On 10/26/2011 09:58 AM, Peter Rathlev wrote:
On Wed, 2011-10-26 at 09:41 +0200, Michele Bergonzoni wrote:
You might try to trade the Lo1 for a VLAN:
vlan 4000
exit
no spanning-tree vlan 4000
int Vlan4000
description Primary Management/Peering IP
ip address a.b.c.d 255.255.255.255
address.
Additionally, I am curious why this behavior changed suddenly. I can find no
mention of this in Google or on Cisco's site.
Does anyone have any suggestions for this?
Thanks,
Jared Gillis
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https
...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jared Gillis
Sent: 25 October 2011 20:39
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] 3750 Metro internal vlan allocation for loopback?
Hello,
I just upgraded one of my 3750ME switches from 12.2(46)
(c3750me-i5k91-
mz.122-46.SE.bin) to 12.2(58) (c3750me-i5k91-mz.122-58
queueing and trust config on other physical (non
port-channel) ports on the same chassis with no issue.
On 08/10/2011 12:55 PM, Jared Gillis wrote:
My service policy only sets internal queueing values based on source/dest IP
or input DSCP.
policy-map SONIC-DEFAULT-QOS
class SONIC-PRIORITY
Hi all,
I just ran into an unusual problem when deploying some QoS onto a 7606 in my
network. I was configuring all ports to trust DSCP input, and after applying
the command to all the physical ports, I went to apply it to my the
port-channels. Shortly after I did, IS-IS went down (timeout) on
the problem lies.
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 13:28, Jared Gillis jared.a.gil...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi all,
I just ran into an unusual problem when deploying some QoS onto a 7606 in
my network. I was configuring all ports to trust DSCP input, and after
applying the command to all the physical ports
On 06/23/2011 06:28 PM, David Barak wrote:
Here's a quick diagram of what the network needs to look
like:
BB1---BB2
|\ /|
| \ / |
\ POP1 /
\ /
\ /
POP2
The BBs should be learn all routes in the network (L2), and
the POPs can be whatever level, but they should only
-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of David Barak
Sent: Friday, June 24, 2011 3:29 AM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net; Jared Gillis
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] How to effect a totally stubby area in IS-IS
--- On Thu, 6/23/11, Jared Gillis jared.a.gil
Hi all,
I run an IS-IS network, and need to convert it such that it can support
something akin to an OSPF totally stubby area.
In a nutshell, we have backbone routers that redundantly serve POP routers. We
need the POP routers to be able to advertise local routes (loopbacks, etc), and
only
On 06/23/2011 04:50 PM, David Barak wrote:
Hi Jared,
You didn't specify this, so I'll hazard a guess that all of your NSAPs are in
the same area, and that would cause the problem you're describing. Routers
that have NSAPs in the same area can form L1 relationships, and if they are
in
On 06/23/2011 05:37 PM, David Barak wrote:
Yes. The NSAP address format is:
AFI.Area.Sys-ID.NSEL
Where AFI is two digits, and the NSEL is always 00 in a Cisco. The precise
demarcations of the Area and sys-ID differ between AFIs. In AFI 49 (private
internetworking) the Area ID is two
Hi all,
I just ran into a strange problem on a 3750ME. I've got two gig ports in an
active LACP port-channel looking like this:
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/1
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport trunk allowed vlan 101,102,400,664,1000-2999
switchport mode trunk
speed 1000
switchport trunk allowed vlan add 400 and I ran it under interface
Port-Channel1.
Tony Varriale wrote:
What was the command and where did you add it?
tv
- Original Message - From: Jared Gillis
jared.a.gil...@gmail.com
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: Thursday, January 07, 2010
variation to look at what is going on. If the LACP is wrong
maybe the trunk was carried over gi1/0/1.
Luck,
Buz
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jared Gillis
Sent: Thursday, January 07, 2010 3:23 PM
Hi all,
I've got some ME3400Gs with CWDM SFPs, and some of them are causing errors to
be logged:
Jan 5 14:21:30.087 PST: %SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: Gi0/1: Voltage high
warning; Operating value: 3.56 V, Threshold value: 3.50 V.
These SFPs are not Cisco official, which I think is the
Hello,
I'm running some 3750s that are providing IP aggregation for customers of mine.
One of the customers reported that his gateway (the 3750) was responding to ARP
for his local LAN addresses. Taking a look, I realized that I forgot to disable
proxy-arp on that 3750. I disabled it via the
Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 09:51:40AM -0800, Jared Gillis wrote:
While I agree with these statements, our issue is not tree
recalculation/convergence. Our issue and driving need for IS-IS
multiarea is the fact that we have 3750ME's which can only hold ~2k
routes
Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
In order to detect loopbacks going away and using this to
invalidate/remove next-hops quickly, you can't aggregate anyway.
Sorry, I have yet to hear someone describe an ISP network (designed as
per ISP essentials, carry loopbacks in IGP and everything else in BGP),
Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) wrote:
Jared,
I've been having quite a few adventures with IS-IS over the last few
weeks
and have finally hit a wall, so I'm hoping someone here can give me a
hand.
Basically, I need to build a network with IS-IS multiarea as described
here:
Chris Wopat wrote:
Hello all,
I'm trying to get a lab 7204VXR (NPE-400) up and running on SRC code, and am
having no luck.
I've loaded it up with 12.2(33)SRC4 ipbase, and 12.2(33)SRD3 ipbase, and the
router locks or crashes on boot each
time:
Cisco IOS Software, 7200 Software
Hello all,
I'm trying to get a lab 7204VXR (NPE-400) up and running on SRC code, and am
having no luck.
I've loaded it up with 12.2(33)SRC4 ipbase, and 12.2(33)SRD3 ipbase, and the
router locks or crashes on boot each time:
Cisco IOS Software, 7200 Software (C7200-IPBASE-M), Version
Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) wrote:
Well.. not sure how large you want to grow your L1 area, but you could
investigate advertise-passive-only to only adveritse the loopbacks
(all customer routes should be in BGP if you need to plan for growth),
and you'll be fine, even with a 1000 nodes in the
Daniel Verlouw wrote:
On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 15:02 -0700, Jared Gillis wrote:
Hm, interesting though. Unfortunately, it doesn't seem to pan out in the lab.
The LSPs don't seem to get flooded, but the routes do get passed through
Router
A to all the stub routers, regardless of how I set up
areas, but
doesn't solve the problem of needing local-only routes plus default on B and
C...
Daniel Verlouw wrote:
On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 15:02 -0700, Jared Gillis wrote:
Hm, interesting though. Unfortunately, it doesn't seem to pan out in the lab.
The LSPs don't seem to get flooded, but the routes
Hello all,
I'm trying to accomplish something with an IS-IS network, and I'm starting to
think it may not be possible, but I'm hoping someone here might have a
suggestion to help.
Basically, what I'm trying to accomplish is to have two routers subtended off an
aggregation router. So, say Router A
Daniel Verlouw wrote:
have a look at IS-IS mesh-groups. Although designed for a different
purpose, it might work. Stick router A and all of its stub routers into
the same L1 area. On router A, put all interfaces towards the stub
routers in the same mesh-group.
Hm, interesting though.
looking all over Cisco's website and can find plenty of configuration
examples, but nothing explaining how communication between the inside and vpn
clients is handled.
--
Jared Gillis - ja...@corp.sonic.net Sonic.net, Inc.
Network Operations2260 Apollo Way
707.522.1000
at is unconfigured and shut.
I've even verified that there's no internal vlan assigned to it, so it should
definitely be using the phy mac, but it's not, hence my confusion and email =)
--
Jared Gillis - ja...@corp.sonic.net Sonic.net, Inc.
Network Operations2260 Apollo Way
/Supervisor_Engine_and_Route_Switch_Processor_Guide/SupE01.html#wp1015861
Is this a known feature of the 7600/Sup720-3B?
--
Jared Gillis - ja...@corp.sonic.net Sonic.net, Inc.
Network Operations2260 Apollo Way
707.522.1000 (Voice) Santa Rosa, CA 95407
707.547.3400
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
--
Jared Gillis - ja...@corp.sonic.net Sonic.net, Inc.
Network Operations
that there's got to be something new to 12.3 or the 3640 that I'm
missing.
Thanks in advance,
--
Jared Gillis - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sonic.net, Inc.
Network Operations2260 Apollo Way
707.522.1000 (Voice) Santa Rosa, CA 95407
707.547.3400 (Support
31 matches
Mail list logo
