Re: [c-nsp] ASR9902 experiences?

mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > -- *Med Vänliga Hälsningar / Best Regards* *Mattias Gyllenvarg* ___ cisco-nsp mailing list c

Re: [c-nsp] [External Email] Re: big uptime - what you got ?

Regards, > Alex > ___ > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > -- *Med Vänliga Hälsningar / Best Regards* *Matti

Re: [c-nsp] mVPN mroute flags

So, this is a feature and not an error flag, that indicates that superfluous PIM messages are not sent. tis 29 maj 2018 kl 14:36 skrev : > > Mattias Gyllenvarg > > Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2018 1:05 PM > > > > Dear All > > > > Does anyone know the function

[c-nsp] mVPN mroute flags

E, Cust-MROUTE), 00:00:04/00:02:55, flags: Tn <- Incoming interface: Lspvif22, RPF nbr , Mbgp Outgoing interface list: BDI-CUST, Forward/Sparse, 00:00:04/00:03:25 -- Mvh Mattias Gyllenvarg ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck

Re: [c-nsp] BGP not advertising supernet to RR's

LocPrf Weight Path > *> xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx.112/28 >xxx.xxx.78.230 0 32768 ? > *> xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx.136/30 >xxx.xxx.78.230 0 32768 ? > *> xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx.164/30 >xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx.102

Re: [c-nsp] PVLAN Edge on 4500 Sup8E

switchport proteceted feature. > > And that is what I did, going full PVLAN. > > What's the reason PVLAN is not possible? > > > > Lukas > -- Mvh Mattias Gyllenvarg ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

[c-nsp] PVLAN Edge on 4500 Sup8E

that claims this is not a permanent feature in the box. That he can not guarantee will be in future releases. -- Mvh Mattias Gyllenvarg ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http

Re: [c-nsp] NCS4200 - re-badged ASR920 / ASR900 ?

transmitted by e-mail. > ___ > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ -- Mvh Mattias Gyllenvarg ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

[c-nsp] Ode to the old days

Dear All 10year 4weeks 6days and about 11hours ago I was working for my first ISP (ispA). On that day I put a 3560-24TS into production as a device to terminate to a Metronet running OSPF/BGP och public IP space. A few years later I started consulting for ispB who later split into and became

Re: [c-nsp] BGP with MPLS

Well L2 is hard and ugly, L3 is fine. :p ons 5 okt. 2016 kl 14:35 skrev Mattias Gyllenvarg <matt...@gyllenvarg.se>: > L3 redundancy is hard and ugly without MPLS. L3 is fine without. > > tis 4 okt. 2016 kl 21:59 skrev Maile Halatuituia <maile.halatuit...@tcc.to > >:

Re: [c-nsp] BGP with MPLS

l be working > > I hope i am not add confusion to my question. > > Cheers. > > Maile. > -- > *From:* Mattias Gyllenvarg <matt...@gyllenvarg.se> > *Sent:* Wednesday, October 5, 2016 3:04 AM > *To:* Maile Halatuituia > > *Subj

Re: [c-nsp] ASR-901 EoMPLS qinq

We have moved to 920-4 for these situations. 901 has been a let down. tis 5 juli 2016 kl 17:48 skrev Divo Zito : > Hello, > > I need to transport some double-tagged customers from SiteA to SiteB > through a GbE link and to rewrite S-VLANs so that those I use on the >

Re: [c-nsp] Etherchannel load-balacing change on live network

I have done this many times with no noticeable effect. At least on modern IOS versions. There was a bug that caused all traffic to go over one interface which required a reload to fix, but that was ages ago. ons 6 juli 2016 kl 23:14 skrev Satish Patel : > We have C3750

Re: [c-nsp] mVPN Rosen - S,G is not refreshed but *,G is

Puzzling indeed, they are also the same channels after reload and even IOS upgrade. tors 26 maj 2016 kl 10:13 skrev Adam Vitkovsky <adam.vitkov...@gamma.co.uk>: > > Mattias Gyllenvarg [mailto:matt...@gyllenvarg.se] > > Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2016 1:20 PM > > >

Re: [c-nsp] mVPN Rosen - S,G is not refreshed but *,G is

Adam, Thank you for replying. There is no Data MDT at this point. Correct me if I am wrong but i gather that it is not necessary so we are working on having basic functionality right now. ons 25 maj 2016 kl 13:45 skrev Adam Vitkovsky <adam.vitkov...@gamma.co.uk>: > > Mattia

[c-nsp] mVPN Rosen - S,G is not refreshed but *,G is

Dear All Any input is greatly appreciated! I have two PE ME3600X where one is RP (North) and one is has the customer link (South). North receives a set of TV streams that work perfect locally. But over the tunnel interface down to South SOME mroutes on North are not refreshed properly. The *,G

Re: [c-nsp] what the heck is "ip forward-protocol nd" good for

Yeah, This was discussed some time ago when they where planning on IOS 15 and checked what we wanted here on the list. I asked for a global "modern standards/defaults" but no go. Or legacy-default-off. Nothing fancy, just like the above. No proxy-arp etc etc, stuff left behind the last millenia.

Re: [c-nsp] ME3800X/ME3600X/ME3600X-24CX/ASR903/ASR901 Deployment Simplification Feedback

Even not considering vendor-lock you will have less options from said supplier if you expect to use this as a universal solution. The ASR920 series has many variants, I am capitalizing on this for our topology. There will always, I find, be the Odd ball requirement that makes these kind of

Re: [c-nsp] dai / dhcp snooping bug

Mike I recently solved an issue a client had with a very similar setup and the same symptoms. They had a very complex PBR setup and the unicasts in the renew process got misplaced . tis 11 aug. 2015 kl 00:40 skrev Mike mike-cisconspl...@tiedyenetworks.com: On 08/10/2015 12:37 PM, Gert Doering

Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 Microbursts

From what I have understood it is a 12MB global buffer pool. On 4 Aug 2015 4:47 pm, Jordi Magrané Roig jordimagr...@hotmail.com wrote: Dear Colleagues, Recently I have installed one ASR920 and I have configured on 1G interface one service instance with an outbound policy-map shaping to 30

Re: [c-nsp] ASR902 vs ME3800X

. It seems a little early for this platform to be deeming things incompatible. On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 3:49 PM, Adam Vitkovsky adam.vitkov...@gamma.co.uk wrote: Mattias Gyllenvarg Sent: 23 April 2015 08:56 Regarding what replaces the ME3800 Was looking around the Cisco labyrinth and saw

Re: [c-nsp] ASR902 vs ME3800X

at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ -- *Med Vänliga Hälsningar / Best Regards* *Mattias Gyllenvarg* ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] ASR902 vs ME3800X

cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ -- *Med Vänliga Hälsningar / Best Regards* *Mattias Gyllenvarg* ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] ASR902 vs ME3800X

software maturity, but that is in the nature of new things. On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 9:50 AM, Mark Tinka mark.ti...@seacom.mu wrote: On 24/Mar/15 10:37, Mattias Gyllenvarg wrote: I have no machine in production yet so this is speculation. But the ASR920 has less bufferspace then the ME3600x

Re: [c-nsp] ASR902 vs ME3800X

/ -- *Med Vänliga Hälsningar / Best Regards* *Mattias Gyllenvarg* ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] ASR902 vs ME3800X

-732079.html Cheers ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ -- *Med Vänliga Hälsningar / Best Regards* *Mattias Gyllenvarg

Re: [c-nsp] ASR vs 6807

/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ -- *Med Vänliga Hälsningar / Best Regards* *Mattias Gyllenvarg

[c-nsp] Experience on ASR9k XR 5.1.2

Dear List I would love to hear some feed back on the 5.1.2 Train of IOS XR. This was preloaded in a few boxes (9010) and I am looking for the most stable train without downgrading (fingers crossed). Will be running: MP-BGP VRF OSPF -- *Med Vänliga Hälsningar / Best Regards* *Mattias

Re: [c-nsp] Experience on ASR9k XR 5.1.2

. All of this should be fixed in 5.1.3. They promised :) I wait 5.1.3 release. On Thu, 21 Aug 2014 11:24:19 +0100 Nick Hilliard n...@foobar.org wrote: On 21/08/2014 10:43, Mattias Gyllenvarg wrote: I would love to hear some feed back on the 5.1.2 Train of IOS XR. This was preloaded

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco ME3x00 Egress Policie - Denied by Cisco/IOS!

@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ -- *Med Vänliga Hälsningar / Best Regards* *Mattias Gyllenvarg* ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https

Re: [c-nsp] EVC/EFP - Longest match VLAN stack length

be sent too bd10555 and 10+any to bd1 and then 10+non to bd10. //Mattias Gyllenvarg Obduro Network AB On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Arash Alizadeh aras...@hotmail.se wrote: Hi, I wonder if anyone knows if you in two seperate EFP's could match the same outermost tag where one matches

Re: [c-nsp] Simultaneous drops - 2 upstream providers

A and B uses A or Bs infrastructure at eighter end of the link? Or a common third party somewhere in the signal path. Den 20 aug 2013 05:23 skrev CiscoNSP List cisconsp_l...@hotmail.com: Thanks Blake - Both links (that drop) are doing minimal traffic (One is only a backup link, so isnt used)

Re: [c-nsp] Temporarily disable all forwarding on ASR9K

. So, I just want to say that you should verify traffic patterns on the customer port(s) when testing this. Regrading disabling forwarding, why not shutdown links from the adjacent devices. Recovery time would be linkstate+igp+bgp sync. Not too slow on ASR9k right? //Mattias Gyllenvarg On Thu

Re: [c-nsp] why are packets not following the more specific route - xr 4.1.2 (asr9k)

/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ -- *Med Vänliga Hälsningar* *Mattias Gyllenvarg* ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] why are packets not following the more specific route - xr 4.1.2 (asr9k)

/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ -- *Med Vänliga Hälsningar* *Mattias Gyllenvarg* ___ cisco-nsp

Re: [c-nsp] why are packets not following the more specific route - xr 4.1.2 (asr9k)

routes is an ip address on the distant end of a layer 2 segment which is connected to that border asr9k ** ** Aaron ** ** *From:* Mattias Gyllenvarg [mailto:matt...@gyllenvarg.se] *Sent:* Thursday, August 15, 2013 2:27 PM *To:* Aaron *Cc:* Aaron; cisco-nsp; LavoJM *Subject:* Re

Re: [c-nsp] why are packets not following the more specific route - xr 4.1.2 (asr9k)

connected to…so those routes have next hop of the bh interface of the appliance…. ** ** Aaron ** ** ** ** *From:* Mattias Gyllenvarg [mailto:matt...@gyllenvarg.se] *Sent:* Thursday, August 15, 2013 3:02 PM *To:* Aaron *Cc:* Aaron; cisco-nsp; LavoJM *Subject:* Re: [c-nsp] why

Re: [c-nsp] ME3800X/ME3600X/ME3600X-24CX/ASR903/ASR901 Deployment Simplification Feedback

Hälsningar* *Mattias Gyllenvarg* ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] Do you have command auto reoptimize Traffic Engineering by the router?

Though I have no actual experience I asked the same question at cisco live. And yes, it is supposed to reevaluate at certain intervals. . Best regards Mattias Gyllenvarg On Jul 22, 2013 12:15 PM, PlaWanSai RMUTT CPE IX pws_ad...@thaicpe.com wrote: Hi all, Do you have command

Re: [c-nsp] ME3800X/ME3600X/ME3600X-24CX/ASR903/ASR901 Deployment Simplification Feedback

+1 and I add a me3600x chassie to the mix of wet dreams. On 21 Jul 2013 08:01, Mark Tinka mark.ti...@seacom.mu wrote: On Tuesday, March 19, 2013 09:27:45 AM Waris Sagheer (waris) wrote: Hi Everyone, I have seen lot of good inputs on this mailer. I am collecting feedback for the existing

Re: [c-nsp] vrf-lite routing

location and not a switch. Dan. On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 1:28 AM, Mattias Gyllenvarg matt...@gyllenvarg.se wrote: Hi Dan Sounds like your getting of on the wrong foot. The 3560 can't do much more then routing and switching. No GRE or MPLS so you are pretty much stuck

Re: [c-nsp] vrf-lite routing

* *Mattias Gyllenvarg* ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] Carrier Aggregation advice

that may have got a lot better in the past half year. Best regards Mattias Gyllenvarg On Jul 17, 2013 3:55 PM, Chris Gibbs chris.gi...@gosford.nsw.gov.au wrote: Gday all, I'm currently investigating terminating a NNI from NBN Co and aggregating services before dumping into our core. Consider

Re: [c-nsp] Carrier Aggregation advice

Xe is the same syntax as ios classic. Just modular. Asr9000 uses xr and is all new syntax. Best regards Mattias Gyllenvarg On Jul 17, 2013 10:16 PM, Chris Gibbs chris.gi...@gosford.nsw.gov.au wrote: Thanks Mattias. We have dual upstream providers so probably don't need full bgp to start

[c-nsp] ASR-9010-AC vs ASR-9010-AC-V2

Dear List What is the difference between the chassie versions? Is the V2 just a hardware revision? -- *Best Regards* *Mattias Gyllenvarg* Senior Network Architect Obduro Network AB ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https

Re: [c-nsp] ASR-9010-AC vs ASR-9010-AC-V2

from the PEM. On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 10:12 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson swm...@swm.pp.sewrote: On Thu, 20 Jun 2013, Mattias Gyllenvarg wrote: Dear List What is the difference between the chassie versions? Is the V2 just a hardware revision? V2 is probably the uprated FAN array, which means

Re: [c-nsp] Terminating lots of double-tagged vlans

Hälsningar - Best Regards* *Mattias Gyllenvarg* *Nätutveckling* Bredband2 Tel: +46 406219712 ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] Metro Ethernet nightmares (L2PT, PBB-VPLS, Load Balancing, EVPN)

, Holger L ci...@entrap.de wrote: Hi Mattias, On Mon, May 6, 2013 03:13, Mattias Gyllenvarg wrote: From what I gathered about this. EVPN (BGP signaled Ethernet VPN) will solve this as there are to many variants of Spanning tree that your clients can use that you today need to implement

Re: [c-nsp] Ang: Making SUP720 cope better under BGP load

I can vouch for the asr9k in regards too performance. But the software still is not as stable as you might want. On May 2, 2013 9:52 AM, gustav.ulan...@steria.se wrote: Hello Simon. We are using asr1k for peering purposes and Sup2T in the core. We also have some sup 720 as PE routers. We find

Re: [c-nsp] IPv6 Transition - IP/MPLS Backbone

___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ -- *Med Vänliga Hälsningar - Best Regards* *Mattias Gyllenvarg* *Nätutveckling* Bredband2 Tel: +46 406219712

Re: [c-nsp] Using EoMPLS instead of end to end VLAN

://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ -- *Med Vänliga Hälsningar - Best Regards* *Mattias Gyllenvarg* *Nätutveckling* Bredband2 Tel: +46 406219712 ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp

Re: [c-nsp] Sup2T - poor netflow performance

cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ -- *Med Vänliga Hälsningar - Best Regards* *Mattias Gyllenvarg* *Nätutveckling* Bredband2 Tel: +46 406219712 ___ cisco

[c-nsp] Inga mer ds switchar

Hej allihop Vi kommer inte deplya några nya DS switchar, dessa kommer i framtiden vara AS switchar. De befinliga kommer endast döpas om om de samtidigt märks om på plats. -- *Med Vänliga Hälsningar - Best Regards* *Mattias Gyllenvarg* *Nätutveckling* Bredband2 Tel: +46 406219712

Re: [c-nsp] IOS XR and router rib rump always-replicate

Sorry for the weak context. I was just refering too removing PIM from within Core/Dist not inter-AS. On 6 March 2013 08:26, Mikael Abrahamsson swm...@swm.pp.se wrote: On Wed, 6 Mar 2013, Mattias Gyllenvarg wrote: About that, Oliver, is multicast-BGP production ready in IOS ans IOS XR

Re: [c-nsp] IOS XR and router rib rump always-replicate

swm...@swm.pp.se wrote: On Wed, 6 Mar 2013, Mattias Gyllenvarg wrote: I was just refering too removing PIM from within Core/Dist not inter-AS. How is multicast supposed to work at all whereever for L3 routing without PIM? I'll admit I'm a bit rusty and only know about PIM-SM and PIM-SSM

Re: [c-nsp] IOS XR and router rib rump always-replicate

Regards* *Mattias Gyllenvarg* *Nätutveckling* Bredband2 Tel: +46 406219712 ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] BGP route won't advertise

/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ -- *Med Vänliga Hälsningar - Best Regards* *Mattias Gyllenvarg* *Nätutveckling* Bredband2 Tel: +46 406219712 ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive

Re: [c-nsp] IOS XR and router rib rump always-replicate

at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ -- *Med Vänliga Hälsningar - Best Regards* *Mattias Gyllenvarg* *Nätutveckling* Bredband2 Tel: +46 406219712 ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman

Re: [c-nsp] 802.1Q-in-Q VLAN Tag Termination on 7600/6500 OSN modules

encapsulation dot1q 10 second-dotq 100 ip address 10.0.0.1 255.255.255.0 with the ES+ (and I think also with 7600-SIP-400 + SPA-5X1GE-V2) is possible. Thanks, Davide 2013/2/28 Mattias Gyllenvarg mattias.gyllenv...@bredband2.se: Do it in the 3600X, thats what there good at. On 28

Re: [c-nsp] list wisdom please, Cisco switches

list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ -- *Med Vänliga Hälsningar - Best Regards* *Mattias Gyllenvarg* *Nätutveckling* Bredband2 Tel: +46 406219712

Re: [c-nsp] Advanced Metro license, ME-3600

list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ -- *Med Vänliga Hälsningar - Best Regards* *Mattias Gyllenvarg* *Nätutveckling* Bredband2 - bara hårda paket Tel: +46 406219712

Re: [c-nsp] IOS XR

Dear Mohamed/List If you go with 4.1.0 do not miss the appropriate SMUs or you will have nasty surpises. //Mattias 2011/9/5 mohamed Osama Saad Abo sree mohamed.abos...@gmail.com: Hello, I'm wondering if any one had upgraded to IOS XR release Version 4.1.1 and face any Bugs or issues that

Re: [c-nsp] ASR9k A9K-8T-L LC crash and reload

the reload. Best Regards Mattias Gyllenvarg Bredband2 2011/6/16 Piotr Wojciechowski pe...@peper.eu.org: On 6/16/11 14:25 , Wyatt Mattias Gyllenvarg wrote: Hi All We are having an issue with a ring of 3 ASR9010 and one 7606 Sup7203BXL with 6704-DFC3BLX. Hi, Because problem occurs on multiple

[c-nsp] ASR9k A9K-8T-L LC crash and reload

* Any opinions or comments appreciated! Best Regards Mattias Gyllenvarg Bredband2 Sweden ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] Recieving Dying Gasp notifications

Heir heir This is a feature I would like too see. But via syslog, I dont know if there is enough running time for the switch too create a packet and send it before the psu is drained. Otherwise I guess a regular DG that could be logged if enabled would work aswell. This would save alot of time

Re: [c-nsp] Multicast trickery

is recieved? Perhaps I have not waited long enough? What would a static multicast route look like, all my attempts indicate that I don not understand how it works :p Best regards Mattias Gyllenvarg Omnitron 2009/10/20 Paul Cosgrove paul.cosgrove@gmail.com: Hi Mattias If I understand your topology

[c-nsp] Multicast trickery

and inject them into MDSP. My hope is that I will get to a point where I can use MSDP between cores and ANYCAST my RPs. Best regards Mattias Gyllenvarg Omnitron Sweden ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman

Re: [c-nsp] Multicast trickery

Best regards Mattias Gyllenvarg 2009/10/20 Hans Verkerk hverk...@winitu.com: Hi, If I run PIM-DM they call me in a hurry and tell me that my PIM packets are disturbing the network. Maybe your BSR packets are interfering with SP2's network, so include ip pim bsr-border on interface facing

[c-nsp] ME3400-24FS 12.2(46)SE METROIPACCESS with no MLS QOS commands

commands. Neither global nor interface commands. I haven't found any reference too this change anywhere. So, how do I get it too trust the DSCP values it on the uplink port so I can reserve bandwidth for it on the outgoing port. Best regards Mattias Gyllenvarg

Re: [c-nsp] ME3400-24FS 12.2(46)SE METROIPACCESS with no MLS QOS commands

Hi Claes I figured that something like that would work, but it seems a like a stretch compared too mls qos trust. I will run a version of your config for the time being. Thanks Mattias Gyllenvarg 2009/4/15 Claes Jansson cl...@gastabud.com: Hi Mattias! I've been in the same position as you

Re: [c-nsp] ME3400-24FS 12.2(46)SE METROIPACCESS with no MLS QOS commands

dscp ? snip dscpSet packet dscp from dscp Enjoy Mattias Gyllenvarg 2009/4/15 Tassos Chatzithomaoglou ach...@forthnet.gr: Mattias, I believe the default mode is to not change the CoS/DSCP of packets, so you shouldn't have any problem. Also, you can use a policy-map under

[c-nsp] Right IOS for 7600

Hi All Asking you real IOS gurus out there for the production options on IOS upgrades. Where running 7600 Sup720PFC3BLX OSPF BGP and wish too add microFlow policing Netflow Currently on 12.2(18)SXF7 I understand that are several trains too choose from. Best Regards Mattias Gyllenvarg Omnitron

[c-nsp] Ip unnumbered on 3750

gives the following when inputing the ip unnumbered command. Point-to-point (non-multi-access) interfaces only My question is, is there a work around for this or will 3750 never support ip unnumbered on multi-access interfaces? Best regards Mattias Gyllenvarg Omnitron

Re: [c-nsp] %SW_MATM-4-MACFLAP_NOTIF

. //Mattias Gyllenvarg 2008/10/16 Ozgur Guler [EMAIL PROTECTED]: no mac address-table notification mac-move might help. --- On Thu, 16/10/08, Jimmy Halim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Jimmy Halim [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [c-nsp] %SW_MATM-4-MACFLAP_NOTIF To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net