Randy wrote:
I perhaps; should have been *clearer*! Default-MTUs for different
media-types are *different*!
That does not by any stretch of the imagination *imply* that a
router/switch's BVI/SVI/L3-interface will *auto-magically*
coalesce(INCREASE) transit-datagrams to fit the MTU of the
Randy wrote:
...at L2 no! the BVI itself is l3 so as long as you have your mtu set
to the lowest-common-denominator it will work(while your L2
interfaces are set to a higher mtu) From your email, it appears you
are trying to do this *mtu-translation* at L2-conditionally. That
will not work.
Randy wrote:
I was thinking all ethernet for some reason...but translation between different
media-types should work.
My bad
Is gigabit ethernet (1000BASE-SX) considered the same media type as fast
ethernet (100BASE-TX)? Because that's my configuration.
Peace... Sridhar
Hi. I'm running a bridge group between a Gig E interface and a Fast E
interface. I'd like to use jumbo frames on the Gig E interface and have
it translate the MTU for packets headed to the Fast E interface, but not
translate the MTU for packets headed to a jumbo-frames enabled Gig E
Mack McBride wrote:
HP also has very solid switch gear, much of this is patent rights from Cisco so
the tech
is the same Ciscos. Primary advantage is price. The CLI leaves something to
be desired.
I've had very good luck with HP's Procurve switching gear, both in terms
of reliability and
Dave Weis wrote:
If the half duplex circuit is plugged directly from one device to
another device, how could you possibly have collisions without a hub
somewhere in the mix?
You'll get collisions if the devices at either end of the link try to
talk at the same time. The more traffic there is
Luan Nguyen wrote:
Ah, glad you brought that up. I was looking into a FDDI to Fast Ethernet
converter: http://www.data-connect.com/RAD_AMC-101.htm
http://www.data-connect.com/RAD_AMC-101.htmWonder if anyone uses those
kind of converter and how reliable are they?
I have a FDDI hand off.
I use
Gert Doering wrote:
I may be able to lead the cabal if folks so desire, rounding up the
right people from the cisco side.
Count me in. But you know that already :-)
Me too, FWIW.
Peace... Sridhar
___
cisco-nsp mailing list
Łukasz Bromirski wrote:
On 2010-09-05 01:52, Keegan Holley wrote:
I thought this was only optimized for TCAM operations related to packet
filtering/manipulation.
No, Turbo ACLs were actually made for software-forwarding platforms -
primarly 7200, 7500, later 12000 with old engines to speed up
Gert Doering wrote:
I'm shopping on ebay. Is there any way to tell the difference by
looking at them? The ones marked PA-2FE-TX/ISL or PA-2FEISL-TX are
two different parts? Because they seem to be the same price. The ones
with no mention at all of ISL sell for $150-200 more.
I'm not sure.
Is there any way to get a SA-VAM card working in a 7500? I have both
VIP2-50s and VIP4-80s available to me. The card doesn't show up in
show inventory. That said, I don't know if there's a problem with the
hardware or not.
Peace... Sridhar
___
Seth Mattinen wrote:
What's the difference between the C6500 and the 7600?
Just software?
Oh no, you're going to wake Gert :-).
I always find Gert's input quite educational. ;)
As do I, but being somewhat of a newbie with all this stuff, I find
lurking and reading the conversations of
Joe Maimon wrote:
Real world I would not expect any more than roughly the same throughput
through a 7500 RSP4 with VIP2-50 as you will an NPE-400.
Of course. However, GEIP+ are significantly cheaper than PA-GEs, and
I'm running VIP4-80s. I'd love to run an RSP8 but they still cost $$$.
Gert Doering wrote:
I've read in the list archive of people complaining about the
performance of the /ISL port adapters. I've been using a number
PA-FE-TX/ISL for years without trouble. However, now I need to upgrade
to PA-2FE port adapters to get auto-duplex negotiation.
Those two are not
Joe Maimon wrote:
If you are shopping the used market, you may be better off with the 7200
series. The 7500 isnt worth the juice it sucks and even when it was
supported, it was an abysmal experience.
First of all, I already have the 7500 gear. Second, doing 7200 with
gigabit is WAAY more
What's the difference between the C6500 and the 7600? Just software?
Peace... Sridhar
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Christopher Gatlin wrote:
Change ACL 101 to reflect the following and I think you'd be good to go.
access-list 101 deny ip 172.22.22.0 0.0.0.255 173.50.165.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 101 deny ip 173.50.165.0 0.0.0.255 172.22.22.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 101 permit ip any any
Even though I don't
Is it possible to use a larger-than-32MB linear flash card in an RSP4?
For example, a card compatible with the MEM-C6K-FLC64M? Failing that,
is there any other way of getting a recent IOS onto an RSP4 without
replacing it with something newer (RSP4+/RSP8)?
Peace... Sridhar
Joe Maimon wrote:
A recent bootflash image will boot system images from ATAPI/IDE (normal)
flash, and will work with cf+pc card adapter up to at least 1gb size
(personal experience)
This applies to the RSP4 too? Not just the RSP4+?
Peace... Sridhar
I've read in the list archive of people complaining about the
performance of the /ISL port adapters. I've been using a number
PA-FE-TX/ISL for years without trouble. However, now I need to upgrade
to PA-2FE port adapters to get auto-duplex negotiation.
I understand from my readings that
The machines on the bridged interfaces can talk to the outside world,
the machines on the private network can talk to the outside world with
NAT, but the machines on the bridged network can't talk to the machines
on the private network. What am I doing wrong with the following
John Neiberger wrote:
I have a set of complicated commands that I need to run periodically
on several modules on a bunch of routers. I'd like to create a text
file of the commands and store it on the flash of each router, then
just run the commands from the text file stored on the router. I know
I have a Verizon FiOS connection with 5 IP addresses attached to my 7505.
So because it's excluded from the access-list, traffic from my private
network 172.16.16.0 to my public IP addresses is not NATed. I still
can't figure out how to pass this traffic without NATing it. If I
remove the
Ziv Leyes wrote:
Where do you want to pass the traffic without NAT? to your own public network?
What else do you have connected there? Some server?
I can suggest you either create a NAT pool of a single public IP from your
range, and let it access the other public IPs in the same range.
Octavio Alvarez wrote:
I have a Verizon FiOS connection with 5 IP addresses attached to my 7505.
So because it's excluded from the access-list, traffic from my private
network 172.16.16.0 to my public IP addresses is not NATed. I still
can't figure out how to pass this traffic without NATing
My years-long quest to get a pair of GEIP+ boardsets has finally come to
fruition. However, I have one question.
Does the GEIP+ support 1000BASE-T GBICs? I don't need it to be eligible
for Cisco support; I just need it to work.
Failing that, does the C4912G support 1000BASE-T GBICs?
Abello, Vinny wrote:
The PA-FE-TX (at least the ones I've used) don't support auto speed/duplex,
so it's not that they have problems with auto. They just don't support it.
I've always had to set the device up that they're talking to using manual
settings.
It's especially bad when the device on
Gert Doering wrote:
NAME: module 0, DESCR: I/O Dual FastEthernet Controller
PID: C7200-I/O-2FE/E , VID:, SN: 33390818
... and dual port. Different chip, different driver, different (less) bugs.
The 2FE/E is more similar to the PA-2FE-TX.
So can I conclude from your statement that the
Is there any way to get a PA-FE-TX to autonegotiate duplex?
Peace... Sridhar
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Charles Mills wrote:
Is anyone running DC for their Cisco 6509's and just using rack mount
DC inverters in lieu of having a DC Power Plant?
And..if so, what's everyone using for their inverters? Any to avoid
or to recommend?
I think the word you're looking for is rectifiers.
Peace...
Is there any way to prevent these kinds of messages from making it all
the way to the list? It's a pretty bad waste of bandwidth, both network
and human.
Peace... Sridhar
Shivlu Jain (via Digg) wrote:
Shivlu Jain is a member of Digg and would like to send you an invitation.
With Digg
bharath kondi wrote:
Dear All,
I have a strange situation, I can browse the websites but cannot browse
them.
Please share your finding with me.
That's often caused by MTU problems. Are you on an ADSL line?
Peace... Sridhar
___
cisco-nsp mailing
Phil Mayers wrote:
Alexander Clouter wrote:
Phil Mayers p.may...@imperial.ac.uk wrote:
bharath kondi wrote:
I have a strange situation, I can browse the websites but cannot browse
them.
Check for MTU issues
It is a pretty impressive to screw up non-SSLed traffic with an MTU
issue, I would
Why do GEIP+ cards go for so much money? There can't be *that* many
people left on the 7500 platform...
Peace... Sridhar
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at
Ziv Leyes wrote:
I second that, besides, back then, there were not so many bugs as today, as
with every new feature and more complex technology comes also a lot of bugs.
When systems were simpler, there were less problems, how many times do you remember having to hard reset your PC when using
Nic McCartney wrote:
Not techy, just interesting anyone beat this uptime?
I can, but not on a Cisco.
Peace... Sridhar
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at
Roy wrote:
I am trying to ssh from a 2811 to linux box. I telnet to the Cisco and
issue
ssh -l root xx.xx.xx.xx
and I get the password prompt. I enter that and then logon goes through
and I get the shell prompt. The problem is that nothing I type seems to
get through to linux.
Is there
ann kok wrote:
why click tinyurl.com to redirect to cisco site?
Do they have any relationship?
Because the Cisco URL in question was long. That's the purpose of
TinyURL and services like it.
Peace... Sridhar
___
cisco-nsp mailing list
Hank Nussbacher wrote:
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008, Jared Mauch wrote:
They don't hear us, they don't see us unless we happen to be doing some
6 digit tender for equipment.
With their stock having dropped from 29 to under 16 today all in the
course of 12 months, do you really think any VP there
Anyone know where I can GEIP, GEIP+ or PA-GE cards cheap? I'm running a
7505 at home, and I'm not made of money. 8-)
Peace... Sridhar
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive
Martin Moens wrote:
Tried Ebay?
Yup. Very expensive. More than some dealer prices.
Peace... Sridhar
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
we need to send serial data from a PC with a rs232 Interface over IP/TCP
to a Server. This was done with X.25 over Sat before.
Is there any Solution to use pure IP to transport this Data
Try a terminal server. I use them for that kind of stuff all the time.
I
Vinny Abello wrote:
The 877 is for ADSL. Last I knew, I thought Covad's DSLAMs only did
SDSL. What Netopia model does it work with? I can confirm if the 877
is incompatible if you let me know what does work with it.
I have had ADSL service from Covad in the past.
Peace... Sridhar
Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 03:55:04PM -0400, Jared Mauch wrote:
Does anyone have a rough idea on the current internet routing table
size. I see about 115K prefixes from one of my providers.
~270k is the current table size.
You guys need to control your
Ross Vandegrift wrote:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 05:03:27PM +0800, Mark Tinka wrote:
Not sure if it's just me but for the past several months,
I've found the performance (response times) when browsing
www.cisco.com is not all too great.
I've found issues with my browser - I use Mozilla
Is the SA-ISA supported on the VIP2-50 in a 7500-series router? If it
isn't, will it work anyway?
Thanks.
Peace... Sridhar
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at
Deny IP Any Any wrote:
I'm looking for a 24-port GigE 1RU layer 2 switch, and comparing the
3560G-24TS to a C2960G-24TC-L. They seem to have similar backplane, and
similar pps forwarding. I just need L2. They seem pretty similar on
paper, except the 3560 is a almost double the price of the
Adam Greene wrote:
Yeah, weird, isn't it? But it's definitely terminating an ADSL PVC and
passing traffic!
If it turns out that this is indeed a PA-1C-P card and not just
mis-listed in the inventory, that would be great, because it means I can
use a 7200 as a DSL CPE without using an
Adam Greene wrote:
Wondering if anyone can help me dispel this mystery ...
I've got two ADSL cards, both p/n 73-4771-08.
One is inserted into a WIC slot on a 2811 running 12.3(8)T6. The show
diag mentions no FRU #, but I know it is a WIC-1ADSL.
The other is inserted into a NM-2W module on a
Richey wrote:
I've got a customer with a T1. They have been bought out by a large hotel
chain. They are pretty much demanding that they have SNMP full read access
to our router that is at their location as well as a copy of the config for
the router. This is not their router, it is ours and
Mark Tinka wrote:
On Friday 09 May 2008, Chris Riling wrote:
I've done some research on SSH in IOS and I've only
been able to find the usual information on how to
implement SSH; (generate keys, change transport, etc.)
but I'm more interested in seeing if I can use key files
for
David Coulson wrote:
You have to use an fast ethernet port with a external dsl modem... Run pppoe
client on cisco with modem in bridge mode passing ppp to router.
Which DSL modems support fast ethernet (and full-duplex)?
Peace... Sridhar
___
Peter Rathlev wrote:
On Thu, 2008-05-01 at 17:06 +0200, Benny Amorsen wrote:
Eric Van Tol [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Are /31 subnets valid for an ethernet network nowadays?
See RFC 3021.
So the answer is: No, not unless Ethernet is point-to-point, which it
isn't.
It can be, can't it? How
Ziv Leyes wrote:
What's an IOS anyway???
In Outer Space.
Peace... Sridhar
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, April 2, 2008 10:47 am, Dale Shaw wrote:
From the same people responsible for the VMS wombats? Did Cisco hire a
bunch of ex-DEC folks?
... It was founded by ex-DEC folks
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Len_Bosack
well, the other DEC folk went to
Whisper wrote:
Got to love Microsoft, XP has a Windows IPv6 stack that doesn't do native
IPv6 DNS lookups.
Bleh!!
Peace... Sridhar
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at
Mohacsi Janos wrote:
Whisper wrote:
Got to love Microsoft, XP has a Windows IPv6 stack that doesn't do
native
IPv6 DNS lookups.
May be worth asking Microsoft to fix this in Windows XP SP3?
Isn't SP3 too close to release for that? It's not like they couldn't
release any old Tuesday patch
Fred Reimer wrote:
Exactly, autosecure is just a macro. It is always advisable to check the
actual router configuration after it is completed. The engineer should make
sure they understand how all of the commands implemented, and if they don't
research them and make sure they know of any
Does anyone know of any resources available on the 'net for learning how
to translate pf firewall rulesets into IOS Firewall rulesets?
Peace... Sridhar
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
I'm interested in adding a firewall to a network I admin at work. The
gateway router on the network is a 7200 NPE-G1.
What I want to know is whether I have to route all of my packets through
my external firewall, or is there a way to have the firewall set state
in the router to enable it to
Masood Ahmad Shah wrote:
Normally people would put like show below..
WAN-Router-Firewall--LAN-Switch
That's what I was hoping to avoid.
Peace... Sridhar
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
connection.
As far as I can tell, (3) would be the best of both worlds, but I, for
the life of me, can't figure out if there's a way to set a network up
like that.
Any ideas?
Peace... Sridhar
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sridhar
David Coulson wrote:
Short of using the PA-MC-T3 to finance the purchase of a PA-T3+, nope.
Couldn't you do it with some kind of T3 channel bank?
Peace... Sridhar
Brandon Price wrote:
Is there any way to have a PA-MC-T3 in a 7206 use the full DS3 (non
channelized) for an HDLC connection to
Jason Berenson wrote:
Can you elaborate on that a bit?
I believe he might be referring to the power consumption.
Peace... Sridhar
e ninja wrote:
c10k is a beast. You're better of with the VXRs.
/eninja
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 8:40 PM, Jason Berenson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL
Jason Berenson wrote:
Justin,
I'm not worried too much about the size, I have room and on top of that
it will replace 3+ 7206's. I do however have the option of just
upgrading the 7206's to NPE-G1's, adding more chassis as needed and
calling it a day.
I'm trying to make a decision
Paul Stewart wrote:
Hey Jason...
I'm curious as to what you decide in the final aspect and why... we have
several NPE-1G and NPE-2G boxes right now and I need to order a couple of
more to meet capacity needs (DSL termination via PPPOE)... we were also
looking at the 10k series and also took
Adrian Chadd wrote:
Anyways, just wanted to chime in letting you know you're definitely not the
only person facing these issues ; ) I would definitely upgrade to NPE-1G or
2G if it's in budget though as that will be a significant upgrade from a
performance spec
But doesn't the 7200 (and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
R
M
A
--
Regards,
Jason Plank
CCIE #16560
e: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Original message --
From: Jonas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
Anyone who know where to buy a power supply for a 2960G?
I got one which just caught fire!!
I *really* wish Cisco had made an ADSL PA.
Peace... Sridhar
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
David Freedman wrote:
And Whats wrong with PA-FE-TX + ISR?
It requires MSS clamping in the configuration to work right because
people tend to ignore proper guidelines and block all ICMP.
Peace... Sridhar
Sridhar Ayengar wrote:
I *really* wish Cisco had made an ADSL PA.
Peace... Sridhar
Is there a web page for Cisco that will allow me to look up a part
number to find out what model it is?
Right now, I need to find out what a 73-2570-01 is.
Peace... Sridhar
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
The subject says it all. Are these two cards the same thing?
Before anyone tells me to read the archive, I have, and I'm still confused.
Peace... Sridhar
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
Does Cisco do anything to stop these kind of antics:
http://losangeles.craigslist.org/lac/cpg/536118581.html
I think Cisco probably figures anyone smart enough to get
a CCIE would not be dumb enough to respond to this ad. I
particularly loved the line:
I am
Jason Gurtz wrote:
Here in the N.E. of the US we get primarily ADSL from or resold from ATT.
Bog standard. Over the years, SNET/SBC/ATT has supplied consumer grade
speedstream or netopia equipment and neither has been stellar from a
quality standpoint.
I thought that Verizon was by far the
are you talking about?
I was digging through a pile of hardware and I found a box that talks to
ADSL on one side and ATM25 on the other.
I'm trying to get out from under the sub-1500 MTU with PPPoE.
Peace... Sridhar
Sridhar Ayengar wrote:
Is there any way to hook an ATM25 device to a 7505
Gert Doering wrote:
I was digging through a pile of hardware and I found a box that talks to
ADSL on one side and ATM25 on the other.
Get a used Cisco 1401 from somewhere - ethernet in, ATM25 out.
Usually they (don't) sell on eBay for 1 US$.
Wouldn't that require an additional layer of
Gert Doering wrote:
I was digging through a pile of hardware and I found a box that talks to
ADSL on one side and ATM25 on the other.
Get a used Cisco 1401 from somewhere - ethernet in, ATM25 out.
Usually they (don't) sell on eBay for 1 US$.
Wouldn't that require an additional layer of NAT
Gert Doering wrote:
Well, if you insist on doing NAT, the 1401 is capable of doing so...
I'd like to avoid it, if possible.
In that case, just don't use NAT... :-)
So then how do I get the static IP assigned to my 7505 to my 7505 when
the 1401 is in the way?
Peace... Sridhar
Gert Doering wrote:
Well, if you insist on doing NAT, the 1401 is capable of doing so...
I'd like to avoid it, if possible.
In that case, just don't use NAT... :-)
So then how do I get the static IP assigned to my 7505 to my 7505 when
the 1401 is in the way?
Assign a transfer network?
I
I have a 7505 with an RSP2 running IOS 12.4. One of the boards is a
VIP2-50, and on that board is a PA-FE-TX and a PA-4E. The PA-FE-TX is
attached to my routed public network, and one of the ports on the PA-4E
is attached to my NATed private one.
The outbound connection is a PPPoE DSL line
Jeff Kell wrote:
I have a 7505 with an RSP2 running IOS 12.4. One of the boards is a
VIP2-50, and on that board is a PA-FE-TX and a PA-4E. The PA-FE-TX is
attached to my routed public network, and one of the ports on the
PA-4E is attached to my NATed private one.
So you've got one side
Hyunseog Ryu wrote:
Or if you have recent IOS running, you can try show inventory.
I didn't know about that one. That's a handy command. Thanks a lot.
Peace... Sridhar
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Does the SA-ISA work properly with the VIP2-50? There are mentions of
VIPs in the index for the IC docs for the SA-ISA, but nowhere in the
doc is anything but the 7100/7200 mentioned.
Peace... Sridhar
___
cisco-nsp mailing list
Pete Templin wrote:
What kind of Gigagit modules should I use for Cisco 7507 and 7513 routers?
I appreciate if somebody give me some recommendations in this regard.
Ok, I got it, will check GEIP+.
We have 7507 in a border which is connected to peer with ATM modules
right now and we are
Kevin Graham wrote:
My understanding is that the PA-CyBus interface is a variation of PCI
that's limited to 330Mbps.
So then doesn't that limitation also apply to the 7200VXR series routers?
Yes, which is why the NPE-G1 and NPE-G2 have onboard gigabit interfaces that
don't touch the shared
David Coulson wrote:
I'm not sure how much memory is required to load 12.4 onto a VIP - I
only run 12.2S on the 7507s/7513s I manage. That said, you can probably
pick up 128Mb of DRAM and 8Mb of SRAM for less than $50 to get the card
up to snuff. Plus, if you're really wanting to run 12.4,
Jon Lewis wrote:
My VIP2-50 has 32MB of DRAM and 4MB SRAM. Does this need to be
upgraded? The RSP2 has 128MB DRAM and is running IOS 12.4(1a).
if-con into that vip with dCEF off, and do a show mem. I bet with 12.4
IOS, 32mb is barely enough to boot up.
I checked, and you're right.
insan praja wrote:
Dear all, I'm trying to do reverse telnet from 7507 aux port to 2948
console port. Since I don't have rj-45 to db25 adapter, I'm trying to
build my own cable. Right now, I'm frustated since I failed to build
it. Can't someone help me? please.. In Indonesia, it's not easy to
Howard Leadmon wrote:
For home use, just find some GEIP units, not the GEIP+ units, as there is a
HUGE different in the resale value as I am sure you know. If I remember my
reading correctly, the older GEIP is still good for 3-400mbps, if your
running
more than that wow.
From what I've
Daniel Hooper wrote:
Always a good idea to remove passwords (even encrypted ones) and
production IP address's from configuration's posted to public mailing
list.
I usually change the password to something stupid, post the
configuration, and then change it back.
Peace... Sridhar
Winders, Timothy A wrote:
The problem is... no one wants to pay the cost of the shipping for a
7507 chassis and power supplies.
I wouldn't mind, but only if there were good cards in the chassis. I
frankly don't need that many slots at home, though.
Sorry, no GEIP+ here, just the RSP4
Winders, Timothy A wrote:
So what is everyone doing with these forklifted 7507's? I just replaced my
7507 and it's sitting powered off in the corner.
I wish more of them got on ebay for us hobbyists/home users to pick
over. I'd love to get a GEIP+ for a reasonable amount of money. $1000+
Howard Leadmon wrote:
For home use, just find some GEIP units, not the GEIP+ units, as there is a
HUGE different in the resale value as I am sure you know. If I remember my
reading correctly, the older GEIP is still good for 3-400mbps, if your running
more than that wow.
From what I've been
Jon Lewis wrote:
Well, I am running a 7505 and not a 7507, which helps a bit with the
power bill. It's still a pretty big load.
What about the noise and heat? Do you run it in the garage?
I run a datacenter in the house.
http://www.ikickass.org/machineroom/
Peace... Sridhar
Justin Shore wrote:
1) Always use authentication between your local peers. Ideally you
would also take advantage of NIST's offer of authenticated NTP (or make
arrangements with another provider with whom you peer).
This isn't a big deal if all of the devices are behind a firewall. You
can
Jeff Crowe wrote:
Hi all,
I am trying to configure a router that will be able to handle the following:
Multichannel T3 (probably PA-MC-T3),
Couple of routed FE ports
Gig Uplink to switching fabric
Sorry to change the subject, but I had a similar question.
I need to source a router to
I have a NAT question which could probably be considered simple, but my
Google-fu fails me. I would appreciate either an answer, or a pointer
to where I can RTFM.
I have four networks that I'm routing between. The first is a
publicly-accessible block for servers with a routeable IP block.
Kevin Blackham wrote:
Did I mention this is spread out over 20,000 square feet? I'll have to
do some math on huge wads of non-reusable cable. I had avoided the
big-and-dense option due to that hassle.
Is it *absolutely* required to have 100Mbps ports everywhere? It would
simplify things
Kevin Blackham wrote:
We're promoting a one day event that requires around 500 FE access ports. I
need to filter at layer 4 (block DHCP serving) and perform some QoS duties
to ensure a good experience. 40x 2950T-24 will do the job, but even on the
grey market I'm looking at a $20k project
the nearest switch, but for those exceptions,
there would be nothing to stop you from running fiber out to those points.
There has to be a way to make it work. It would get you down about an
order of magnitude in cost. We're only talking about one day.
Peace... Sridhar
On 6/22/07, *Sridhar Ayengar
1 - 100 of 104 matches
Mail list logo
