[c-nsp] NAT question

Hi all, Is there a way of showing or knowing the NAT session per second current rate on ASR1k? According to its Datasheet it says it supports 200,000 sessions per second with 20G ESP. On CLI the cmd "show ip nat trans tot" shows the active sessions only for both TCP and UDP based. Thanks, To

[c-nsp] nat question

hey all i configured natting on a cisco router i have loopback interface and f0/0 interface with ip nat inside configured and one interface configured for outside natting does that affect ? _ More than messages–check out the rest o

[c-nsp] Nat Question

Here's the scenario... I have a Cisco 1800ISR already configured to a DSL modem for internet...its doing great. The customer now brought in another internet feed and wants two websites that they use to go out that internet feed...no problem. The sticking issue I'm having right now is wi

Re: [c-nsp] NAT question.

Keyzer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 17, 2007 6:04 AM To: 'Troy Beisigl' Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: RE: [c-nsp] NAT question. > packets from the Ethernet of Router A do not seem to get nat'd, however to > show up in the nat translations table.

Re: [c-nsp] NAT question.

> packets from the Ethernet of Router A do not seem to get nat'd, however to > show up in the nat translations table. What do you mean by that? Please post outputs of "sh ip nat tran" for both 192.168 and 10. What makes you think that don't "get nat'd" ? Vincent

[c-nsp] NAT question.

I have a strange problem happening with NAT and am wondering if anyone here might be able to help solve the problem. We have a cisco 2611 router configured to do NAT of IP addresses on the 2 T1 serial interfaces to public IP addresses on the Ethernet 0/0 interface. It seems to translate the IP addr

Re: [c-nsp] NAT Question

Hi, On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 08:05:55PM +0800, Brett Looney wrote: > > Which is why you can do cool tricks with "bounce over loopback" :) > > (even if half of them woulnd't be necessary if static NAT mappings > > could take an ACL for "only for *these* destinations, please!"). > > You mean like yo

Re: [c-nsp] NAT Question

> Which is why you can do cool tricks with "bounce over loopback" :) > (even if half of them woulnd't be necessary if static NAT mappings > could take an ACL for "only for *these* destinations, please!"). You mean like you can do with a route map? Ala: ip nat inside source static 192.168.

Re: [c-nsp] NAT Question

Hi, On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 11:35:22AM +0200, Vincent De Keyzer wrote: > > This is the cool thing about the classic IOS NAT - you can do things like > > this. > > Does Cisco have any other NAT than the "classic IOS" one ? > > PS: You can reply on-list if ever my question makes sense :) Yes, the

Re: [c-nsp] NAT Question

Hi, On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 12:26:45AM +0930, Tom Storey wrote: > IIRC NAT occurs after routing, therefore it traffic is simply routed between > inside interfaces, it should never be NATed. Specifically, inside-to-outside NAT occurs if and only if (!) the packet comes in from an "ip nat inside"

Re: [c-nsp] NAT Question

Message - From: "Gert Doering" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Sridhar Ayengar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Cisco NSPs" Sent: Friday, June 29, 2007 6:52 PM Subject: Re: [c-nsp] NAT Question > Hi, > > On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 05:06:42AM -0400, Sridhar A

Re: [c-nsp] NAT Question

Hi, On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 05:06:42AM -0400, Sridhar Ayengar wrote: > What I can't figure out is how to configure the network for the servers. Make them "neither inside nor outside" - then packets will never be NATted coming from this interface, or going towards it. This is the cool thing abou

[c-nsp] NAT Question

I have a NAT question which could probably be considered simple, but my Google-fu fails me. I would appreciate either an answer, or a pointer to where I can RTFM. I have four networks that I'm routing between. The first is a publicly-accessible block for servers with a routeable IP block. T

Re: [c-nsp] nat question

I figured it out. I forgot that I needed ip nat inside on f0/0. Everything works now. Thanks. Dan. Dan wrote: > Kevin, > > That make sense. Now how can I route certain ip's or subnets to this > gateway? On the lan port f0/0 i already have a route-map called "inet" > that sets the next-hop

Re: [c-nsp] nat question

Kevin, That make sense. Now how can I route certain ip's or subnets to this gateway? On the lan port f0/0 i already have a route-map called "inet" that sets the next-hop behavior for subnets. When I create a sequence in the "inet" route-map that permits a certain ip and sets the next-hop to the

Re: [c-nsp] nat question

On 4/30/07, Dan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > interface FastEthernet0/3/3 > switchport access vlan 303 [...] > route-map nat-wb permit 10 > match interface FastEthernet0/3/3 [...] > interface Vlan303 > ip address 64.x.x.1 255.255.255.240 [...] > ip nat inside source route-map nat-wb interface Fa

[c-nsp] nat question

I'm having trouble setting up nat on a router. I have a route-map routing internal subnets to various dsl lines. We have another isp connection now that I need to connect to the router on an hwic and setup nat. I have a workstation that i'm trying to route through to the new isp connection b