Re: [cisco-voip] [External] Re: FX0 pool exhuastion

Check out telemetry: https://blogs.cisco.com/developer/model-driven-telemetry-sandbox You can have the gateway stream data to the collector (such as Telegraf). This works great for streaming the number of channels in use for ISDN. There are probably similar models for SIP. > On Apr 17, 2023,

Re: [cisco-voip] [EXTERNAL] quick question about UCCX license

Specific License Reservation (SLR) is the best way to resolve the UCCX Smart Licensing defects. Once applied and rebooted you have blissful silence from the eternal Smart Licensing failures.On Apr 11, 2023, at 19:23, JASON BURWELL wrote: My experience has always been that the new licenses

Re: [cisco-voip] Specific Off-net Called Numbers Being Dropped When Called From Jabber

Missed that someone else already mentioned the region. Sorry.On Jan 27, 2023, at 09:42, Gentoo wrote:Is “Retry Video Call as Audio” checked on the SIP trunk to the SBC?You could try setting the Maximum Session Bit Rate for Video & Immersive video calls to 0 for the region used for the SBC

Re: [cisco-voip] Specific Off-net Called Numbers Being Dropped When Called From Jabber

Is “Retry Video Call as Audio” checked on the SIP trunk to the SBC?You could try setting the Maximum Session Bit Rate for Video & Immersive video calls to 0 for the region used for the SBC. So long as that region is only used for the SBC and you don’t ever need video across the SBC.On Jan 27,

[cisco-voip] VG400 FXO

Has anyone used FXO ports on the VG400s? Any caveats routing calls from the FXO port to CUCM over SIP? Or sending calls to analog paging systems via FXO? Any info would be helpful. Thanks! ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net

Re: [cisco-voip] VMware ESXi v7.0u3

No issues with 7.0.3 for UCCE 12.5, Expressway, CUCM 12.5/14, CUC 12.5 for me. 7.0.3 is an iffy esxi release though, be sure to read the vmware notices regarding it, depending on your environment and which 7.0.3 release you are on https://kb.vmware.com/s/article/86287 > On Mar 25, 2022, at

Re: [cisco-voip] [External] Re: ATA Devices

Just fyi VG20x XM end of sale date is April 29, 2022. Replacement product is VG400 series at a higher price if you just want FXS ports. ATA-191 are an option, but the CUCM version doesn’t support power denial. > On Jan 25, 2022, at 14:43, Adam Pawlowski wrote: > > Sort of a derail, but

Re: [cisco-voip] [External] Error Processing SAML Response

Is one system observing Daylight Savings Time and the other is not? > On Sep 17, 2021, at 08:14, Jonathan Charles wrote: > >  > Here is another one that failed... but the timestamp is not off... > > 2021-09-15 16:06:26,226 DEBUG [http-nio-81-exec-4] fappend.SamlLogger - >

Re: [cisco-voip] [External] Re: Error Processing SAML Response

Is there valid TLS trust between UCM and Idp? > On Sep 16, 2021, at 19:46, Johnson, Tim wrote: > >  > Nah, looks like he said logging into CCM Admin pages, with AD accounts, so > all areas of the web UI (I believe). The NTP errors that I’ve seen are > presented as SAML assertion errors. >

Re: [cisco-voip] PCD 12.6 and CSR 14...

UCM 14 isn’t listed in PCD 12.6’s supported tasks in https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/pcdadmin/12_5_1/cucm_b_pcd-admin-guide_126/cucm_b_pcd-admin-guide_126_chapter_011.html It is in PCD 14

Re: [cisco-voip] UCCX skill manager page

What ES (if any) are you running? > On Jul 3, 2021, at 12:31, James Dust wrote: > >  > Afternoon all, > > We have recently moved our users on a version ‘’12.5.1’’ UCCX cluster, and > apparently our supervisors were able to access skill’s page on the previous > version via this link ‘’

[cisco-voip] UCCX Max HTTP POST Size

Hello, Is there a documented maximum file size UCCX (11.5) can upload with HTTP POST? Is there a supported way to increase this? Thanks, Gentoo ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] anyone see audit log files fill up with a bunch of dbipphone entries?

Lelio, Just a guess but is 192.8.112.0 an IP address in your voice environment? > On Feb 7, 2018, at 08:19, Lelio Fulgenzi wrote: > > 7342272 ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net

Re: [cisco-voip] Lights for Calls in Queue CCX

Of course they have: https://jaspervanloenen.com/web-training-collar/ > On Feb 2, 2018, at 10:04, Haas, Neal via cisco-voip > wrote: > > Has anyone developed a Network attached electric zap……. > > From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On

Re: [cisco-voip] Duplicate ipaddress space and vlans on separate vSwitches on same ESXi host

You can have the same VLAN ID on different switches without issue. This works fine: Switch A has vlan 100 and 200 and NIC A is trunking VLANs 100 and 200 to Switch A. Switch B has vlan 100 and 200 and NIC B is trunking VLANs 100 and 200 to Switch B. As long as those are truly

[cisco-voip] UCCE Agent Silent Monitoring

. As well as reviews of Finesse under UCCE and its integrated silent monitoring. Thanks, Gentoo ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] ATA190 Registration Failed

/release-notes/ata190-rn-112.html?mdfid=286248743 Are use using the latest device pack on UCM? http://www.cisco.com/web/software/282074299/124017/cmterm-devicepack10.5.2_12014-1_Release_Notes.pdf -Gentoo On 2015-05-26 15:57, Alessandro Bertacco wrote: Hi all, we have issue with ATA190 (FW

Re: [cisco-voip] UCCX Upgrade question

to a dentist which uses improper equipment and training to have a tooth drilled with as trying to have licens...@cisco.com fulfill a manual order correctly in the first few attempts, let alone a timely manner. /endrant -Gentoo On 2015-05-22 09:22, Anthony Holloway wrote: Thanks Brian

[cisco-voip] CUWL 9.x to CUWL 10.x

Insufficient Licenses when one or more users requires a license. Thanks, Gentoo ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] h323 trunk between cisco and asterisk

Any change if you allow h323 to h323 and disable toll fraud prevention? voice service voip no ip address trusted authenticate allow-connections h323 to h323 What does debug voip dialpeer show when the call is coming from Asterisk? Which dial-peer do you intend for incoming calls from

Re: [cisco-voip] Unity Connection upgrade from 7.1(3) to 9.1(2)

. Database will sync. Once database is sync'd promote the publisher to primary. Verify license is applied on both pub and sub The process is similar for the sub, the CUC docs should be enough for that. On 2015-04-23 09:22, Rasim Duric wrote: Thank you Gentoo. This is very useful. Our plan

Re: [cisco-voip] Unity Connection upgrade from 7.1(3) to 9.1(2)

Oh, I missed that part completely. On 2015-04-23 13:50, Rasim Duric wrote: Thank you again Gentoo. There is a slight miscommunication here, my two servers are not in a Unity Connection cluster. These are independent servers, a CUC digital networking is established though.   Rasim Duric Network

Re: [cisco-voip] Unity Connection upgrade from 7.1(3) to 9.1(2)

Its also possible to do this without COBRAS or DRS. Basically you just replace each node one at a time on the current version but running on the new HW. Once you have the current version running on the new hardware you upgrade as usual. (Don't forget to get your 7.x licenses ahead of time

Re: [cisco-voip] Jabber 10.6 high CPU

I haven't personally seen this, but did see this possibly related bug: https://tools.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCuu02593 Symptom: Slow response 3-5 seconds entering chat Conditions: Jabber 10.x with KB3038314 installed. Workaround: remove KB3038314 On 2015-04-21 04:57, Antonis Kouloglou

Re: [cisco-voip] Extension that hangs up on the user?

Are you using a version of UCM with native call queuing? Instead of routing the call to CUC you could try sending it to a hunt list with queuing enable, that has no logged in members that is set to disconnect the call. On 2015-03-18 01:33, James Andrewartha wrote: Hi list, Is there a way

Re: [cisco-voip] CUE 8.6.5 notification to gmail...

Possibly an SSL/TLS issue. Can you get a packet capture of the CUE trying to connect? CUE traces of the process as well? Just a guess, but if you don't have a trusted CA installed on the CUE that trusts Gmail's SSL cert, this probably won't work. Haven't played with SMTP/ssl on CUE, but

Re: [cisco-voip] Rehost CUCM 9 licenses...

Jonathan, Are you trying to move these to a non-ELM/PLM server or just migrate ELM/PLM to a new server? If you are migrating ELM/PLM there is a self service tool that can do this now. On 2015-03-05 14:19, Jonathan Charles wrote: Cool, let me try that... Jonathan On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at

Re: [cisco-voip] Rehost CUCM 9 licenses...

If you have access to the same CCO account that they licenses were issued to, you should be able to this with PLM without a TAC case.

Re: [cisco-voip] MediaSense Interfaces

Chris, That is good news, I look forward to seeing those features in MediaSense. Is MediaSense 11.x likely to be released at the same time with UCM 11.x? Thanks! On 2015-03-03 16:24, Chris Ward (chrward) wrote: While it doesn't help you with your current query, I can tell you that we have

[cisco-voip] CUCM 11.0 Release Date?

Anyone have any guesses for the date when CUCM 11.0 hits CCO? Its starting to show as the latest version in some places: http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/unified-communications/unified-communications-manager-version-11-0/model.html ___

Re: [cisco-voip] Removing licenses CUCM 8.6

Since you want to break it... If you change the NTP server and reboot it should recalculate the license MAC. Changing the NTP server back should restore the original license MAC after another reboot. Maybe that will be enough to clear our the old license information. Otherwise, you could

[cisco-voip] VCS Expressway - Cannot login with Web or SSH

of TAC - and see notes in VCS Cluster deployment guide. You will destroy data so if it is not saved elsewhere it will be lost forever Has anyone else encountered this bug? If so, what caused it, and how was it resolved? -Gentoo ___ cisco-voip mailing

Re: [cisco-voip] OT: using subnet/wildcard mask for group within a group, issues?

This could probably be accomplished this with a layer 2 filtering bridge. Either with a Linux VM with multiple tagged VLANs or an ASA in transparent mode with multiple tagged VLANs for each host (or group of hosts you want to filter). You would need to place the layer 2 filtering bridge

Re: [cisco-voip] CUBE SIP TCP connection timeout

You could also add voice-class sip options-keepalive under the dial-peers and they will be disabled when they are unreachable. You can see their status with sh dial-p v s. On 2015-02-05 12:32, Brian Meade wrote: Hey all, Does anyone know a SIP equivalent of h225 timeout tcp establish? The

Re: [cisco-voip] CUBE SIP TCP connection timeout

Not sure why this didn't hit the list the first time I sent it, maybe its just slow. Anyways: sip-ua retry invite 2 timers trying 100 On 2015-02-05 12:32, Brian Meade wrote: Hey all, Does anyone know a SIP equivalent of h225 timeout tcp establish? The default SIP TCP timeout is 5

Re: [cisco-voip] CUBE SIP TCP connection timeout

sip-ua retry invite 2 timers trying 100 On 2015-02-05 12:32, Brian Meade wrote: Hey all, Does anyone know a SIP equivalent of h225 timeout tcp establish? The default SIP TCP timeout is 5 seconds: 001306: Feb  4 20:44:34.164: %VOICE_IEC-3-GW: SIP: Internal Error (Socket error):

Re: [cisco-voip] easiest and quickest way to disable a PRI PSTN (MGCP) port?

Assuming that you don't care about dropping any active calls: controller t1 X/X/X shutdown Otherwise, you could busy out the channels that are not in use (sh isdn service to see status). interface SerialX/X/X:23 isdn busy b_channel 0-24 On 2015-02-03 08:42, Lelio Fulgenzi wrote: Good

Re: [cisco-voip] easiest and quickest way to disable a PRI PSTN (MGCP) port?

Is Enable status poll checked for the port on the MGCP device? http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/voice-unified-communications/unified-communications-manager-callmanager/71647-busy-out-c-chan-ccm.html On 2015-02-03 10:43, Lelio Fulgenzi wrote: double dang. not working. following