Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2015 1:49 PM
To: gen...@ucpenguin.com
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Extension that hangs up on the user?
Goal was to answer and then disconnect instead of a call rejection before
the connected state - said it was so that callers don't
18 PM
To: Daniel Pagan
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] Extension that hangs up on the user?
I thought the goal was to disconnect the call, when there were no logged in
members?
The options for the hunt list would seem to provide this. It is probably worth
checki
cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf
Of Daniel Pagan
Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2015 2:50 PM
To: gen...@ucpenguin.com; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Extension that hangs up on the user?
Unfortunately, in this scenario, this doesn't answer th
---
From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
gen...@ucpenguin.com
Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2015 2:39 PM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Extension that hangs up on the user?
Are you using a version of UCM with native call queuing?
Instead of rou
p [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
gen...@ucpenguin.com
Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2015 2:39 PM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Extension that hangs up on the user?
Are you using a version of UCM with native call queuing?
Instead of routing the call t
Are you using a version of UCM with native call queuing?
Instead of routing the call to CUC you could try sending it to a hunt
list with queuing enable, that has no logged in members that is set to
disconnect the call.
On 2015-03-18 01:33, James Andrewartha wrote:
Hi list,
Is there a way in
How have I never seen this site before???
Thanks!
Rob
From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Mike
King
Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2015 10:25 PM
To: James Andrewartha
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Extension that hangs up on the user
On 19/03/15 10:47, Anthony Holloway wrote:
> Have you seen this post? I'm not sure if it applies to your environment
> or not, but I thought I'd throw it your way anyway.
>
> https://greiginsydney.com/hey-um-dont-record-messages-im-on-holidays/
I did come across it when searching, but it looks l
Have you seen this post? I'm not sure if it applies to your environment or
not, but I thought I'd throw it your way anyway.
https://greiginsydney.com/hey-um-dont-record-messages-im-on-holidays/
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 1:34 AM James Andrewartha <
jandrewar...@ccgs.wa.edu.au> wrote:
> Hi list,
>
I'm showing my age here, but in the Nortel mailing list I used to be apart
of, everyone was aware if you needed a phone to do something wacky, you
needed to look at the sandman.
This might work for you.
http://www.sandman.com/Wizard.html#CPCGenerator
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 9:31 PM, James Andre
On 18/03/15 23:55, Daniel Pagan wrote:
> Definitely makes sense and what I thought you were trying to achieve. If this
> is the case, then rejecting the call via xlate or route patterns won't do -
> the call will be rejected instead of connecting and then being disconnected.
> You'll more than l
ha [mailto:jandrewar...@ccgs.wa.edu.au]
Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2015 11:38 AM
To: Daniel Pagan; Ryan Huff; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] Extension that hangs up on the user?
Hi Dan,
This is to transfer to from an Exchange UM AA where we want to hang up on the
caller after playing a
5 11:16 PM
To: Ryan Huff; James Andrewartha; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] Extension that hangs up on the user?
The main question I have… if CUC is being used simply to hang-up on the calling
party, what’s the purpose of needing this migrated to CUCM instead of si
bject: RE: [cisco-voip] Extension that hangs up on the user?
>The main question I have... if CUC is being used simply to hang-up on the
>calling party, what's the purpose of needing this migrated to CUCM instead of
>simply leaving the number unallocated? Correct me if I'm wro
a rejection or error recording due to unallocated number.
- Dan
From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ryan
Huff
Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2015 10:23 AM
To: James Andrewartha; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Extension that hangs up on the u
gt; To: ryanh...@outlook.com; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 22:10:36 +0800
> Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] Extension that hangs up on the user?
>
> Yeah, CUC has Callers Hear: Nothing then After Greeting/Call Action: Hang Up.
> How would I dump the call? Select Ro
tern Australia
Ph. (08) 9442 1757
Mob. 0424 160 877
From: Ryan Huff [ryanh...@outlook.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 18 March 2015 8:12 PM
To: James Andrewartha; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Extension that hangs up on the user?
So is CUC just so you
So is CUC just so you can use the after action hang up technique or are you
playing a greeting first?
If your just hanging up and not playing a greeting, could you just catch the
ingress call on a translation then just dump the call (or play the reorder
tone)?
Thanks,
Ryan
Original
Hi James
Cant think of a way in CUCM itself.
A little TCL script on IOS box could do it though.
Cheers,
Tim
Sent from my iPhone
> On 18 Mar 2015, at 17:33, James Andrewartha
> wrote:
>
> Hi list,
>
> Is there a way in CUCM to make an extension that hangs up on the other
> end? Currently we
19 matches
Mail list logo
