management.
--
tarko
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
On Wed, 1 Mar 2023 at 02:41, Phil Bedard via cisco-nsp
wrote:
> With XR7 the idea was to mimic how things are done with Linux repos by having
> a specific RPM repo for the routers and the patches which is managed similar
> to Linux and that’s how all software is packaged now. Dep
operations, there is no more
install apply, etc. Most customers do not want to manage an RPM repo for their
routers, so they just use whole images.
Thanks,
Phil
From: cisco-nsp on behalf of Steve
Mikulasik via cisco-nsp
Date: Tuesday, February 28, 2023 at 10:20 AM
To: Mark Tinka , cisco-nsp
the device reboots.
Phil
From: cisco-nsp on behalf of Tarko Tikan
via cisco-nsp
Date: Sunday, February 26, 2023 at 9:45 AM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] NCS IOS-XR rant (was:Re: Internet border router
recommendations and experiences)
hey,
> XR for a number of years now has
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 08:33:47AM -0800, William McCall via cisco-nsp wrote:
> My long-term solution to this problem is to install with iPXE. That lets
> you do it via HTTP and without all the nonsense :)
This sounds like a fairly long downtime to do upgrades... not exactly
what
On Sun, Feb 26, 2023 at 6:45 AM Tarko Tikan via cisco-nsp <
cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> wrote:
> hey,
>
> > XR for a number of years now has had the concept of a “golden ISO”.
> > It’s a single image either built by Cisco or customers can build
> > their own
. Patch management
software should be part of the product, it shouldn't be something I need to pay
extra to do in an efficient manner, nor should it be expected you'd build out
some scripting solution that accounts for all the annoying oddities a vendors
platform should have. Cisco and other
Robert A. Heinlein, The Moon is a Harsh Mistress
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany g...@greenie.muc.de
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https:/
2023 at 02:29:13PM +, Phil Bedard wrote:
> XR for a number of years now has had the concept of a ?golden ISO?. It?s a
> single image either built by Cisco or customers can build their own that
> include the base software and the SMUs in a single image. You just issue a
> s
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 26, 2023 at 02:29:13PM +, Phil Bedard wrote:
> XR for a number of years now has had the concept of a ?golden ISO?. It?s a
> single image either built by Cisco or customers can build their own that
> include the base software and the SMUs in a single image. You j
On 2/26/23 16:44, Tarko Tikan via cisco-nsp wrote:
Well, not so in practice.
You can't issue install from http:// or any other remote URL.
You have to sit around and issue "install apply" after "install
replace" is finished. Replace is async so you have to sit around a
hey,
XR for a number of years now has had the concept of a “golden ISO”.
It’s a single image either built by Cisco or customers can build
their own that include the base software and the SMUs in a single
image. You just issue a single “install replace myiso.iso” and
that’s it.
Well, not so
the concept of a “golden ISO”.
It’s a single image either built by Cisco or customers can build their
own that include the base software and the SMUs in a single image.
You just issue a single “install replace myiso.iso” and that’s it.
I did not know that. But then again, we haven't used IOS XR
than the other
two, in that role.
Mark.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
image either built by Cisco or customers can build their own that
include the base software and the SMUs in a single image. You just issue a
single “install replace myiso.iso” and that’s it.
Thanks,
Phil
From: cisco-nsp on behalf of Gert Doering
via cisco-nsp
Date: Friday, February 24, 2023 at 4
a bit curious if there was something specific in the config or
other operations that was a show stopper issue?
Thanks,
Phil
From: Mark Tinka
Date: Thursday, February 23, 2023 at 9:58 PM
To: Phil Bedard , Brian Turnbow , Gert
Doering
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Internet
On 2/24/23 19:51, Lukas Tribus via cisco-nsp wrote:
Hello,
for the unititiated, how does the licensing on a mx204 look like for
different or combined use-cases like pure IP edge, mpls layer3 and layer2
VPNs, BNG functionality?
IIRC, BNG deployments support up to 1,000 concurrent
Hello,
for the unititiated, how does the licensing on a mx204 look like for
different or combined use-cases like pure IP edge, mpls layer3 and layer2
VPNs, BNG functionality?
Thanks,
Lukas
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https
https://apps.juniper.net/home/port-checker/index.html
nice website to check port mix capabilities.
-Aaron
On 2/22/2023 5:06 PM, Thomas Scott via cisco-nsp wrote:
Yes - 400 Gbps throughput total If I recall correctly.
The MX204 has four rate-selectable ports that can be configured as
100
scenarios like the Metro.
Copy, save, reboot, is very attractive.
This is why we rejected the NCS540.
Not sure XR64 is better in that regard, no experience - we lost trust in
Cisco before the question of "successor to the 9001? something with XR64?"
arose.
We stopped keeping track
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 05:00:52AM +0200, Mark Tinka via cisco-nsp wrote:
> For IOS XR, it's just too heavy for that sort of thing. Okay in the data
> centre where we are aggregating a ton of customers and/or Metro-E rings,
> but not out in the Metro. The Metro calls for a more
On 23/02/2023 19:32, Mark Tinka via cisco-nsp wrote:
Cisco have lost the plot, IMHO. Every solution at every level of the
network is now a bulldozer searching for a tiny nail to hammer.
Mark.
So well said.
-Hank
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco
On 2/23/23 21:45, Shawn L via cisco-nsp wrote:
That's one of the major reasons we're sticking with the ASR920 in metro
deployments for all it's faults. They do silly license stuff on the 12SZ
(no bulk, make all the 10G ports work license) but once you figure out
their quirks they do work
.
Not so much the memory footprint of the OS, but really, it's rather
verbose architecture for high-touch areas like the Metro, for which the
NCS540 was to replace the ASR920.
Mark.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https
months ago). It seems nice but
again, licensing. Want to put more than 120G worth of optics, add a
license. And reboot. Really, reboot? That just seems silly in this day
and age.
On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 12:32 PM Mark Tinka via cisco-nsp <
cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> wrote:
>
>
> O
of bandwidth.
XRd runs in a container with very little memory, it doesn’t always have to be
“fat”. In fact some of the smaller 540 systems have very little RP memory.
Thanks,
Phil
From: cisco-nsp on behalf of Mark Tinka via
cisco-nsp
Date: Thursday, February 23, 2023 at 12:32 PM
To: Brian
the ASR920 with the
NCS540.
Cisco have lost the plot, IMHO. Every solution at every level of the
network is now a bulldozer searching for a tiny nail to hammer.
Mark.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailma
Hi
>
> So if Cisco price themselves out of the market with their flagship Ethernet
> box
> - the ASR9000 - that just makes it easier for customers to consider Juniper,
> Arista, Nokia, e.t.c.
They also seem to want to follow the same route in metro with the NCS540s and
this g
server and are realistic about your traffic-handling
capabilities.
All announced Juniper MX series, Cisco ASR1k or IOS XR 9k series are very
expensive for the initial request. Not to mention about price on licensing,
spare parts and RMA contracts from the vendor.
I'd throw Nokia and Arista
world, one would be hard-pressed to
find TDM/PDH/SDH/SONET in any meaningful degree of presence.
So if Cisco price themselves out of the market with their flagship
Ethernet box - the ASR9000 - that just makes it easier for customers to
consider Juniper, Arista, Nokia, e.t
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 09:40:26AM +0200, Mark Tinka via cisco-nsp wrote:
> The issue they face is Ethernet-centric platforms are much more
> optimized for today's Internet, and platforms like the ASR1000 simply
> don't make sense anymore. Why pay all that to get some
Hello,
> Which is why we just focus on Juniper and Arista right now. Cisco are
> still living in the pre-Covid era. Those good ol' days are gone, and
> unless you have the clout to command proper discounts from Cisco, you
> are losing out on better efficiencies with other vendors.
+
On 2/23/23 08:22, Hank Nussbacher via cisco-nsp wrote:
For an ASR9906 to add 4x port 100G here is the GPL pricing:
Part Number Description Unit List Price
A99-4HG-FLEX-TR= ASR 9900 400GE Packet Transport Combo Line Card -
5th Gen 271,493.78
CON-SNT-A994HGFT SNTC-8X5XNBD ASR
On 2/23/23 08:15, Hank Nussbacher via cisco-nsp wrote:
A fully licensed asr1001-hx (all 8 10G ports operational) w/ 5 years
Cisco Smartnet support - GPL is around $220K. Add your discount here.
Cheap is relative.
The ASR1000 platforms are pretty sexy, but Cisco have out-priced
On 23/02/2023 0:19, Eric Louie via cisco-nsp wrote:
Oh geez, I just realized I left a zero off the interface - we need 100G
interfaces both upstream (x1) and downstream (x2)
That probably changes the product choices a little bit.
Anyone with 100G Internet feeds want to let me know what you're
On 22/02/2023 20:25, zzif via cisco-nsp wrote:
22.2.2023, 5:31, Eric Louie via cisco-nsp wrote:
For a 10G (or maybe 2x10G) Cisco ASR1001-HX is adequate, rock solid and
relatively cheap. If you have more budget, need 100G etc. there are a
lot of other options too.
Br,
EA
A fully licensed
On 2/23/23 01:06, Thomas Scott wrote:
Yes - 400 Gbps throughput total If I recall correctly.
That's right - it's basically an MPC7E line card with a-third of the
capacity, i.e., 1x 3rd generation Trio chip (Eagle).
Mark.
___
cisco-nsp mailing
to handle all of this if you peer
or pick up transit in 2 or more locations.
Mark.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
ott
On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 5:19 PM Eric Louie via cisco-nsp <
cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> wrote:
> Oh geez, I just realized I left a zero off the interface - we need 100G
> interfaces both upstream (x1) and downstream (x2)
> That probably changes the product choices a little bit.
.
We tried an NCS-5501 and it was a disaster, in a word. The 10G interface,
uRPF, source-based blackholing, and routing table depth with Cisco is a
limiting factor in their product line.
Broadcom-based systems should always be looked at with one eye open, i.e.,
test test test before you
.
We tried an NCS-5501 and it was a disaster, in a word. The 10G
interface, uRPF, source-based blackholing, and routing table depth
with Cisco is a limiting factor in their product line.
Broadcom-based systems should always be looked at with one eye open,
i.e., test test test before you commit
On Wednesday, February 22, 2023 at 10:25:37 AM PST, zzif via cisco-nsp
wrote:
22.2.2023, 5:31, Eric Louie via cisco-nsp wrote:
For a 10G (or maybe 2x10G) Cisco ASR1001-HX is adequate, rock solid and
relatively cheap. If you have more budget, need 100G etc. there are a
lot of other options too.
Br
Eric Louie via cisco-nsp wrote on 22/02/2023 18:29:
Mark, thanks. We were quoted a MX304 for the Internet edge from
Juniper. How has your experience been with it? are you 10G upstream
and downstream? Any IPS on the 10G connection?
Eric,
you're mixing up DFZ routing capability with traffic
the time to be compassionate today
On Wednesday, February 22, 2023 at 10:25:37 AM PST, zzif via cisco-nsp
wrote:
22.2.2023, 5:31, Eric Louie via cisco-nsp wrote:
For a 10G (or maybe 2x10G) Cisco ASR1001-HX is adequate, rock solid and
relatively cheap. If you have more budget, need 100G etc
hi,
On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 06:29:00PM +, Eric Louie via cisco-nsp wrote:
> We tried an NCS-5501 and it was a disaster, in a word. The 10G interface,
> uRPF, source-based blackholing, and routing table depth with Cisco is a
> limiting factor in their product line.
Do n
, and routing table depth with Cisco is a
limiting factor in their product line.
-e-
Eric Louie
619-743-5375 Cell/text
Stay in this moment, it's the only one you really have
Take the time to be compassionate today
On Wednesday, February 22, 2023 at 08:36:31 AM PST, Mark Tinka via
cisco-nsp wrote
22.2.2023, 5:31, Eric Louie via cisco-nsp wrote:
For a 10G (or maybe 2x10G) Cisco ASR1001-HX is adequate, rock solid and
relatively cheap. If you have more budget, need 100G etc. there are a
lot of other options too.
Br,
EA
Hi folks
Recommendations and your experiences with an Internet
On 2/22/23 05:31, Eric Louie via cisco-nsp wrote:
Hi folks
Recommendations and your experiences with an Internet border router for a 10G
Internet connection, with DDoS service and unicast reverse path forwarding.
Brand and model requested, if you have it, and bad experiences are ok, too
What ever the recommendations, require the vendor to deliver test data with all
the features working together - under load - with a ACL/FIB values that
reflects reality.
> On Feb 21, 2023, at 19:31, Eric Louie via cisco-nsp
> wrote:
>
> Hi folks
> Recommendations and y
in this moment, it's the only one you really have
Take the time to be compassionate today
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Hi Hank,
That indeed looks bad - can you share OS and version? I'll take it to devs.
—
Łukasz Bromirski
> On 16 Feb 2023, at 07:40, Hank Nussbacher via cisco-nsp
> wrote:
>
>
>>
>> These days a lot of experience is getting lost, and the industry hasn’t
&g
These days a lot of experience is getting lost, and the industry hasn’t found
a way to transfer that knowledge to new generations.
Cheers,
Sander
It makes me sadder that people in Cisco don't know how to spell "iput",
"recieved" or "byetes" and there is no
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 at 02:21, Lee Starnes via cisco-nsp
wrote:
> So attempted to just remove the ACL and try. Still nothing. Lastly, I
> enabled telnet and tried to connect via telnet. Still nothing. I really
> don't want to restart the switch if there is any other way t
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
the basics, and not a replacement of them.
Mark.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Hi Mark,
> On 9 Feb 2023, at 05:42, Mark Tinka via cisco-nsp
> wrote:
>
> For those going to Manila for this year's APRICOT meeting, I will be part of
> a panel that is discussing this very issue - about the dwindling talent pool
> as it pertains to those with the hard skil
Hank Nussbacher via cisco-nsp writes:
> we requested that the case be moved to Amsterdam on Feb 5
Bad choice. They're probably all at Cisco Live this week. Better go
there and see if you can find a TAC engineer at the show ;-)
https://www.ciscolive.com/emea.html
Bj
is written on.
Mark.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Effective human capability redundancy does not persist as a stable
status inside of any discreet organization.
Mark Tinka via cisco-nsp wrote:
On 2/8/23 16:45, Aaron wrote:
i think the problem is they let the good ones go.
That is a trend currently affecting our industry - mostly because
, Mario Ruiz via cisco-nsp wrote:
Yes miss the old days
On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 12:21 PM Hank Nussbacher via cisco-nsp <
cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> wrote:
On 08/02/2023 15:27, Mark Tinka via cisco-nsp wrote:
On 2/8/23 10:23, Saku Ytti via cisco-nsp wrote:
Working would be muc
ard skills
anymore.
Mark.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Yes miss the old days
On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 12:21 PM Hank Nussbacher via cisco-nsp <
cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> wrote:
> On 08/02/2023 15:27, Mark Tinka via cisco-nsp wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 2/8/23 10:23, Saku Ytti via cisco-nsp wrote:
> >
> >> Work
On 08/02/2023 15:27, Mark Tinka via cisco-nsp wrote:
On 2/8/23 10:23, Saku Ytti via cisco-nsp wrote:
Working would be much more pleasurable if half the
world's white collar workers wouldn't be unemployed plat card holders
and cruising without output, while looking down on people doing 3 jobs
Another available avenue is to reach out to the TAC duty manager. It's an
on-duty role that various managers in the Cisco support org cover.
They can take a look at your case and hopefully make a decent decision on
how to push the case forward.
To reach a duty manager you call the TAC number
Hi Hank,I had similar experience with Cisco TAC in the past. I managed to
escalate it via my Cisco account rep. That landed the case on the desk of
someone who actually knows a thing or two and we were able to at least have an
intelligent conversation about the issue.
Realistically though, I
i think the problem is they let the good ones go.
On Wednesday, February 8, 2023, Mark Tinka via cisco-nsp <
cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> wrote:
>
>
> On 2/8/23 10:23, Saku Ytti via cisco-nsp wrote:
>
> Working would be much more pleasurable if half the
>> world's wh
On 2/8/23 09:48, Hank Nussbacher via cisco-nsp wrote:
We opened a case on Jan 22 (Case #694936467). Since then we have
exchanged countless email, countless logs and countless command output
captures.
On Jan 31 we requested transfer to a more senior IOS-XR team. The case
was transferred
On 2/8/23 10:23, Saku Ytti via cisco-nsp wrote:
Working would be much more pleasurable if half the
world's white collar workers wouldn't be unemployed plat card holders
and cruising without output, while looking down on people doing 3 jobs
and not qualifying for a mortgage.
Sadly, as folk
On Wed, 8 Feb 2023 at 09:48, Hank Nussbacher via cisco-nsp
wrote:
> So how does one escalate such an issue within TAC? Is there some secret
> email like escalati...@cisco.com or vp-...@cisco.com that one can contact?
You call your account team, express your grief and set expectations.
Th
after 9 days we have not heard from anyone inside Cisco TAC. The
case is listed as moderate - we requested that the case be moved to
Amsterdam on Feb 5 and as of today no Cisco engineer is assigned to the
case, no engineer manager is listed and it would appear that after 9
days in TAC limbo
Hi Hank,
Am 31.01.2023 um 10:19 schrieb Hank Nussbacher via cisco-nsp:
For the past week we have exchanged countless emails, logs and command
outputs with Cisco TAC in regards to call-home not working on our IOS-XRs.
At one point Cisco TAC suggested CSCwd36654 but that didn't help. All
our
For the past week we have exchanged countless emails, logs and command
outputs with Cisco TAC in regards to call-home not working on our IOS-XRs.
At one point Cisco TAC suggested CSCwd36654 but that didn't help. All
our IOS-XEs manage to call-home and register fine. What trick or tip can
you
On Fri, 27 Jan 2023 at 17:09, Blake Hudson via cisco-nsp
wrote:
>
> Seems to be a thing...
> https://bst.cloudapps.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCuq85985
>
> > Crash of both active and standby ESP. Applies to ESP80, 100, and 200.
It shows up in "show platform power
Seems to be a thing...
https://bst.cloudapps.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCuq85985
Crash of both active and standby ESP. Applies to ESP80, 100, and 200.
--Blake
On 1/26/2023 7:31 AM, Timur via cisco-nsp wrote:
anybody heard about cisco asr1000 esp80 module?
Listed on official website
I am looking for where to download the install script for Cisco Software
Manager\IOS XR Software Manager- 4.0.
The prebuilt ova is where the ASR9K software is located on cisco.com, but that
only has the VMWare OVA files that is prebuilt on Ubuntu 18.04. Kinda of dont
want to use thtat
er J2 1RU router which is the
> NCS-57B1-6D-24H , with 24x100G and 6x400G ports.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Phil
>
>
>
> From: cisco-nsp on behalf of Tom Hill via
> cisco-nsp
> Date: Tuesday, January 24, 2023 at 5:00 PM
> To: Marcin
> Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.
node based on J2C+ , the NCS-57D2-18DD which can
support 66x100G or 18x400G. There is an older J2 1RU router which is the
NCS-57B1-6D-24H , with 24x100G and 6x400G ports.
Thanks,
Phil
From: cisco-nsp on behalf of Tom Hill via
cisco-nsp
Date: Tuesday, January 24, 2023 at 5:00 PM
To: Marcin
Cc
anybody heard about cisco asr1000 esp80 module?
Listed on official website are esp 40 and esp 100, nothing between.
Have seen several on sale
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
On 2023-01-24 14:13, Marcin via cisco-nsp wrote:
Hi,
Do Cisco have a 32 x 10G (at least more than 16 x 100G) box with a
similar scale to ACX87100-32C / Ufispace S9600-32X (basically J2 / J2C
chipsets)? It needs to have deeper buffers, >500K MACs + MPLS feature
set. I thought that I'd f
Hi,
Do Cisco have a 32 x 10G (at least more than 16 x 100G) box with a
similar scale to ACX87100-32C / Ufispace S9600-32X (basically J2 / J2C
chipsets)? It needs to have deeper buffers, >500K MACs + MPLS feature
set. I thought that I'd find something in the NCS series but the
number of 100G po
. If they have switches
connected everywhere and end up in a loop, that’s something they need to be
aware of and mitigate.
Thanks,
Phil
From: cisco-nsp on behalf of Shawn L via
cisco-nsp
Date: Thursday, January 12, 2023 at 11:46 AM
To: Cisco Network Service Providers
Subject: [c-nsp] Best Practices
On 1/14/23 04:40, Tom Hill via cisco-nsp wrote:
The normal answer in Cisco land, even today, is to use Martini-draft
P2P pseudowires (either tag or port-based MPLS interconnects) which
will use tLDP for establishment, and should serve you very well
(especially at a port-based level
On 2023-01-12 16:45, Shawn L via cisco-nsp wrote:
I'm wondering what other providers are doing when they need to
transport a
bunch of third-party layer-2 services?
For Example -- if another SP wants to hand you 3 vlans (for example
10,11,12) and have you transport them to a couple of sites
A and B, vlan 11 (again could be
Q-in-Q) needs to go to sites C and D, etc.
I'm specifically asking (in a cisco world) what do you do to protect
yourself from any funny business (spanning tree, whatever) that may happen
on the other provider's network or on the end-customer's network.
Thanks
I understand that the people that created DNA need to be compensated but Cisco
decided to build or acquire a product that not very many people want due to how
much better the free tools are.
So that seems like an issue for the C-suite at Cisco and not something that you
force people to bail
I did some benchmarking back in ~2008-2009 (with 12.2.31SB and 12.2SR,
who still remembers that?), and we (Cisco) fixed numerous non optimized
paths in the routing code. But that was over a decade ago, so I’ll
limit bragging about it ;) There are two presentations, quoted from
about that time I
Hi Drew,
Please take a look here:
https://xrdocs.io/8000/blogs/8100-8200-deployment-note/
—
./
> On 11 Jan 2023, at 19:11, Drew Weaver via cisco-nsp
> wrote:
>
> Has anyone seen a routing scalability guide for the 8000 series?
>
> My guess from reading the 'overview' an
Has anyone seen a routing scalability guide for the 8000 series?
My guess from reading the 'overview' and 'datasheet' from Cisco that the 8100
cannot support a full routing table and the 8200 can?
But I can't actually find a routing scalability guide for this series on
Cisco's website
, but if you have volume and options to go
elsewhere it may be possible to determine it.
- Jared
> On Jan 6, 2023, at 9:15 AM, Drew Weaver via cisco-nsp
> wrote:
>
> Also is there any way to figure out what this stuff should cost?
>
> The resellers could just be trying to tak
On 06/01/2023 14:15, Drew Weaver via cisco-nsp wrote:
Also is there any way to figure out what this stuff should cost?
It's some variant of Broadcom Trident chipset, right? Trident3-X5?
Though remember that the value of hardware packaging around the ASIC is
extremely variable. Poor cooling
Also is there any way to figure out what this stuff should cost?
The resellers could just be trying to take way too much out of us. I'm not sure
and I have no idea how to find out.
Thanks,
-Drew
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp On Behalf Of Drew Weaver
via cisco-nsp
Sent: Friday
If the price of the hardware wasn't already juiced beyond belief then maybe it
would make sense but ... yeah I am just going to have to find another vendor.
Thanks,
-Drew
-Original Message-
From: Paul
Sent: Thursday, January 5, 2023 3:58 PM
To: Gert Doering ; Drew Weaver
Cc: cisco
Yes, we also have our own libraries and tools that manage the switches.
It's sort of funny that Cisco is 15 years late to automation and now they are
like "Hey I bet you've never seen this before" Yawn.
-Drew
-Original Message-
From: Hunter Fuller
Sent: Wednesday,
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 04, 2023 at 03:45:51PM +, Drew Weaver via cisco-nsp wrote:
> I'm trying to put together an order for some Cisco switches.
Cisco licensing shit has made us decide that we're just not going to
buy any new Cisco products. Period.
Yes, these really look nice, and the b
On Wed, Jan 4, 2023 at 9:46 AM Drew Weaver via cisco-nsp
wrote:
> Off-list is fine. I know nobody wants to be like "AHhhh it's useless" on a
> public forum.
Speak for yourself! ;)
I mean, to be fair, it's not *useless*, we just already built up our
own, other tooling, that
Hello,
I'm trying to put together an order for some Cisco switches.
We finally settled on this one: C9300X-48TX-A and the pricing is mostly fine
but then there is this line item:
C9300-DNA-A-48-3Y
We don't want that or at a minimum we don't want to pay for it, but the
reseller (and I guess
On 02/01/2023 22:58, Nitzan Tzelniker wrote:
One of my NOC staff solved it by:
Creating a new Token in Cisco Software Central and then:
route1#license smart deregister
route1#license smart register idtoken token_string
Regards,
Hank
Hank,
I have just fight with it last week on NCS540
-interface ipv4 Loopback0
http client source-interface ipv4 Loopback0
call-home
service active
contact-email-addr your-cisco-acco...@cisco.com
source-interface Loopback0
profile CiscoTAC-1
active
destination address http
https://tools.cisco.com/its/service/oddce/services/DDCEService
destination
,
Hank
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Hi,
Not much different than Junos. Everything in the XR config can be configured
using Netconf using either native models or OpenConfig. You can check out
https://github.com/YangModels/yang/tree/main/vendor/cisco/xr for supported
models by version. Any other questions just let me know
201 - 300 of 1125 matches
Mail list logo
