to
downstream consumers, you've made things awfully confusing and
unpredictable.
Jonathan
Ere Maijala wrote:
Jonathan Rochkind wrote:
Ere Maijala wrote:
That shouldn't be a problem as any sane OAI-PMH provider, unAPI or ATOM
serializer would escape the contents. Things that resemble HTML
Ere Maijala wrote:
That shouldn't be a problem as any sane OAI-PMH provider, unAPI or ATOM
serializer would escape the contents. Things that resemble HTML tags
could be present in MARC records without any HTML-in-MARC too.
Sure, and then, if you have html tags in your marc, that system doing
There are things you'd want to do with data in a MARC record _other_
than display it in HTML. Maybe you want to send it to someone in email,
or a txt message. Embedding html in your marc is going to make this more
difficult than it should be.
Alexander Johannesen wrote:
Hiya,
I guess I'm
Yeah, if I was writing code to display MARC, I think the _right_ thing to do
would be to escape anything I was displaying, because I'd assume it was NOT
html, but might have or chars in it, etc.
I don't think HTML tags belong in MARC, that seems like a bad idea to me.
Unless there was a
There is no way to do that inherent to XSL. There _might_ be a way to
do that in the particular environment you are processing your XML.
Which I guess is a Java XSL processor? I'd reccommend finding the
listserv for the Java XSL processor you're using, and asking there.
There might not be a
Jonathan Rochkind said,
there's not really a built in way into XSL to refer to these things
like some other languages. The reason is typically the XSL processor
is used by some other language/system to transform a stylesheet, not
connected directly to the web server. The cgi example works because
you have
mobile
# do...@uta.edu
# http://rocky.uta.edu/doran/
-Original Message-
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On
Behalf Of Jonathan Rochkind
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2009 9:13 AM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Durability of PDFs
The bet
Does the xISSN documentation say that exceptions by non-OCLC members can
be asked for, and instruct on where to make the request? If you want to
keep from discouraging use accidentally by people who don't know they
can get an exception, it needs to say that on the same page that talks
about
It's true that we have buns in the oven that are promissing.
But it's also worth noting that HathiTrust mainly came about via the
Google partnership, and they have certain limitations on what they can
do with their scans that came out of the Google partnership (the current
vast majority), as
Ross Singer wrote:
My point is that there's a step before that, possibly, where the
theory behind unAPI, Jangle, whatever, is tested to even see if it's
going in the right direction before writing it up formally as an RFC.
I don't think the lack of adoption of unAPI has anything to do with
the
The Amazon products API keeps changing it's name, and has just been
changed to Amazon Product Advertising API -- it's the one you use to
look up books in Amazon and get metadata for them, though.
It looks from an email I got from Amazon that ss of August 15th, you'll
need to cryptographically
Alexander Johannesen wrote:
Yeah, don't use MODS in general; it's a hack. It's even crazier still
that many versions have the same namespace. What were they thinking?!
Um, MODS is awfully useful for a bunch of reasons. I'm not going to stop
using it because they've used namespaces in a
, at least—now is hardly the
time to make it less attractive.
Tim
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 9:40 AM, Jonathan Rochkind rochk...@jhu.edu wrote:
The Amazon products API keeps changing it's name, and has just been changed
to Amazon Product Advertising API -- it's the one you use to look up books
I don't understand from your description how Topic Maps solve the
identifying multiple versions of a standard problem. Which was the
original question, right? Or have I gotten confused? I didn't think the
original question was even about topic vocabularies, but about how to
best provide an
I started to do a just bit of web research in this. Open source barcode
photo recognition software looks like it's _just_ starting to become
realistically available. This was the product that looked most
promissing in my web research (not sure if it's what the Android app is
using):
I wonder how xID handles superceded OCLCnums, if it'll still succesfully
find the right matches for you?
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress wrote:
From: Eric Lease Morgan emor...@nd.edu
1. What MARC field/subfield might I put this string?
2. How would I go about getting the string
for this resource (since the skos:Concept would need to have a URI),
but we could probably hand wave that away as the id for the registry
concept, not the data format.
So -- we seem to have some agreement here?
-Ross.
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 5:53 PM, Jonathan Rochkind rochk...@jhu.edu wrote:
From my
Identifier (and Registry) to
Rule
Them All
Jonathan Rochkind writes:
Crosswalk is exactly the wrong answer for this. Two very small
overlapping communities of most library developers can surely agree
on using the same identifiers, and then we make things easier
Yeah, I don't think people use cameras instead of flatbed scanners
because they produce superior results, or are cheaper: They use them
because they're _faster_ for large-scale digitization, and also make it
possible to capture pages from rare/fragile materials with less damage
to the
Crosswalk is exactly the wrong answer for this. Two very small overlapping
communities of most library developers can surely agree on using the same
identifiers, and then we make things easier for US. We don't need to solve the
entire universe of problems. Solve the simple problem in front of
There is no such thing as rft.identifier.
There is an rft_id -- it's with the underscore, not a period, because
it's not a data element in a _particular_ OpenURL format, rather it
applies to any OpenURL format.
rft_id can be set to any URI (although that URI does need to be itself
, and you can always use it.
Hope this helps. OpenURL is... kinda a mess.
Jonathan
Jonathan Rochkind wrote:
There is no such thing as rft.identifier.
There is an rft_id -- it's with the underscore, not a period, because
it's not a data element in a _particular_ OpenURL format, rather
HTML works out pretty well. If our biggest failures were 'failures' like
HTML, we'd be doing pretty well.
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress wrote:
From: Walker, David dwal...@calstate.edu
I'm not sure it's a _big_ mess, though, at least for metasearching.
I wasn't thinking
@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Serials Solutions Summon
Jonathan Rochkind wrote:
It _would_ be great if SerSol would actually give you (if you were
subscribed) a feed of their harvested and normalized metadata, so you
could still pay them to collect and normalize it, but then use it for
your own
Both the terms federated searching and meta-searching are often used
ambiguously to refer to both of these techniques.
I've been trying to use broadcast search and local index to be clear
about which technique I'm talking about. (I used to say 'cross-search'
for 'broadcast search', but I
Karen Schneider wrote:
But I don't think I was clear with my question in any case; it occurs to me
now that my true question wasn't code-related, but seeing Summon on the conf
agenda prompted me to bring it up here. Namely: has anyone investigated
whether the arrangements SerSol has with
Thomas Dowling wrote:
We've occasionally tried to disambiguate those terms for some purposes
around
here and realized that, if most people use them synonymously, they're synonyms.
You can define differences between meta-, federated, and broadcast search, but
every discussion on the topic will
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress wrote:
Leaving aside metasearch and broadcast search (terms invented more recently)
it is a shame if federated has really lost its distinction
fromdistributed. Historically, a federated database is one that
integrates multiple (autonomous) databases so it
(mobile)
www.museglobal.com
-Original Message-
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of
Jonathan Rochkind
Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2009 08:59
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Serials Solutions Summon
Ray Denenberg, Library
Peter Murray wrote:
I don't think it is part of SerSol's business model to offer a feed of
the full metadata it aggregates, but it does seem to be part of the
business model to offer an API upon which you could put your own
interface to the underlying aggregated data.
Yep, it's not
The user community for these products is WAY bigger than code4lib,
naturally. If Oracle manages to mess them up, then the user community
will fork, or migrate to different products, and we will follow.
Fortunately we are not alone here, there are giant communities formed
around these open
Dan Scott wrote:
In the context of the Oracle-Sun and MySQL/OpenOffice/yada yada parent
thread, Derby demonstrates that a software project can 1) go from
proprietary to open source, 2) be contributed to by (in some ways)
direct competitors, and once it is open source 3) lose commercial
support
Alexander Johannesen wrote:
I think you are quite mistaken on this, but before we leap into wheter
the web is suitable for SuDoc I'd rather point out that SuDoc isn't
web friendly in itself, and *that* more than anything stands in the
way of using them with the web.
It stands in the way of
The difference between URIs and URLs? I don't believe that URL is something
that exists any more in any standard, it's all URIs. Correct me if I'm wrong.
I don't entirely agree with either dogmatic side here, but I do think that
we've arrived at an awfully confusing (for developers)
[alexander.johanne...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2009 9:48 AM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] resolution and identification (was Re: [CODE4LIB]
registering info: uris?)
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 23:34, Jonathan Rochkind rochk...@jhu.edu wrote:
The difference between URIs
Thanks Ray. By that definition ALL http URIs are URLs, a priori. I read
Alexander as trying to make a different distinction.
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress wrote:
From: Jonathan Rochkind rochk...@jhu.edu
The difference between URIs and URLs? I don't believe that URL is
something
that
the environment those TAG documents are encouraging is a confusing one.
Jonathan
Houghton,Andrew wrote:
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of
Jonathan Rochkind
Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2009 10:21 AM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB
Wait, is this the same or different than link rel=canonical, as in:
http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/02/specify-your-canonical.html
link rel=canonical seemed like a good idea to me. But when I start
reading some of those URLs, it's not clear to me if they're talking
about the
Well, the thing is, those sem web folks LIKE what has resulted. They think it's
_good_ that http:// can be resolved with a certain protocol in some cases, but
can be an arbitrary identifier untied to protocol in others.
It definitely is convenient in some cases.
I have mixed feelings, I
Karen Coyle wrote:
The ones that really puzzle me, however, are the OpenURL info namespace
URIs for ftp, http, https and info. This implies that EVERY
identifier used by OpenURL needs an info URI, even if it is a URI in its
own right. They are under info:ofi/nam which is called Namespace
Karen Coyle wrote:
Sorry, spoke/wrote too soon. FRBR at vocab.org isn't using the FRBR
attributes either. And it does have the entities as classes. I'm still
not sure how one can model a relationship between RDA or bibo properties
and FRBR Group 1 entities and their properties. RDA tries to
Isn't there always a single point of failure if you are expecting to be
able to resolve an http URI via the HTTP protocol?
Whether it's purl.org or not, there's always a single point of failure
on a given http URI that you expect to resolve via HTTP, the entity
operating the web server at the
Rob Sanderson wrote:
info URIs, In My Opinion, are ideally suited for long term identifiers
of non information resources. But http URIs are definitely better than
something which isn't a URI at all.
Through this discussion I am clarifying my thoughts on this too. I feel
that info URIs are
Houghton,Andrew wrote:
Lets separate your argument into two pieces. Identification and
resolution. The DOI is the identifier and it inherently doesn't
tie itself to any resolution mechanism. So creating an info URI
for it is meaningless, it's just another alias for the DOI. I
can create an
Houghton,Andrew wrote:
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of
Jonathan Rochkind
Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 11:08 AM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: [CODE4LIB] resolution and identification (was Re: [CODE4LIB]
registering info: uris?)
Houghton,Andrew wrote
I completely disagree. There are all sorts of useful identifiers I use
in my work every day that can not be automatically dereferenced.
Jonathan
Ed Summers wrote:
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 9:17 AM, Mike Taylor m...@indexdata.com wrote:
It wouldn't be good for much if you couldn't
Houghton,Andrew wrote:
Organization need to have a clear understanding of what they are minting
URIs for.
Precisely. And in the real world... they don't always have that. Neither
the minters nor the users of URIs, especially the users of http URIs,
where you can find so many potential
an info: URI can do, I agree.
Jonathan
Houghton,Andrew wrote:
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of
Jonathan Rochkind
Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 1:23 PM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] resolution and identification
Houghton,Andrew wrote
Houghton,Andrew wrote:
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of
Jonathan Rochkind
Sent: Friday, March 27, 2009 6:09 PM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] registering info: uris?
If GPO had a system where I could resolve Sudoc identifiers
I think this is a good point.
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress wrote:
From: Erik Hetzner erik.hetz...@ucop.edu
I believe that registering a domain would be less
work than going through an info URI registration process, but I don’t
know how difficult the info URI registration process
So is there anything wrong with having both that http-based PURL URI
available, AND an info uri? Not only available, but in common use?
It gets complicated thinking about these things. There are potentially
several things wrong with it.
Jonathan
Ross Singer wrote:
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at
Because the ability to de-reference seems to be the main reason to use
an HTTP URI as an identifier, and the main reason that some people
prefer an HTTP URI as an identifier to an info: URI.
Jonathan
Mike Taylor wrote:
Ross Singer writes:
There should be no issue with having both, mainly
This is a long argument that's been going on in other communities for a
long time, Mike. I can see both sides.
Jonathan
Mike Taylor wrote:
Jonathan Rochkind writes:
Take, for instance, DOIs. What do you see in the wild? Do you ever
see info:uris (except in OpenURLs)? If you
Meanwhile, there are others who are arguing just as strongly that
identifiers should _always_ be resolvable.
Seriously, this debate has been going on in a while in other forums, we
aren't the first to have it. I can see both sides, neither seems
obviously right to me. Which I guess suggests
for these identifiers.
Jonathan
Houghton,Andrew wrote:
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of
Jonathan Rochkind
Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 12:16 PM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] registering info: uris?
Some hints of the existing argument in other
Erik Hetzner wrote:
I don’t actually think that there is anybody who is arguing that all
identifiers must be resolvable. There are people who argue that there
are identifiers which must NOT be resolvable; at least in their basic
form. (see Stuart Weibel [1]).
There are indeed people
There are obviously other uses for URIs than sticking them in an 'href'
attribute of an a. Like, the uses I thought this conversation was about?
What are we talking about again?
Houghton,Andrew wrote:
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of
Jonathan Rochkind
Does anyone know the process for registering a sub-scheme for info: uris?
I'd like to have one for SuDoc classification numbers, info:sudoc/.
I'm not sure if I can register that on my own, without working with the
US Government Printing Office, who actually maintains sudocs. But if I
have to
: Jonathan Rochkind rochk...@jhu.edu
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Sent: Friday, March 27, 2009 3:12 PM
Subject: [CODE4LIB] registering info: uris?
Does anyone know the process for registering a sub-scheme for info: uris?
I'd like to have one for SuDoc classification numbers, info:sudoc/.
I'm
-
From: Jonathan Rochkind rochk...@jhu.edu
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Sent: Friday, March 27, 2009 3:36 PM
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] registering info: uris?
Thanks Ray.
Oh boy, I don't know enough about SuDoc to describe the syntax rules
fully. I can spend some more time with the SuDoc
,
Jonathan Rochkind wrote:
Thanks Ray.
Oh boy, I don't know enough about SuDoc to describe the syntax rules
fully. I can spend some more time with the SuDoc documentation (written
for a pre-computer era) and try to figure it out, or do the best I can.
I mean, the info registration can clearly
True, good point. I am looking for something a _bit_ more shareable
between other software and institutions than tag. info: still seems a
nice compromise to me.
Houghton,Andrew wrote:
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of
Jonathan Rochkind
Sent: Friday, March
Aha, cool! Yeah, I could use tag for this, but it wouldn't seem
appropriate for something I want to encourage others to use compatibly
as well, info seems better.
Houghton,Andrew wrote:
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of
Jonathan Rochkind
Sent: Friday
: Friday, March 27, 2009 5:24 PM
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] registering info: uris?
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of
Jonathan Rochkind
Sent: Friday, March 27, 2009 5:18 PM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] registering info: uris?
I am
, and call
it a day, and leave it to someone else to figure out in 100 years. :)
Jonathan
Erik Hetzner wrote:
At Fri, 27 Mar 2009 17:18:24 -0400,
Jonathan Rochkind wrote:
I am not interested in maintaining a sudoc.info registration, and
neither is my institution, who I wouldn't trust
I have been using all four, and they seem to be working out. None of
them are TOO too slow. But I haven't fully investigated or tracked for
'non-consistent performance', not sure what you mean there, just that
sometimes it's slow? All of those seem to work fairly well for me.
There is
You can get cover images from worldcat? How? I'm pretty sure the
worldcat ToS specifically disallow you from re-using those covers, even
if you are managing to get them via machine access somehow.
Lynch,Katherine wrote:
Going along with Jonathan Rochkind, Amazon does a good job of supplying
,
but getting addicted to this stuff is not without risk. If the load
ever became something they cared about, they could turn it off in a
snap.
kyle
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 12:53 PM, Jonathan Rochkind rochk...@jhu.edu wrote:
You can get cover images from worldcat? How? I'm pretty sure the worldcat
those that are actually searching Worldcat.
--Dave
==
David Walker
Library Web Services Manager
California State University
http://xerxes.calstate.edu
From: Code for Libraries [code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of Jonathan
Rochkind [rochk
but charged for it, then I wouldn't be
allowed to use the free GBS APIs at all, since it would be an
alternatative to a paid service? Makes no sense.
Jonathan
Nate Vack wrote:
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 3:30 PM, Jonathan Rochkind rochk...@jhu.edu wrote:
However, my understanding is that Worldcat
As I think about the award idea more, I still don't really like it.
(Sorry Eric!).
Some comments at
http://bibwild.wordpress.com/2009/03/09/why-i-dont-like-the-code4lib-code-award-idea/
With a shorter version below (thanks Jodi).
The award will inevitably be seen as an endorsement of the
I worry about putting the name Code4Lib on it, and implying that somehow
Code4Lib collectively approves the awardee. Code4Lib can’t do much of
anything collectively. But the name seems to have acquired a cachet
among people who may not understand what it is. People within Code4Lib
will have
Karen, you should post your notes from that break-out somewhere. Take
your choice of on the listserv, on www.code4lib.org, on
wiki.code4lib.org, on your own blog, wherever you think is appropriate. :)
I think it's good that as a community we're starting to discuss these
issues more, and learn
Mike Taylor wrote:
The Motion Picture Academy doesn't collectively know enough about what
makes good movies to give a Best Picture Oscar reliably, either, but
that doesn't stop them taking their best guess.
And if the Oscars are our model, color me even more concerned. :)
But the _effect_
I hadn't known about Zetoc either! How did I miss that?
They both seem very useful.
One of the tricks with using ticTOCs, is that the RSS feeds (provided by
the publisher) may include links to article full text that may or may
not be accessible to any given institution's patrons, depending
Doh, is Zetoc not free? Nevermind my excitement about it in that case. :)
Jonathan
Dr R. Sanderson wrote:
Thanks Terry, a really good comparison!
One more that I came up with, in thinking about this slightly further
... ticTOCs is open to the public whereas ZETOC requires an
institutional
Didn't we finish having this conversation last week? We talked about all
this stuff being brought up now last week.
Andrew, for why marc+xml is appropriate, see RFC 3023.
I am completely confident that application/marc+xml would be the right
type to register for (eg) MARC XML , and that until
St, PO Box 123
Liverpool, L69 3DA, UK
Tel: +44 (0)151 794 2692
Fax: +44 (0)151 794 2681
From: Code for Libraries [code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of Jonathan
Rochkind [rochk...@jhu.edu]
Sent: 12 February 2009 17:13
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject
than LC who could conceivably fill out an application
for application/marc+xml and application/mods_xml?
Seriously, application/xml is not sufficient, although it is legal.
Jonathan
Alexander Johannesen wrote:
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 22:32, Jonathan Rochkind rochk...@jhu.edu wrote:
Didn't
Alexander Johannesen wrote:
One question we haven't asked is if we really need a MIME type for MARCXML. :)
PPS: Yes, it has been asked, and it's pretty obvious to me that we do.
Because I write lots of software that will be fetching MARCXML from the
web, and needs to know what it's got.
I am actually rather shocked that it seems that MARC-XML, MODS,
MARC21-binary, do not have registered Internet Content Types (aka MIME
types).
Am I missing something, or is this really so?
Anyone know what the process is for registering such? Anyone want to
help try to do that? I guess we'd
. I don't have any of those files handy.
Ethan
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Jonathan Rochkind rochk...@jhu.edu wrote:
I am actually rather shocked that it seems that MARC-XML, MODS,
MARC21-binary, do not have registered Internet Content Types (aka MIME
types).
Am I missing something
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Jonathan Rochkind rochk...@jhu.edu wrote:
I am actually rather shocked that it seems that MARC-XML, MODS,
MARC21-binary, do not have registered Internet Content Types (aka MIME
types).
Am I missing something, or is this really so?
Anyone know what the process
of Jonathan Rochkind
Sent: Wed 2/4/2009 11:01 AM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] MIME Type for MARC, Mods, etc.?
If anyone does want to work on it, I'd be happy to help. Maybe I'll
contact clay.
The most immediate and clear need I see is for application/marc+xml and
application/mods
Alexander Johannesen wrote:
I would say a little bit more than oh well (but I don't really have;
you know how I feel :), but I would love to hear what the vendors are
thinking about this all. They seem to very, very quiet about it all
(without speculating to why ...)
Because their customers
, Scotland/
I hope this helps.
Diane
Jonathan Rochkind wrote:
Thanks Diane. That article on RDA/ONIX doesn't seem to include actual
terms, the actual vocabularly. I realize there are plans to
'register' it officially, but prior to that, can the actual term list
be found anywhere in human-readable
...@tudelft.nl
skype: eposthumus
twitter: http://twitter.com/epoz
http://www.library.tudelft.nl/
Prometheusplein 1, 2628 ZC, Delft, Netherlands
--
Jonathan Rochkind
Digital Services Software Engineer
The Sheridan Libraries
Johns Hopkins University
410.516.8886
rochkind (at) jhu.edu
think it's premature to worry about it, since there is no proposal
on the table. And if there were a proposal on the table, why not just
vote on it and not worry about making a rule about it?
//Ed
--
Jonathan Rochkind
Digital Services Software Engineer
The Sheridan Libraries
Johns Hopkins
a way to go yet.
Diane
Jonathan Rochkind wrote:
Thanks, that's interesting too.
One of the most useful lists I've found is actually in ONIX, Code
List 7.
http://www.editeur.org/codelists.html
Although Code List 7 actually needs to be supplemented by Code List
78 if you want full detail. (Like
_far_ from good though. Any others anyone knows about?
Jonathan
--
Jonathan Rochkind
Digital Services Software Engineer
The Sheridan Libraries
Johns Hopkins University
410.516.8886
rochkind (at) jhu.edu
-Original Message-
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of
Jonathan Rochkind
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 12:24 PM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: [CODE4LIB] multimedia carrier vocabulary?
Anyone know of any good existing controlled vocabulary for 'format
) to build them up in ways that will be much more useful.
Diane
Jonathan Rochkind wrote:
Anyone know of any good existing controlled vocabulary for 'format'
or 'carrier' for multimedia materials? I'm thinking of things like
CD, DVD, digital, etc.
The closest I can get is from RDA at
http
So the Marriott for the conference hotel is telling me there are no
rooms with two queen beds available. That's kind of a problem, since I
was planning on sharing a room with a colleague.
Anyone know if there's any way around that?
Jonathan
--
Jonathan Rochkind
Digital Services Software
/openbookwpress-general.
John
m...@johnmiedema.ca
http://johnmiedema.ca
We love open source. strikeNo, you can't/strike Yes, you can have
our code.
--
Jonathan Rochkind
Digital Services Software Engineer
The Sheridan Libraries
Johns Hopkins University
410.516.8886
rochkind (at) jhu.edu
and there's a way to do this, can you
give me an example of a DC KEV OpenURL with a type in it specifying
something like 'audio' or 'video'?
Jonathan
**
--
Jonathan Rochkind
Digital Services Software Engineer
The Sheridan Libraries
Johns Hopkins University
410.516.8886
rochkind (at) jhu.edu
we will learn from in subsequent standards.
Jonathan
Ross Singer wrote:
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Jonathan Rochkind rochk...@jhu.edu wrote:
Hmm, I could send a DC KEV OpenURL (ie info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dc ; there
is no format for an XML DC? Kind of odd), and use the type element
Can someone send me the special code I need to get the conference rate
at the hotel? I forgot to keep it from the conf registration process,
and it doesn't appear to be available anywhere else, once you've registered?
Jonathan
: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of
Jonathan Rochkind
Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2008 11:38 AM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Mime type for PHP serialized objects
If you want to publish calendar event information, you should use
iCal/iCalendar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.kcoyle.net
ph.: 510-540-7596 skype: kcoylenet
fx.: 510-848-3913
mo.: 510-435-8234
--
Jonathan Rochkind
Digital Services Software Engineer
The Sheridan Libraries
Johns Hopkins University
410.516.8886
rochkind (at) jhu.edu
LCCN--Library of Congress Control Number--eg 98013779--, yes.
LCC--Library of Congress Classification--eg BF575.H27 W35 1991--I don't
think so.
Jonathan
Eric Hellman wrote:
just catch up on the discussion here...
for the benefit of those who aren't on the openurl list, it was pointed out
501 - 600 of 752 matches
Mail list logo
