D]>
>CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [Coder-Com] Plus Channels
>Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 10:09:54 +0100 (BST)
>
>How to emulate a + channel (this assumes no ircops with /opmode :)):
>
>/join #channeliwanttouse
>/mode #channeliwanttouse +nt
>/mode #channeliwanttouse -o
/me *applauds* gk and his wittyness
Cheers,
net
- Original Message -
From: "Jeekay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Braden Temme" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 5:09 AM
Subject: Re: [Coder-Com] Plus Channel
How to emulate a + channel (this assumes no ircops with /opmode :)):
/join #channeliwanttouse
/mode #channeliwanttouse +nt
/mode #channeliwanttouse -o mynick
Huzzah :) You now have the instant convenience of an uncontrollable
channel from your own desk.
GK
On Wed, 11 Sep 2002, Braden Temme wr
Braden Temme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> You are missing the point. The point isn't whether they are hard to enforce but the
>ability of us
> to use them. There should of been an Fline created for them enabling or disabling
>them. They
> shouldn't of ripped them out of the code altogether.
You are missing the point. The point isn't whether they are hard to enforce but the
ability of us
to use them. There should of been an Fline created for them enabling or disabling
them. They
shouldn't of ripped them out of the code altogether. Entropy, if you had a problem
with them,
then y
Braden Temme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I concur. I hardly believe the code size for them was enough to warrent their
>destruction. I
> would think modeless channels would be used. I did not before know they existed,
>but now I know
> they do (or did) I would miss them. I think they shou
I concur. I hardly believe the code size for them was enough to warrent their
destruction. I
would think modeless channels would be used. I did not before know they existed, but
now I know
they do (or did) I would miss them. I think they should be brought back.. Shouldn't
be too
hard... Jus
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 05:05:19PM +0200, Tom Rons wrote:
> > I have noticed that I`m now unable to join +channels
> > (modeless channels?) -
> > are they gone
> > for good? I thought they were quite funky:O)
>
> Yes, they're gone for good.. They were hardly used anyway, even on the
> big networks
> I have noticed that I`m now unable to join +channels
> (modeless channels?) -
> are they gone
> for good? I thought they were quite funky:O)
Yes, they're gone for good.. They were hardly used anyway, even on the
big networks, and I believe there are some bugs in the implementation
too. So overa
Hello,
I have noticed that I`m now unable to join +channels (modeless channels?) -
are they gone
for good? I thought they were quite funky:O)
William.
10 matches
Mail list logo
