I have IOS image(134Mb) with size more then flash(128Mb) size.
Does it possible re-pack IOS image on 28xx/38xx/76xx series?
--
Alexandr Gurbo
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
Aleksandr Gurbo wrote:
I have IOS image(134Mb) with size more then flash(128Mb) size.
Does it possible re-pack IOS image on 28xx/38xx/76xx series?
It's already compressed if you have mz in the image name.
~Seth
___
cisco-nsp mailing list
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 11:14:21PM +0200, Grzegorz Janoszka wrote:
Have you had similar problems? It is not the big issue, only the graphs
look not so nice with the rows of spikes down/up. If there is a simple
solution to the problem we would like to know it.
Well, I think this is just
On Wednesday 29 July 2009 04:59:46 am Justin Shore wrote:
According to a Pannaway SE who visited us a few years
ago, he'd seen SPs many times our size who used static
routes for everything. He said we weren't big enough to
need a routing protocol. Of course he also said that our
pipes
On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 23:58:13 -0700
Seth Mattinen se...@rollernet.us wrote:
Aleksandr Gurbo wrote:
I have IOS image(134Mb) with size more then flash(128Mb) size.
Does it possible re-pack IOS image on 28xx/38xx/76xx series?
It's already compressed if you have mz in the image name.
Hi,
For those of you that have dived into VSS... are you still doing
redundant supervisors per chassis? or just duplicating links on each
chassis and crossing your fingers?
VSS cannot currently support multiple sups in a chassis. which is handy
as it means you only need to buy one
Gert Doering wrote:
Well, I think this is just the way this architecture works. The hardware
does the actual counting, and every now and then a low-prio process grabs
all the counters from the hardware and fills in SNMP variables.
Hi, thanks for the answer. Is there any way to somehow
--- On Wed, 29/7/09, Aleksandr Gurbo k...@linkey.ru wrote:
I have IOS image(134Mb) with size more then
flash(128Mb) size.
Does it possible re-pack IOS image on
28xx/38xx/76xx series?
My image is c7600s72033-adventerprisek9-mz.122-33.SRD2.bin
If it is for the 7600, then you will
Alan Buxey wrote:
Hi,
For those of you that have dived into VSS... are you still doing
redundant supervisors per chassis? or just duplicating links on each
chassis and crossing your fingers?
VSS cannot currently support multiple sups in a chassis. which is handy
as it means you
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 02:12:31PM -0700, Randy wrote:
4) Also disable DPD(no isakmp keepalive.
Why?
I haven't experienced any issues with DPD yet, but I regularily see people
recommending to turn off DPD, or blaim other issues (like rekeying doesn't
work) on DPD - so I wonder what I'm
Hi,
So, 3750 stack on steroids?
not really - with the 3750 you get a 32 or 64Gb backplane
stacking mechanism (stckwise or stackwise+) - whereas
with VSS its a 10Gb starter...
alan
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
On Wed, 29 Jul 2009 09:32:32 +0100
Peter Hicks peter.hi...@poggs.co.uk wrote:
Hello
Aleksandr Gurbo wrote:
I know, but I know about ability to re-pack IOS on 26xx series( on russian
- http://betep.wpl.ru/2009/02/cisco.html). I tried repeat steps for images
on 28xx/38xx/76xx series but
Hello
Aleksandr Gurbo wrote:
I know, but I know about ability to re-pack IOS on 26xx series( on russian -
http://betep.wpl.ru/2009/02/cisco.html). I tried repeat steps for images on
28xx/38xx/76xx series but nothing happened.
My image is c7600s72033-adventerprisek9-mz.122-33.SRD2.bin
You
I changed the default-group-policy to Kiran-CUCM-VPN and now I am able
to VPN in to my network. Thanks Ryan and everyone for your help
Regards,
Kiran
-Original Message-
From: Ryan West [mailto:rw...@zyedge.com]
Sent: 28 July 2009 15:18
To: Oddiraju, Kiran @ London SMC
Cc:
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-
boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Justin Shore
Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2009 5:00 PM
To: Ivan Pepelnjak
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net; 'Hank Nussbacher'
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Humor: Cisco announces end
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-
boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Eric Van Tol
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-
boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Justin Shore
IPv6 was just a fad and would never be adopted in the US.
Sadly, he's not
You guys need to get on the ARIN list and say that. I'll make the popcorn. :)
Network Engineer, JNCIS-M
214-981-1954 (office)
214-642-4075 (cell)
jbrash...@hq.speakeasy.net
http://www.speakeasy.net
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
Randy,
5) the outside acl is wide-open(with permit ip any any) Recommend locking it
down. for vpn, allow tcp 50 and udp 500 to the outside int from any unless
sysopt conn ipsec permit is enabled.
6) Probable would be a good idea to replace ip's with x.x.x.x when posting
configs on a public
Dear All
I need your advice , we'll open an office in Washinghton DC and will need a
reliable internet connection between US office and our office in middle east
to transport data and vidoe confernce traffic
according to your experince with ISPs in US , what is the best ISP that can
offer
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 01:19:16PM +0400, Aleksandr Gurbo wrote:
On images for 26xx series it is possible re-pack IOS, you can try
yourself. I don't know about re-pack operations on images for
28xx/38xx/76xx series, may be new degree of protection or new methods
of compression are used.
Sure,
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-
boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of TJ
Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2009 7:09 AM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Humor: Cisco announces end of BGP
From:
Andy:
I am told Level 3 is to have it by the end of the year. Not sure on their
middle east connections but since they own AS #1 my guess is they have pretty
good connectivity everywhere.
We are looking to use 2 internet connections as a failover route for our
corporate VoIP - they said as
Hello list,
I would appreciate any help with going through the following configuration
and making suggestions to reduce CPU usage on this router. The example
router is a 3640 with a single FE interface run to a 2924 switch. It is
loaded at peak times with less than 2000 PPS and 9 Mbps aggregate on
-Original Message-
From: Eric Van Tol [mailto:e...@atlantech.net]
boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Justin Shore
IPv6 was just a fad and would never be adopted in the US.
Sadly, he's not too far off on this one.
Totally disagree, but I might also be biased ... in several cases
On Wed, 29 Jul 2009, Robert Johnson wrote:
Suggestions?
Please provide output from show int switching (not tab-completable) to
verify that all traffic is cef switched.
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se
___
cisco-nsp mailing list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco IOS Software Border Gateway Protocol
4-Byte Autonomous System Number
Vulnerabilities
Advisory ID: cisco-sa-20090729-bgp
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sa
I have a question, I have over 50 vlans and each needs to be policed at
different speeds. I have a cat 6509 with sup32's
Creating access-lists, class maps etc. are no issues for me. To my
understanding that I can only police in one direction on any given interface.
So I put a service-policy
Verizon: IPv6!
We do have a IPv6 transport from Verizon, granted. (1) good luck globally
routing your /48 outside of VZB land, they won't do it unless your providing
a /32, and if you have been delegated any address space from an RIR, (2)
good luck getting delegated addressing from Verizon's
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 10:32:24AM -0400, TJ wrote:
Verio: IPv6!
And therein lies the rub. The objection was to never be adopted ...
I know several of the above (and other large carriers you omitted) have
started deploying it, but started deployment != commercially
available.
(i.e. -
Grzegorz Janoszka wrote:
Hi,
We have several 6500's, some of them heavily loaded. We use snmp to
graph traffic on all interfaces - just the simplest solution. Since some
time we have had an issue with the interface counters. When the CPU box
is really loaded (usually synchronization of BGP
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-
boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Gert Doering
Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2009 11:47 AM
To: TJ
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Humor: Cisco announces end of BGP
Actually, NTT/Verio
On Wed Jul 29, 2009 at 12:11:59PM -0400, Eric Van Tol wrote:
This is true, but they are the only provider that we have run up against that
actually charges *extra* for v6, at outrageous per-meg rates. Last quote I
got was two years ago, so perhaps things have changed.
We've been running IPv6
And therein lies the rub. The objection was to never be adopted ...
I know several of the above (and other large carriers you omitted)
have started deploying it, but started deployment != commercially
available.
(i.e. - not easy to request. And for today, I totally agree ...
that is why I
-Original Message-
From: Simon Lockhart [mailto:si...@slimey.org]
Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2009 12:26 PM
To: Eric Van Tol
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Humor: Cisco announces end of BGP
We've been running IPv6 with Level3 and NTT/Verio for a while now, and
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 01:19:16PM +0400, Aleksandr Gurbo wrote:
Thank you, Peter, for you wide answer, but my question is previous.
I explain. I want unpack image and pack again image, but with better
parametres of compression. So I can receive image with size less, then I
have. After this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Good point ... in fact, we had NTT/Verio for a bit. Wish we still did (even
if they were doing the whole /126 on point to point links think).
(I meant to include that some carriers do fully offer IPv6 today, but
somehow edited that out ... my
Here is what Michael and I have determined:
In the past hour, only about 0.3% of IP traffic has been process switched.
Where should I look next?
Here is a sho int switching and sho cef not-cef-switched from this morning:
routersho cef not
CEF Packets passed on to next switching layer
Slot
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 12:47:15PM -0400, Eric Van Tol wrote:
Last time I looked into it with Verio, they wanted close to $50/Meg on
a 5M commit, plus an additional MRC of $500 for IPv6.
Which doesn't really make very much sense, indeed.
All our upstreams treat bits as bits, no matter
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-
boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of David Freedman
Good point ... in fact, we had NTT/Verio for a bit. Wish we still did
(even if they were doing the whole /126 on point to point links think).
(I meant to
Robert VanOrmer wrote:
Verizon: IPv6!
We do have a IPv6 transport from Verizon, granted. (1) good luck globally
routing your /48 outside of VZB land, they won't do it unless your providing
a /32, and if you have been delegated any address space from an RIR, (2)
good luck getting
Hi, I'm looking at using BFD with BGP on 7600's (rsp720's and sup720-3b)
and was wondering if there were any known issues with certain IOS's in
the SRC or SRD train.
--
Walter Keen
Network Technician
Rainier Connect
___
cisco-nsp mailing list
Gert,
1) DPD on site-to-site vpn tunnels: I have used regularly and without
issues.(dpd b/w cisco and 3com wouldn't work unless it has been fixed recently)
2) DPD with cisco VPN clients-to-ASA: I have had issues with.(on older versions
of vpn clients).
Regards,
./Randy
--- On Wed, 7/29/09,
On Wed, 29 Jul 2009, Walter Keen wrote:
Hi, I'm looking at using BFD with BGP on 7600's (rsp720's and sup720-3b) and
was wondering if there were any known issues with certain IOS's in the SRC or
SRD train.
SRC4 is has memory corruption bug with BFD running, this is a crash and
reload type
Specs on WS-X6148-GE-TX say there is a maximum MTU of 1518:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/switches/ps5718/ps708/product_data_sheet0900aecd8017376e_ps4835_Products_Data_Sheet.html
However, on a 6500 running SXH, it will not let me use the mtu command
to adjust. I am trying to up the
Hank,
Any news on what exactly was EOL'ed ?
Rubens
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 4:50 AM, Hank Nussbacher h...@efes.iucc.ac.il wrote:
I just got this product alert from Cisco:
From: cisconotificationserv...@cisco.com
To: h...@efes.iucc.ac.il
Subject: Cisco Notification Alert
At 15:36 29/07/2009 -0300, Rubens Kuhl wrote:
Hank,
Any news on what exactly was EOL'ed ?
I think it was a mistake on their part.
-Hank
Rubens
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 4:50 AM, Hank Nussbacher h...@efes.iucc.ac.il wrote:
I just got this product alert from Cisco:
From:
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-
boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Seth Mattinen
Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2009 11:04 AM
To: Robert VanOrmer
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Humor: Cisco announces end of BGP
I would love to hear from anyone using HP NAS in a MSP/Multi tenant setup
offline ?
Or anyone else doing configuration/provisioning/software management in a MSP
setup ?
Thanks and regards
Kevin
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
My feeling is based on two things:
I don't like the idea of vendors/providers ignoring an RFC just because.
And note the RFC in question leaves no wiggle room here.
Please cite chapter and verse. As long as you use static IPv6
addresses, /126 is fine. No, a /126 address does *not* have
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-
boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Walter Keen
Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2009 11:04 AM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] BFD + BGP on 7600 SRC or SRD
Hi, I'm looking at using BFD with BGP
Hi, I have what's probably an obvious question but googling isn't returning
an obvious answer.
I'm installing a pair of new ASA5500 devices for the purposes of providing
VPN connectivity to users running the Cisco VPN Client and also two lan to
lan sessions. When I try to connect from a
Scott,
If you want debug on a temporary basis for that traffic, you can try 'deb cry
isa 2' (or higher than 2, but normally that's enough). Another option is to
use logging classes to troubleshoot just the VPN. Here is an example:
logging class vpn monitor debugging
Assuming you have
I've been testing our different model of switches to allow for DSCP
transparency by using the mls qos trust dscp command on their
interfaces. All of the switches seem to support this properly and I can
tell when they're overwriting versus allowing the DSCP to continue
through but I came
TJ wrote:
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-
boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of David Freedman
And what, prey tell is wrong with /126 on point to point links, you want
to use SLAAC between routers?
Nothing is wrong, per se. It certainly
Michael K. Smith - Adhost wrote:
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-
boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Seth Mattinen
Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2009 11:04 AM
To: Robert VanOrmer
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Humor:
At 15:36 29/07/2009 -0300, Rubens Kuhl wrote:
Hank,
Any news on what exactly was EOL'ed ?
I think it was a mistake on their part.
When I saw it I thought it was one of the (various)
license options that we all (were supposed to have)
bought to run BGP on certain boxes, and that Cisco
has
Does anyone know how many PVDM2-64 comes with this unit? What is the
total number of voice channels included in this unit?
--
regards,
Nathaniel Bernadeau
Gallant Systems, LLC
11064 Livingston RD Suite 106-C
Fort Washington, MD 20744
Toll Free: 888-836-3751
Ph: 301-627-6358
Fax: 240-823-6897
Has anyone seen this symptom?
1841, advanced IP feature set
DMVPN spoke and OSPF over the DMVPN
Running 12.4(24)T
Periodically, the router looses all it's OSPF routes and stays that
way. Clearing the DMVPN or OSPF process does nothing. It recreates
the OSPF session with neighbor but it still
Hi,
The bundle ships one PVDM2-64 base.
CISCO3845-V/K9
3845 Voice Bundle,PVDM2-64,SP Serv,64F/256D
-ryan
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Nathaniel Bernadeau
Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2009 4:41 PM
To:
Jay Nakamura wrote:
Has anyone seen this symptom?
1841, advanced IP feature set
DMVPN spoke and OSPF over the DMVPN
Running 12.4(24)T
Periodically, the router looses all it's OSPF routes and stays that
way. Clearing the DMVPN or OSPF process does nothing. It recreates
the OSPF
Kevin Loch wrote:
Try adjusting 'service counters max age' to zero if you haven't already.
It has not changed anything.
As others have pointed out a delay of 3-4 minutes is not normal
What does your SP (not RP) cpu usage look like? Try disabling netflow
if your SP cpu usage is maxing out.
Hi, I have been struggling with this issue for almost 10 days now. I have a
Cisco AS5300 which is being used as an NAS for Dialup and ISDN clients. A
few days back it shut down abruptly and I had to pull out the power cord
from the back and plug it back in again to start it up, since then now it
It's a 20Gb starter if you use both 10G ports on each sup, which has
worked fine for us with relatively light use. According to the sales
pitch, it is also trivial to bond up to eight ports from a 10G line card
to increase the backplane between chassis. We installed VSS as a
datacenter core
On Wed, 29 Jul 2009, Teddy A. wrote:
Hi, I have been struggling with this issue for almost 10 days now. I have a
Cisco AS5300 which is being used as an NAS for Dialup and ISDN clients. A
few days back it shut down abruptly and I had to pull out the power cord
from the back and plug it back in
Lobo wrote:
I setup a traffic generator to send 95Mbps of traffic with DSCP EF
(46) across the different switches but when it hit the 3750, the
egress traffic was only ~4Mbps.
After reading up a bit, I found a command srr-queue bandwidth shape
that I could apply to the interfaces. After
OSPF and DMVPN can be a bit funky.
Did you force the DR to be the hub by setting the priority?
I forgot, did you set it to broadcast or multipoint?
I'd suggest you look at the packet capture feature and get a trace when
it's down.
Do you see the LSA's in the database?
Can you ping 224.0.0.5
Did you force the DR to be the hub by setting the priority?
Yes. And confirmed.
I forgot, did you set it to broadcast or multipoint?
broadcast
I'd suggest you look at the packet capture feature and get a trace when it's
down.
Is this what you are referring to?
Walter Keen wrote:
Hi, I'm looking at using BFD with BGP on 7600's (rsp720's and sup720-3b)
and was wondering if there were any known issues with certain IOS's in
the SRC or SRD train.
BFD support for SVIs was removed with SRB2 if that's something that you
think you'll need.
Justin
Jon Lewis wrote:
If by shut down, you mean all the lights go out, fans stop, etc., then
it sounds like you may have a power supply gone bad. If you mean it
stops working, but lights are on, fans are spinning, just the software's
locked up, then it be all sorts of things. If it's doing either
I rebooted a 7507 router that had a site connected with 3 T1's and now all
the traffic is nailing one line instead of being distributed over all 3
using the static routes/CEF.
I did look at the Cisco troubleshooting tips but didn't see anything
immensely helpful. Here is a config snippet on the
On Thursday 30 July 2009 03:06:10 am Kevin Loch wrote:
Lots of folks, myself included use /112 for point to
point links, server only subnets and just about anything
that doesn't require RA's (which is almost everything in
a hosting environment). /112 is a convenient bit
boundary to work
On Thursday 30 July 2009 02:16:38 am Mikael Abrahamsson
wrote:
SRC4 is has memory corruption bug with BFD running, this
is a crash and reload type of bug.
SRC5 fixes a somewhat similar issue for the NPE-G1 (after so
much bi**ing moaning, since SRC).
Not sure if this affects the 7600. Last
72 matches
Mail list logo
