, 21 Jul 2015 12:00:01 -0400
clamav-users-requ...@lists.clamav.net wrote:
--
Message: 2
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2015 12:55:54 +0300
From: Henrik K h...@hege.li
To: clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
Subject: Re: [clamav-users] Streaming support in ClamD
Message-ID
On 08/07/15 17:33, Rafael Ferreira wrote:
Well, the progress you see is likely to be transfer, not processing, time
since that’s where most time is going to be spent for a sizable file anyways
(under normal circumstances) so I doubt clamd is your main latency source
here.
? I said clam was
Great timing for me on this topic. We are currently phasing out our use
of Henrik's great havp proxy and are going to ICAP - and I have been
majorly disappointed with the performance of the commercial ICAP
services I've tried
I had a 60M zip file I was testing with via Firefox: Kaspersky would
Well, the progress you see is likely to be transfer, not processing, time since
that’s where most time is going to be spent for a sizable file anyways (under
normal circumstances) so I doubt clamd is your main latency source here.
Can you elaborate on your setup a bit? Is the ICAP proxy
Hi guys,
Waiting for your reply. It should be simpler answer.
Does ClamAv support virus checking in stream mode for large files?
If i have file size of 10Mb do i have to send all data to clamAv and clamAv
will send status ok
or it can scan data in each packet and return status for each segment?
Let's say you have a zip file. How do you expect ClamAV to scan it packet by
packet? Or any other data really. I think there are very few wild
signatures in database that are allowed to match any position anywhere in a
file. Only reliable way is to scan a complete file, so it knows the
length
