what's going on.
Alex.
בתאריך יום ג׳, 10 באפר' 2018, 16:06, מאת Alan Buxey <alan.bu...@gmail.com>:
> 802.1AE
>
> Look that up for how it works
>
> alan
>
> On Wed, 4 Apr 2018, 00:32 Alex K., <nsp.li...@gmail.c
this far, are some really general sketches of MACSec
exchanges and seemingly unrelated debug commands.
Am I missing something? Any help, such as linking to proper documentation,
successful and unsuccessful debug outputs and such, on and off-list, will
be gladly appreciated.
Thank you,
Alex
Hello everyone,
I really glad to hear everyone opinion.
We're talking about a DC-to-DC scenario, aggregating a few 10GigE WAN
Ethernet links. Fun indeed :)
Brocade ASIC requirement is really discouraging, since no single boxes are
allowed at DCI level.
Sure, most things can survive out of
the products I mentioned above, may shed some light
on the subject.
בתאריך 9 בינו' 2018 18:05, "Saku Ytti" <s...@ytti.fi> כתב:
Hey Alex,
The daemon is not exaggerated, but it's also not inherent problem to
TCP. TCP inherently guarantees correct order, so reordering isn't
Hello everyone,
An interesting issue came across my desk, one I'd like to hear community
opinion about.
A customer of mine, due to carrier restrictions, is about to aggregate a
few links into one (using etherchannel). Due to required bandwidth, it
seems he would need to load balance across the
ld alerts on our NMS which flag when traffic
levels drop extremely low. This works well for major links that always
have traffic.
We also have setup "ip sla" on some links. The status of the ip sla can
then be polled by the NMS over SNMP to detect the state of the link.
On 16/09
Thank you Aaron.
In my humble opinion, syslog is a bit inapplicable. The way I know it, it
will have an error message like "ISIS session to changed to down" (maybe it do has interface name, I don't recall
the exact message right now).
Anyhow, not the neighboring router hostname nor interface
;
>
>
> On 15 Sep 2017 10:50 am, "Alex K." <nsp.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> A customer of mine, ran into interesting problem - his monitoring software
>> unable to provide him with a meaningful alert, in case a link goes
Hello everyone,
A customer of mine, ran into interesting problem - his monitoring software
unable to provide him with a meaningful alert, in case a link goes down.
As an ISP, they have lots of links, they run ISIS/BFD on all of them but,
as it regularly happens with carriers, layer 2 never
Hello everyone,
Is there any known method for offloading on premise WebEx traffic from WAN
circuits?
Let us assume we're dealing with one to many WebEx video stream. Let us
also assume, we have 1000 attendees for that stream in one branch. Is the
genius of Cisco leads to the WAN circuit for that
to gather those (show platform software
status control-processor brief).
Am I missing something? Is gathering values for standby units it's an
impossibility? And I just missed that in the documentation? Anyhow, any
suggestion will be appreciated.
Thank you in advance.
Alex
Hello everyone,
Does anyone uses EVC on Cisco 3900?
It seems, based on Cisco documentation -
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/routers/access/1900/software/configuration/guide/Software_Configuration/evcBD.html
- EVC's supported on G2 (3900 in particular), but - nowhere I can find the
minimum
.
Alex.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
ug?
>
> Best,
>Sebastian.
>
> ___
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
--
Alex Presse
"H
Hello everyone,
One of our customers decided to stream video in their network. Obviously
they ran into problems :)
They are using one of those modern protocols. One of it key features is
adaptive bit rate - i.e. it senses the available bandwidth between the
source and the end PC and adjusts
Hi all,
Can anyone recommend any good nagios checks for time drifting on Cisco routers
and switches ?
-Alex
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net
___
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
--
Alex Presse
"How much net work could a network work if a network could net work?"
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
t; Harry Hambi BEng(Hons) MIET Rsgb
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
> Alex Pressé
> Sent: 19 November 2015 15:01
> To: Daniel Brisson
> Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net; Jared Mauch
> Subject: Re: [c-ns
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> ___
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> ___
Hello everyone,
I'm having a little bit of problem, trying to figure out which multicast
VPN solution will interoperate on both vendors.
It's seems quite certain to me, that both vendors are implementing
draft-rosen (aka dual PIM), but to my knowledge, there're more advanced
solutions nowadays -
Hello,
Thanks for your reply. Am not shaping in the child policy just added the
priority for management.
Seems like a bug:
https://tools.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCuo66446/?referring_site=bugquickvie
wclick
Alex
De : Brian Turnbow <b.turn...@twt.it>
Date : Mon, 5 Oct 2015 19:08:00 +
someone help please?
Regards,
Alex
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
.
Regards,
Alex
Le 10/5/15, 14:13, « Brian Turnbow » <b.turn...@twt.it> a écrit :
> Hi Alex,
>
> on the 9k you can check out shared policy instance for this.
> " Using SPI, a single instance of qos policy can be shared across multiple
> subinterfaces, allo
Hi,
Tried it but seems like in my classes I can¹t go above 128Mbps :(
!!% 'prm_ezhal' detected the 'warning' condition 'Cannot support child/flat
shape rate > 128Mbps¹
Thanks.
Regards,
Alex
De : Brian Turnbow <b.turn...@twt.it>
Date : Mon, 5 Oct 2015 15:13:00 +0200
À : kavi
__
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
--
Alex Presse
"How much net work could a network work if a network could net work?"
___
any (105 hw matches)
Regards,
Alex
Le 7/13/15, 20:46, « Adam Vitkovsky » adam.vitkov...@gamma.co.uk a écrit
:
Hello Alex,
Can you ping the next hop
Can you see it being programed in HW correctly?
show access-lists ipv4 internet hardware ingress location 0/2/cpu0
-if yes can you see some
gi0/2/0/1
ipv4 access-group internet ingress
Can someone help please?
Thanks.
Regards,
Alex
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive
Normal routing is OK. But re-routing to the nexthop is not working at all.
Instead of routing to x.x.x.x it is routed to router’s default route.
Regards,
Alex
From: buz.d...@usg.edu
To: alex.willia...@outlook.com; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ABF not working
Date
Hello,
I know this is a Cisco list, but maybe somebody will kindly help me with
Brocade here. I have the following setup:
L2 switch --- ICX 7750 --- SOME IP NETWORK --- ICX 7750 --- L2 switch
The VXLAN setup is really simple:
vlan 100 name TEMP by port
tagged ethe 1/1/33
interface ethernet
@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
--
Alex Presse
How much net work could a network work if a network could net work?
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
--
Alex Presse
How much net work could a network work if a network could net work?
___
cisco-nsp mailing
Hello everybody,
Although I have “no hello padding” configured, the adjacency won't come up
until I limit the CLNS MTU on some link in my network (there is an MTU
issue on that link, it's not 1500).
As far as I remember, Cisco IOS implementation of IS-IS will *still send
out first* IIHs padded,
There should be a factory-restore.cfg file on the flash. Just load it to
running,copy to startup and reboot.
Alex Moya
On Apr 3, 2014 4:10 PM, Nathaniel Bernadeau nbernad...@gallantsys.com
wrote:
Can anyone help?
--
regards,
Nathaniel Bernadeau
Gallant Systems, LLC
11064 Livingston RD
This is what private vlans are for. On lower end switches you can use protected
switch ports.
Sent from mobile; please excuse brevity typos.
On Mar 23, 2014, at 8:23, M K gunner_...@live.com wrote:
Hi I have two hosts connected to vlan 10 on the same switchI want to prevent
the
/
--
Alex Presse
How much net work could a network work if a network could net work?
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
--
Alex Presse
How much net work could a network work if a network could net work?
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive
are changed?
(EIGRP won't peer with mismatched k-values...)
Jeff
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
--
Alex Presse
How much net
..
--
*Alex *
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Hello team,
I running an MPLS VPN network over ASR1002 Cisco routers and i have a
request from a client to offer multi-VRF. Is it possible to run the
multi-VRF without affecting the current MPLS network and setup.
--
*Alex *
___
cisco-nsp mailing
Hello,
I have a ARS1000 and the carrier can only offer a DS3 traffic to my
network. Can someone please give me the part number for a module that I can
use, Ethernet (if there is) or Serial
--
*Alex*
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
--
Alex Presse
How much net work could a network work if a network could net work?
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive
/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
--
Alex Presse
How much net work could a network work if a network could net work?
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net
It's the new java update - unsigned code gets user verification windows. Cisco
(and everybody else) will need to update all their java delivered user
interfaces to avoid this annoyance.
Sent from mobile; please excuse brevity typos.
On Nov 2, 2013, at 19:46, chris tknch...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
how much users do you want to terminate on your MX80 ?
Keep in mind, that there is a limit of 16.000 IFLs. When you plan to use
hierarchical qos, better go to a bigger platform.
Regards,
Alex
Am 19.10.2013 21:44, schrieb Enoch Nyatoti:
Hello,
I am new to Juniper hence my request. We
,
Alex
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Hi,
with local-pref you can control outgoing traffic for a specific
destination.
Prefer one of your upstreams based on the source of traffic, you have to
use policy-based routing.
Regards,
Alex
Am 16.10.2013 03:49, schrieb CiscoNSP List:
Thanks for everyone's responses - Would the following
Hi guys,
can anyone give me an indication of the exact differences between
Supervisor Engine 6L-E and Supervisor Engine 6-E for Cat 4506-E
Thanks in advance...
Regards,
Alex
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net
Many thanks for the quick reply. This answers all my open questions...
Regards,
Alex
Am 11.10.2013 12:58, schrieb Joshua Morgan:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps4324/prod_models_comparison.html
On Friday, October 11, 2013, Alex D. wrote:
Hi guys,
can anyone give me
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
--
Alex Presse
How much net work could a network work if a network could net work?
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https
Hello everybody,
Can someone please share a working configuration for 3Com 5500-EI
connecting to Cisco ACS 5.4 (RADIUS)?
Thank you in advance!
Alex.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo
Hello everybody,
Some interesting problem I ran into recently – MQC not supported in output
direction on Sup-2T WS-X6908-10G?
Let consider following simple configuration:
class-map AF1X
match ip dscp af11 af12 af13
class-map AF2X
match ip dscp af21 af22 af23
policy-map TEST
class AF1X
Thank you very much.
I was looking for such document.
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 5:04 PM, Michel Grossenbacher pash...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi Alex
Cat65k with SUP2-T does actually support configuration similar to MQC, its
called C3PL. The issue you got is nothing card related, this is how QoS
/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
--
Alex Presse
How much net work could a network work if a network could net work?
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco
Anyone worked with OTV on some type of layer 2 extension across Data
Centers in different Cities.
Alex Moya
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net
://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
--
Alex Presse
How much net work could a network work if a network could net work?
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net
/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
--
Alex Presse
How much net work could a network work if a network could net work?
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail
/http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
--
Alex Presse
How much net work could a network work if a network could net work?
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http
I don't think the acl VPNNETZE matches what you want it to match.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
OMG never mind; I'm an idiot and didn't see the entire config.
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Alex Pressé alex.pre...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't think the acl VPNNETZE matches what you want it to match.
--
Alex Presse
How much net work could a network work if a network could net work
Hi Pete,
Interesting point. I'll verify this tomorrow.
Thank you.
Best Regards,
Alex.
On Jan 22, 2013 5:55 AM, Pete Lumbis alum...@gmail.com wrote:
Do you have any ports in that VLAN that are not on the SIP?
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 7:19 PM, Alex K. nsp.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Pete
didn't run into some sort of
bug/mis-configuration.
Thank you.
Best Regards,
Alex.
On Jan 22, 2013 8:04 AM, Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) oboeh...@cisco.com
wrote:
Alex,
On 22/01/2013 01:19, Alex K. nsp.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Pete,
We're running 12.2(33)SRA6.
On SIP-200 it's running
* say explicitly ...
On Jan 22, 2013 11:47 AM, Alex K. nsp.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Oliver,
Exactly - not supported. It implies that *if it works (not on SIP-200), it
must be software'.
I came across this document before I sent the question. As it seems, that
what I'll use.
I'm looking
Yes I know. I'm looking for a best match.
I've already sent an email to my local SE.
The point is that I need something official that will state 'yes, it's done
by software, cpu impact is expected'.
Best Regards,
Alex.
On Jan 22, 2013 11:58 AM, Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) oboeh...@cisco.com
wrote
Hi Andy,
Cat6500 is a distributed environment. Not only PFC (or any other one part
for this matter) is responsible for capabilities.
Alex.
On Jan 22, 2013 2:27 PM, Andy Ellsworth a...@dar.net wrote:
If the PFC doesn't support it, it's done in software (or not at all). This
is Cat6500
Hi Pete,
Thank you. By any chance, some of this may become public?
Someone asked me to prove that the vendor officially states that those
packets will be punted.
Alex.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net
Hi Nick,
Yes, it is clear. That's not the point. This list isn't *Cisco official*.
Alex.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Yes Andy, I know.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Please note that the rationale behind this question, was to verify the SVI
functionality for ports on SIP-200 isn't offloaded to NBAR capable SIP-200.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
is not). But, I can't find a document states this.
A link wil be appreciated.
Best Regards,
Alex.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
thoughts on this.
Best Regards,
Alex.
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 9:23 PM, Daniel Husand dan...@fnutt.net wrote:
The following features/traffic types are common features that are not
supported by the 6500 and will cause high CPU if implemented:
**Note this is not an exhausted list and there may
(by the way of exclusion) but in my case it is
supported (i.e. on SVI).
It just sends the CPU thru the roof.
Thank you for your efforts, but that not seems to be document I'm looking
for, either. Will be glad to hear your future thoughts on this one.
Best Regards,
Alex.
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 9:37 PM
, on SVI by software – and this is not a bug/some other
malfunctioning.
I'm asking for a document from which we can understand that, yes, using
NBAR on an SVI will make those packets punted. Technically I agree with you
completely, most likely that’s what happening.
Alex.
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 12:53
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
--
Alex Presse
How much net work could a network work if a network could net work
) 2002 by cisco Systems, Inc.
Warning: monitor nvram area is corrupt ... using default values C7200
platform with 131072 Kbytes of main memory
rommon 1 boot disk0
I have seen a very similar hardware bug on 65K-SUP720s:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/ts/fn/200/fn27595.html
-Alex
enable/disable
statistics-export qos statistics data export
What do you think I'm missing?
Alex.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco
?
Thanks in advance,
Alex.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
R3.111(config-router-af)# neighbor 1.1.1.1 route-map SOO_OUT out
% SOO_OUT used as BGP outbound route-map, set extcommunity soo not
supported
Hopefully this resolves anything unclear in my previous message. Any idea
will be welcomed.
Best Regards,
Alex
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 4:25 PM, Saku
translate the
behavior I pointed out in the beginning of my previous email into
corresponding Cisco CLI without going into interface level (cisco's way of
configuring SoO)?
*P.S. Because there are many-many interfaces involved.*
Best Regards,
Alex.
___
cisco
Hi Saku, please excuse me on misspelling your name.
Alex.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
(another MX box) … I'll
check, thank you.
Best Regards,
Alex.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
, but on the other hand, I saw
no limitations for this command (i.e. either it supported or not).
Alex.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Kiwi Catools works great.
Alex Moya
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 3:59 PM, Josh Baird joshba...@gmail.com wrote:
I have also used Solarwinds' tool - NCM (formerly known as Cirrus).
Works well with a nice interface, but obviously is not free. I
believe it is licensed per device.
Josh
On Fri
1 - 100 of 296 matches
Mail list logo