Re: [cisco-voip] Looking for advice on sRTP using tokenless CTL

Ryan, Could you elaborate a little on this change ?I did an upgrade on my lab system to 11.5(1)su3a and after the upgrade I see from the output of 'show itl' that the callmanager.pem is still the signer of the ITL file. Would the ITLRecovery only be the signer of the ITL on a fresh install

Re: [cisco-voip] UDS Searches not sanitizing the Plus Symbol

i meant to say it will also find numbers with hypens (the documentation mentions they are ignored) On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 8:05 AM, Justin Steinberg <jsteinb...@gmail.com> wrote: > While Anthony's encoding is right, I actually think the documentation does > intend to actually mean

Re: [cisco-voip] UDS Searches not sanitizing the Plus Symbol

While Anthony's encoding is right, I actually think the documentation does intend to actually mean you can act as though the + was not in the phone number value as stored in AD. I have used the query below https://{host}:8443/cucm-uds/users?numberlast=3175551234 To search for phone numbers in

Re: [cisco-voip] Question regarding Rightfax Configuration and "Transmission Error"

I use t38 over AT just fine On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 10:37 AM, Brian Meade wrote: > I've got SIP with T.38 as well as PRI in different environments that are > all working pretty well with that setup. > > On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 10:24 AM, Haas, Neal wrote: >

Re: [cisco-voip] Integrating IM only between Jabber & S4B cross-organizations

This is possible now on the latest version of expressway x8.9 and IMP server 11.5(1)su2. This will only work between two different domain names, which seems to be what you want to do. This will provide IM & Presence. Voice & Video calling would require CMS. On Feb 23, 2017 4:54 PM, "Ben

Re: [cisco-voip] Not supported I'm sure..... but what do you think?

Keep in mind that if you COBRAS data significantly before the cut and then use message shuttle that you'll get all messages moved over at cut time but you'll miss things like users who update their voicemail greetings daily, or put an out of office in place for vacation, etc. On Tue, Nov 1, 2016

Re: [cisco-voip] Not supported I'm sure..... but what do you think?

The upgrades take too long is part of it. Especially if the upgrade is an RU upgrade, because it means that both the patch install/upgrade and the switch needs to take place in a maintenance mode. The missing piece in my opinion is a way to put CUCM into a maintenance mode where it continues to

Re: [cisco-voip] Video Conference Auto attendant?

is this a joke? how can CUWL pro just not exist anymore for people who bought it for conferencing functions. On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 3:08 PM, Matthew Loraditch < mloradi...@heliontechnologies.com> wrote: > Yeah, CUWL Pro no longer exists and is now CUWL Meetings and is $100 more. > You can of

Re: [cisco-voip] DTMF interworking on CUBE - asymmetric payloads

BE as of yet? > > > http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/voice/cube/configuration/cube-book/dtmf-relay.html#concept_264617919921874995299551391601561__table_16E37E2F33CE4E0B836D2E5A809E7252 > > On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 8:21 PM, Justin Steinberg <jsteinb...@gmail.com> >

Re: [cisco-voip] DTMF interworking on CUBE - asymmetric payloads

yes, CUBE can do RFC2833/NTP to a Telco and SIP-KPML to CUCM. I do this for calls that terminate on CCX IVR since CCX does not support RFC2833. With only rtp-nte on the dialpeer from CUBE to CUCM, CUCM will invoke a MTP. Adding sip-kpml to the dial-peer will allow RTP directly from CUBE to CCX

Re: [cisco-voip] UCCX 11.0.1 bug watch

Why is there still not a COP file for CSCux33949? This has been a known issue for so long it should not be left up to customers to try the 11.0, run into a bug, and then open a TAC case. The BU has known about this for so long, please release a COP file or SU to fix this so this doesn't keep

Re: [cisco-voip] TSP client after CM cert added?

i've seen CTI manager need a restart after new callmanager.pem certs even for non-secure clusters On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 1:24 PM, Dave Goodwin wrote: > Scott, is the UCM cluster running in mixed mode? Do you know whether the > security settings were configured during

Re: [cisco-voip] Voice Dialing Misdirects

make sure the codec is G711 and not G729 On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 5:23 PM, Bill Talley wrote: > Isn't there a setting to play all matches? I don't recall for sure. At > least the caller could pick on or the other. > > Sent from an Apple iOS device with very tiny touchscreen

Re: [cisco-voip] LDAP, Sync, Filters and CUCM

CUCM doesn't delete the users when they are marked inactive. you can fix the LDAP agreement, resync and get them back if you get it fixed before the garbage cycle clears them out. this is really an issue for the UCCX team, they should handle user changes in CUCM more gracefully. This is also

Re: [cisco-voip] UCCX 10.6(1) SU1 & SU2 CAD Upgrade Warning

you. > > Regards, > Abhiram Kramadhati > Technical Solutions Manager, CBABU > CCIE Collaboration # 40065 > > From: Justin Steinberg <jsteinb...@gmail.com> > Date: Friday, 25 September 2015 2:41 am > To: Cisco VOIP <cisco-voip@puck.nether.net> > Subject: [cisco-voi

Re: [cisco-voip] Additional historical reports available on CCO

those reports have the temp tables issue. they need to be imported using the uccxhrc user. Which makes me really question using these reports in production since the QA on these must have been really minimal to document that they should be imported with uccxhruser. On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 11:14

Re: [cisco-voip] UCCx 10.5 custom stored procedure for reporting

i haven't experienced this issue before.Care to share your stored procedure ? On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 6:06 PM, Bill Talley wrote: > Hi all, > > Has anyone imported custom stored procedures into the db_cra for use in > CUIC? I'm having an issue getting a new stored proc

Re: [cisco-voip] increasing VM virtual memory?

I've increased the UCM/CUC 10.x VMs to 6 GB to prevent memory issues and haven't had any problems.I keep the bug below folded on some paper tucked away in my wallet just in case. https://bst.cloudapps.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCuo38244 *increase the threshold for LowAvailableVirtualMemory

Re: [cisco-voip] UCCX 11 Finesse HAoW Island Mode

This isn't the full answer you're looking for, but I'll still throw it out there... I know LDAP enabled agents can login to Finesse when the UCM publisher is down as that happened to me last week. The UCM LDAP auth component doesn't rely on the Dirsync service, so the UCM LDAP auth runs on all

Re: [cisco-voip] UCCX Bug

are you running 10.6(1)su1 ?I have seen this on 10.6 base on two seperate installs. it's really ugly, all Finesse Admin team specific data is lost. the biggest problem is if you customize XML and then lose it and have to try and figure out how to rebuild it. Since i had this the first time

[cisco-voip] UCM Hunt Group Reporting

Has anyone used any CDR package they like with UCM environments with heavy hunt group usage ? This is a retail environment with centralized operator group handling inbound main number calls, and transferring calls to various hunt groups throughout the retail sites. Essentially we are using UCM

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM Native Presence (BLF/SD) populating Directories / Call Lists

BLFs don't generate missed call alerts. only DNs. It might be helpful to get a third phone (or IP Communicator) so you don't have to 'dial itself', that might be making things a little confusing to understand the various behaviors. On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 8:32 PM, Jeffrey Girard

Re: [cisco-voip] DRS Backups 10.5

solarwinds does have a lightweight free SFTP client. It usually works reliably if the Windows server it runs on is 32 bit and if the Cisco UC apps are relatively new. Obviously it still isn't supported by TAC but when it works it works. On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 12:03 PM, Brian Meade

Re: [cisco-voip] Background url

i believe you just put the file name in that field, so like below. Background.png I will say that I did this for the first time on 9.12 via the common phone profile and applied the config. It dropped every call in progress. This was an early 9.1 and the phones were 8945s. I never

Re: [cisco-voip] Understanding a Defect's Affected Versions

I agree with that. It's too hard to know how to search the bug toolkit for fixes in a certain version. On Oct 5, 2015 11:54 PM, "Erick Bergquist" wrote: > I'm also not a fan of the newer release notes not including a list of > the Resolved Bugs, but a link to bug search

[cisco-voip] UCCX 10.6(1) SU1 CAD Upgrade Warning

The current UCCX compatibility matrix lists CAD 10.6.1.95 for both UCCX 10.6(1) and 10.6(1)SU1, implying there is no CAD upgrade forced after the SU1 upgrade. This isn't the case. Upgrading 10.6(1) to 10.6(1)su1 does force a CAD upgrade. Hopefully this helps someone else. Justin

Re: [cisco-voip] MRA (Collaboration Edge) Intrusion Protection

There are some settings on the Expressway regarding the number of auth attempts, etc. have you tried to increase those to see if that makes any difference ? On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Ryan Huff wrote: > I'll hav to sift through my logs and see if that is what my

Re: [cisco-voip] Any way to invoke / force MTP for CSF devices using device mobility?

I think they need to reconsider their policy against preventing VPN users from communicating with each other. Perhaps they can and an ACL to block undesired traffic and allow the RTP to pass directly between the VPN clients. On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 9:49 PM, Tong, Dana dana.t...@team.telstra.com

Re: [cisco-voip] jabber directory lookup attributes (UDS)

-technologies?trk=top_nav_home | G+ https://plus.google.com/+Heliontechnologies/posts *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] *On Behalf Of *Lelio Fulgenzi *Sent:* Wednesday, August 5, 2015 3:40 PM *To:* Justin Steinberg jsteinb...@gmail.com *Cc:* cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco Finesse Phone Book

No there isn't a way. Hopefully this is added to the roadmap, since it would be easy for finesse to utilize the UDS API. There are likely 3rd party gadgets, but this should be built in. On Jul 24, 2015 2:11 PM, John J bcch...@gmail.com wrote: Anyone know if there's a way to populate Finesse's

Re: [cisco-voip] Digicert Wildcard certificates

While we are on the topic of certs, has anyone had issues with certain CAs not allowing top level domain as a SAN (e.g. cisco.com) ? GoDaddy would complain in the UI that you shouldn't have a top level domain as a SAN but would still sign the cert. I'm having a problem know with

Re: [cisco-voip] Digicert Wildcard certificates

.com, .net, .org , etc. I think you meant parent domain. Also, is that a feature of the multiserver cert, because I don't see CER for example putting the parent domain in the CSR. On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 10:24 AM Justin Steinberg jsteinb...@gmail.com wrote: While we are on the topic of certs

Re: [cisco-voip] Digicert Wildcard certificates

To Dennis' point you don't have to put DNS=mycollab.com in the SAN. There is an alternative to use DNS=collab-edge.mycollab.com http://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/expressway/config_guide/X8-5/Mobile-Remote-Access-via-Expressway-Deployment-Guide-X8-5.pdf [image: Inline image

[cisco-voip] Opinions on 10.5(2) SU2 ?

Anyone running this version in production ? I saw a COP file was released this week addressing three SIP bugs that unregister the phones (CM crash?). http://www.cisco.com/web/software/282204704/18582/ciscocm.FQDNwithDNS-v1.0.k3.readme.pdf Any of the Cisco guys know whether this is going to

Re: [cisco-voip] Opinions on 10.5(2) SU2 ?

[mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] *On Behalf Of *Justin Steinberg *Sent:* Friday, July 10, 2015 3:56 PM *To:* Cisco VOIP *Subject:* [cisco-voip] Opinions on 10.5(2) SU2 ? Anyone running this version in production ? I saw a COP file was released this week addressing three SIP bugs

Re: [cisco-voip] Making a message appear anonymous/unknown via single inbox

) end end end return M On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 11:47 AM, Justin Steinberg jsteinb...@gmail.com wrote: in addition to the PSTN, they also want to have caller id blocked on calls on-net to other Cisco phones. So we have certain CSS on Cisco phones that route calls through translation patterns

Re: [cisco-voip] Making a message appear anonymous/unknown via single inbox

Apologies for resurrecting an old thread here, but I was curious if there was fixed in more recent versions of Unity Connection. I'm trying this with 10.5(2)su1 with SIP trunk between UCM and UCXN and having the problem where UCXN ignores the restriction settings configured on CUCM. I'm

Re: [cisco-voip] Making a message appear anonymous/unknown via single inbox

) that makes an outbound call from call manager to the pstn (via a sip trunk to an itsp?) And some of them want to block their Caller ID or mask it to anon? Thanks, Ryan Original Message From: Justin Steinberg jsteinb...@gmail.com Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2015 11:06 AM To: Ted

Re: [cisco-voip] Consolidate multiple CUCM clusters using Prime Collab Provisioning

I would say this would be extremely ambitious. I would just recommend using the UCM BAT export/import, along with some excel manipulation. On Jun 15, 2015 3:49 PM, Rob Dawson rdaw...@force3.com wrote: Not much more info than the subject – is it possible to consolidate multiple CUCM clusters

Re: [cisco-voip] Hosted Jabber, SSO and onprem UCM and UCXN

but without SSO. On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 9:18 AM, Justin Steinberg jsteinb...@gmail.com wrote: It seems like the problem is that for some reason, Jabber thinks the DNS server is the voicemail server. So it is performing a SSO check with the DNS server and that fails. Any idea why Jabber would

Re: [cisco-voip] Hosted Jabber, SSO and onprem UCM and UCXN

Meade bmead...@vt.edu wrote: Probably worth pulling a problem report right after sign in. It should show the process of checking if SSO is enabled for Unity Connection. On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 4:33 PM, Justin Steinberg jsteinb...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Chris, I checked all that out

Re: [cisco-voip] Hosted Jabber, SSO and onprem UCM and UCXN

VoicemailService_UseCredentialsFromphone/VoicemailService_UseCredentialsFrom in your jabber-config.xml file as it will need to have a separate login for the voicemail server versus CallManager. *~Chris* *From:* Justin Steinberg [mailto:jsteinb...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Wednesday, June 10, 2015 12:30 PM *To:* Chris

[cisco-voip] Hosted Jabber, SSO and onprem UCM and UCXN

Has anyone setup SSO in the hybrid Jabber deployment model? Customer has hosted WebEx Messenger Jabber, on-prem CUCM, and UCXN. We have enabled SSO for all three systems. We can use SSO to login to jabber and the UCM and UCXN end user self service web interfaces.All that seems OK and SSO

Re: [cisco-voip] Hosted Jabber, SSO and onprem UCM and UCXN

/SAML_SSO_deployment_guide/10_0_1/CUCM_BK_SB003832_00_saml-sso-deployment-guide-for/CUCM_BK_SB003832_00_saml-sso-deployment-guide-for_chapter_010.html *~Chris* *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] *On Behalf Of *Justin Steinberg *Sent:* Wednesday, June 10, 2015 12:09 PM *To:* Cisco VOIP

Re: [cisco-voip] UCCX 10.6 | CUCM 10.5.2 | CAD Extension out of service

Are you on UCM 10.5.2su1 ? I haven't seen that issue at all. Is your VMware LRO disabled ? Do your UCMs have one or two vCPU ? On Jun 9, 2015 12:42 AM, Ryan Huff ryanh...@outlook.com wrote: Has anyone been noticing that in this environment (UCCX 10.6 | CUCM 10.5.2 | CAD); extensions will

Re: [cisco-voip] UCCX 10.6 | CUCM 10.5.2 | CAD Extension out of service

I always turn off LRO. I've had weird issues that are next to impossible to troubleshoot at the application layer and disabling LRO is the solution. I would also recommend that if you are using the 2500 user template that you make sure your callmanagers are using 2 vCPUs when using CCX. I

Re: [cisco-voip] Priority of Calls To Hunt Pilot

first come first serve On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Gary Parker g.j.par...@lboro.ac.uk wrote: Afternoon all, I wonder if anyone could shed some light on a query I have regarding my CUCM 8.6.2 system. I have a hunt pilot that is feeding into a small callcentre operation (6 DNs, one line

Re: [cisco-voip] collab edge dns/SSL cert

Click through the error. Dont modify the CSR or take out SANs. The fqdn should be in the CN and SAN. I dont know why godaddy complains about that but I just ignore it and things are fine. Justin On Jun 1, 2015 1:49 PM, Ed Leatherman ealeather...@gmail.com wrote: Matt had it right with his

Re: [cisco-voip] Changing DNS entries in Call Manager 9.1.2.10000-28

are you sure that all your CM subscribers have the proper primary and secondary DNS ?Since your outbound is the only think that failed, maybe you have a specific CM sub routing the outbound calls and it didn't have proper redundant DNS. Or maybe you had a MGCP gateway for outbound that

Re: [cisco-voip] UCCX Upgrade question

that's not possible afaik On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 9:25 PM, Ryan Huff ryanh...@outlook.com wrote: I have CCX 8.5.1; I am going to 10.6.1. I am NOT doing an in-place upgrade. I'm having issues sourcing the .ISO for their current version, so I can restore/jump upgrade it to 10.6.1 and get a

Re: [cisco-voip] Remove ELM/PLM Option

it immediately reboots the server (after you confirm the change) and after the reboot the link for PLM is still there on the main webpage. However, once you click the link it says PLM has been removed by your administrator. I know that behavior isn't what any of us want, but atleast it will

[cisco-voip] CUCM Immersive Video Device List

Below is a list of all the devices on CUCM 10.5(2)SU1 that are configured to use the Immersive Video region bandwidth setting. Does anyone know if there is a way to modify this list? I would like to add the new DX series into the list. Seems like an oversight since the EX are in the list.

Re: [cisco-voip] RTMT??? or some other way to monitor a phone

RTMT has a device search that let's you filter by device pool or subnet. On May 10, 2015 7:38 PM, Abhiram Kramadhati (akramadh) akram...@cisco.com wrote: This might be helpful: https://www.singlewire.com/free-xml-apps.html From: Scott Voll svoll.v...@gmail.com Date: Saturday, 9 May 2015

Re: [cisco-voip] PCD 10.5(3) and IMP 9x to 10x

i've done it and it is mostly straightforward. In my case, I did a network migration to change the hostname of IM/P. However, I used the same IP address as the old server (this was a MCS to UCS 8 to 10 migration). I only did a network migration because I wanted to change the hostname to align

Re: [cisco-voip] PCD 10.5(3) and IMP 9x to 10x

is possible, let alone a Simple Migration. Just take a look at the PCD 10.5(3) doc under supported releases. Thanks for replying. On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 10:27 PM Justin Steinberg jsteinb...@gmail.com wrote: i've done it and it is mostly straightforward. In my case, I did a network migration

Re: [cisco-voip] dx80 and MRA

i noticed that Expressway X8.5.2 was just released and was surprised when the DX/7800/8800 was still listed as Preview support. I suspect the Preview is due to the items below: 1) Primary line support only (multiple lines won't work on MRA) 2) Hunt group/pilot/list aren't supported 3) Shared

Re: [cisco-voip] RTMT on Windows 8.1

works fine for me. what error are you getting ? On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Matthew Loraditch mloradi...@heliontechnologies.com wrote: Hmm need to try with local admin account. Same but on Domain. Argh.. Matthew G. Loraditch – CCNP-Voice, CCNA-RS, CCDA Network Engineer Direct

Re: [cisco-voip] Upgrading CUCM from 8.5 to 10.5

Hi Adam, Can you elaborate on this yet ? :)I never see any PCD software posted to cisco.com, it always seems to require E-delivery download. I'm not sure why that is, since all the other Prime Collaboration (Provisioning Assurance) can be downloaded from cisco.com Thanks, Justin On

Re: [cisco-voip] CIPC via MRA? Anyone done it?

CIPC isn't MRA aware On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 4:36 PM, Erick Wellnitz ewellnitzv...@gmail.com wrote: Had a question posed to me and I'm not 100% on the answer. I think the answer is no but I thought I'd see if anyone had done this successfully. Anyone been successful at getting CIPC to

Re: [cisco-voip] Finesse customisations - feedback

Abhiram, Thanks for soliciting the feedback. I've found a few items on my list that I'll share. All my experience is from UCCX by the way. - UCCX Finesse API doesn't support passing call variables in the MAKE_CALL request. This has been a huge problem for me, since we are using

Re: [cisco-voip] FYI: UCCx v9.0 EOL announced...

Center Cisco Services Direct: +1 919 392 9898 Hours: M - F 9:00am - 5:00pm Eastern Time From: Justin Steinberg Date: Monday, April 13, 2015 at 3:02 PM To: Abhiram Kramadhati (akramadh) Cc: voip puck Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] FYI: UCCx v9.0 EOL announced... I opened up a TAC case to get

Re: [cisco-voip] FYI: UCCx v9.0 EOL announced...

, 7 April 2015 8:52 am To: Justin Steinberg jsteinb...@gmail.com Cc: Josh Warcop j...@warcop.com, Lelio Fulgenzi le...@uoguelph.ca, voip puck cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] FYI: UCCx v9.0 EOL announced... Hi Justin, Allow me till Wednesday, I will have some

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco Unified Border Element Session Licensing

Cant cube licenses be bought ala carte ? Do you even have to provide a router serial ? On Apr 11, 2015 9:39 AM, Mark Holloway m...@markholloway.com wrote: I don’t think CUBE licensing is perpetual. You should call Cisco to get a definite answer but the folks I know had to rip and replace. On

Re: [cisco-voip] FYI: UCCx v9.0 EOL announced...

the file from though. File name is ciscouccx.1061.MixedMode.7.cop.sgn. I'm guessing they haven't released it publicly yet as I don't see it on CCO. On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 3:27 PM, Justin Steinberg jsteinb...@gmail.com wrote: Abhiram, Is there any update on the COP file for official support

Re: [cisco-voip] (no subject)

Shutdown the vm Change virtual disk from 80G to 110G Save /OK settings Power on VM It will reboot a few times while extending disk then come up fine / normal . Sent from my iPhone On Mar 20, 2015, at 9:34 AM, Justin Steinberg jsteinb...@gmail.com wrote: So in the CUCM 10.5 download

Re: [cisco-voip] (no subject)

a few times while extending disk then come up fine / normal . Sent from my iPhone On Mar 20, 2015, at 9:34 AM, Justin Steinberg jsteinb...@gmail.com wrote: So in the CUCM 10.5 download section for the Utilities, it seems to have combined the common cleanup COP file and the VMware Disk Size

[cisco-voip] (no subject)

Has anyone successfully expanded the virtual disk size of CUCM VMs without rebuild/DRS? I have an install where CM 10.5 is using the 2500 user template and we want to increase to 7500 users. The 2500 OVA is 1 vCPU, 4GB, 1x80GB.The 7500 OVA is 2vCPU, 6 GB, 1x110GB.In the past, the older

Re: [cisco-voip] USB Tokens

on this subject, is it possible to take a mixed mode v8 or v9 (signed by USB tokens) and upgrade to v10 and then use the new CLI command to update the CTL and move away from the need for the tokens? Is there anything to do other than run the CLI command to update the CTL ? Do I then no longer

Re: [cisco-voip] Jabber, MRA, and Free Public WiFi

good write up. I wonder what would happen if the _collab-edge._tls SRV returned port 443 with an internet firewall in front of Expressway translating 443 to 8443. I wonder whether the Jabber clients read the port from the SRV or whether they have 8443 hardcoded. I'll try to test that on my next

Re: [cisco-voip] UCCX Virtual 9.0(2) to 10.6(1) Upgrade

I just went through a CUC 8.5(1)su7 to 10.5(2) upgrade last night. I tried to upgrade before the vRAM increase from 4 GB to 6GB and the upgrade failed about 5 minutes in due to 'unsupported hardware'. Shutdown the VMs, increased the vRAM to 6GB, booted it back up and the upgrade was fine. On

Re: [cisco-voip] Informix Drivers for CCX

what wasn't working about the drivers ? I've used them before without any issues. I suspect maybe it was a 32/64 bit issue. I've also seen some weird behavior where the odbc gui is just finicky about how you enter the data for it to save properly. On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 2:23 PM, Matthew

Re: [cisco-voip] Prep CAD Client Update Ahead of time?

it appears that 9.0(2)SU2 ISO is showing CAD 8.x as well. I am planning an upgrade from 9.0(2)SU1 to SU2 and trying to get the MSI in advance. I do have access to a second 9.0(2)SU2 system, does anyone know if I download the CAD msi file from one cluster and edit the MSI installer in Orca if I

Re: [cisco-voip] UCCX 8.5.1sr3 to sr4 to Refresh Upgrade 10.5.1

Sounds like Jason is doing HA. Anthony I didn't see any sub listed in your tasks, so I think that accounts for some portion of the difference. On Nov 5, 2014 11:12 PM, Jason Aarons (AM) jason.aar...@dimensiondata.com wrote: The funny part is that this is the replicated offline environment.

Re: [cisco-voip] Broadcast Hunt Group query

you will probably crash the system if you put 4,000 phones in a broadcast hunt group :) You would need some third party application like Singlewire Informacast, SA-Announce Synapps, etc. to get this type of functionality On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 7:59 AM, Andy andy.ca...@gmail.com wrote: I know

Re: [cisco-voip] UCCX 8.5.1sr3 to sr4 to Refresh Upgrade 10.5.1

i'll take a stab at time estimates. that being said, i have heard of switch-versions taking much longer or sitting at SELINUX loading for longer than the typical 15-20 minutes. checking for existing snapshots before doing anything is really important. if there are snapshots that someone left

[cisco-voip] PCD CUCM Migration Upgrades with UCCX

Anyone have any thoughts on using PCD to upgrade CUCM in environments with UCCX ? Assuming customer is running v8 CUCM UCCX on MCS hardware and wants to upgrade to 10.5. PCD can take CUCM from v8 MCS direct to ESXi and 10.5. But, UCCX isn't supported for PCD migrations. CUCM 10.5 isn't

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 10.5 Tomcat Subject Alternate Name (SAN) (Alternatehostname) via CLI

I thought you could only add a single SAN via command line. On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Jason Aarons (AM) jason.aar...@dimensiondata.com wrote: Trying to add an alternatehostname in CUCM 10.5 I got the below error. Anyone spot my problem? set web-security CH Hawaii Department of

Re: [cisco-voip] EWS Limits Throttling Policy

I've successfully used the 'paged view functionality' on the later versions of Connections that works around this issue by staying under the EWS default limits. http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/connection/10x/unified_messaging/guide/10xcucumgx/10xcucumg020.html#83993 On Thu,

[cisco-voip] Interested UCCX Script Issue

I am working on a script where I call the CCX application via HTTP trigger. The CCX script will use the 'place call' step to call a CUCM hunt group. Then I need to determine the line group member (extension would be fine) of the person who answered the call. I then need to pass the extension

Re: [cisco-voip] Possible to force SIP refer transfer from IP phone

? Brian On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 7:12 PM, Justin Steinberg jsteinb...@gmail.com wrote: I have a unique requirement between a new 10.5 CUCM and a third party dialer/ACD. CUCM is integrated to PSTN via SIP trunk to 2911 PRI gateway. CUCM is also integrated via SIP trunk to the dialer/ACD via

[cisco-voip] Possible to force SIP refer transfer from IP phone

I have a unique requirement between a new 10.5 CUCM and a third party dialer/ACD. CUCM is integrated to PSTN via SIP trunk to 2911 PRI gateway. CUCM is also integrated via SIP trunk to the dialer/ACD via SIP trunk directly between CUCM and the dialer/ACD. CUCM takes inbound call to IP phone.

Re: [cisco-voip] MRA

you manually copy the SANs from Expressway C GUI and just paste them into the SAN section of Expressway E GUI. Then generate CSR for E, then setup TLS link between CE On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 11:49 AM, Heim, Dennis dennis.h...@wwt.com wrote: Working through MRA. TLS is required which require a

Re: [cisco-voip] Disappearing Agents in CAD

See if CAD is running in compatibility mode on those Agent's PCs.I had an issue with an upgrade to CCX 10.0su1 and I believe it was related since the previous version of CAD was running in compatiblity mode. Upgrading CAD kept that setting and the CCX 10.0su1 didn't seem to like it. On Mon,

Re: [cisco-voip] MRA/Expressway

It should match the XMPP domains configured on your CUPS / IMP server. V10 configures these by default based on the domains you are using. In v9 the XMPP is set by default to the domain name of the server, but can be changed to another domain. For .local environments, I have changed the XMPP

Re: [cisco-voip] MRA Expressway Edge 1 or 2 Ports?

Single port solution without advanced Networking license will only work if you assign the expressway E single port a valid public address directly to expressway E. If your DMZ uses private addresses you need the advanced networking license. You can still use a single nic with advanced

Re: [cisco-voip] IMP 10.x Source the SIP traffic from a particular node to OCS2007R2

The SIP federation service does this, so you could disable that service on certain nodes. On Jun 26, 2014 11:32 AM, Jason Aarons (AM) jason.aar...@dimensiondata.com wrote: I’ve setup a Partitioned Intradomain Federation between IMP 10.5 and OCS 2007R2. We have 3 nodes running IMP. Can I

Re: [cisco-voip] SCCP Session Border Controllers

is anyone actually using CUBE Line Side ? On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 3:30 PM, Brian Meade bmead...@vt.edu wrote: I've done a lot of phone proxy work. It doesn't really work for new phones that used signed config files. It was pretty much abandoned completely once Phone VPN was introduced. If

Re: [cisco-voip] SIP phones CMR

...@cisco.com wrote: What specific data are you looking for? The newer phones have dropped MOS and Q-Factor subjective ratings in lieu of concealed seconds and severely concealed seconds. You won't see any raw MOS values reported by newer phones. -Ryan On Apr 25, 2014, at 1:16 PM, Justin Steinberg

[cisco-voip] SIP phones CMR

I've noticed on the last few systems I have worked on that the SIP based phones are not showing any CMR data in the CUCM CAR system. This is happening on atleast 8945s the new 7841s. Also I have noticed that the Jabber for Windows phones aren't reporting it either. This is happening for both

Re: [cisco-voip] MTP allocation failure - CDDR cause code 47

Any change device mobility could be in play for this user changing the device pool/region ? On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Brian Meade bmead...@vt.edu wrote: There's some scenarios where you do not get a media resource list exhausted alert. One scenario is where the CCM service has an

Re: [cisco-voip] Collaboration Edge for Jabber

You need the advanced networking key so you can specify the public IP. There is no charge for that license when used for collaboration edge (i.e. Cisco expressway) On Mar 20, 2014 5:12 AM, Bruno Nonogaki (AM) bruno.nonog...@dimensiondata.com wrote: If you don't have this key, you have to

Re: [cisco-voip] Changing CUCM SystemServer from IP to FQDN

: The doc I have is a draft version so may be subject to change. What is directing you to use the FQDN for helping jabber validate certs? I don't see anything perusing the server setup guide or install guide for 9.6. Sent from my iPhone On Feb 18, 2014, at 8:35 PM, Justin Steinberg jsteinb

[cisco-voip] Changing CUCM SystemServer from IP to FQDN

Is anyone using CUCM deployments where they set the SystemServer value to the FQDN of the CUCM nodes ? I'm in the process of deploying Jabber for Windows 9.6+ with Collaboration Edge, and there are requirements around certificate validation that seem to require the CUCM SystemServer value set to

Re: [cisco-voip] Changing CUCM SystemServer from IP to FQDN

, Erick Wellnitz ewellnitzv...@gmail.com wrote: We were but it interferes with EMCC. The phone only does DNS lookups for the domain it is assigned so we switched back to IP addreses. On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 8:39 AM, Justin Steinberg jsteinb...@gmail.comwrote: Is anyone using CUCM deployments

Re: [cisco-voip] 7945 VPN option

Are these new phones on the internal LAN? They will need to be in order to download the initial config files before you take them remote. On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Brian Meade (brmeade) brme...@cisco.comwrote: James, A restart of TFTP service may do the trick since the web page