That could get really tricky given the new rules with scripts and
sandboxing. The scripts folder cannot be written to by your app
(AFAIK, it can only be created and read). App would have to direct the
customer to copy in the appropriate script into your script folder.
It's about as clunky a process
Surely you could make the specific email client a Preference the user sets
once, and then handle the act of sending with one menu item? Not any help with
the sandbox issue however...
Sent from my iCapsule somewhere in orbit
On 2012-11-01, at 7:43 AM, Martin Hewitson wrote:
>
> On Nov 1, 201
On Nov 1, 2012, at 3:37 PM, Sean McBride wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Nov 2012 05:17:09 +0100, Martin Hewitson said:
>
>> I did include a description on the resubmit. Seems it didn't help. I wrote:
>>
>> "I'm using this entitlement to allow the app to send documents by mail
>> from within the app. On 10
On Thu, 1 Nov 2012 05:17:09 +0100, Martin Hewitson said:
>I did include a description on the resubmit. Seems it didn't help. I wrote:
>
>"I'm using this entitlement to allow the app to send documents by mail
>from within the app. On 10.8 I can use the new
>com.apple.security.scripting-targets but
I did include a description on the resubmit. Seems it didn't help. I wrote:
"I'm using this entitlement to allow the app to send documents by mail from
within the app. On 10.8 I can use the new com.apple.security.scripting-targets
but this isn't available on 10.7, so there I need to use the temp
On Oct 26, 2012, at 10:35 PM, Martin Hewitson
wrote:
> So, the story's not over. I resubmitted and the app was reviewed quickly, but
> rejected again with the same rejection note. So, what now? Not sure how to
> figure out my error, other than to pay for DTS...
Out of curiosity, when you re
In case anyone's interested, I tracked down my original source for these
entitlement keys:
I got this from the WWDC2012 video entitled "The OS X App Sandbox". At
time-stamp 39:48 they show a slide which details the new use of access groups
and the recommended way of talking between apps in Moun
On 29, Oct, 2012, at 07:27 PM, "Stephen J. Butler"
wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 12:49 PM, Martin Hewitson
> wrote:
>> But com.apple.security.scripting-targets is not a temporary entitlement, is
>> it? I thought this was the recommended way of communicating between apps in
>> the new era.
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 12:49 PM, Martin Hewitson
wrote:
> But com.apple.security.scripting-targets is not a temporary entitlement, is
> it? I thought this was the recommended way of communicating between apps in
> the new era.
But this part clearly is:
com.apple.security.temporary-exception
On 29, Oct, 2012, at 06:41 PM, Jayson Adams wrote:
>
> On Oct 29, 2012, at 5:07 AM, Martin Hewitson wrote:
>
>> Humph. So now what do I do? I'd rather not use one of my DTS tickets for
>> this, especially as I feel like this should be documented, but maybe I have
>> no choice.
>>
>> Anybody
On Oct 29, 2012, at 5:07 AM, Martin Hewitson wrote:
> Humph. So now what do I do? I'd rather not use one of my DTS tickets for
> this, especially as I feel like this should be documented, but maybe I have
> no choice.
>
> Anybody have any other guesses why this entitlement entry might be wrong
Humph. So now what do I do? I'd rather not use one of my DTS tickets for this,
especially as I feel like this should be documented, but maybe I have no choice.
Anybody have any other guesses why this entitlement entry might be wrong?
Thanks,
Martin
com.apple.security.scripting-targets
com.ap
On 27/10/2012, at 5:11 PM, Quincey Morris
wrote:
> I don't recall if the session has the entitlements needed for your specific
> case, but I think it is worth watching. (IIRC it did use Mail as an example
> scripting target, so it might well have exactly your answer.)
Interestingly the slides
On Oct 26, 2012, at 22:58 , Martin Hewitson wrote:
> Am I doing something wrong here in principle? I confess I can't find mention
> of these entitlements anywhere on google, nor in the apple documentation. So
> I can't reconstruct where I got this from.
Have you being following the 'Code signi
Just some more info, in case it triggers ideas.
I use these entries in my entitlements file:
com.apple.security.temporary-exception.apple-events
com.apple.mail
com.apple.security.scripting-targets
com.apple.mail
com.apple.mail.compose
with the aim of composing emails on 10.8,
So, the story's not over. I resubmitted and the app was reviewed quickly, but
rejected again with the same rejection note. So, what now? Not sure how to
figure out my error, other than to pay for DTS...
Martin
On 26, Oct, 2012, at 05:13 PM, Martin Hewitson
wrote:
>
> On 26, Oct, 2012, at
On Oct 26, 2012, at 11:13 AM, Martin Hewitson wrote:
>
> On 26, Oct, 2012, at 05:05 PM, Sean McBride wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 21:23:36 -0700, Seth Willits said:
>>
The communication between the MAS staff and developers is absolutely
>>> shocking. I would go as far as to say it's t
On 26, Oct, 2012, at 05:05 PM, Sean McBride wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 21:23:36 -0700, Seth Willits said:
>
>>> The communication between the MAS staff and developers is absolutely
>> shocking. I would go as far as to say it's the worst I've experienced
>> from Apple since I first had dealing
I have now. Thanks for the link!
Martin
On 26, Oct, 2012, at 03:37 PM, Chuck Soper wrote:
> On 10/25/12 10:28 PM, "Martin Hewitson" wrote:
>
>> On Oct 26, 2012, at 6:04 AM, Graham Cox wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On 26/10/2012, at 8:24 AM, Jayson Adams wrote:
>>>
The catch is that the lovely f
On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 21:23:36 -0700, Seth Willits said:
>> The communication between the MAS staff and developers is absolutely
>shocking. I would go as far as to say it's the worst I've experienced
>from Apple since I first had dealings with them in the mid 80s. They
>come across as arrogant, "job
On 10/25/12 10:28 PM, "Martin Hewitson" wrote:
>On Oct 26, 2012, at 6:04 AM, Graham Cox wrote:
>
>>
>> On 26/10/2012, at 8:24 AM, Jayson Adams wrote:
>>
>>> The catch is that the lovely folks at the MAS will not actually
>>>approve any app that uses these special entitlements. And helpfully,
On Oct 26, 2012, at 6:04 AM, Graham Cox wrote:
>
> On 26/10/2012, at 8:24 AM, Jayson Adams wrote:
>
>> The catch is that the lovely folks at the MAS will not actually approve any
>> app that uses these special entitlements. And helpfully, as part of their
>> condescending lecture to you, th
On Oct 25, 2012, at 9:04 PM, Graham Cox wrote:
> The communication between the MAS staff and developers is absolutely
> shocking. I would go as far as to say it's the worst I've experienced from
> Apple since I first had dealings with them in the mid 80s. They come across
> as arrogant, "jobswo
On 26/10/2012, at 8:24 AM, Jayson Adams wrote:
> The catch is that the lovely folks at the MAS will not actually approve any
> app that uses these special entitlements. And helpfully, as part of their
> condescending lecture to you, they will refer you to documentation that makes
> it sound l
This left hand/right hand bullshit needs to be fixed yesterday. If MAS gives
you a rejection, they need to provide the technical staff who can answer
questions about that rejection. In my experience, DTS is unprepared to address
MAS policy issues. MAS support doesn't have to write your code for
It does still work with lower-case 'mail'. So, I will just resubmit with a new
entitlements file and see what happens. When I asked the MAS for clarification
regarding what was actually wrong with my entitlements file, I was told to
contact DTS :/
Thanks all!
Martin
On Oct 26, 2012, at 12:27
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012, at 02:06 PM, Alex Zavatone wrote:
> Does it still work if you correct the case of the M in com.apple.Mail?
Yes, do check this. IIRC we got bitten recently by a case-sensitivity
issue with special entitlements.
This problem extends beyond MAS submission; there are places in t
On Oct 25, 2012, at 11:46 AM, Martin Hewitson wrote:
> I forgot to mention: the entitlement is working as it is. Without it, I can't
> send mails from within the app. With the entitlement as written, I can send
> mails.
>
> Wouldn't the mail sending fail (be blocked by app sandbox) if the enti
Does it still work if you correct the case of the M in com.apple.Mail?
On Oct 25, 2012, at 2:46 PM, Martin Hewitson wrote:
> I forgot to mention: the entitlement is working as it is. Without it, I can't
> send mails from within the app. With the entitlement as written, I can send
> mails.
>
>
I forgot to mention: the entitlement is working as it is. Without it, I can't
send mails from within the app. With the entitlement as written, I can send
mails.
Wouldn't the mail sending fail (be blocked by app sandbox) if the entitlement
was wrong?
Thanks,
Martin
On Oct 25, 2012, at 08:27
On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 20:11:39 +0200, Martin Hewitson said:
> com.apple.security.temporary-exception.apple-events
>
>com.apple.mail
>
> com.apple.security.scripting-targets
>
> com.apple.Mail
I think those are case-sensitive... com.apple.mail vs com.apple.Mail
C
31 matches
Mail list logo