On Thu, 1 Nov 2012 05:17:09 +0100, Martin Hewitson said:
I did include a description on the resubmit. Seems it didn't help. I wrote:
I'm using this entitlement to allow the app to send documents by mail
from within the app. On 10.8 I can use the new
com.apple.security.scripting-targets but this
On Nov 1, 2012, at 3:37 PM, Sean McBride s...@rogue-research.com wrote:
On Thu, 1 Nov 2012 05:17:09 +0100, Martin Hewitson said:
I did include a description on the resubmit. Seems it didn't help. I wrote:
I'm using this entitlement to allow the app to send documents by mail
from within
Surely you could make the specific email client a Preference the user sets
once, and then handle the act of sending with one menu item? Not any help with
the sandbox issue however...
Sent from my iCapsule somewhere in orbit
On 2012-11-01, at 7:43 AM, Martin Hewitson martin.hewit...@aei.mpg.de
That could get really tricky given the new rules with scripts and
sandboxing. The scripts folder cannot be written to by your app
(AFAIK, it can only be created and read). App would have to direct the
customer to copy in the appropriate script into your script folder.
It's about as clunky a
On Oct 26, 2012, at 10:35 PM, Martin Hewitson martin.hewit...@aei.mpg.de
wrote:
So, the story's not over. I resubmitted and the app was reviewed quickly, but
rejected again with the same rejection note. So, what now? Not sure how to
figure out my error, other than to pay for DTS...
Out
I did include a description on the resubmit. Seems it didn't help. I wrote:
I'm using this entitlement to allow the app to send documents by mail from
within the app. On 10.8 I can use the new com.apple.security.scripting-targets
but this isn't available on 10.7, so there I need to use the
Humph. So now what do I do? I'd rather not use one of my DTS tickets for this,
especially as I feel like this should be documented, but maybe I have no choice.
Anybody have any other guesses why this entitlement entry might be wrong?
Thanks,
Martin
keycom.apple.security.scripting-targets/key
On Oct 29, 2012, at 5:07 AM, Martin Hewitson wrote:
Humph. So now what do I do? I'd rather not use one of my DTS tickets for
this, especially as I feel like this should be documented, but maybe I have
no choice.
Anybody have any other guesses why this entitlement entry might be wrong?
On 29, Oct, 2012, at 06:41 PM, Jayson Adams jay...@circusponies.com wrote:
On Oct 29, 2012, at 5:07 AM, Martin Hewitson wrote:
Humph. So now what do I do? I'd rather not use one of my DTS tickets for
this, especially as I feel like this should be documented, but maybe I have
no choice.
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 12:49 PM, Martin Hewitson
martin.hewit...@aei.mpg.de wrote:
But com.apple.security.scripting-targets is not a temporary entitlement, is
it? I thought this was the recommended way of communicating between apps in
the new era.
But this part clearly is:
On 29, Oct, 2012, at 07:27 PM, Stephen J. Butler stephen.but...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 12:49 PM, Martin Hewitson
martin.hewit...@aei.mpg.de wrote:
But com.apple.security.scripting-targets is not a temporary entitlement, is
it? I thought this was the recommended way of
In case anyone's interested, I tracked down my original source for these
entitlement keys:
I got this from the WWDC2012 video entitled The OS X App Sandbox. At
time-stamp 39:48 they show a slide which details the new use of access groups
and the recommended way of talking between apps in
Just some more info, in case it triggers ideas.
I use these entries in my entitlements file:
keycom.apple.security.temporary-exception.apple-events/key
array
stringcom.apple.mail/string
/array
keycom.apple.security.scripting-targets/key
dict
keycom.apple.mail/key
array
On Oct 26, 2012, at 22:58 , Martin Hewitson martin.hewit...@aei.mpg.de wrote:
Am I doing something wrong here in principle? I confess I can't find mention
of these entitlements anywhere on google, nor in the apple documentation. So
I can't reconstruct where I got this from.
Have you being
On 27/10/2012, at 5:11 PM, Quincey Morris quinceymor...@rivergatesoftware.com
wrote:
I don't recall if the session has the entitlements needed for your specific
case, but I think it is worth watching. (IIRC it did use Mail as an example
scripting target, so it might well have exactly your
On 10/25/12 10:28 PM, Martin Hewitson martin.hewit...@aei.mpg.de wrote:
On Oct 26, 2012, at 6:04 AM, Graham Cox graham@bigpond.com wrote:
On 26/10/2012, at 8:24 AM, Jayson Adams jay...@circusponies.com wrote:
The catch is that the lovely folks at the MAS will not actually
approve any
On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 21:23:36 -0700, Seth Willits said:
The communication between the MAS staff and developers is absolutely
shocking. I would go as far as to say it's the worst I've experienced
from Apple since I first had dealings with them in the mid 80s. They
come across as arrogant,
I have now. Thanks for the link!
Martin
On 26, Oct, 2012, at 03:37 PM, Chuck Soper chu...@veladg.com wrote:
On 10/25/12 10:28 PM, Martin Hewitson martin.hewit...@aei.mpg.de wrote:
On Oct 26, 2012, at 6:04 AM, Graham Cox graham@bigpond.com wrote:
On 26/10/2012, at 8:24 AM, Jayson
On 26, Oct, 2012, at 05:05 PM, Sean McBride s...@rogue-research.com wrote:
On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 21:23:36 -0700, Seth Willits said:
The communication between the MAS staff and developers is absolutely
shocking. I would go as far as to say it's the worst I've experienced
from Apple since I
On Oct 26, 2012, at 11:13 AM, Martin Hewitson wrote:
On 26, Oct, 2012, at 05:05 PM, Sean McBride s...@rogue-research.com wrote:
On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 21:23:36 -0700, Seth Willits said:
The communication between the MAS staff and developers is absolutely
shocking. I would go as far as to
So, the story's not over. I resubmitted and the app was reviewed quickly, but
rejected again with the same rejection note. So, what now? Not sure how to
figure out my error, other than to pay for DTS...
Martin
On 26, Oct, 2012, at 05:13 PM, Martin Hewitson martin.hewit...@aei.mpg.de
wrote:
Dear list,
I've just had an app update rejected due to an invalid app-sandbox entitlement.
In particular, the resolution center says:
This app incorrectly implements sandboxing, or it contains one or more
entitlements with invalid values. Please review the included entitlements and
sandboxing
On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 20:11:39 +0200, Martin Hewitson said:
keycom.apple.security.temporary-exception.apple-events/key
array
stringcom.apple.mail/string
/array
keycom.apple.security.scripting-targets/key
dict
keycom.apple.Mail/key
I think those are
I forgot to mention: the entitlement is working as it is. Without it, I can't
send mails from within the app. With the entitlement as written, I can send
mails.
Wouldn't the mail sending fail (be blocked by app sandbox) if the entitlement
was wrong?
Thanks,
Martin
On Oct 25, 2012, at 08:27
Does it still work if you correct the case of the M in com.apple.Mail?
On Oct 25, 2012, at 2:46 PM, Martin Hewitson wrote:
I forgot to mention: the entitlement is working as it is. Without it, I can't
send mails from within the app. With the entitlement as written, I can send
mails.
On Oct 25, 2012, at 11:46 AM, Martin Hewitson wrote:
I forgot to mention: the entitlement is working as it is. Without it, I can't
send mails from within the app. With the entitlement as written, I can send
mails.
Wouldn't the mail sending fail (be blocked by app sandbox) if the
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012, at 02:06 PM, Alex Zavatone wrote:
Does it still work if you correct the case of the M in com.apple.Mail?
Yes, do check this. IIRC we got bitten recently by a case-sensitivity
issue with special entitlements.
This problem extends beyond MAS submission; there are places in
It does still work with lower-case 'mail'. So, I will just resubmit with a new
entitlements file and see what happens. When I asked the MAS for clarification
regarding what was actually wrong with my entitlements file, I was told to
contact DTS :/
Thanks all!
Martin
On Oct 26, 2012, at 12:27
This left hand/right hand bullshit needs to be fixed yesterday. If MAS gives
you a rejection, they need to provide the technical staff who can answer
questions about that rejection. In my experience, DTS is unprepared to address
MAS policy issues. MAS support doesn't have to write your code for
On 26/10/2012, at 8:24 AM, Jayson Adams jay...@circusponies.com wrote:
The catch is that the lovely folks at the MAS will not actually approve any
app that uses these special entitlements. And helpfully, as part of their
condescending lecture to you, they will refer you to documentation
On Oct 25, 2012, at 9:04 PM, Graham Cox wrote:
The communication between the MAS staff and developers is absolutely
shocking. I would go as far as to say it's the worst I've experienced from
Apple since I first had dealings with them in the mid 80s. They come across
as arrogant,
On Oct 26, 2012, at 6:04 AM, Graham Cox graham@bigpond.com wrote:
On 26/10/2012, at 8:24 AM, Jayson Adams jay...@circusponies.com wrote:
The catch is that the lovely folks at the MAS will not actually approve any
app that uses these special entitlements. And helpfully, as part of
32 matches
Mail list logo
