i'm now +1
i'd like to thanks rory for his quick response. i'm now satisfied that
there are substantive issues with the net code and so i'm happy to
change my -1 to a +1.
- robert
On Thu, 2005-12-01 at 22:08 +, robert burrell donkin wrote:
-1 to any commons-net new release. see pmc thread
thanks to dennis for the release plan page
(http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/Logging/1%2e1%2e0ReleasePlan).
i'd like to propose the following solutions to the design issues
highlighted. please indicate opinions in the conventional fashion :)
1 eliminate optional jar
IMHO sub-components
On Fri, 2005-12-02 at 19:46 +0100, karl wettin wrote:
1 dec 2005 kl. 23.35 skrev robert burrell donkin:
On Thu, 2005-12-01 at 22:44 +0100, karl wettin wrote:
Is the sandbox project feed parser abandoned? I have updated the
source to work with the new jdom and would like to commit my
On Fri, 2005-12-02 at 10:14 -0500, Eric Pugh wrote:
I agree with the 1 year mark. I know that there are projects that I
haven't worked on for six months until the itch came back and I had
to scratch it! Is there any reason to remove committers?
Performance? Security? It seems to
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
Hi all,
ATM I am facing a problem with hsqldb and JDK 1.3 compatibility and
would like to know if the same occurred for other components (and if
already a solution exists).
Commons Configuration contains a class DatabaseConfiguration whose test
class makes use of hsqldb. When trying to build the
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-xml-test has an issue affecting its community
integration.
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-xml-test has an issue affecting its community
integration.
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-swing has an issue affecting its community
integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-swing has an issue affecting its community
integration.
This
Oliver Heger wrote:
---
[ ] +1 I support this release and am willing to help
[ ] +0 I support this release but am unable to help
[ ] -0 I do not support this release
[X] -1 I do not support this release, and here are my reasons
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-define-test has an issue affecting its community
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-define-test has an issue affecting its community
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test has an issue affecting its community
integration.
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test has an issue affecting its community
integration.
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-html has an issue affecting its community
integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-html has an issue affecting its community
integration.
This
Author: scohen
Date: Sat Dec 3 05:06:11 2005
New Revision: 351936
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=351936view=rev
Log:
cut branch for NET_1_4_1 from tag of NET_1_4_0 to fix jdk incompatibility
problems.
Added:
jakarta/commons/proper/net/branches/NET_1_4_1/
- copied from
Author: scohen
Date: Sat Dec 3 05:34:01 2005
New Revision: 351942
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=351942view=rev
Log:
Apply patch from Andrea Rombald to restore JDK 1.3 compatibility.
Modified:
Author: scohen
Date: Sat Dec 3 05:43:06 2005
New Revision: 351944
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=351944view=rev
Log:
change maven.compile.target to 1.2 from 1.4
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/net/branches/NET_1_4_1/project.properties
Modified:
Author: scohen
Date: Sat Dec 3 06:07:00 2005
New Revision: 351950
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=351950view=rev
Log:
update for version 1.4.1
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/net/branches/NET_1_4_1/project.xml
Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/net/branches/NET_1_4_1/project.xml
URL:
Author: scohen
Date: Sat Dec 3 06:20:49 2005
New Revision: 351951
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=351951view=rev
Log:
update for version 1.4.1
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/net/branches/NET_1_4_1/xdocs/changes.xml
Modified:
Gump's drive has always been to let people know of problems in the
future (at least that's how I've always seen it). By compiling head of
each project against each other, they discover when a problem is in
the pipeline.
It seems that we should be able to freeze the version of Jaxen that
Jelly
On Tue, 2005-11-29 at 00:51 -0500, Sandy McArthur wrote:
Since my last update I've made some performance improvements and made
my composite object pool both serializable and cloneable.
I've improved the construction so that the internal List that holds
idle objects is either an ArrayList or
Hi all,
Like your list Henri. Here is my list (with some overlap..)
My ideas to improve things are :
- Move sandbox components to the background (at least on the commons page). If
the components are worthy, they will pick up interest without it. For now it
looks like just another list of
Hi everyone,
I will be at javapolis from 12 till 16 december (the whole week).
Anyone else coming, so we can meet for eg drinks ?
On monday night there is already a meeting with some myfaces folks..
Mvgr,
Martin
-
To
Oliver Heger wrote:
As I found out the cause for that is the hsqldb.jar distributed through
ibiblio, which was built for JDK 1.4 and later. Indeed I was able to
recompile hsqldb on JDK 1.3 and then the problem disappears.
Unfortunately there does not seem to be a JDK 1.3 compatible version of
a
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37401.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36473.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36249.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35863.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35592.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35338.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35260.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35185.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I understand the issues involved with pending release of vfs and
compatibility with net, but I thought we discussed during the last
release or so of net that we cut a 1.2/1.3 compatible release and from
that release forward we were using 1.4 stuff ( nio I believe was the
issue ). So projects
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34778.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34763.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32579.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31108.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29613.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26296.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24539.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24456.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: scohen
Date: Sat Dec 3 07:43:40 2005
New Revision: 351961
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=351961view=rev
Log:
update for version 1.4.1
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/net/branches/NET_1_4_1/build.xml
Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/net/branches/NET_1_4_1/build.xml
URL:
Author: scohen
Date: Sat Dec 3 08:03:42 2005
New Revision: 351968
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=351968view=rev
Log:
update changes log
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/net/branches/NET_1_4_1/xdocs/changes.xml
Modified:
Martin van den Bemt wrote:
Hi everyone,
I will be at javapolis from 12 till 16 december (the whole week).
Anyone else coming, so we can meet for eg drinks ?
On monday night there is already a meeting with some myfaces folks..
I'll be arriving Monday and I'll be around on Tuesday and
On Fri, 2005-12-02 at 23:47 +0100, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Henri Yandell wrote:
7) Contributor page. Is this worth the effort of the maintenance?
I don't know how this page is maintained currently, but maybe it could
be built automatically from the POMs with a script ?
+1
such a script
Stephen,
thanks for your feedback. I will address your points. Some questions follow:
- What is the purpose of the -src-ide.zip file? I didn't find anything
about that in the releasing components instructions. It contains the
*.java files and the LICENSE and NOTICE files, right?
- Line endings:
Shouldn't that be no substantive issues? ;-)
robert burrell donkin wrote:
i'm now +1
i'd like to thanks rory for his quick response. i'm now satisfied that
there are substantive issues with the net code and so i'm happy to
change my -1 to a +1.
- robert
On Thu, 2005-12-01 at 22:08 +,
Steve Cohen wrote:
Steve Cohen wrote:
Mario Ivankovits wrote:
Steve Cohen wrote:
It has been discovered that 1.4.0 is inadvertently incompatible with
jdk 1.3. Please vote on a release of a fixed version.
Checked VFS using net svn head and it works.
So here is my +1
BTW: maven
We need to discuss this further.
Mario Ivankovits VFS is a client of Net and he has users still on 1.3
who are complaining that Net 1.4 breaks VFS.
Jeffrey D. Brekke wrote:
I understand the issues involved with pending release of vfs and
compatibility with net, but I thought we discussed
Steve Cohen wrote:
We need to discuss this further.
Mario Ivankovits VFS is a client of Net and he has users still on 1.3
who are complaining that Net 1.4 breaks VFS.
And not only my users constantly complain about it. AFAIK this is also
true for other commons components.
Though, there is an
Sheesh, the release process has gotten much hairier since I last did it!
5 hours and I'm still not all the way there. And this was supposed to
be a simple release.
Phooey.
I decided that that easiest way to do this simple release fixing ONLY
the 1.3 compatibility problem would be to work
Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Oliver Heger wrote:
As I found out the cause for that is the hsqldb.jar distributed through
ibiblio, which was built for JDK 1.4 and later. Indeed I was able to
recompile hsqldb on JDK 1.3 and then the problem disappears.
Unfortunately there does not seem to be a JDK
On 12/3/05, Steve Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sheesh, the release process has gotten much hairier since I last did it!
5 hours and I'm still not all the way there. And this was supposed to
be a simple release.
Phooey.
I decided that that easiest way to do this simple release fixing ONLY
You'll ned maven 1.0.2 plus the latest release of any plugin that barfs.
Plus you'll need various project properties set. See commons-io for a
recent working example.
And yes you are right, releasing with svn and maven at ASF is a right
royal pain.
Stephen
Steve Cohen wrote:
Sheesh, the
Oliver Heger wrote:
- What is the purpose of the -src-ide.zip file? I didn't find anything
about that in the releasing components instructions. It contains the
*.java files and the LICENSE and NOTICE files, right?
The purpose is so users can attach the source of the component to the
binary jar
On 12/3/05, Oliver Heger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stephen,
thanks for your feedback. I will address your points. Some questions follow:
- What is the purpose of the -src-ide.zip file? I didn't find anything
about that in the releasing components instructions. It contains the
*.java files
Will this eventually be translated to xdoc and included in the commons site?
Is it really too painful to just start by developing it in xdoc, or by
modifying the commons web site? Much of the content is already there.
Generating the commons site is just maven site from commons-build
and maven
On 12/3/05, Stephen Colebourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You'll ned maven 1.0.2 plus the latest release of any plugin that barfs.
Plus you'll need various project properties set. See commons-io for a
recent working example.
And yes you are right, releasing with svn and maven at ASF is a right
statcvs and svn dont work together (yet)...
http://www.researchkitchen.co.uk/blog/archives/13
I just turned off the statcvs report last time.
Steve Cohen wrote:
Sheesh, the release process has gotten much hairier since I last did it!
5 hours and I'm still not all the way there. And this
I saw the same problem when I was testing the [configuration] release
with a .mavenrc set to force maven itself to run under 1.3. (which,
btw is another workaround for the jdk spec in manifest problem), but I
did not mention it since the build with maven.compile.executable
pointing to jdk 1.3
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37727.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37727.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Rory Winston wrote:
statcvs and svn dont work together (yet)...
http://www.researchkitchen.co.uk/blog/archives/13
I just turned off the statcvs report last time.
where do you do that? Project.xml?
-
To unsubscribe,
I don't think it is feasible to patch the maven dist plugin or the
hand-rolled ant scripts to inspect .svn/props for each file and then
change line endings accordingly.
I also verified that distros created on Windows are in fact shipping
CRLF line endings on all files that have eol=native in
On 12/3/05, Steve Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rory Winston wrote:
statcvs and svn dont work together (yet)...
http://www.researchkitchen.co.uk/blog/archives/13
I just turned off the statcvs report last time.
where do you do that? Project.xml?
snip/
Yup, for this project.xml
Yes, remove the reference to the statcvs report from the reports
element. You should obviously also check in the change so the project
builds correctly from svn sources.
You should have no problem building from branches, tags, etc., as long
as commons-build is checked out as a peer.
Phil
On
Author: scohen
Date: Sat Dec 3 13:40:38 2005
New Revision: 352026
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=352026view=rev
Log:
remove statcvs plugin which doesn't work.
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/net/branches/NET_1_4_1/project.xml
Modified:
On 12/2/05, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
In the old days we kept lf line endings on all the source files in
cvs and hand-rolled ant scripts were used to put crlf on the .txt
files in the zips. Between maven and svn's eol=native, that is no
longer possible or at least
On 12/3/05, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think it is feasible to patch the maven dist plugin or the
hand-rolled ant scripts to inspect .svn/props for each file and then
change line endings accordingly.
I also verified that distros created on Windows are in fact shipping
CRLF
Thanks guys. statcvs gone. Past that hurdle.
Now this one:
xdoc:jelly-transform:
[echo] Generating
/home/scohen/commons-net/branches/NET_1_4_1/target/docs/javadoc.html
from
/home/scohen/commons-net/branches/NET_1_4_1/target/generated-xdocs/javadoc.xml
Could not find the class:
On 12/3/05, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/2/05, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
In the old days we kept lf line endings on all the source files in
cvs and hand-rolled ant scripts were used to put crlf on the .txt
files in the zips. Between maven and svn's
You need to make sure you are running version 1.9.2 of the maven xdoc plugin.
maven plugin:install
maven
maven-xdoc-plugin
1.9.2
Phil
On 12/3/05, Steve Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks guys. statcvs gone. Past that hurdle.
Now this one:
xdoc:jelly-transform:
[echo]
Thanks, Martin. I stand corrected then and will shut up about this.
To close this out, I guess we are agreeing that we have no standard
for line endings and will make no attempt to make them consistent. I
did not know the Windows cvs client was also converting the files, so
thought this was a
Author: dion
Date: Mon Nov 21 16:25:08 2005
New Revision: 348046
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=348046view=rev
Log:
Removed tabs
Fixed POM as per bug 37314
Use groupId/artifactId instead of id
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/lang/trunk/project.xml
Modified:
Henri Yandell wrote:
Let's imagine a manual existed for Commons committers. It would assume
that a committer understands the ASF, ie) they've read the
Apache-Committer-Manual (imagine that exists too). What would the
chapters be?
Initial list:
* Short description of Commons/Introduction.
*
Nope, 1.6.
This is sort of what I meant when I said it's harder to do these
releases. How is one supposed to KNOW what versions of these 30 or 40
plugins you have to have in order to build a release?
Does Jakarta or Jakarta-commons have a page that tells you the minimum
maven setup needed
On 12/3/05, Dennis Lundberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Henri Yandell wrote:
Let's imagine a manual existed for Commons committers. It would assume
that a committer understands the ASF, ie) they've read the
Apache-Committer-Manual (imagine that exists too). What would the
chapters be?
On 12/3/05, Steve Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nope, 1.6.
This is sort of what I meant when I said it's harder to do these
releases. How is one supposed to KNOW what versions of these 30 or 40
plugins you have to have in order to build a release?
Does Jakarta or Jakarta-commons have a
okay, made it down to step 12 now.
* Update Jakarta News Page Add a standard news item announcing
the release to the current Jakarta news page. Look for the page whose
name covers today's date in the site/xdocs/site/news directory. For
example, the news for a release created in July
On 12/3/05, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/3/05, Steve Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nope, 1.6.
This is sort of what I meant when I said it's harder to do these
releases. How is one supposed to KNOW what versions of these 30 or 40
plugins you have to have in order to
Pls disregard. I figured it out.
Steve Cohen wrote:
okay, made it down to step 12 now.
* Update Jakarta News Page Add a standard news item announcing the
release to the current Jakarta news page. Look for the page whose name
covers today's date in the site/xdocs/site/news directory.
On 12/3/05, Steve Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
okay, made it down to step 12 now.
* Update Jakarta News Page Add a standard news item announcing
the release to the current Jakarta news page. Look for the page whose
name covers today's date in the site/xdocs/site/news directory. For
On 12/3/05, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/3/05, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/3/05, Steve Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nope, 1.6.
This is sort of what I meant when I said it's harder to do these
releases. How is one supposed to KNOW what versions of
On 12/3/05, Steve Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pls disregard. I figured it out.
snip/
Yup, noticed that as I clicked send to the earlier email. I think
you've a typo, the id for the net 1.4.1 news item should be 20051203.1
(instead of 2005203.1)
-Rahul
Steve Cohen wrote:
okay, made it
Author: mvdb
Date: Sat Dec 3 15:26:20 2005
New Revision: 352049
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=352049view=rev
Log:
Added iso-8859-1 encoding, since the u umplaut is not utf-8
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/transaction/trunk/project.xml
Modified:
Phil Steitz wrote:
On 12/3/05, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/3/05, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/3/05, Steve Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nope, 1.6.
This is sort of what I meant when I said it's harder to do these
releases. How is one supposed to KNOW what
Phil Steitz wrote:
On 12/3/05, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/3/05, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/3/05, Steve Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nope, 1.6.
This is sort of what I meant when I said it's harder to do these
releases. How is one supposed to KNOW what
Has everyone been following the bit on
http://www.apache.org/dev/version-control.html?
--
Committers will need to properly configure their svn client. One
particular issue is OS-specific line-endings for text files. When you
add a new text file, especially when
Author: mvdb
Date: Sat Dec 3 15:35:37 2005
New Revision: 352050
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=352050view=rev
Log:
whoops.. recover commented out extend
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/transaction/trunk/project.xml
Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/transaction/trunk/project.xml
Yes, thanks, fixed it now.
Rahul Akolkar wrote:
On 12/3/05, Steve Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pls disregard. I figured it out.
snip/
Yup, noticed that as I clicked send to the earlier email. I think
you've a typo, the id for the net 1.4.1 news item should be 20051203.1
(instead of
Wow, who would have thought the smallest of releases would produce this
much email traffic???
Dennis Lundberg wrote:
Phil Steitz wrote:
On 12/3/05, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/3/05, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/3/05, Steve Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/3/05, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/3/05, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/3/05, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/3/05, Steve Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nope, 1.6.
This is sort of what I meant when I said it's harder to do these
On 12/3/05, Dennis Lundberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Phil Steitz wrote:
snip
Another thing that might work would be to add explicit dependencies to
the required versions in commons-build's project.xml. Then executing
even the clean target there would make maven download and install them
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Jakarta-commons Wiki
for change notification.
The following page has been changed by RahulAkolkar:
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/CreatingStandardWebPresence
The comment on the change is:
Update proper components
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Jakarta-commons Wiki
for change notification.
The following page has been changed by JamesCarman:
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/CreatingStandardWebPresence
On 12/3/05, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/3/05, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/3/05, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/3/05, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/3/05, Steve Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nope, 1.6.
This is
1 - 100 of 142 matches
Mail list logo