...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of David Granzer
Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 09:13
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] OSPF Default Route Injection
Hello,
please could someone explain what exactly command default-information
originate always
Hello,
please could someone explain what exactly command default-information
originate always under ospf process works ? When you have more than
one router configured with this default route injection is correct
behavior that you don't see on these routers default route in their ip
routing table
Hello,
I would like to know whether is possible redistrubution between BGP
VPNv4 and OSPF under VRF based on extcommunit rt match.
R1 send to R2 via MP-BGP prefix P1 with RT A:A, on R2 we need
redistribute MP-BGP learned prefixes to OSPF VRF routing process based
on RT value.
!
router ospf 1
Hi,
there are feature BPVCs (bridged-style permanent virtual circuits ),
see
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk39/tk48/technologies_configuration_example09186a0080094ceb.shtml
David
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 4:52 AM, Forrest W. Christian f...@mt.net wrote:
I have a new-to-me Cisco 12008 which
Hello,
please could anybody explain the diffrence when 6500/7600 running with
MLS QoS enabled (mls qos) and when running with MLS QoS disabled no
mls qos ?
Regards,
David
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Hi,
could you post how much bandwidth and packet per second your 7200 ?
Generally upgrade to I/O GE will not
help much because the performance is based on the NPE used.
regards,
David
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 3:52 PM, Juan C. Crespo R. jcposei...@cantv.net wrote:
Guys
I have one POP with
Hello,
did anybody see output below with SXH4 ? Why applying vlan can take a
few minutes ?
6503-lab-1#conf t
Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z.
6503-lab-1(config)#vlan 123
6503-lab-1(config-vlan)#end
% Applying VLAN changes may take few minutes. Please wait..
In lab
that with V1/V2.
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Granzer
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2008 4:37 AM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] SXH4 Applying VLAN changes may take few minutes
Hello,
did anybody see
Hello,
some 1000T SFP are 1000-Full only and does not support auto
negotiation. You can try set 1000-Full on the servers and check if
that helps.
Regards,
David
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 6:17 AM, Vigar, Damien
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
We are experiencing an issue with Windows 2003R2
Hello,
we had exactly the same troubles with SXF15, now we are back to
previous version. It seemed
like CEF related bug.
David
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 5:34 AM, Janet Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm interested in hearing about people's experiences with SXF15/15a,
especially in an
Hello,
with non-XL card you will be limited run non-XL mode, it means you
will not be able to get full BGP. One
workaround might be filter some routes from your upstream and get
default route from him.
David
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 2:07 PM, moshe mizrachi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi ,
i have
Hello,
try sh inventory.
Regards,
David
On 10/2/08, Stephan Lochner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Group,
we have a problem with our 7200 series router. We have a supplier that
handles our maintenance contracts. We want now to put some more devices into
maintenance.
Normally we use the
Hello,
I'm not surre how it works on UC520, but with 3750 (for example) when
you don't have a spanning tree instance for that vlan then the
interface state is up/down.
3750-1#sh spanning-tree vlan 24
Spanning tree instance(s) for vlan 24 does not exist.
3750-1#sh int vlan 24 | i Vlan
Vlan24 is
Hello,
I can't find information about maximum number of class-map supported on a
particular platfom (e.g. 2800, 3800, NPE-G1) in one policy-map. Does
anyone have link
to any documentation or does anyone know how many class-map are supported
in one policy-map ?
Regards,
David
-limitations/
Regards,
David
On 9/25/08, Aaron Riemer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
AFIAK it's 256 mate.
Could be different for the different IOS versions though.
Cheers,
Aaron.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Granzer
Hello,
with CoPP enabled and flood ping to the RSP720 I don't have higher CPU
utilization than is normal on my box. Without CoPP and ICMP flood
(ping -f -s 1400) the CPU util goes to 90% - 99%.
CPU utilization for five seconds: 96%/21%; one minute: 44%; five minutes: 20%
PID Runtime(ms)
Hello,
I have the same output on RSP720-3CXL with mls qos enabled.
RSP720#sh mls qos
QoS is enabled globally
RSP720#sh policy-map control-plane input class copp-management
Control Plane
Service-policy input: control-plane-in
Hardware Counters:
class-map: copp-management
Hello,
On 9/4/08, Saku Ytti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On (2008-09-04 13:23 +0200), Philippe Strauss wrote:
Hey,
chassis 7604?
This is fine it's 'S' chassis like 7606S and 7609S even though the 'S'
is not visible there and it's black and not white :). Technically it's
the same.
Hello Andy,
I'm not sure if there exist something like best practice for using private or
public IP's between PE-CE. I think it's more depend on your own design and
what you want to use.
You can use private IP's and 'save' your public IP space, but then you can
find case (maybe) when you will
Hello,
if the interface is GigE with traffic at around 300Mb/s and there is
not any other back presure mechanism like traffic shaping then on the
interface is not congestion and the congestion management like WFQ is
not in use.
David
the congestion management is used only when
On 8/19/08, Nic
queuing.
Any further help or input on this will be greatly appreciated.
Regards,
Zahid
-Original Message-
From: David Granzer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 18 June 2008 12:34
To: Zahid Hassan
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] CBWFQ/PQ
to
understand or see any DSCP markings in MPLS packets ?
Will a match on DSCP markings work for MPLS packets
on LDP/TDP enabled interfaces ?
Regards,
Zahid
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 13:52:07 +0200
Von: David Granzer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
An: Zahid
/configuration/guide/mplsqos.html
David
Thanks in advance.
Zahid
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 10:36:32 +0200
Von: David Granzer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
An: Zahid Hassan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: Cisco NSP Puck Nether Net (Cisco NSP) cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
shaping. The 6500 does not have this type of feature.
SIP-200/400 for either DS1/100FD/1G type of connections.
Hope this helps.
Douglas
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Granzer
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 5
(230Mb/s),
80% CPU.
David
- ?-
??: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ?? ? David Granzer
??: 10 ?? 2008 ?. 18:35
: Gregory Boehnlein
?: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
: Re: [c-nsp] CBWFQ-LLQ on PPPoE Virtual Templates
On 4/10/08, Gregory Boehnlein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
We have a 7206 running (C7200-IK9S-M), Version 12.3(20), RELEASE
SOFTWARE (fc2). We are trying to get LLQ implemented on Virtual
Template interfaces for our PPPoE DSL users:
vpdn-group akrnaa01rr
On 4/10/08, Andrey Kostin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Mentioned document states about applying service-policy command to
virtual-template interface:
This features does not support the input keyword. Enter the output keyword
only.
However, later in the section Configuring
This is called MUX-UNI and works fine, you need SR or SXH.
David
On 4/8/08, Tom Storey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wouldnt say so, because of this command:
switchport
What would have been a layer 3 port has now become a layer 2 port,
hence switchport.
Thats a guess. Someone may
Hello,
On 2/6/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm playing with IPv6 on some test routers. I noticed that sh ip bgp sum
does not give information about IPv6 neighbors. IOS running on the boxes is
12.3(20). Is there an IOS version that has show commands regarding bgp and
Hello,
On 1/22/08, Mohamed Ahmad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi everyone,
I just wanted to see how many of you guys took some CCNP exams (and studied
for them :)) while in full time employment? I am thinking of taking the
yes, this is possible for CCNP exams. Also I think that many of the CCIEs
Hello,
On 1/18/08, Alexandre Snarskii [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 01:07:16AM +0100, Peter Rathlev wrote:
Hello,
Anybody knows what software supports MUX-UNI? All our 7600/SRBx can do
it, and none of our 6500/SXF6 can. Does any later SXF support MUX-UNI?
Or do we
I'm not sure how QinQ can help here, but L2TPv3 yes.
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios124/124cg/hwan_c/hl2tpv3.htm#wp1045845
David
On 1/9/08, Andrew Gristina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can also look at QinQ tunneling. But really that just extends the
pain. It
On 1/9/08, Mohacsi Janos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
We are using Sup32 with 12.2(18)SXF11 for more than 2.5 months without a
problem (Earlier we used 12.2(18)SXF10) - of course without full routing
table
We are using one of our SUP32 (SXF7) with full routing table, and also
without
On 1/9/08, Euan Galloway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 10:51:21AM +0100, David Granzer wrote:
FIB TCAM maximum routes :
===
Current :-
---
IPv4- 239k
Total routes: 243424
IPv4 unicast routes
On 1/8/08, Rivo Tahina RAZAFINDRATSIFA [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I do traffic shaping on a 7206 box, eg:
a: 10Mbps for one class
b: 15Mbps for another class
c: 20Mbps for another class
If c: only use 10Mbps, how can I share it to a: and b:?
maybe this help
policy-map PMAP1
class
Next question is about supported IOS SR version in the future. As we
talked with our account there will be SRB and SRC images available,
but not SRD.
David
On 12/13/07, Simon Leinen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When Cisco started enforcing the IOS platform split with 12.2(33)SRB,
they also
36 matches
Mail list logo
