Hi,
thanks for the pointer, I thought clojure.java.jdbc is 1.3 only. :)
Las
2011/7/30 Sean Corfield seancorfi...@gmail.com
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 5:07 AM, László Török ltoro...@gmail.com wrote:
I'll probably resort to clojure.contrib.sql for now.
You mean clojure.java.jdbc I hope? :)
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 11:56 PM, László Török ltoro...@gmail.com wrote:
thanks for the pointer, I thought clojure.java.jdbc is 1.3 only. :)
I suspect a lot of ppl think the new contrib libraries are 1.3 only
but Clojure/core made it clear to me that new contrib libraries are
all supposed to be
The moment I saw the previous controversial topic - about yes
language push - I realized that Clojure has become mature. When the
people who do not agree with some choices appear not just outside but
in the community itself - it means that the language matters to them
despite the parts they don't
Thanks, that was very informative.
I got no technical reason to expect that implementing an interface would
define a function, lets just say that it felt right :/
2011/7/29 Aaron Cohen aa...@assonance.org
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 3:18 PM, Andreas Liljeqvist bon...@gmail.comwrote:
Is this a
2011/7/30 nchurch nchubr...@gmail.com
But my question is : is it ready yet ?
As a quick and simple way to get a REPL and edit code it seems to work
fine. I added a sentence about its newness just so people would be
aware of it...
OK. I can really see it fill in the gaps, as I said
This discussion is getting a lot of What are you talking about? Leiningen
is what you're looking for! replies. I know. I'm a happy lein user, and use
it and clojars frequently with some of my larger projects. I'm very grateful
for the work Phil and the other
In JavaScript, the `this` identifier gets bound when a function is
called. Determining what to bind is from either:
* Looking up the object that the function was called from
* An explicit parameter in these functions:
* `Function.prototype.apply`
* `Function.prototype.call`
So the following
Thanks for your in-depth analysis.
In conclusion, the 11.5 listing is broken specifically with the
reification of the seq function. The problem is that the seq function
allows the array reference to escape in an unsafe manner. The issue is
concurrency as well as visibility. As you suggest, the
The closure-template tools let you take a template, and pre-process it to
something like:
hello3.soy.js:
goog.provide('example.templates');
goog.require('soy');
goog.require('soy.StringBuilder');
[...]
example.templates.welcome = function(opt_data, opt_sb) {
[...]
In my clojurescript, I can
Hi Ken,
On 29 Jul 2011, at 22:02, Ken Wesson wrote:
P.S. Thanks everyone for your help so far. My brain is overheating but I am
learning a lot.
You're welcome.
To do what you're proposing you will probably need the emitted
function to look like:
(fn [ args]
(let [foo (some logic
On a related note...
If I have something like this:
(defn make-archive [] (Archive. ))
(defrecord Archive []
java.io.Closeable
(close [_] (print first try)))
user (.close (make-archive))
first try
(defrecord Archive []
java.io.Closeable
(close [_] (print second try)))
user
Dean gave a talk at Windy City Rails a few years ago that opened this (ruby)
programmer's eyes to functional programming. I haven't read the book, but
he's a very good educator.
Kenny
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 12:03 AM, Sean Corfield seancorfi...@gmail.comwrote:
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 5:03 AM,
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 5:31 AM, Michal B mibu.cloj...@gmail.com wrote:
Instead of iterating what's available today and how much better it makes
things (I know), I hope we can question our assumptions about how things are
and get a discussion going on how to make things better. If not for
I'm all for a better, easier solution that is better in most ways. What I'm
saying is:
1. I don't want to go back to downloading jar files from the websites of all
of the libraries I want to use in a project and tracking different versions,
no matter how large or small the project is, as
Try to see the situation from the lead developer perspective
(e.g. Rich's perspective). I have been through the head-punching,
as you call it and I don't want to put words in Rich's mouth but
I do see things differently.
To lead a project you need to make design choices.
To make those design
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 7:58 AM, Mark Rathwell mark.rathw...@gmail.com wrote:
One thing, though, is new users coming from Python/Ruby/etc really do seem
to have a hard time adjusting to the fact the standard is not to have a
Clojure installation, with a clj executable that you run scripts
On Jul 30, 2011, at 11:24 AM, Mark Engelberg wrote:
I would love to have a more streamlined way in Clojure for my personal
common case -- writing a short script and using it interactively.
+1 on the whole perspective presented here, most of which I cut.
-Lee
--
You received this message
Oh sorry, I saw the title and thought bean access rather than field
access. Obviously the code I posted relies on the presence of setters
rather than fields.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to
On Saturday, July 30, 2011 6:24:50 PM UTC+3, puzzler wrote:
The issue I have with the build tools is that they all presume
you want to *build* something. 95% of the time, I just want to open a
file, write some Clojure code, and interactively test it in a REPL.
Exactly what I'm talking about.
The problems with paths on Windows have been fixed and ClojureScript
now has batch files for cljsc, repl, and repljs. There is also a page
in the wiki to help Windows users get started.
https://github.com/clojure/clojurescript/wiki/Windows-Setup
Support for Windows will come from the community
not sure wheret it applies to your requirements: www.gigamonkeys.com/book
On 29 July 2011 14:03, Colin Yates colin.ya...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
Not sure whether this is good etiquette or not, but I wanted to praise
http://oreilly.com/catalog/0636920021667. I found it pretty useful in
blip.tv is still wrapped around a tree. I've tried several times over
the last several days. I tried a few random other videos too, but no
luck.
Trying to get the avi to play on the mac...
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 7:58 AM, Mark Rathwell mark.rathw...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe a Clojure installer for
Mac/Windows/Linux, that installs a clj executable on the path
This was actually how I started with Clojure on Mac OS X (I think the
project was Clojure-MacOSX or something like that) but
I've subscribe to the Blip.tv itunes feed and it makes it really easy
to download the blip.tv videos in iTunes and transfer them to iPod/
iPad.
You can search for Clojure on the iTunes store Podcasts section and
subscribe.
Or you can go in iTunes Advances Menu / Subscribe to Podcast and use
this
Any Google Closure compliant JavaScript can be pulled into the build
process by using the :libs option.
For example:
(build src {:libs [/foo/bar]})
would include any JavaScript files under /foo/bar in the build
process.
On Jul 30, 7:02 am, David Powell djpow...@djpowell.net wrote:
The
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 8:24 AM, Mark Engelberg
mark.engelb...@gmail.com wrote:
And yes, there are certain libraries I tend to use, and I want them to
always be available. Right now, for every file I want to tinker with,
I have to do lein new make-up-some-project-name. Then I have to go in
Please post all Errors and Corrections here
http://www.manning-sandbox.com/thread.jspa?threadID=41321tstart=0
On Friday, July 29, 2011 9:10:00 PM UTC-7, Julien Chastang wrote:
Thanks for your in-depth analysis.
In conclusion, the 11.5 listing is broken specifically with the
reification of
Brenton, thank you for your efforts!
I noticed that in the current .bat files, CLASSPATH is directly modified and
over-written. Perhaps they should instead use CLJSC_CP like the sh scripts?
On Saturday, July 30, 2011 10:10:03 AM UTC-6, Brenton wrote:
The problems with paths on Windows have
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 10:43 AM, Sean Corfield seancorfi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 8:24 AM, Mark Engelberg
mark.engelb...@gmail.com wrote:
95% of the time, I just want to open a
file, write some Clojure code, and interactively test it in a REPL.
Really? Genuine question.
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 12:10 AM, Julien Chastang
julien.c.chast...@gmail.com wrote:
By the way, I still think you need a lock in the count function in the
case where the caller tries to invoke the count function on a
partially constructed object.
I don't think that's possible in this case. As
I thought this would be an interesting video to share with those who
haven't seen it yet.
Raffi Krikorian, the head of the Application Services Group at
Twitter, talks about the move from Ruby on Rails to the JVM. He also
briefly talks about running Clojure at Twitter, the new kid on the
block.
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 7:29 AM, Sam Aaron samaa...@gmail.com wrote:
(fn [ args]
(let [foo (some logic goes here)
bar (some logic goes here)
...]
(body goes here)))
I just finished implementing a solution and it looks exactly like this.
You're absolutely right - this is
On Jul 29, 2:02 pm, Ken Wesson kwess...@gmail.com wrote:
(fn [ args]
(let [argmap__5673__auto (#'some-ns/parse-args args)
foo (or (:foo argmap__5673__auto) 42)
bar (or (:bar argmap__5673__auto) nil)
...]
(body goes here)))
where you define a private parse-args
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 10:09 AM, abedra aaron.be...@gmail.com wrote:
Can you provide a couple of concrete examples for this? I will make
the ticket in JIRA and start working on it, but I am spread thin on
quite a few things at the moment and these examples will help a lot.
Cheers,
Aaron
Thank you for tracking it down and doing the legwork, Anthony :)
On Thursday, July 28, 2011 5:50:37 PM UTC-6, Anthony Grimes wrote:
Oh! I apologize. I was replying via the google interface and didn't realize
it wasn't quoting. Here is a link to the topic for context:
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 9:07 PM, Alan Malloy a...@malloys.org wrote:
(get :foo argmap__5673__auto 42) is the right way to solve this
problem.
Is another way to solve it, yes, and a good one.
Or if, as in the current example, you want to destructure a map with
lots of defaults, simply:
(let
On Sat, 30 Jul 2011 11:02:13 -0400
+1
I would add that I want to see Rich maintain is grip on the Clojure wheel for a
very long time.
Consensual decisions are most of the time not the best. They are the result
of compromises not based on technical arguments but on people's feelings or
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 10:58 AM, Mark Rathwell mark.rathw...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm all for a better, easier solution that is better in most ways. What I'm
saying is:
1. I don't want to go back to downloading jar files from the websites of all
of the libraries I want to use in a project and
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 10:22 PM, Luc Prefontaine
lprefonta...@softaddicts.ca wrote:
I would add that I want to see Rich maintain is grip on the Clojure wheel for
a very long time.
Consensual decisions are most of the time not the best. They are the result
of compromises not based on
FWIW, one work around for this is to include the sub-namespace as well
and reference it from that one. So in your example:
(ns notepad
(:require
[goog.dom :as dom]
[goog.ui :as ui]
[goog.ui.Zippy :as Zippy]))
(ui/Zippy. ttt sss)
On Jul 28, 7:41 am, Marko Kocić
40 matches
Mail list logo
