Re: [c-nsp] Two questions in re ACL-Based Forwarding (ABF) in IOS-XR.

1.Is ABF available in XR for the 12000/GSR? The Command Reference says yes, but Feature Navigator says no (typical, heh). No, ABF is currently only implemented on the CRS. 2.In setting a nexthop via ABF, does said nexthop have to be a direct adjacency, or can it be any

Re: [c-nsp] annoying SYS-6-EXIT_CONFIG messages

On Fri, 27 Aug 2010 08:44:37 +0300 Tassos Chatzithomaoglou ach...@forthnet.gr wrote: Łukasz Bromirski wrote on 27/08/2010 01:13: On 2010-08-26 22:37, Jared Mauch wrote: It's more about the culture at Cisco of we can introduce undocumented changes at our own whim and not give you knobs

[c-nsp] Aironet repeater config issue?

Hello! I have three AP1232AGs and one LAP1232AG. One of the AP1232AG's is set up with station-role root access-point while the rest are set up with station-role repeater on interface Dot11Radio0. The Root AP is running 12.3(8)JA2. The repeaters are running 12.3(4)JA (two AP1232AG's,) and

Re: [c-nsp] Two questions in re ACL-Based Forwarding (ABF) in IOS-XR.

On Aug 27, 2010, at 1:31 PM, Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) wrote: If the NH has a label assigned to it, pkts are sent along the LSP. Thanks for the clue, Oliver - greatly appreciated! --- Roland Dobbins rdobb...@arbor.net //

[c-nsp] Packet core Networks

Hi guys, Can you please suggest me with good boook or link for diifrent Packet solutions going on in todays GSM world. Regards ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at

[c-nsp] Unmanageable Switch Access

Hi, Is it possible to take access unmanageable Switches plz help ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

[c-nsp] 6509 Linecard RAM

Hi, Does anyone know how to view the RAM that is currently installed on each linecard in a VSS cluster 2x6509 running SXI2a? I could not find anything on Cisco website, or I did not know where to look for that information. Thank you Catalin

Re: [c-nsp] 6509 Linecard RAM

On (2010-08-27 13:40 +), C and C Dominte wrote: Does anyone know how to view the RAM that is currently installed on each linecard in a VSS cluster 2x6509 running SXI2a? I could not find anything on Cisco website, or I did not know where to look for that information. You could do 'remote

Re: [c-nsp] 6509 Linecard RAM

Thanks for letting me know. I just wanted to know what is currently on the 6748 modules that are currently in use. Thanks again. Catalin From: Saku Ytti s...@ytti.fi To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Sent: Fri, 27 August, 2010 15:42:43 Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 6509

[c-nsp] How to run script file from flash

I have a set of complicated commands that I need to run periodically on several modules on a bunch of routers. I'd like to create a text file of the commands and store it on the flash of each router, then just run the commands from the text file stored on the router. I know we can use more to view

Re: [c-nsp] How to run script file from flash

-Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of John Neiberger Sent: Friday, August 27, 2010 11:32 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] How to run script file from flash I have a set of complicated

[c-nsp] Cat6500 modular IOS - direction?

Hi all, So, I've been reading many posts, Cisco documentation and release notes and testing various versions of 12.2(33)SXH and SXI in a lab environment. Based on all the Cisco marketing fluff, modular IOS seems like the way to go for reliability. Real world experience from many smart people

Re: [c-nsp] How to run script file from flash

John Neiberger wrote: I have a set of complicated commands that I need to run periodically on several modules on a bunch of routers. I'd like to create a text file of the commands and store it on the flash of each router, then just run the commands from the text file stored on the router. I know

Re: [c-nsp] How to run script file from flash

John Neiberger wrote: I have a set of complicated commands that I need to run periodically on several modules on a bunch of routers. I'd like to create a text file of the commands and store it on the flash of each router, then just run the commands from the text file stored on the router. I know

Re: [c-nsp] Cat6500 modular IOS - direction?

Patching and install are deprecated as of SXI3. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_2sx/12_2sxi/12_2_33_sxi3_newfeatlist.html As for a formal announcement about the future of ION; as far as I know Cisco has not made any. However, someone closer to the horse's mouth may be willing to

Re: [c-nsp] Cat6500 modular IOS - direction?

On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 2:03 PM, Benjamin Lovell belov...@cisco.com wrote: Patching and install are deprecated as of SXI3. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_2sx/12_2sxi/12_2_33_sxi3_newfeatlist.html As for a formal announcement about the future of ION; as far as I know Cisco has not

Re: [c-nsp] Cat6500 modular IOS - direction?

On 2010-08-27 18:49, Abello, Vinny wrote: So, I've been reading many posts, Cisco documentation and release notes and testing various versions of 12.2(33)SXH and SXI in a lab environment. Based on all the Cisco marketing fluff, modular IOS seems like the way to go for reliability. Real world

Re: [c-nsp] Cat6500 modular IOS - direction?

On 2010-08-27 20:20, Tim Durack wrote: Despite claims to the opposite, I don't think Cisco are committing much engineering resources to the C6K at this point in its life. On the contrary. You'll see a lot of new things soon and the 6500 stays a flagship for Enterprise deployments and services

Re: [c-nsp] Cat6500 modular IOS - direction?

Absolutely correct. We are by no means backing away from, sunsetting, scaling back development or anything else to that effect, the 6500 platform. -Ben On Aug 27, 2010, at 2:26 PM, Łukasz Bromirski wrote: On 2010-08-27 20:20, Tim Durack wrote: Despite claims to the opposite, I don't think

Re: [c-nsp] Cat6500 modular IOS - direction?

Hi, On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 08:26:35PM +0200, ?ukasz Bromirski wrote: On 2010-08-27 20:20, Tim Durack wrote: Despite claims to the opposite, I don't think Cisco are committing much engineering resources to the C6K at this point in its life. On the contrary. You'll see a lot of new things

Re: [c-nsp] Cat6500 modular IOS - direction?

On Fri, 27 Aug 2010 22:50:21 +0200, you wrote: If I were a competitor, my worst nightmare might be Cisco gets their operating system act together, and delivers a stable, modular, cross- platform OS *for all their existing product lines*. CRS-3 and Cisco 500 routers, Nexus 7000 and SFE 1000P

[c-nsp] Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco IOS XR Software Border Gateway Protocol Vulnerability

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco IOS XR Software Border Gateway Protocol Vulnerability Advisory ID: cisco-sa-20100827-bgp Revision 1.0 For Public Release 2010 August 27 2200 UTC (GMT

Re: [c-nsp] Cat6500 modular IOS - direction?

On 27/08/2010 21:59, Gert Doering wrote: The Rumors seem to suggest that The New Supervisor (does it have management commitment yet?), if it shows up, is incompatible with existing line cards, runs a completely different software than The Old Supervisor, and mainly shares the chassis and power

Re: [c-nsp] Cat6500 modular IOS - direction?

The rumors are that the new supervisor will work with both 40G and 80G cards but only in E chassis line. Again rumors are that it will support both 40G and 80G simultaneously. The 6500 is being re-positioned as a services chassis and some older line cards will not be supported. Meaning anything