Re: [cisco-voip] Vyopta

[Jason Aarons (Americas)]

Great product.   Excellent dashboards on video, usage, adoption.  Can pull data 
direct for endpoint for more realtime info.  When you go big on video you tend 
to encounter more network issues.  I can’t speak to pricing.


From: cisco-voip  On Behalf Of Matthew 
Loraditch
Sent: Monday, August 5, 2019 5:27 PM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] Vyopta


Anyone use it in a CUCM only environment? Also curious about pricing. Feel free 
to reply direct.

Matthew Loraditch​
Sr. Network Engineer
p: 443.541.1518
w: www.heliontechnologies.com
 |
e: mloradi...@heliontechnologies.com
[Helion Technologies]
[Facebook]
[Twitter]
[LinkedIn]


itevomcid
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Unity Connection Mailbox

[Jason Aarons (Americas)]

We implemented that CXN Service Parameter “Last Redirecting Number” and it’s 
working.

Just which something there was a per user solution in CUCM etc.



From: Lelio Fulgenzi 
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2019 1:20 PM
To: Lelio Fulgenzi ; Jason Aarons (Americas) 
; cisco-voip (cisco-voip@puck.nether.net) 

Subject: RE: Unity Connection Mailbox


Ok – I’m _pretty_ sure this is what helps:


  *   Connection Admin > Advanced > Conversations
  *   Use Last (Rather than First) Redirecting Number for Routing Incoming Call 
[ ]

“When this check box is checked, Unity Connection uses the last redirecting 
number for routing incoming calls.”

I have not (ever) had a chance to test this.



---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. | Senior Analyst
Computing and Communications Services | University of Guelph
Room 037 Animal Science & Nutrition Bldg | 50 Stone Rd E | Guelph, ON | N1G 2W1
519-824-4120 Ext. 56354 | le...@uoguelph.ca<mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca>

www.uoguelph.ca/ccs<http://www.uoguelph.ca/ccs> | @UofGCCS on Instagram, 
Twitter and Facebook

[University of Guelph Cornerstone with Improve Life tagline]

From: cisco-voip 
mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net>> 
On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2019 1:10 PM
To: Jason Aarons (Americas) 
mailto:jason.aar...@dimensiondata.com>>; 
cisco-voip (cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>) 
mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Unity Connection Mailbox

There used to be a system wide settings on Unity Connection where you could 
decide to either send it to the originating mailbox. Not sure if it was 
available in the admin GUI or it needed a cisco unity monkey tool to do it.

Will spend a few minutes looking…


---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. | Senior Analyst
Computing and Communications Services | University of Guelph
Room 037 Animal Science & Nutrition Bldg | 50 Stone Rd E | Guelph, ON | N1G 2W1
519-824-4120 Ext. 56354 | le...@uoguelph.ca<mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca>

www.uoguelph.ca/ccs<http://www.uoguelph.ca/ccs> | @UofGCCS on Instagram, 
Twitter and Facebook

[University of Guelph Cornerstone with Improve Life tagline]

From: cisco-voip 
mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net>> 
On Behalf Of Jason Aarons (Americas)
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2019 12:43 PM
To: cisco-voip (cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>) 
mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>>
Subject: [cisco-voip] Unity Connection Mailbox


Jack on PSTN  >>>>>   Diane ext 4001  >>>>>>   Bobbie ext 4002

If Jack calls Diane and Diane has call forward all to Bobbie, is there a way 
for Jack to hear Bobbie’s voicemail and not Diane’s?

TAC said no.  Ask the expert at Cisco Live said no.  is the answer really no?





This email and all contents are subject to the following disclaimer:
"http://www.dimensiondata.com/emaildisclaimer;<http://www.dimensiondata.com/Global/Policies/Pages/Email-Disclaimer.aspx>


itevomcid
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

[cisco-voip] Unity Connection Mailbox

[Jason Aarons (Americas)]

   Jack on PSTN  >   Diane ext 4001  >>   Bobbie ext 4002

If Jack calls Diane and Diane has call forward all to Bobbie, is there a way 
for Jack to hear Bobbie's voicemail and not Diane's?

TAC said no.  Ask the expert at Cisco Live said no.  is the answer really no?

This email and all contents are subject to the following disclaimer:

"http://www.dimensiondata.com/emaildisclaimer;
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 12.5 Regions > Max Session Bit Rate for Video vs Immersive Video

[Jason Aarons (Americas)]

Here is the report, but testing confirmed a Cisco WebEx Room 55 is not an 
Immersive Video endpoint.  Sort of opposite of what below indicates.

[cid:image001.png@01D541A5.C71662C0]

Jason Aarons, CCIEx2 No. 38564, MCSE: Communications
Advanced Technical Consultant
Dimension Data
M: +1-904-338-3245 mobile/whatsApp
T: +1-954-517-2033 office/Miramar
x62033 Miramar
Call My Video Unit 62...@rccl.com<mailto:62...@rccl.com>

Together we do great things.
Dimension Data has joined 28 expert companies to become NTT.
Our transition to the NTT brand will be complete soon. Visit us at 
hello.global.ntt<https://hello.global.ntt/?elqTrackId=3F7027E56EB15D03DBADE8E3418458AD=a39c94d982094528a3908202d287fc13=5286=1=2994>


From: Anthony Holloway 
Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2019 11:35 AM
To: Jason Aarons (Americas) 
Cc: cisco-voip (cisco-voip@puck.nether.net) 
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 12.5 Regions > Max Session Bit Rate for Video vs 
Immersive Video

I agree that the name isn't as useful anymore, but did you run the report?  If 
so, do you feel the report is accurate, or are you noticing something is wrong 
with it?

Also, you didn't mention if you switched your Service Param over or not, else, 
everything uses non-immersive video by default.

On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 4:11 PM Jason Aarons (Americas) 
mailto:jason.aar...@dimensiondata.com>> wrote:
I can’t recall a new product from the Oslo team that said Telepresence it.   
The last products where Cisco TelePresence DX70, Cisco Telepresence MX200 G2 
etc.  The larger 3 panel half table conference room we all identify as 
Telepresence blah.

New huddle space products customers like are the Cisco Webex Board 55, Cisco 
Webex Room 55/70.  Based on testing these WebEx Room blah are no longer 
Immersive Video (on right in Regions) but just video endpoints similar to a 
8845/8865.

Guess I was going by the video screen size.  Big meant Telepresence.  Struggle 
was TAC SE didn’t know what Immersive Video vs Video was.  The CCIE Collab lab 
is pretty clear the 8845/65 are just video as you have tasks related to regions.

From: Anthony Holloway 
mailto:avholloway%2bcisco-v...@gmail.com>>
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2019 10:22 AM
To: Jason Aarons (Americas) 
mailto:jason.aar...@dimensiondata.com>>
Cc: cisco-voip (cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>) 
mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 12.5 Regions > Max Session Bit Rate for Video vs 
Immersive Video


Did you already change the value of Service Parameter: Use Video BandwidthPool 
for Immersive Video Calls?

The classification is per version of CUCM, and thus can be queried in CUCM.  
See below from SRND.

Endpoint Classification
Cisco TelePresence endpoints have a fixed non-configurable Video Call Traffic 
Class of immersive and are identified by Unified CM as immersive. Telepresence 
endpoints are defined in Unified CM by the device type. When a device is added 
in Unified CM, any device with TelePresence in the name of the device type is 
classified as immersive, as are the generic single-screen and multi-screen room 
systems. Another way to check the capabilities of the endpoints in the Unified 
CM is to go to the Cisco Unified Reporting Tool > System Reports > Unified CM 
Phone Feature List. In the feature drop down list, select Immersive Video 
Support for TelePresence Devices ; in the product drop down list, select All. 
This will display all of the device types that are classified as immersive. All 
other endpoints have a fixed Video Call Traffic Class of desktop due to their 
lack of the non-configurable immersive attribute.

Source: CUCM 11.x 
SRND<https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/srnd/collab11/collab11/cac.html#pgfId-1489913>

On Sun, Jul 21, 2019 at 6:51 PM Jason Aarons (Americas) 
mailto:jason.aar...@dimensiondata.com>> wrote:


Where is there a definitive list of what is Immersive?  Is a Room 55 Immersive?

From my training the left is 88xx video and right were products formerly made 
by Tandberg such as Room 55/DX80/SX80/MX300 etc

In a Room 55 trying to figure out if it is left or right side.

[cid:image002.png@01D541A5.C71662C0]

-jason




This email and all contents are subject to the following disclaimer:
"http://www.dimensiondata.com/emaildisclaimer;<http://www.dimensiondata.com/Global/Policies/Pages/Email-Disclaimer.aspx>
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip<https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip>


itevomcid
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 12.5 Regions > Max Session Bit Rate for Video vs Immersive Video

[Jason Aarons (Americas)]

I can’t recall a new product from the Oslo team that said Telepresence it.   
The last products where Cisco TelePresence DX70, Cisco Telepresence MX200 G2 
etc.  The larger 3 panel half table conference room we all identify as 
Telepresence blah.

New huddle space products customers like are the Cisco Webex Board 55, Cisco 
Webex Room 55/70.  Based on testing these WebEx Room blah are no longer 
Immersive Video (on right in Regions) but just video endpoints similar to a 
8845/8865.

Guess I was going by the video screen size.  Big meant Telepresence.  Struggle 
was TAC SE didn’t know what Immersive Video vs Video was.  The CCIE Collab lab 
is pretty clear the 8845/65 are just video as you have tasks related to regions.

From: Anthony Holloway 
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2019 10:22 AM
To: Jason Aarons (Americas) 
Cc: cisco-voip (cisco-voip@puck.nether.net) 
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 12.5 Regions > Max Session Bit Rate for Video vs 
Immersive Video


Did you already change the value of Service Parameter: Use Video BandwidthPool 
for Immersive Video Calls?

The classification is per version of CUCM, and thus can be queried in CUCM.  
See below from SRND.

Endpoint Classification
Cisco TelePresence endpoints have a fixed non-configurable Video Call Traffic 
Class of immersive and are identified by Unified CM as immersive. Telepresence 
endpoints are defined in Unified CM by the device type. When a device is added 
in Unified CM, any device with TelePresence in the name of the device type is 
classified as immersive, as are the generic single-screen and multi-screen room 
systems. Another way to check the capabilities of the endpoints in the Unified 
CM is to go to the Cisco Unified Reporting Tool > System Reports > Unified CM 
Phone Feature List. In the feature drop down list, select Immersive Video 
Support for TelePresence Devices ; in the product drop down list, select All. 
This will display all of the device types that are classified as immersive. All 
other endpoints have a fixed Video Call Traffic Class of desktop due to their 
lack of the non-configurable immersive attribute.

Source: CUCM 11.x 
SRND<https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/srnd/collab11/collab11/cac.html#pgfId-1489913>

On Sun, Jul 21, 2019 at 6:51 PM Jason Aarons (Americas) 
mailto:jason.aar...@dimensiondata.com>> wrote:


Where is there a definitive list of what is Immersive?  Is a Room 55 Immersive?

From my training the left is 88xx video and right were products formerly made 
by Tandberg such as Room 55/DX80/SX80/MX300 etc

In a Room 55 trying to figure out if it is left or right side.

[cid:image001.png@01D540B0.469D3FB0]

-jason




This email and all contents are subject to the following disclaimer:
"http://www.dimensiondata.com/emaildisclaimer;<http://www.dimensiondata.com/Global/Policies/Pages/Email-Disclaimer.aspx>
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip<https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip>


itevomcid
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

[cisco-voip] CUCM 12.5 Regions > Max Session Bit Rate for Video vs Immersive Video

[Jason Aarons (Americas)]

   
Where is there a definitive list of what is Immersive?  Is a Room 55 Immersive?

>From my training the left is 88xx video and right were products formerly made 
>by Tandberg such as Room 55/DX80/SX80/MX300 etc

In a Room 55 trying to figure out if it is left or right side.

[cid:image001.png@01D53FFD.7EFF3D30]

-jason

This email and all contents are subject to the following disclaimer:

"http://www.dimensiondata.com/emaildisclaimer;
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

[cisco-voip] CUCM 11.5 and SNMP

[Jason Aarons (Americas)]

   In CUCM 11.5 under Serviceability > SNMP > Accept  SNMP Packes only for 
these hosts I noticed you can't enter a subnet mask.  So If I only want to 
permit SNMP form 10.10.128.0/24 can I limit SNMP based on subnet? Or is it only 
exact hosts.  Help for this page doesn't really elaborate.

Is 10.0.0.0 the whole Class A or just the exact host 10.0.0.0 ?


[cid:image001.png@01D51EF1.0FF7B020]

Jason Aarons, CCIEx2 No. 38564, MCSE: Communications
Advanced Technology Consultant

This email and all contents are subject to the following disclaimer:

"http://www.dimensiondata.com/emaildisclaimer;
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Automated cluster building? (devops tools)

[Jason Aarons (Americas)]

The Clone/Snapshot button in vMware vCenter, Bulk Administration > 
Export/Import is very easy method.

From: cisco-voip  On Behalf Of Nick Barnett
Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2019 3:38 PM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] Automated cluster building? (devops tools)


I'm looking into what we need in a non-prod environment and I can't seem to 
find what I'm looking for. Has anyone used standard devops tools to automate 
the build of clusters? I doubt I'm going to find anything that would be an 
"IaaS for CUCM" that I can run at my company, but that's what I'm after.


What are other people doing for the problem of needing repeatable and quick 
development environments? There has to be a better way than building a new 
cluster from scratch, which can take hours. I can hit a button and deploy a 
full cluster of linux servers, all of the containers they need, DNS, the 
virtual network to connect them all, and everything else needed to be 
production ready (and it will be done in a few minutes), but I have to spend 
DAYS making a dev CUCM environment. What am I missing?


Thanks,
Nick


Thanks,
Nick



itevomcid
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Estimated time to apply SU6 on v11.5(1) SU4

[Jason Aarons (Americas)]

Took a 4000 phone 11.5.1SU5 pub 2 hours 30 minutes.  CDR tables likely full.

From: cisco-voip  On Behalf Of Lelio 
Fulgenzi
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2019 11:48 AM
To: cisco-voip voyp list 
Subject: [cisco-voip] Estimated time to apply SU6 on v11.5(1) SU4




I need to prepare some maintenance requests sooner than I will have the 
opportunity to test out applying SU6 on a test server.

Does anyone have any estimates on how long it takes to apply?

Last time I did one was a while ago and if I recall correctly, it was almost as 
long, if not as long, as a regular install. 1 1/2 hours - 2 hours.

Is that still legit?

I’d also need to know how long a switch versions might take? I’m assuming those 
would have to happen sequentially?

Any info would be great.

Lelio

-sent from mobile device-


Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. | Senior Analyst
Computing and Communications Services | University of Guelph
Room 037 Animal Science & Nutrition Bldg | 50 Stone Rd E | Guelph, ON | N1G 
2W1
519-824-4120 Ext. 56354 | 
le...@uoguelph.ca

www.uoguelph.ca/ccs | @UofGCCS on Instagram, 
Twitter and Facebook

[University of Guelph Cornerstone with Improve Life tagline]


itevomcid
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Unity Connection 12.5 Licenses not loaning down.

[Jason Aarons (Americas)]

I seem to recall seeing a bug note, about works with Smart Software Manager 
Satellite.  Open a case with TAC/Licensing.  Not sure what fix is.


From: cisco-voip  On Behalf Of Nick via 
cisco-voip
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2019 9:03 AM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] Unity Connection 12.5 Licenses not loaning down.


I have upgraded a client to 12.5.1.1-23  who has also migrated to flex 
knowledge worker, the licenses for Unity Connection have been supplied as 
enhanced messaging and not basic messaging and my licenses are not loaning down 
and out of compliance, according to the docs they should loan as below, anyone 
come across this issue yet?


Cisco Smart Software Licensing supports license hierarchy, in which higher 
level licenses are utilized to fulfill the request for lower level licenses to 
avoid a shortage of the licenses. Following are the licenses included in 
license hierarchy in an order from higher level to lower level:

Unity Connection Enhanced Messaging User Licenses (12.x)
Unity Connection Basic Messaging User Licenses (12.x)


itevomcid
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

[cisco-voip] CUCM 11.5SU5 delete all file list tftp *

[Jason Aarons (Americas)]

   Is there any reason to keep any files in the TFTP (file list tftp *) on a 
CUCM Publisher, when you have two other dedicated TFTP servers?

Facing the free common space issue on a lot of 11.5 upgrades related to the 
publisher.  7500 user nodes with 110GB drive.

This email and all contents are subject to the following disclaimer:

"http://www.dimensiondata.com/emaildisclaimer;
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Reply to CUCM 12.5 Trunk down/up SNMP OID? (Jason Aarons (Americas))

[Jason Aarons (Americas)]

Not spotting a status column;

[cid:image001.png@01D50730.6AB725F0]

Jason Aarons, CCIEx2 No. 38564, MCSE: Communications
Advanced Technology Consultant
Dimension Data
+1-904-338-3245 mobile/whatsApp
+1-954-517-2033 office/Miramar
x62033 Miramar
Call My Video Unit 62...@rccl.com

From: Amit Katyal 
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2019 8:13 AM
To: Jason Aarons (Americas) ; 
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Reply to CUCM 12.5 Trunk down/up SNMP OID? (Jason Aarons (Americas))


for CUCM SIP trunk with gateway, you can use ccmSIPDeviceTable.

its description says that this is a table containing a list of all SIP trunks 
in the Cisco Unified CM cluster that the local CiscoUnified CM is aware of. 
there is a status column in the table. Hope it helps.

Amit
-- Forwarded message -
From: 
mailto:cisco-voip-requ...@puck.nether.net>>
Date: Thu, May 2, 2019 at 9:33 PM
Subject: cisco-voip Digest, Vol 187, Issue 2
To: mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>>


Send cisco-voip mailing list submissions to
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit

https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip<https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip>
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to

cisco-voip-requ...@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip-requ...@puck.nether.net>

You can reach the person managing the list at

cisco-voip-ow...@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip-ow...@puck.nether.net>

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of cisco-voip digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. CUCM 12.5 Trunk down/up SNMP OID? (Jason Aarons (Americas))
   2. CUCM registered sx20 and audio conferencing (Lelio Fulgenzi)
   3. Re: CUCM registered sx20 and audio conferencing (Brian Meade)
   4. Re: CUCM registered sx20 and audio conferencing (Lelio Fulgenzi)


--

Message: 1
Date: Wed, 1 May 2019 20:42:19 +
From: "Jason Aarons (Americas)" 
mailto:jason.aar...@dimensiondata.com>>
To: "cisco-voip (cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>)"
mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>>
Subject: [cisco-voip] CUCM 12.5 Trunk down/up SNMP OID?
Message-ID:

mailto:vi1pr06mb436621680ea3624495e9bfd182...@vi1pr06mb4366.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>>

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

   Anyone looked at SNMP in regards to CallManager 12.5 and SIP Trunks being 
up/down?  Know the OID MIB etc?

From
https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/managed_services/12_5_1/cucm_b_managed-services-guide-1251/cucm_b_managed-services-guide-1251_chapter_0110.html<https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/managed_services/12_5_1/cucm_b_managed-services-guide-1251/cucm_b_managed-services-guide-1251_chapter_0110.html>

guessing ccmGatewayTrunkStatus


-jason

This email and all contents are subject to the following disclaimer:

"http://www.dimensiondata.com/emaildisclaimer;
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20190501/b962b375/attachment-0001.html<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20190501/b962b375/attachment-0001.html>>

--

Message: 2
Date: Wed, 1 May 2019 23:41:44 +
From: Lelio Fulgenzi mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca>>
To: cisco-voip voyp list 
mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>>
Subject: [cisco-voip] CUCM registered sx20 and audio conferencing
Message-ID: 
mailto:e7356259-0711-472f-9ad3-e1358bbf6...@uoguelph.ca>>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"


I recall seeing a section on the SX20 config screen about using the media 
resource list.

Does this mean and SX20 can initiate an audio conference call like other 
telephones? We have HW conferencing resources, up to 16 participants. It would 
be nice to be able to use these resources.

The SX20 does not have multipoint license.


-sent from mobile device-

Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. | Senior Analyst
Computing and Communications Services | University of Guelph
Room 037 Animal Science & Nutrition Bldg | 50 Stone Rd E | Guelph, ON | N1G 
2W1
519-824-4120 Ext. 56354 | 
le...@uoguelph.ca<mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca><mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca<mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca>>

www.uoguelph.ca/ccs<http://www.uoguelph.ca/ccs><http://www.uoguelph.ca/ccs<http://www.uoguelph.ca/ccs>>
 | @UofGCCS on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook

[University of Guelph Cornerstone with Improve Life tagline]
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20190501/e1289b32/attachment-0001.html<https://puck

[cisco-voip] CUCM 12.5 Trunk down/up SNMP OID?

[Jason Aarons (Americas)]

   Anyone looked at SNMP in regards to CallManager 12.5 and SIP Trunks being 
up/down?  Know the OID MIB etc?

From
https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/managed_services/12_5_1/cucm_b_managed-services-guide-1251/cucm_b_managed-services-guide-1251_chapter_0110.html

guessing ccmGatewayTrunkStatus


-jason

This email and all contents are subject to the following disclaimer:

"http://www.dimensiondata.com/emaildisclaimer;
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco Live CLUS anyone??

[Jason Aarons (Americas)]

So which Avenger character are you going to be?  We fully expect you to dress 
up in character.  How do you look wearing green body paint?


From: cisco-voip  On Behalf Of Stephen Welsh
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2019 2:35 AM
To: Anthony Holloway 
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco Live CLUS anyone??


I’ll be there too.

The WebEx room was fun and helpful, another would be great.

We will have a stand again

Stephen Welsh
Founder & CTO
UnifiedFX
Sent from my iPhone

On 29 Apr 2019, at 20:39, Anthony Holloway 
mailto:avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I'll be there!

Last year, I started a webex teams room for those of us who were in attendance 
(and wanted to be in the room).  A few of us used it to coordinate meetups.  
There was also some good conversation in the room during the week as well.  
Mostly, heads-ups on events, humor and commentary on what was being learned 
that week.

I might even been in the Engineering Deathmatch again, as a defending champ.  I 
hope to god they don't put me up against you Ryan.  Fingers crossed.

On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 2:19 PM Ryan Huff 
mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote:
Just curious to know whom (if anyone) from the list will be at CLUS this year 
in San Diego? I will be and would love to meetup with those from the list whom 
I’ve only exchanged emails with thus far.
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


itevomcid
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco Live CLUS anyone??

[Jason Aarons (Americas)]

Ryan Huff finds Lelio Fulgenzi at the White House and tells him all CCIEs are 
now the son of Jor-El, their jailer, and offers to lead him to WebEx Mountain 
in exchange for control of Spark Cloud from King Holloway?

I think this needs to be an Avengers Endgame party them.  I’ll be Dr Strange, 
master of 200 OK spells.


From: Ryan Huff 
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2019 9:18 PM
To: Jason Aarons (Americas) 
Cc: Anthony Holloway ; 
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco Live CLUS anyone??

Listen,

No one goes to the Hall of Justice without trying to at least trying to see 
some of the Justice League...
Sent from my iPhone

On Apr 29, 2019, at 21:07, Jason Aarons (Americas) 
mailto:jason.aar...@dimensiondata.com>> wrote:
I’ll be there, but trying to sync up has been pretty hard given the size of 
venue etc!

-jason

From: cisco-voip 
mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net>> 
On Behalf Of Anthony Holloway
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2019 3:38 PM
To: Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>>
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco Live CLUS anyone??


I'll be there!

Last year, I started a webex teams room for those of us who were in attendance 
(and wanted to be in the room).  A few of us used it to coordinate meetups.  
There was also some good conversation in the room during the week as well.  
Mostly, heads-ups on events, humor and commentary on what was being learned 
that week.

I might even been in the Engineering Deathmatch again, as a defending champ.  I 
hope to god they don't put me up against you Ryan.  Fingers crossed.

On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 2:19 PM Ryan Huff 
mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote:
Just curious to know whom (if anyone) from the list will be at CLUS this year 
in San Diego? I will be and would love to meetup with those from the list whom 
I’ve only exchanged emails with thus far.
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip<https://eur04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpuck.nether.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fcisco-voip=02%7C01%7C%7C38bbb40c464943939cf008d6cd084649%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435%7C1%7C0%7C636921832747285311=WqyCPPpj903sxIEiVeWR7xZFjHRk%2Bd8%2BF8xIIFvhsbc%3D=0>


itevomcid
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco Live CLUS anyone??

[Jason Aarons (Americas)]

I’ll be there, but trying to sync up has been pretty hard given the size of 
venue etc!

-jason

From: cisco-voip  On Behalf Of Anthony 
Holloway
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2019 3:38 PM
To: Ryan Huff 
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco Live CLUS anyone??


I'll be there!

Last year, I started a webex teams room for those of us who were in attendance 
(and wanted to be in the room).  A few of us used it to coordinate meetups.  
There was also some good conversation in the room during the week as well.  
Mostly, heads-ups on events, humor and commentary on what was being learned 
that week.

I might even been in the Engineering Deathmatch again, as a defending champ.  I 
hope to god they don't put me up against you Ryan.  Fingers crossed.

On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 2:19 PM Ryan Huff 
mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote:
Just curious to know whom (if anyone) from the list will be at CLUS this year 
in San Diego? I will be and would love to meetup with those from the list whom 
I’ve only exchanged emails with thus far.
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


itevomcid
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] latest CUCM 12.5 and ESXi 6.7 ?

[Jason Aarons (Americas)]

I did confirm with Cisco SE/BU that ESXi 6.7 on host is not yet supported.

-jason

From: Lelio Fulgenzi 
Sent: Saturday, March 30, 2019 11:38 PM
To: Jason Aarons (Americas) 
Cc: cisco-voip (cisco-voip@puck.nether.net) 
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] latest CUCM 12.5 and ESXi 6.7 ?



This page would seem to support that.

https://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/uc_system/virtualization/cisco-collaboration-virtualization.html<https://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/uc_system/virtualization/cisco-collaboration-virtualization.html>
-sent from mobile device-


Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. | Senior Analyst
Computing and Communications Services | University of Guelph
Room 037 Animal Science & Nutrition Bldg | 50 Stone Rd E | Guelph, ON | N1G 
2W1
519-824-4120 Ext. 56354 | 
le...@uoguelph.ca<mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca>

www.uoguelph.ca/ccs<http://www.uoguelph.ca/ccs> | @UofGCCS on Instagram, 
Twitter and Facebook

[University of Guelph Cornerstone with Improve Life tagline]

On Mar 30, 2019, at 5:26 PM, Jason Aarons (Americas) 
mailto:jason.aar...@dimensiondata.com>> wrote:

Based on this ESXi 6.7 is not supported?

https://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/uc_system/virtualization/virtualization-cisco-unified-communications-manager.html<https://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/uc_system/virtualization/virtualization-cisco-unified-communications-manager.html>

-jason



This email and all contents are subject to the following disclaimer:
"http://www.dimensiondata.com/emaildisclaimer;<http://www.dimensiondata.com/Global/Policies/Pages/Email-Disclaimer.aspx>
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip<https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip>


itevomcid
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

[cisco-voip] latest CUCM 12.5 and ESXi 6.7 ?

[Jason Aarons (Americas)]

   Based on this ESXi 6.7 is not supported?

https://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/uc_system/virtualization/virtualization-cisco-unified-communications-manager.html

-jason

This email and all contents are subject to the following disclaimer:

"http://www.dimensiondata.com/emaildisclaimer;
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

[cisco-voip] CUCM 12.5 CCMAdmin login error

[Jason Aarons (Americas)]

   Every time we are logged in to CUCM pub and step away when we try to log 
back in we get the below error

https://blah/ccmadmin/j_security_check

HTTP Status 400 - Invalid direct reference to form login page


Known bug?

-jason

This email and all contents are subject to the following disclaimer:

"http://www.dimensiondata.com/emaildisclaimer;
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

[cisco-voip] SME and Cisco Meeting Server (CMS) (CUCM 12.5)

[Jason Aarons (Americas)]

   If you had 4 clusters, connected via SME (with centralized SIP in via SME) 
and wanted to do Cisco Meeting Server, would it makes sense to put a CMS for 
bridges (no Ad-Hoc) would you register them to SME or one for each Leaf CUCM.  
I could then use ILS to advertise a Route Pattern to CMS via SME.

Trying to find the right design guide for this scenario.  The me this usage of 
CMS matches centralized applications.
https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/srnd/collab12/collab12/models.html

Honestly almost all our calls/meetings are WebEx > Call my Video unit via 
Expressway/Proximity.  The CMS will rarely get used I bet.


-jason

This email and all contents are subject to the following disclaimer:

"http://www.dimensiondata.com/emaildisclaimer;
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

[cisco-voip] CallManager Route Pattern Regular Expression Calculator

[Jason Aarons (Americas)]

   I am looking for a CallManager route pattern generator.  In these days of 
automation I'm not finding one online.

For example in Skype you can input the starting number 7040  and ending number 
7539 and get back ^(7(04\d|0[5-9]\d|[1-4]\d\d|5[0-2]\d|53\d))$ and import your 
whole dialplan via online tools;
https://www.ucdialplans.com/

Is there not a similar tool for CUCM to input Route Patterns?

-jason

This email and all contents are subject to the following disclaimer:

"http://www.dimensiondata.com/emaildisclaimer;
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

[cisco-voip] FW: CUCM 12.5 keeps unregistering

[Jason Aarons (Americas)]

   Anyone seen where 12.5 won’t stay registered?  Put in the token Registration 
Status - happy for 10 minutes and then Registration Status back to Unregistered 

Using an on-prem SSMS 6.2 and another cluster is good/happy.


[cid:image001.jpg@01D4D27D.831DCBE0]

Jason Aarons, CCIEx2 No. 38564
Advanced Technology Consultant
Dimension Data
+1-904-338-3245
x62033

This email and all contents are subject to the following disclaimer:

"http://www.dimensiondata.com/emaildisclaimer;
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] TCL Script to play message for hotel room?

[Jason Aarons (Americas)]

To followup I had no issues running a TCL script that played a prompt and 
continued call out.  Google play_message_2_calling_then_connect.tcl

IOS XE 16.6.5 on ISR 4431

conf t
app
service welcome bootflash:play_message_2_calling_then_connect.tcl

dial-peer voice 24 voip
service welcome

As stated I understand CVP/VXML is not supported, but good to know basic TCL 
working.

-jason

From: cisco-voip  On Behalf Of Pawlowski, 
Adam
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2019 2:55 PM
To: 'Sreekanth Narayanan (sreenara)' ; Lelio Fulgenzi 
; 'Brian Meade' 
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] TCL Script to play message for hotel room?


And yes it seems that on/off ramp faxing and TCL audio are dead so on to other 
things.

I can do this easily with Asterisk, it is just another thing to maintain.

One of the things we did use this for was having a fallthrough recording if all 
the dialpeers were dead to the UCM on a PRI gateway, we’d play something 
letting people know we were having an issue and check a website, versus sending 
back the a cause and having them get a recording that caused the caller to try 
over and over.

Things move on, such is life I guess.

Thanks for all the information

Adam
SUNYAB

From: Sreekanth Narayanan (sreenara) 
mailto:sreen...@cisco.com>>
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2019 10:43 PM
To: Lelio Fulgenzi mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca>>; Pawlowski, 
Adam mailto:aj...@buffalo.edu>>; 'Brian Meade' 
mailto:bmead...@vt.edu>>
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] TCL Script to play message for hotel room?

Yes, VXML is no longer supported on the ISR4K so these routers cannot be used 
in a CVP deployment as VXML gateways.
The VVB is the alternative.

I’m not sure the fax TCL script has been tested on ISR4K, but BACD has been 
tested and works fine.

Regards
Sreekanth

From: cisco-voip 
mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net>> 
On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2019 01:53 AM
To: Pawlowski, Adam mailto:aj...@buffalo.edu>>; 'Brian 
Meade' mailto:bmead...@vt.edu>>
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] TCL Script to play message for hotel room?

Is this what you might need?

https://community.cisco.com/t5/contact-center/vxml-gateway-alternatives/td-p/2859129



Munaf Ahmed 
[Cisco Employee]

Cisco Employee
‎01-05-2017 09:34 PM
One option would to deploy
One option would to deploy UCS-E series server on ISR 4K router and install VVB 
on it.
https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/contact-center/virtualized-voice-browser-12-0-1/model.html


---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. | Senior Analyst
Computing and Communications Services | University of Guelph
Room 037 Animal Science & Nutrition Bldg | 50 Stone Rd E | Guelph, ON | N1G 2W1
519-824-4120 Ext. 56354 | le...@uoguelph.ca

www.uoguelph.ca/ccs | @UofGCCS on Instagram, 
Twitter and Facebook

[University of Guelph Cornerstone with Improve Life tagline]

From: cisco-voip 
mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net>> 
On Behalf Of Pawlowski, Adam
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2019 2:47 PM
To: 'Brian Meade' mailto:bmead...@vt.edu>>
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] TCL Script to play message for hotel room?

Spoke too soon maybe.

I’m getting answers that refer to VXML but I’m told that TCL is impacted as 
well. There’s a module for the 4K apparently that runs IP IVR to be a VXML 
processor but I can’t find details on this at the moment or what impact that 
has on other functionality.

So maybe panic attack not totally averted.

Adam



From: Brian Meade mailto:bmead...@vt.edu>>
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2019 2:21 PM
To: Pawlowski, Adam mailto:aj...@buffalo.edu>>
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] TCL Script to play message for hotel room?

This is interesting because I was working to move a customer to a different 
platform due to fax detect scripts no longer working in ISR4k's.  Should that 
still be working as well?  I thought the new architecture couldn't terminate 
the audio streams like this.

On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 1:59 PM Pawlowski, Adam 
mailto:aj...@buffalo.edu>> wrote:
Almost had a panic attack there for a minute.

I heard that's why the DVO functionality moved into the UCM as the new ISR 4k 
didn't support VXML. That was more of a CVP thing I think and VXML is probably 
as ancient and unused as VRML.

The TCL function to terminate a call leg and play a stream I didn't think was 
related and I take advantage of this on fall through or other cases where I 
want to play an announcement to a caller without 

[cisco-voip] TCL Script to play message for hotel room?

[Jason Aarons (Americas)]

   Call is routed to router as #23+number, then a message would need to be 
played flash  "This call will be charged to your account at the rate indicated 
in your room, to accept these charges and continue your call press 1 otherwise 
hangup" then if thye hit 1 send it along to dial-peer.

Anyone seen something like this, don't have UCCX to script etc.

IOS 16.6.5 on ISR 4431s

-jason

This email and all contents are subject to the following disclaimer:

"http://www.dimensiondata.com/emaildisclaimer;
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] WebEx Room 70 upgrade to CE 9.5.2 No Camera detected

[Jason Aarons (Americas)]

Just to followup, it was a typo .loads is correct and not .pkg  in the Phone 
Load field under device.


From: Matthew Loraditch 
Sent: Monday, January 7, 2019 7:40 PM
To: Jason Aarons (Americas) ; cisco-voip 
(cisco-voip@puck.nether.net) 
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] WebEx Room 70 upgrade to CE 9.5.2 No Camera detected


Have you tried downgrading and then if that works stepping through 9.3 and 9.4 
to 9.5?

Get Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef>



Matthew Loraditch​

Sr. Network Engineer


p: 443.541.1518



w: www.heliontechnologies.com<http://www.heliontechnologies.com/>

 |

e: mloradi...@heliontechnologies.com<mailto:mloradi...@heliontechnologies.com>


[cid:image001.png@01D4AC3D.74D47450]


[Facebook]<https://facebook.com/heliontech>



[Twitter]<https://twitter.com/heliontech>


[LinkedIn]<https://www.linkedin.com/company/helion-technologies>








From: cisco-voip  on behalf of Jason Aarons 
(Americas) 
Sent: Monday, January 7, 2019 5:37 PM
To: cisco-voip (cisco-voip@puck.nether.net)
Subject: [cisco-voip] WebEx Room 70 upgrade to CE 9.5.2 No Camera detected


After upgrading a working CUCM registered Room 70 Single from CE 9.2.1 to 9.5.2 
it appears from logs the camera is still stuck at firmware 9.2.1

Screen shows “No Camera Connected”

So far I have upgraded about 7 Room 55s to CE 9.5.2 and haven’t had any 
problems.

I’ve opened a TAC case.


-jason



This email and all contents are subject to the following disclaimer:
"http://www.dimensiondata.com/emaildisclaimer;<http://www.dimensiondata.com/Global/Policies/Pages/Email-Disclaimer.aspx>


itevomcid
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Multiple COP Files Requiring Reboot

[Jason Aarons (Americas)]

Keep in mind 11.5 has Hitless COP updates.  Google Fu that.  “Can wait to next 
maint window to reboot” and still use the new COP files.  Not clear why you 
even need to reboot with “Hitless”


From: cisco-voip  On Behalf Of Anthony 
Holloway
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2019 3:31 PM
To: Cisco VoIP Group 
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Multiple COP Files Requiring Reboot


Opened a PDI case for CUCM, and yes you can install multiple and reboot once at 
the end.

Also, I just learned that PDI goes away at the end of this week.

On Mon, Jan 14, 2019, 10:51 AM Anthony Holloway 
mailto:avholloway%2bcisco-v...@gmail.com> 
wrote:
Looks like I had better luck than I suspected I would when googling for the 
answer.

A Cisco employee responded that you can reboot once to a forum post:
https://community.cisco.com/t5/unified-communications/if-i-need-to-reboot-the-cucm-cluster-after-each-of-the-following/m-p/2939154/highlight/true#M14032

On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 10:39 AM Anthony Holloway 
mailto:avholloway%2bcisco-v...@gmail.com>> 
wrote:
I should mention, that normally I would open a PDI case for this type of 
question, however, it seems as though PDI dropped support for UCCX. If this 
thread doesn't get any traction, I might just open a similar case for CUCM. I 
thought I'd try a quick check here first.

On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 10:05 AM Anthony Holloway 
mailto:avholloway%2bcisco-v...@gmail.com>> 
wrote:
Can anyone confirm that one can install one or more COP files, each requiring a 
reboot, back to back, and just reboot once, as opposed to after each?

Specifically:

UCCX Struts and DST Fix COP files.


itevomcid
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

[cisco-voip] WebEx Room 70 upgrade to CE 9.5.2 No Camera detected

[Jason Aarons (Americas)]

   After upgrading a working CUCM registered Room 70 Single from CE 9.2.1 to 
9.5.2 it appears from logs the camera is still stuck at firmware 9.2.1

Screen shows "No Camera Connected"

So far I have upgraded about 7 Room 55s to CE 9.5.2 and haven't had any 
problems.

I've opened a TAC case.


-jason

This email and all contents are subject to the following disclaimer:

"http://www.dimensiondata.com/emaildisclaimer;
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

[cisco-voip] CallManager and PLM 11.5.1 ports (firewall issues)

[Jason Aarons (Americas)]

   Have a centralized Prime License Manager (PLM) for several clusters.   One 
cluster the Product Instance shows "Unknown error".  We have firewalls between 
PLM and clusters.

I hit Test Connection in PLM and see traffic from source PLM coming in to 
remote cluster on TCP/443 and then I see traffic back source TCP/443 to 
destination TCP/56648 and then lots of TCP retransmissions.  The GUI in PLM 
says "Test Connection Failed.The cause of the error is unknown. Check the Cisco 
Prime License Manager log for details."

I can't find in the Port Usage guide where TCP/56648 is documented?  What log 
file do I look at via RTMT on PLM?

[cid:image001.png@01D4991A.D30EF800]

Jason Aarons, CCIEx2 No. 38564
Advanced Technology Consultant
Dimension Data
904-338-3245

This email and all contents are subject to the following disclaimer:

"http://www.dimensiondata.com/emaildisclaimer;
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

[cisco-voip] 11.x Mixed mode back to Insecure

[Jason Aarons (Americas)]

   Anyone done a CUCM mixed mode back to Insecure via utils cmd? CUCM 11.x



Get Outlook for Android

This email and all contents are subject to the following disclaimer:

"http://www.dimensiondata.com/emaildisclaimer;
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Telepresence DX 80 CE 8.x to 9.5 and CTL vs ITL

[Jason Aarons (Americas)]

   Found the problem, appears CTS only used CTL and not ITL.  Did that change 
with CE 9.5 ?
https://community.cisco.com/t5/telepresence-and-video/telepresence-endpoints-itl-security-by-default/td-p/2702643


Pubs and subs have CTL, but not new subs.
admin:show ctl
Length of CTL file: 0
CTL File not found. Please run CTLClient plugin or run the CLI - utils ctl.. to 
generate the CTL file.
Error parsing the CTL File.


Looks like they ran a USB hardware eToken on the cluster,  I'd rather do a 
"utils ctl set-cluster non-secure-mode" and reboot cluster then convert to 
Tokenless CTL.

Jason Aarons, CCIEx2 No. 38564
Advanced Technology Consultant
Dimension Data
904-338-3245

From: Jason Aarons (Americas)
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2018 6:23 PM
To: cisco-voip (cisco-voip@puck.nether.net) 
Subject: Telepresence DX 80 CE 8.x to 9.5 and CTL vs ITL

Anyone familiar about changes in CE endpoints going from 8.2 to 9.5 ?  Did 
older video endpoints use CTL and maybe change to ITL?



I added some new subscribers and TFTP server (realized now without running the 
capf utility) , and noticed the DX80s have issues talking to new subs/tftp (we 
are in Mixed Mode) but if I upgrade 9.5+ CE they work fine.  Maybe the upgrade 
is resetting security settings?  Kind of stumped why upgrade fixes problem.  
Also think I need to run a "tils ctl set-cluster non-secure-mode" and reboot 
cluster.  Don't really need mixed-mode.





Jason Aarons, CCIEx2 No. 38564
Advanced Technology Consultant
Dimension Data
904-338-3245

This email and all contents are subject to the following disclaimer:

"http://www.dimensiondata.com/emaildisclaimer;
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

[cisco-voip] Telepresence DX 80 CE 8.x to 9.5 and CTL vs ITL

[Jason Aarons (Americas)]

   Anyone familiar about changes in CE endpoints going from 8.2 to 9.5 ?  Did 
older video endpoints use CTL and maybe change to ITL?



I added some new subscribers and TFTP server (realized now without running the 
capf utility) , and noticed the DX80s have issues talking to new subs/tftp (we 
are in Mixed Mode) but if I upgrade 9.5+ CE they work fine.  Maybe the upgrade 
is resetting security settings?  Kind of stumped why upgrade fixes problem.  
Also think I need to run a "tils ctl set-cluster non-secure-mode" and reboot 
cluster.  Don't really need mixed-mode.





Jason Aarons, CCIEx2 No. 38564
Advanced Technology Consultant
Dimension Data
904-338-3245

This email and all contents are subject to the following disclaimer:

"http://www.dimensiondata.com/emaildisclaimer;
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

[cisco-voip] IOS SIP Profile match calling number less then 10 digits

[Jason Aarons (Americas)]

   I have a few phones missing an External Phone Number Mask, was thinking 
about adding a IOS translation rule on outbound dial peer that if less than 
less than 10 digits change calling number to our main number. Any got a sample?

SIP carrier is passing some extensions out to PSTN by accident.

Get Outlook for Android

This email and all contents are subject to the following disclaimer:

"http://www.dimensiondata.com/emaildisclaimer;
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

[cisco-voip] TelePresence DX80 and CUCM 11.5

[Jason Aarons (Americas)]

   I have a CUCM 11.5.1SU5 registered DX80 running CE 9.2.2

In CUCM under Device > Phone was does Settings Menu Mode supposed to do if set 
to Restricted?  I set it to Restricted and find I can still edit setting on the 
screen gui of DX80.  Nothing seems restricted, factory reset, time zone, etc.

Just trying to limit end users for editing some items.

Jason Aarons, CCIEx2 No. 38564
Advanced Technology Consultant
Dimension Data
904-338-3245

This email and all contents are subject to the following disclaimer:

"http://www.dimensiondata.com/emaildisclaimer;
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

[cisco-voip] Speed Dial #30 to URI

[Jason Aarons (Americas)]

   I'm trying to setup #30 to be n...@domain.com in 
CallManager for a Jabber for Andorid 12.1 client.

Route Patterns and Translation Patterns can't be SIP URI.  Any other 
ideas/workarounds?

CallManager 11.5.1SU5

Jason Aarons, CCIEx2 No. 38564
Advanced Technology Consultant
Dimension Data
904-338-3245

This email and all contents are subject to the following disclaimer:

"http://www.dimensiondata.com/emaildisclaimer;
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

[cisco-voip] ASR 1k CUBE recommended version

[Jason Aarons (Americas)]

   I'm not finding any guidance on cisco.com for a recommended version of CUBE 
to use on an ASR or 44xx.

Is there one?

-jason

This email and all contents are subject to the following disclaimer:

"http://www.dimensiondata.com/emaildisclaimer;
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

[cisco-voip] TAC Support Cases just shows spinning wheel

[Jason Aarons (Americas)]

   Not a fan of the website changes for TAC cases..lots of spinning 
wheels. https://mycase.cloudapps.cisco.com/case


Contract is associated to account, yet Open TAC case can't find the Service 
Contract, have to call in every time, took 30 minutes to open a new case over 
the phone.

Try it over a high latency satellite link and it just fails.

-jason

This email and all contents are subject to the following disclaimer:

"http://www.dimensiondata.com/emaildisclaimer;
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

[cisco-voip] CUCM 11.5.1SU5 from Pub go to Serviceablity and subscriber error?

[Jason Aarons (Americas)]

   Any pointers on when Serviceability can't show services status on another 
sub etc? Is that tomcat-trust or ipsec-trust etc?

Seen it on a couple clusters running 11.5.1SU5. Perhaps a known bug.

Db replication status is happy.

Get Outlook for Android

This email and all contents are subject to the following disclaimer:

"http://www.dimensiondata.com/emaildisclaimer;
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

[cisco-voip] Need a 8845 Skin for IP Communicator ?

[Jason Aarons (Americas)]

   Need a 8845 Skin for IP Communicator...think that would be easy...customer 
not wanting Jabber client for political issues.

Get Outlook for Android

This email and all contents are subject to the following disclaimer:

"http://www.dimensiondata.com/emaildisclaimer;
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

[cisco-voip] better debug ccsip messages invites?

[Jason Aarons (Americas)]

   Please ask the devs to add some better sip debugs on CUBEs.

How about debug ccsip messages invites or something that display filters on 
type of sip message?

I am getting better at show log | inc INVITE  

Surely I can’t be the first to ask for this.

-jason

This email and all contents are subject to the following disclaimer:

"http://www.dimensiondata.com/emaildisclaimer;
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

[cisco-voip] CallManager 11x disable HSTS ?

[Jason Aarons (Americas)]

   Is there a Enterprise or Service Parameter to disable HTTP Strict Transport 
Security in CallManager 11.5.1Su5?  It is one thing to add HSTS and another to 
not allow customers to choose to disable it. (added in 11.0 per CSCuy47554)

Customer upgraded Firefox and now they can't connect to their Self-Signed 
cluster to manage it.

Firefox   "This site uses HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) to specify that 
Firefox may only connect to it securely. As a result, it is not possible to add 
an exception for this certificate."

-jason

This email and all contents are subject to the following disclaimer:

"http://www.dimensiondata.com/emaildisclaimer;
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

[cisco-voip] CUBE setup to Centurylink SIP Trunk

[Jason Aarons (Americas)]

   I have a new CenturyLink SIP Service.  CenturyLink said it is new and 
doesn't match the Cisco guides.  (No more of the funky registrar and fixup 
headers via SIP profiles!)



In short in CUBE they want me to send calls to them per these settings;

SIP Signaling IP 6.6.156.245:5060

RTP IP 6.6.156.244

I'm just drawing a blank on how to setup CUBE to send SIP signaling requests to 
CenturyLink with different Signaling and RTP destination addresses.  Don't I 
just send session target ipv4:X.X.156.245:5060 and the SDP takes care of the 
RTP negotiation part?  Do I really care in my CUBE what their RTP address is?


-jason

This email and all contents are subject to the following disclaimer:

"http://www.dimensiondata.com/emaildisclaimer;
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

[cisco-voip] Fixed in?

[Jason Aarons (Americas)]

   So if bug is fixed in version CUCM 11.5(0.98000.126) and I am running 
11.5.1.15900-18 I already have the fix?

Wanting to verify SU5 has the bug fix for case sensitivity in CSR.   CSCur46416

-jason



Get Outlook for Android

This email and all contents are subject to the following disclaimer:

"http://www.dimensiondata.com/emaildisclaimer;
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

[cisco-voip] SIP Carrier Service inside China mainland ?

[Jason Aarons (Americas)]

   Anyone have an office with a carrier SIP service in mainland China providing 
DIDs?  My customer has several offices and China Telecom seems to indicate SIP 
Trunks are not available.

-jason

This email and all contents are subject to the following disclaimer:

"http://www.dimensiondata.com/emaildisclaimer;
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

[cisco-voip] PCD 12.1.1 for CUCM 6.5 PCD Migration

[Jason Aarons (Americas)]

   I have a customer with CUCM  6.1.5.11900-1 that I plan to upgrade to CUCM 
11.5.1SU5 (Matrix says it is supported, all 7925 phones/loads are good).  I 
plan to use PCD 12.1.1 with PCD Migration.

Does PCD 12.1.1 need to talk to a PLM/Smart Licensing?  The PLM servers are 
still 11.5

-jason

This email and all contents are subject to the following disclaimer:

"http://www.dimensiondata.com/emaildisclaimer;
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

[cisco-voip] Jabber for iPhone (Phone Only mode no IMP)

[Jason Aarons (Americas)]

   APN is a cloud push for IM from what I read, not doing IM but Jabber for 
iPhone with Phone Only with CUCM 11.5.1SU4. On premise only no cloud access. Is 
APN required for iPhone in background with Phone Only.

Get Outlook for Android

This email and all contents are subject to the following disclaimer:

"http://www.dimensiondata.com/emaildisclaimer;
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] CallManager 11.5.1SU4 UDS web page times out

[Jason Aarons (Americas)]

   More info, I see UDS is listening on :443 but not :8443 as the Jabber PRT 
shows client is requesting


From: Jason Aarons (Americas)
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2018 6:40 AM
To: cisco-voip (cisco-voip@puck.nether.net) 
Subject: CallManager 11.5.1SU4 UDS web page times out

I have several clusters, all of them I can go to 
https://x.x.x.x:8443/cucm-uds/version and get back
https://10.132.160.20:8443/cucm-uds/version; 
version="11.5.1">11.5.1false

However I have a new cluster I just built and instead I get back Connection 
Timed Out on https://x.x.x.x:8443/cucm-uds/version

What am I missing?  Jabber clients won't connect was the start to this problem.

Jason Aarons, CCIEx2 No. 38564
Advanced Technology Consultant
Dimension Data
904-338-3245

This email and all contents are subject to the following disclaimer:

"http://www.dimensiondata.com/emaildisclaimer;
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

[cisco-voip] CallManager 11.5.1SU4 UDS web page times out

[Jason Aarons (Americas)]

   I have several clusters, all of them I can go to 
https://x.x.x.x:8443/cucm-uds/version and get back
https://10.132.160.20:8443/cucm-uds/version; 
version="11.5.1">11.5.1false

However I have a new cluster I just built and instead I get back Connection 
Timed Out on https://x.x.x.x:8443/cucm-uds/version

What am I missing?  Jabber clients won't connect was the start to this problem.

Jason Aarons, CCIEx2 No. 38564
Advanced Technology Consultant
Dimension Data
904-338-3245

This email and all contents are subject to the following disclaimer:

"http://www.dimensiondata.com/emaildisclaimer;
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] 8832s

[Jason Aarons (Americas)]

I would only deploy a device pack on new cluster build.  All else per device 
update.  I used to like to hardcode the load field on a per phone basis to 
prevent them from changing.  Been doing less of that.

The cmterm CE (Collaboration Endpoint) loads of 1.8GB are ridiculous, in DRS 
.tar backups too.

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of 
Anthony Holloway
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2018 9:07 AM
To: Charles Goldsmith 
Cc: cisco-voip (cisco-voip@puck.nether.net) 
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] 8832s


I wish CUCM didn't ship with newer phone firmware.

Since Cisco already drops support for all firmware older than the most recent 
firmware:

- For each IP Phone model, once Cisco releases a new firmware version, the 
older versions are no longer supported.
- Cisco expects customers who encounter a problem on an older version of 
firmware to test the latest firmware on a subset of phones in order to confirm 
that the problem still exists.
Source: 
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/collaboration-endpoints/unified-ip-phone-7900-series/116684-technote-ipphone-00.html<http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/collaboration-endpoints/unified-ip-phone-7900-series/116684-technote-ipphone-00.html>

And most people agree that you should upgrade firmware before a CUCM upgrade 
anyway, just remove firmware from CUCM.

Not too mention it clutters up TFTP.

I also think that the firmware should be decoupled from the Device Packs.  When 
adding support for a single model phone, rarely am I also trying to upgrade 
100% of the phones in the environment too.

On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 8:22 PM Charles Goldsmith 
mailto:wo...@justfamily.org>> wrote:
Since the 8832 is a dual bank phone, shouldn't it have the old image on it in 
the backup bank?  Maybe hardcoding the old image on the phone configuration and 
doing a reset will cause it to boot from it?


On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 7:06 PM Ryan Huff 
mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote:
Sounds like the ole’ ‘step upgrade’ issue that plagued the 79xx series back in 
the 8.x days 

My guess is they don’t actually need RMA’ed, just the easiest way to deal with 
it 

I’d flash the phones and advertise an isolated tftp server to them with the 
firmware load and XML bootstrap file. The phones aren’t working now, so 
flashing them and then still not getting them to load right isn’t going to make 
it any worse.

Use DNS in the DHCP scope in your isolation network with the TFTP server and 
pcap/debug the DNS queries to see the bootstrap and load files it’s looking for.

In the 79xx series back in the day when I would perform this Lazarus trick for 
some lucky customers; the bootstrap filename was XMLDefault.cnf.xml. Not sure 
if it’s the same nowadays though.

Here is the Cisco doc on the procedure for the older stuff  worth a shot 
but not sure if it still works on the newer gear.

https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/unified-communications/unified-communications-manager-callmanager/200582-Update-Cisco-IP-Phone-Firmware-through-T.html<https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/unified-communications/unified-communications-manager-callmanager/200582-Update-Cisco-IP-Phone-Firmware-through-T.html>


-Ryan-

On Apr 29, 2018, at 18:53, Jason Aarons (Americas) 
mailto:jason.aar...@dimensiondata.com>> wrote:


I have a customer with four 8832 conference room phones. Their CUCM was running 
version 12.0.1 of the 8832 firmware. These phones shipped with version 
12.0.1SR2. When they registered the first two phones they downgraded from 
12.0.1SR2 to 12.0.1 and are now unusable. They sit on “Connecting” after 
booting up. They do not get an IP address. You cannot set an IP address 
manually. If you reset the phone it doesn’t fix it, nor does a factory 
reset<https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cuipph/8832/english/adminguide/cs88_b_conference-8832-admin-guide-cucm/cs88_b_conference-8832-admin-guide-cucm_chapter_01011.html>
 allow the phone to revert to the firmware they shipped with. Cisco TAC says 
they must be RMA’d. We upgraded CUCM to 12.0.1SR3 and the other two phones 
upgraded fine from 12.0.1SR2 to 12.0.1SR3.

Does anyone have any ideas on what we could do to fix these phones other than 
RMAing them?


Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36>



This email and all contents are subject to the following disclaimer:
"http://www.dimensiondata.com/emaildisclaimer;<http://www.dimensiondata.com/Global/Policies/Pages/Email-Disclaimer.aspx>
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip<https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip>
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/

Re: [cisco-voip] 11.5.1SU2 Average .tar DRS backup side

[Jason Aarons (Americas)]

This was spot on, couple cmterm-ce9_.k3.cop.sgn files taking up large 
amounts of DRS space.  Working to get all Collaboration Endpoints same version 
of CE.

Jason Aarons, CCIEx2 No. 38564
Advanced Technology Consultant
Dimension Data
904-338-3245

From: Schlotterer, Tommy [mailto:tschlotte...@presidio.com]
Sent: Friday, June 8, 2018 9:50 AM
To: Jason Aarons (Americas) ; cisco-voip 
(cisco-voip@puck.nether.net) 
Subject: RE: 11.5.1SU2 Average .tar DRS backup side


Check your TFTP directory and see if you have excessive video endpoint firmware 
files. They can take a large amount of space if you have multiple versions of 
the same endpoints firmware.

Thanks

Tommy


Tommy Schlotterer | Systems Engineer - Collaboration
Presidio (NASDAQ: PSDO) | presidio.com<http://presidio.com>
20 N Saint Clair 3rd Floor, Toledo, OH 43604
D: 419.214.1415 | C: 419.706.0259 | 
tschlotte...@presidio.com<mailto:tschlotte...@presidio.com>


[Future. Built.]<http://www.presidio.com>

Follow us:

[Follow Presidio on Twitter]<http://www.twitter.com/presidio>

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jason 
Aarons (Americas)
Sent: Friday, June 8, 2018 9:34 AM
To: cisco-voip (cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>) 
mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>>
Subject: [cisco-voip] 11.5.1SU2 Average .tar DRS backup side

EXTERNAL EMAIL





I’ve got a customer with about 3,000 users but lots of Spark Room Kits and 
Telepresence DX units, I notice their DRS backup is 17GB in size.  Seems odd?

I used to seeing 7-10GB of .tar backup for 10K users 8 node cluster, 17GB seems 
excessive.

I’m planning to decrypt the .tar and look, but any thoughts on your average 
backup size for 3K users?

Jason Aarons, CCIEx2 No. 38564
Advanced Technology Consultant
Dimension Data
904-338-3245



This email and all contents are subject to the following disclaimer:
"http://www.dimensiondata.com/emaildisclaimer;<http://www.dimensiondata.com/Global/Policies/Pages/Email-Disclaimer.aspx>

This message w/attachments (message) is intended solely for the use of the 
intended recipient(s) and may contain information that is privileged, 
confidential or proprietary. If you are not an intended recipient, please 
notify the sender, and then please delete and destroy all copies and 
attachments. Please be advised that any review or dissemination of, or the 
taking of any action in reliance on, the information contained in or attached 
to this message is prohibited.


itevomcid
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

[cisco-voip] 11.5.1SU2 Average .tar DRS backup side

[Jason Aarons (Americas)]

   I've got a customer with about 3,000 users but lots of Spark Room Kits and 
Telepresence DX units, I notice their DRS backup is 17GB in size.  Seems odd?

I used to seeing 7-10GB of .tar backup for 10K users 8 node cluster, 17GB seems 
excessive.

I'm planning to decrypt the .tar and look, but any thoughts on your average 
backup size for 3K users?

Jason Aarons, CCIEx2 No. 38564
Advanced Technology Consultant
Dimension Data
904-338-3245

This email and all contents are subject to the following disclaimer:

"http://www.dimensiondata.com/emaildisclaimer;
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

[cisco-voip] Register Cisco 8821 to Mitel?

[Jason Aarons (Americas)]

   Customer asking if they can register a 8821 to Mitel.  Line side sip.

Pretty sure answer is no.

Same if someone asked me how to get 8821 to register to Asterisk or a Avaya or 
a Nortel etc.

Any other views?

-jason

This email and all contents are subject to the following disclaimer:

"http://www.dimensiondata.com/emaildisclaimer;
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

[cisco-voip] 8821 Cases and Cisco chargers

[Jason Aarons (Americas)]

   
8821 with Belt Clip putting into Multi Charger?

Customer bought a lot of CP-HOLSTER-8821= for 8821s
Once I put these belt clips on the phones, will the phone still fit in the 
CP-MCHGR-8821-BUN  or the Desktop Charger ?

Or do I have to remove the clip/case to charge the 8821?

Jason Aarons, CCIEx2 No. 38564
Advanced Technology Consultant
Dimension Data
904-338-3245

This email and all contents are subject to the following disclaimer:

"http://www.dimensiondata.com/emaildisclaimer;
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

[cisco-voip] CUCM 11.5 RIS DB shows None

[Jason Aarons (Americas)]

   I've got a 3 subscriber cluster 11.5.2SU2 with about 3,500 phones.  I've got 
a handful of about 300 phones that are working, no problem. I can call them, 
they can call me.  However under Device > Phone I see them not showing an IP 
address and show None.

[cid:image001.png@01D3F012.7BE418A0]

Jason Aarons, CCIEx2 No. 38564
Advanced Technology Consultant
Dimension Data
904-338-3245

This email and all contents are subject to the following disclaimer:

"http://www.dimensiondata.com/emaildisclaimer;
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

[cisco-voip] SRND 11.x 3rd Party SIP Phones MoH

[Jason Aarons (Americas)]

   Can't find in the SRND the section where 3rd party SIP phones and MoH is 
discussed.  I recall some limitations, but need specifics.

Press hold on a 3rd Party SIP vtech hotel phone and pretty sure by design it 
won't play moh.

Got a link to page in SRND with 3rd party SIP endpoint limitations.

Get Outlook for Android

This email and all contents are subject to the following disclaimer:

"http://www.dimensiondata.com/emaildisclaimer;
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

[cisco-voip] 8832s

[Jason Aarons (Americas)]

   
I have a customer with four 8832 conference room phones. Their CUCM was running 
version 12.0.1 of the 8832 firmware. These phones shipped with version 
12.0.1SR2. When they registered the first two phones they downgraded from 
12.0.1SR2 to 12.0.1 and are now unusable. They sit on “Connecting” after 
booting up. They do not get an IP address. You cannot set an IP address 
manually. If you reset the phone it doesn’t fix it, nor does a factory 
reset
 allow the phone to revert to the firmware they shipped with. Cisco TAC says 
they must be RMA’d. We upgraded CUCM to 12.0.1SR3 and the other two phones 
upgraded fine from 12.0.1SR2 to 12.0.1SR3.

Does anyone have any ideas on what we could do to fix these phones other than 
RMAing them?



Get Outlook for Android

This email and all contents are subject to the following disclaimer:

"http://www.dimensiondata.com/emaildisclaimer;
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

[cisco-voip] SFTP backups stop

[Jason Aarons (Americas)]

   Anyone seen where you changed/regenerated the Globalscape SFTP key and 
backups stopped? Or maybe it was something else.

I’m stumped. Filezilla client to SFTP with same username/password works fine, 
log files in GlobalScape show CUCM connection and a dir list returned fine and 
then in CCM I see failure.

Restarted DRS master/local, rebooted PUB etc.

I deleted schedule and device, recreated devices, same problem.

CUCM 11.5 SU2 and latest GlobalScape EFT.

Was working fine,  then I regenerated key pair on GlobalScape.

This email and all contents are subject to the following disclaimer:

"http://www.dimensiondata.com/emaildisclaimer;
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

[cisco-voip] CUCM 11.5 LDAP and Primary Extension

[Jason Aarons (Americas)]

   Noticing that if customer changes LDAP  ipPhone field in ADUC that the 
user's Primary Extension and Self Provisioning ID never get changed unless we 
convert user from LDAP to Manual and delete, re-sync.  Customer is using Self 
Provisioning so this is creating problems.  Is this by-design or a bug?

CallManager 11.5.1SU2

-jason

This email and all contents are subject to the following disclaimer:

"http://www.dimensiondata.com/emaildisclaimer;
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM Trunk timer

[Jason Aarons (Americas)]

https://bst.cloudapps.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCuj19006


From: Erick Bergquist [mailto:erick...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 6, 2017 2:25 AM
To: Jason Aarons (Americas) <jason.aar...@dimensiondata.com>
Cc: cisco-voip (cisco-voip@puck.nether.net) <cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM Trunk timer


It’s 0 days and the same hours and minutes right?

It’s been like that for awhile as far as I recall next to the trunk 
destination. Likely a cosmetic item.

I usually have only one destination per trunk and use route groups to order how 
they are used.

Erick


On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 12:56 PM Jason Aarons (Americas) 
<jason.aar...@dimensiondata.com<mailto:jason.aar...@dimensiondata.com>> wrote:

On a CUCM trunk, you have the status showing the duration it’s been in service, 
then under SIP information there is another timer for the individual links.

CUCM is showing a difference in the timers.  Do you know why that is?



Jason Aarons, CCIEx2 No. 38564
Advanced Technology Consultant
Dimension Data
904-338-3245



This email and all contents are subject to the following disclaimer:
"http://www.dimensiondata.com/emaildisclaimer;<http://www.dimensiondata.com/Global/Policies/Pages/Email-Disclaimer.aspx>
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip<https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip>


itevomcid
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM Trunk timer

[Jason Aarons (Americas)]

0 days but hours and minutes are not the same at top vs drilling down..

Jason Aarons, CCIEx2 No. 38564
Advanced Technology Consultant
Dimension Data
904-338-3245

From: Erick Bergquist [mailto:erick...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 6, 2017 2:25 AM
To: Jason Aarons (Americas) <jason.aar...@dimensiondata.com>
Cc: cisco-voip (cisco-voip@puck.nether.net) <cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM Trunk timer


It’s 0 days and the same hours and minutes right?

It’s been like that for awhile as far as I recall next to the trunk 
destination. Likely a cosmetic item.

I usually have only one destination per trunk and use route groups to order how 
they are used.

Erick


On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 12:56 PM Jason Aarons (Americas) 
<jason.aar...@dimensiondata.com<mailto:jason.aar...@dimensiondata.com>> wrote:

On a CUCM trunk, you have the status showing the duration it’s been in service, 
then under SIP information there is another timer for the individual links.

CUCM is showing a difference in the timers.  Do you know why that is?



Jason Aarons, CCIEx2 No. 38564
Advanced Technology Consultant
Dimension Data
904-338-3245



This email and all contents are subject to the following disclaimer:
"http://www.dimensiondata.com/emaildisclaimer;<http://www.dimensiondata.com/Global/Policies/Pages/Email-Disclaimer.aspx>
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip<https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip>


itevomcid
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

[cisco-voip] CUCM Trunk timer

[Jason Aarons (Americas)]

   On a CUCM trunk, you have the status showing the duration it's been in 
service, then under SIP information there is another timer for the individual 
links.

CUCM is showing a difference in the timers.  Do you know why that is?



Jason Aarons, CCIEx2 No. 38564
Advanced Technology Consultant
Dimension Data
904-338-3245

This email and all contents are subject to the following disclaimer:

"http://www.dimensiondata.com/emaildisclaimer;
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Prime Collaboration Assurance and Analytics 11.5 MOS unavailable and codec 90 ?

[Jason Aarons (Americas)]

Cool. I see G722 is enabled thus Opus is running.

I http to the Cisco 7841 phones and notice the MOS LQK scores are not on phone. 
 Is this MOS LQK K-factor stuff not on 7841s?

Here is example of Cisco 8831 showing MOS LQK scores.
Rcvr Octets 1628640
MOS LQK 4.5000
Avg MOS LQK 4.5000
Min MOS LQK4.5000
Max MOS LQK   4.5000
MOS LQK Version 0.95
Cumulative Conceal Ratio 0.
Interval Conceal Ratio0.
Max Conceal Ratio   0.
Conceal Secs  0
Severely Conceal Secs0

Jason Aarons, CCIEx2 No. 38564
Advanced Technology Consultant
Dimension Data
904-338-3245

From: Nimloth [mailto:niml...@nimloth.pl]
Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2017 9:18 AM
To: Jason Aarons (Americas) <jason.aar...@dimensiondata.com>
Cc: cisco-voip (cisco-voip@puck.nether.net) <cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Prime Collaboration Assurance and Analytics 11.5 MOS 
unavailable and codec 90 ?


Codec 90 is Opus
Wysłano z BlueMail<http://www.bluemail.me/r?b=11061>
W dniu 21.11.2017, o 15:05, użytkownik "Jason Aarons (Americas)" 
<jason.aar...@dimensiondata.com<mailto:jason.aar...@dimensiondata.com>> napisał:

I’m checking CAR in CallManager 11.1, but noticing  a lot of calls in Assurance 
show MOS unavailable.


Also calls shows codec G711, or G729, but what is codec 90?


Jason Aarons, CCIEx2 No. 38564
Advanced Technology Consultant
Dimension Data
904-338-3245




This email and all contents are subject to the following disclaimer:
"http://www.dimensiondata.com/emaildisclaimer;<http://www.dimensiondata.com/Global/Policies/Pages/Email-Disclaimer.aspx>



cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip<https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip>


itevomcid
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

[cisco-voip] Prime Collaboration Assurance and Analytics 11.5 MOS unavailable and codec 90 ?

[Jason Aarons (Americas)]

   I'm checking CAR in CallManager 11.1, but noticing  a lot of calls in 
Assurance show MOS unavailable.

Also calls shows codec G711, or G729, but what is codec 90?

Jason Aarons, CCIEx2 No. 38564
Advanced Technology Consultant
Dimension Data
904-338-3245

This email and all contents are subject to the following disclaimer:

"http://www.dimensiondata.com/emaildisclaimer;
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] reporting on (not)used phones or desks

[Jason Aarons (Americas)]

I’m more often asked for a report on unregistered phones…..and when the last 
time was the phone was registered….which I understand can be done via Select * 
but only if within a short time period of unregistering…you would think that 
would have a been a feature request years ago…

-jason

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of 
ci...@cips.nl
Sent: Monday, October 2, 2017 3:52 PM
To: 'voip puck' 
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] reporting on (not)used phones or desks


This looks interesting, thank you for the link.

I quickly looked at the solution and it seems a nice and complete product.
However it still seems some work and maintenance to get this working.
How will this work with phones not logged in and users logged in to phones via 
extension mobility?
It looks like I have to enrich the data collected by this tool manually.
Any experience whit this?

Kr,
Henk

From: Charles Goldsmith [mailto:wo...@justfamily.org]
Sent: maandag 2 oktober 2017 15:36
To: ci...@cips.nl
Cc: voip puck >
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] reporting on (not)used phones or desks

variphy.com has a report that looks at CDR records and will 
give you a report on directory numbers that have not been used, but you would 
need to build a database of CDR records on Variphy or import them if you 
archived elsewhere.

On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 8:10 AM, > wrote:
Hi,

We have around 450 desks in the office and between 250-275 are mainly used by 
sales employees and flexworkers who do not need a personal desk because they 
are not always in the office, every day.
We are using extension mobility for almost all users, with mainly 7942 and 8841 
phones.
I’m looking for a solution to get some reporting details on the usage of the 
desks.
We need to cut-down the number of desks and I want to see which desks are not 
used, preferably by floor.
Are there any tools you use to get this visible?
I was thinking of a phone report of phones which have not been used for a 
specific period of time, or maybe do something with extension mobility?
Any thoughts anyone?

Thanks.
Henk

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip



itevomcid
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

[cisco-voip] 3rd part SIP phones and HLog?

[Jason Aarons (Americas)]

   Is there any way to get a 3rd party SIP phone to login to a Hunt Group?  For 
example #11 to login, #12 to logoff.

Here I have NEC DECT phones I want to be able to Login/Logout.

-jason

This email and all contents are subject to the following disclaimer:

"http://www.dimensiondata.com/emaildisclaimer;
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

[cisco-voip] Third-Party SIP Basic Phone

[Jason Aarons (Americas)]

   CUCM 11.5 Third-Party  SIP  Device  (Basic)-This  one-line  SIP  device is 
an RFC3261-compliant phone  that
is running SIP from third-party companies.

I should expect a second call to come in Line 1 and be able to switch between 
calls?  I'm using a NEC DECT i766 phone that is line side registered to 
CallManager.  I see the second call come in, but phone doesn't show any kind of 
button to switch calls.  Vendor is researching it, pretty sure this is a 
problem on NEC side.

Go to Device > Phone >  go to bottom of line, the maximum calls is 2, so I 
should expect to get a second call into the NEC DEC i766, agree?

This email and all contents are subject to the following disclaimer:

"http://www.dimensiondata.com/emaildisclaimer;
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

[cisco-voip] NEC DECT I766 phone (SIP)?

[Jason Aarons (Americas)]

   Anyone used the NEC DECT I766 phone with CallManager (3rd party SIP 
endpoint) as Line side device? Any gotchas?

https://www.nec-enterprise.com/products/DECT-handset-I766-63

http://www.necux5000.com/dealer_area/documents/mobility_solutions/nec_sip_dect/admin_guide/nec_sip_dect_solutions_admin_guide_1.pdf



-jason

This email and all contents are subject to the following disclaimer:

"http://www.dimensiondata.com/emaildisclaimer;
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

[cisco-voip] Property Mgmt Software

[Jason Aarons (Americas)]

   Anyone integrated Oracle Hospitality to lmagicile 
https://www.imagicle.com/en-us/ to CallManager?

Guest checks into room and phone css changed from limited to local if no credit 
card on file, if credit card on file than change css to allow international. 
Reset phone/voicemail on checkout, etc.

How about any other property management solution to middleware to CallManager?

Any feedback on what did or didn't work well?

This email and all contents are subject to the following disclaimer:

"http://www.dimensiondata.com/emaildisclaimer;
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

[cisco-voip] 8845/65 Video mbps ?

[Jason Aarons (Americas)]

   Trying to find the 8845/65 information on video calls and per video call 
bandwidth usage.  Strictly 8845/65 to 8845/65.

Jason Aarons, CCIEx No. 38564
Advanced Technology Consultant
Dimension Data
904-338-3245

This email and all contents are subject to the following disclaimer:

"http://www.dimensiondata.com/emaildisclaimer;
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

[cisco-voip] Call Forwarding on secondary lines in 11.5 with 8851?

[Jason Aarons (Americas)]

   Any fixes in CUCM 11.5 that allow you to call forward a secondary line from 
the phone, or is that still a feature request from 2001 


-jason

This email and all contents are subject to the following disclaimer:

"http://www.dimensiondata.com/emaildisclaimer;
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

[cisco-voip] Latest Cisco TAPS and Shared Lines?

[Jason Aarons (Americas)]

   Does Cisco TAPS 11.5 support Shared Lines?  In the past I've used UnifiedFX 
or VoipIntegration.com for TAPS when I had Shared Lines.  I assume no changes?

https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/bat/11_5_1/CUCM_BK_B4FA1139_00_bulk-administration-guide_1151/CUCM_BK_B4FA1139_00_bulk-administration-guide_1151_chapter_01001011.html

-jason

This email and all contents are subject to the following disclaimer:

"http://www.dimensiondata.com/emaildisclaimer;
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

[cisco-voip] E164 format for Italy site?

[Jason Aarons (Americas)]

   

Which one is the correct E.164 format for a site in Rome Italy? Is the zero 
after country code part of E164?

A) tel:+39660292733

B)  tel:+390660292733

This email and all contents are subject to the following disclaimer:

"http://www.dimensiondata.com/emaildisclaimer;
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

[cisco-voip] SEPXXXXXXXXXXX.cnf.xml and directory number?

[Jason Aarons (Americas)]

   What is the field name in the SEPXXX.cnf.xml that has the directory 
number?  Just not seeing it




-Jason Aarons, CCIEx2 No 38564

This email and all contents are subject to the following disclaimer:

"http://www.dimensiondata.com/emaildisclaimer;
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip