ashb opened a new pull request #14606:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/14606
Functionality is the same, this just removes one dep for Py 3.8+
---
**^ Add meaningful description above**
Read the **[Pull Request
kaxil opened a new pull request #14605:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/14605
We don't use "@param" type od docstring. This PR fixes it
---
**^ Add meaningful description above**
Read the **[Pull Request
FredericoCoelhoNunes opened a new issue #14604:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/14604
**Apache Airflow version**: 2.0.1
**Kubernetes version (if you are using kubernetes)** (use `kubectl version`):
**Environment**:
- **Cloud provider or
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on issue #14604:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/14604#issuecomment-790756868
Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the issue
template!
This is an
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #14219:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/14219#issuecomment-790754604
[The Workflow run](https://github.com/apache/airflow/actions/runs/621661103)
is cancelling this PR. It has some failed jobs matching ^Pylint$,^Static
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #14219:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/14219#issuecomment-790754452
[The Workflow run](https://github.com/apache/airflow/actions/runs/621652545)
is cancelling this PR. It has some failed jobs matching ^Pylint$,^Static
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #14219:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/14219#issuecomment-790754193
[The Workflow run](https://github.com/apache/airflow/actions/runs/621651041)
is cancelling this PR. It has some failed jobs matching ^Pylint$,^Static
ephraimbuddy commented on a change in pull request #14588:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/14588#discussion_r587624946
##
File path: airflow/upgrade/rules/custom_operator_metaclass_rule.py
##
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
from __future__ import absolute_import
+from
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
github-bot pushed a commit to branch constraints-master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/constraints-master by this
push:
new 38119d1 Updating
Gaurang033 commented on issue #14489:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/14489#issuecomment-790746887
@mik-laj perfect. we can similar implementation for this as well, then
kaxil merged pull request #14600:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/14600
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
kaxilnaik pushed a commit to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push:
new 4efd584 Remove redundant step in CodeQL
XD-DENG commented on a change in pull request #14588:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/14588#discussion_r587616725
##
File path: airflow/upgrade/rules/custom_operator_metaclass_rule.py
##
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
from __future__ import absolute_import
+from airflow
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
kaxilnaik pushed a change to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git.
from 69a852f Add link to 2.0 Blog post in Changelog (#14602)
add 35175c3 docs: Capitalise & minor fixes
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
kaxilnaik pushed a change to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git.
from 4c1e3c8 Restore correct terminal with to interactive breeze usage
(#14579)
add 69a852f Add link to 2.0
kaxil commented on issue #14283:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/14283#issuecomment-790742678
Closed by https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/14534
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
kaxil closed issue #14283:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/14283
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
kaxil merged pull request #14534:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/14534
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to
kaxil merged pull request #14602:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/14602
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to
eladkal commented on issue #9373:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/9373#issuecomment-790723080
1.10.14
Where is your dag file located?
Could it be that the sql file path isn't relative to the dag file? (if so
did you define `template_searchpath` ?)
kaxil opened a new pull request #14603:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/14603
This is second attempt to https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/4900
Docs: https://jinja.palletsprojects.com/en/2.11.x/nativetypes/
```python
>>> from jinja2 import nativetypes
>>>
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #14581:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/14581#issuecomment-790719692
[The Workflow run](https://github.com/apache/airflow/actions/runs/621474186)
is cancelling this PR. Building images for the PR has failed. Follow the the
workflow
marcosmarxm commented on issue #13838:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/13838#issuecomment-790714532
@mik-laj maybe documentation how to create/maintain providers?
- create a checklist and the common commands to test for specific providers.
aviau commented on issue #14167:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/14167#issuecomment-790709875
Not sure, but maybe fixed by
https://github.com/apache/airflow/commit/809b4f9b18c7040682e17879248d714f2664273d
?
ashb commented on pull request #14581:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/14581#issuecomment-790703631
Related/possibly closes https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/11462
This is an automated message from the
FredericoCoelhoNunes commented on issue #14596:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/14596#issuecomment-790703426
What executor are you using? If you're using SequentialExecutor, I think you
won't be able to run more than one DAG at once
FredericoCoelhoNunes edited a comment on issue #9975:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/9975#issuecomment-790692853
@zachliu Happy to hear you were able to create a stable API! Unfortunately I
am not able to: when I use Python to select a failed DAG run, and clear all its
task
FredericoCoelhoNunes commented on issue #9975:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/9975#issuecomment-790692853
@zachliu Happy to hear you were able to create a stable API! Unfortunately I
am not able to: when I use Python to select a failed DAG run, and clear all its
task
kaxil commented on issue #14592:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/14592#issuecomment-790691181
@fhoda I know you talked about something similar, would you want to add your
description too.
This is an
kaxil opened a new pull request #14602:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/14602
We currently don't have anything mentioned about 2.0.0 in the changelog,
this commit should help users get to our blog post highlighting 2.0
features.
---
**^ Add meaningful
ashb commented on pull request #14476:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/14476#issuecomment-790682935
@bperson Hmmm, not right now/anymore as the logs aren't availabe and GitHub
are having problems so we can't retest.
It _may_ just be a transient faliure, but given both
ephraimbuddy commented on pull request #14219:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/14219#issuecomment-790682313
Can someone review the authentication once more? I feel it's OK now except
for the user data schemas.
The way I was writing the schemas before was to emulate how
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
ash pushed a change to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git.
from 061cd23 Fixes failing test_views tests (#14599)
add 4c1e3c8 Restore correct terminal with to interactive breeze
ashb merged pull request #14579:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/14579
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to
ashb commented on pull request #14579:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/14579#issuecomment-790679115
Will merge without CI -- this doesn't affect them anyway.
This is an automated message from the Apache Git
ryanahamilton commented on pull request #14595:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/14595#issuecomment-790659998
I would like to propose that we close this PR in favor of #14601 that will
remove the feature instead. What do you all think of that? Please comment on
that PR.
ryanahamilton opened a new pull request #14601:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/14601
After fixing and refactoring the "demo mode" feature in #14595, I feel that
it would be more productive to replace that PR with this one that removes the
feature instead.
- It has
kaxil commented on issue #14598:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/14598#issuecomment-790644229
You can already do this via an XComBackend:
https://airflow.apache.org/blog/airflow-1.10.12/#allow-defining-custom-xcom-class
There is also an example in
kaxil opened a new pull request #14600:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/14600
From https://github.com/apache/airflow/runs/2031451066#step:4:9
Warning: 1 issue was detected with this workflow: git checkout HEAD^2 is no
longer necessary.
Please remove this step as Code
ephraimbuddy commented on a change in pull request #14501:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/14501#discussion_r587283929
##
File path: tests/api_connexion/schemas/test_task_instance_schema.py
##
@@ -199,7 +199,6 @@ def test_success(self):
@parameterized.expand(
Naresh-sin edited a comment on pull request #13963:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/13963#issuecomment-790627008
Guys Need help.Sorry by bad did not understand what is the fix to do for
Manual DagRun trigger skip actual schedule?
what I get from here is remove the line
Naresh-sin commented on pull request #13963:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/13963#issuecomment-790627008
Guys Need help.Sorry by bad did not understand what is the fix to do for
Manual DagRun trigger skip actual schedule?
what I get from here is remove the line
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
kaxilnaik pushed a change to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git.
from f5a35f4 Fix some small typos also TESTING.rst (#14594)
add 061cd23 Fixes failing test_views tests
kaxil merged pull request #14599:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/14599
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to
kaxil commented on pull request #14599:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/14599#issuecomment-790619968
Looks like "Resource not accessible by integration" errors (GitHub's
transient errors) -- going to merge it so that we don't have broken master
vemikhaylov commented on issue #14591:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/14591#issuecomment-790606951
@ConstantinoSchillebeeckx
Will this solve your problem? https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/14500
https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/13225
vemikhaylov commented on issue #14598:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/14598#issuecomment-790604779
> * When the task starts it downloads (if exists) the
`artifacts/dag_id/run_id/task_id/artifacts.zip` for each upstream task
Will this be the default behaviour? If so,
HaloKo4 commented on pull request #14595:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/14595#issuecomment-790599526
This is really cool but if the only way to activate it is from airflow.cfg
it isn't very convinent
This is
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
kaxilnaik pushed a commit to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push:
new f5a35f4 Fix some small typos also
kaxil merged pull request #14594:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/14594
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to
ryanahamilton commented on pull request #14595:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/14595#issuecomment-790586929
This implementation is definitely a "demonstration mode" feature and by no
means a security feature. The [description in the
ecerulm commented on issue #14598:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/14598#issuecomment-790584181
My idea was to implement with with a pluggable storage so that S3, and other
storage can be used.
My initial idea on how this could work is the following:
* When the task
ashb commented on pull request #14595:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/14595#issuecomment-790581682
https://imageupscaler.com/deblurring
ashb commented on pull request #14595:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/14595#issuecomment-790575714
I think i t was by design that on, for example the Tree view that only the
task ids were blurred, but not the tree itself. Ditto on the graph view.
This lets the
ashb commented on pull request #14595:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/14595#issuecomment-790574870
I wonder if _all_ of the code view should be blurred? Do you know what it
was trying to blur before?
For instance the any code of python operators is "sensitive" and
ashb commented on pull request #14595:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/14595#issuecomment-790573172
I think this was used for producing screenshots for marketing materials, or
similar, without exposing internal details of what the DAG does.
ashb commented on pull request #14579:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/14579#issuecomment-790556444
@kaxil Updated -- could you confirm this works for you on OSX please?
This is an automated message from the
kaxil opened a new pull request #14599:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/14599
This reverts commit 49952e79b04da932242ebf3981883e591b467994.
Not sure what happended. We made that change because of cPython
vulnerability
Dr-Denzy commented on issue #14167:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/14167#issuecomment-790533319
@kaxil please assign to me.
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
andreaspeters commented on a change in pull request #10977:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/10977#discussion_r587373690
##
File path: airflow/executors/mesos_executor.py
##
@@ -0,0 +1,380 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+# or
andreaspeters commented on a change in pull request #10977:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/10977#discussion_r587373690
##
File path: airflow/executors/mesos_executor.py
##
@@ -0,0 +1,380 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+# or
vemikhaylov commented on a change in pull request #14501:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/14501#discussion_r587331823
##
File path: tests/api_connexion/schemas/test_task_instance_schema.py
##
@@ -199,7 +199,6 @@ def test_success(self):
@parameterized.expand(
ecerulm opened a new issue #14598:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/14598
**Description**
Provide shared storage between tasks.
**Use case / motivation**
Today we have XCom to share small pieces of information between task, but
that is not suitable to
ephraimbuddy commented on a change in pull request #14501:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/14501#discussion_r587283929
##
File path: tests/api_connexion/schemas/test_task_instance_schema.py
##
@@ -199,7 +199,6 @@ def test_success(self):
@parameterized.expand(
vemikhaylov commented on a change in pull request #14501:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/14501#discussion_r587259860
##
File path: tests/api_connexion/schemas/test_task_instance_schema.py
##
@@ -199,7 +199,6 @@ def test_success(self):
@parameterized.expand(
vemikhaylov commented on a change in pull request #14501:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/14501#discussion_r587259860
##
File path: tests/api_connexion/schemas/test_task_instance_schema.py
##
@@ -199,7 +199,6 @@ def test_success(self):
@parameterized.expand(
turbaszek commented on a change in pull request #14492:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/14492#discussion_r587259941
##
File path: airflow/providers/airbyte/example_dags/example_airbyte_trigger_job.py
##
@@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software
vemikhaylov commented on a change in pull request #14501:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/14501#discussion_r587259860
##
File path: tests/api_connexion/schemas/test_task_instance_schema.py
##
@@ -199,7 +199,6 @@ def test_success(self):
@parameterized.expand(
turbaszek commented on a change in pull request #14492:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/14492#discussion_r587259628
##
File path: airflow/providers/airbyte/example_dags/example_airbyte_trigger_job.py
##
@@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software
vemikhaylov commented on a change in pull request #14500:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/14500#discussion_r587250624
##
File path: airflow/api_connexion/openapi/v1.yaml
##
@@ -2218,6 +2218,13 @@ components:
type: boolean
default: true
+
vemikhaylov commented on a change in pull request #14500:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/14500#discussion_r587250624
##
File path: airflow/api_connexion/openapi/v1.yaml
##
@@ -2218,6 +2218,13 @@ components:
type: boolean
default: true
+
andreaspeters commented on a change in pull request #10977:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/10977#discussion_r587247108
##
File path: tests/executors/test_mesos_executor.py
##
@@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+# or
andreaspeters commented on a change in pull request #10977:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/10977#discussion_r587244859
##
File path: airflow/executors/mesos_executor.py
##
@@ -0,0 +1,380 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+# or
Minyus commented on issue #9610:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/9610#issuecomment-790415553
Airflow 1.10.14 with local logging and Celery 4.4.7 reproduced the same
error.
This is an automated message from the
andreaspeters commented on a change in pull request #10977:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/10977#discussion_r587244007
##
File path: airflow/config_templates/default_test.cfg
##
@@ -102,6 +102,18 @@ default_queue = default
sync_parallelism = 0
worker_precheck =
kenfinster commented on a change in pull request #14588:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/14588#discussion_r587243479
##
File path: airflow/upgrade/rules/custom_operator_metaclass_rule.py
##
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
from __future__ import absolute_import
+from airflow
101 - 176 of 176 matches
Mail list logo
