Re: [c-nsp] MST issues

Hi Mateusz, Thank you for the response, and I am running MST without boundary but find that the two devices that are on a point to point link are all claiming to be the root bridge and the p2p link between them on one of them is shown as Mstr though if should be designated or root as the case

Re: [c-nsp] MST issues

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hashiru, Thank you for the response, and I am running MST without boundary but find that the two devices that are on a point to point link are all claiming to be the root bridge and the p2p link between them on one of them is shown as Mstr

Re: [c-nsp] MST issues

Thank you... Mateusz, It was a configuration issue, from one of the switches. it's now resolved. Thanks for your response. regards Hash ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp

Re: [c-nsp] Bridging ATM on 7206?

On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 6:08 PM, Matthew Crocker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nathan, It sounds like what you want to do should be possible. I'm not sure if the 7206 can do it or not. I'm pretty sure a Redback SE-400 can do it. ... I have no idea if this is even close to a working config but

[c-nsp] BGP NHT on 7600 SRC2

Hi, I am testing BGP next-hop tracking on SRC2 code release for the 7600. I have a pretty simple setup as follows: PE1 - P1 --- | / || | RR1 | PE3 | \ || PE2 - P2 --- PE1 and 2 are 7600's running 12.2(18)SXF5. RR1 is a 7204VXR running

Re: [c-nsp] MST issues

Hi Mateusz, Hashiru Aminu -X (haminu - SSAI at Cisco) schrieb: Hi Mateusz, Thank you for the response, and I am running MST without boundary but find that the two devices that are on a point to point link are all claiming to be the root bridge and the p2p link between them on one of them

Re: [c-nsp] ip pool assignment for pppoe

Hi there... Someone else should confirm this but there's radius attributes you can pass that specify the IP pool via an av-pair Paul -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of RAZAFINDRATSIFA Rivo Tahina Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2008 6:57

Re: [c-nsp] Transparent ASA on dot1q trunk

Yes, the question was asked and I remember asking the guy to send them to me. He supplied these two His name is Ge Moua, btw Thanks to Ge again! Ziv -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Geyer, Nick Sent: Monday, October 20, 2008 12:30 AM

Re: [c-nsp] Network Management System

You could try NAV http://metanav.uninett.no/ It will help you manage, monitor and draw topologymaps. But it does not configure devices nor take backup of the device. For that task use rancid or ziptie. -- Rikard On Tue, 21 Oct 2008, Ibrahim Alsharif wrote: Hello Michel thanks for ur

Re: [c-nsp] Bridging ATM on 7206?

(Replying to list but removing Eric's e-mail address completely) On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 1:57 PM, Eric Kagan wrote: Just a thought - did you try 'atm route-bridged ip' on the atm sub-interfaces ? I just had to add this to a recent config in order for layer 3 to work. Oh yes, that's standard

Re: [c-nsp] Network Management System

Ibrahim Solarwinds (www.solarwinds.net) is offering different tools which will do monitoring (Orion NPM), managing and configuring (Orion Network Configuration Manager) and also offers LAN Surveyor which they say draws the network into Visio. I personally only know Orion NPM which is solid

Re: [c-nsp] POC Nexus 7000 anyone ?

Hi List Anyone got any details on the ASR14000, its appeared in the price list, and in the export restrictions stuff, but no info on the cisco site proper?? Looks like a bit of a beast, and pricing one up is interesting... J. ___ cisco-nsp mailing

[c-nsp] Mini-SMB + SPA-4XCT3/DS0

Can any of you recommend a vendor for non-OEM 10ft Mini-SMB to BNC-Male (used to go from patch panel to SPA-4XCT3/DS0) ? These cables are $800 from Cisco... Thanks! Gil ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] Network Management System

Hello All, Since I have dug in to find a respectable monitoring/management system in the past , I might as well shre my 2p with you all. To begin with no monitoring system out there really cuts it simply because they are based on bad design. All of them including the top notch ones which I will

[c-nsp] Anyone encountered any bugs or issues with 12.2.33SRC2 on 7600's?

Anyone running 7600's with the latest 12.2.33SRC2 code that have come across any bugs or issues with that version? I need the per sub-interface MTU feature for EoMPLS which was new in the SRC code train. Currently running 12.2.33SRB4 and am only being bitten by bug SR 608269905. Thanks! Jim

[c-nsp] Cisco Security Advisory: Multiple Vulnerabilities in Cisco PIX and Cisco ASA

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Cisco Security Advisory: Multiple Vulnerabilities in Cisco PIX and Cisco ASA Advisory ID: cisco-sa-20081022-asa http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sa-20081022-asa.shtml Revision 1.0 For Public Release 2008 October 22 1600 UTC (GMT

Re: [c-nsp] Mini-SMB + SPA-4XCT3/DS0

You might try Anixter: http://www.anixter.com On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 11:51 AM, Gil Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can any of you recommend a vendor for non-OEM 10ft Mini-SMB to BNC-Male (used to go from patch panel to SPA-4XCT3/DS0) ? These cables are $800 from Cisco... Thanks! Gil

Re: [c-nsp] Mini-SMB + SPA-4XCT3/DS0

They're actually 1.0/2.3 RF (different from SMB) connectors. We got our cables from http://www.ds3crossconnect.com/ (Clink Inc) and were quite happy with the results. ~Matt -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:cisco-nsp- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gil Cohen Sent:

Re: [c-nsp] Mini-SMB + SPA-4XCT3/DS0

You might try Anixter: http://www.anixter.com On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 11:51 AM, Gil Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can any of you recommend a vendor for non-OEM 10ft Mini-SMB to BNC-Male (used to go from patch panel to SPA-4XCT3/DS0) ? These cables are $800 from Cisco... Thanks! Gil

Re: [c-nsp] Network Management System

Mario Spinthiras wrote: I find it hard to believe that people still use nagios or cacti. I can't even begin to tell you how superior Zenoss is compared to what is out there today. I've used Nagios and Cacti to good effect, although I will freely admit the biggest problem (and that of many

Re: [c-nsp] Anyone encountered any bugs or issues with 12.2.33SRC2on 7600's?

I would of mentioned it but we've switched our CCO to a COLAB and my access to case history is completely screwed. I should of just waited (arrgghhh) because I just found it afterwards. It is CSCsu01272 and is related to MPLS PE 7600 changes RT when a BGP soft clear is executed. Jim

Re: [c-nsp] How to match local IP address?

On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 10:36:04PM +, Marko Milivojevic wrote: Here, I had a few minutes to play in the lab: router bgp 100 address-family ipv4 redistribute connected route-map rc no auto-summary no synchronization exit-address-family ! ip prefix-list AAA seq 5 permit

Re: [c-nsp] How to match local IP address?

i believe the OP wants to advertise these prefixes to his eBGP neighbors w/ no-export set. this way, his provider(s) have the more specifics for each site and his larger prefix is advertised to the world at large. ``A Framework for Inter-Domain Route Aggregation''

Re: [c-nsp] Network Management System

Hi Can you know about CMDB and NMes? Thank you for your information --- Peter Hicks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mario Spinthiras wrote: I find it hard to believe that people still use nagios or cacti. I can't even begin to tell you how superior Zenoss is compared to what is out there

Re: [c-nsp] Network Management System

I read your article, and it's the first time that I've looked into LLDP. Turns out half of my devices aren't running IOS that supports it, but I enabled it on the few that did (with Avaya VoIP phones connected), and it yielded information that I previously did not have access to. Out of

Re: [c-nsp] Cannot initiate tunnel (ASA to PIX )

Hello: -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:cisco-nsp- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of JR Colmenares Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2008 8:07 PM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] Cannot initiate tunnel (ASA to PIX ) On a L2L tunnel CompanyA can initiate the

Re: [c-nsp] EoMPLS terminating on PE?

On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 12:54 PM, Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nathan wrote on Monday, October 20, 2008 10:29 AM: In effect, I want to extend the VC coming in on one PE so that it (L3) terminates on another PE. you need the routed pseudowire feature, but this is

Re: [c-nsp] Cannot initiate tunnel (ASA to PIX )

Mike, Thanks for pointing that out. That was my mistake when posting the question. It is actually correct in the config 1- I was able to ping from company B when the tunnel was up. Could it be related to the crypto dynamic-map command that is not matched up on both ends? Shoudl I enter this

Re: [c-nsp] Cannot initiate tunnel (ASA to PIX )

- Original Message - From: JR Colmenares [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net, Michael K. Smith - Adhost [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2008 2:27:57 PM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cannot initiate tunnel (ASA to PIX ) Mike, Thanks

Re: [c-nsp] Network Management System

The Dude by Mikrotik / IPSwitch What's Up. a. rahman isnaini rangkayo sutan Rikard Stemland Skjelsvik wrote: You could try NAV http://metanav.uninett.no/ It will help you manage, monitor and draw topologymaps. But it does not configure devices nor take backup of the device. For that task