Re: New M2 snapshots use org.apache.commons?

2007-07-09 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 7/9/07, Paul Benedict [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For development of new releases, should the commons-* folders be forgone and use org.apache.commons now? Check the list archives for some past discussion... it has to be handled carefully with old releases relocated in the central repository,

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-sandbox-parent 1

2007-06-23 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 6/23/07, Dennis Lundberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This will be the first release and is important because it enables reproducible builds and site generation for the sandbox components. Since you have a policy against releasing sandbox components, why not just deploy snapshots of the

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-parent 3

2007-05-20 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 5/20/07, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Should have been more clear in my question. If you partially configure a plugin in the parent, can you then just add stuff, such as the version, in a child without repeating the things specified in the parent config? If the answer to that is

Re: [VOTE] 2nd attempt: Release commons-io 1.3.2

2007-05-17 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 5/17/07, Jochen Wiedmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We haven't yet released a version 1.3.2. Of course, if we had, then I'd never dare to call this 1.3.2 again. In a perfect world, a non-snapshot version gets built exactly once and either promoted or discarded. Since the world isn't

Re: [all] parent pom repositories

2007-05-17 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 5/16/07, Torsten Curdt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As we talked about on how to do release on at commons I am wondering if these profiles really make sense: ... idrc/id distributionManagement repository idapache.snapshots/id nameApache Development

Re: [all] parent pom repositories

2007-05-17 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 5/17/07, Antonio Petrelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2007/5/17, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED]: There is a utility for promoting staged releases to the rsynced repo. (Actually for merging one repository into another, including the metadata.) What utility? Maybe I missed something that could

Re: [all] parent pom repositories

2007-05-17 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 5/17/07, Torsten Curdt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So it should be idrc/id repositories repository idrc/id urlhttp://people.apache.org/builds/commons/$ {project.name}/${project.version}/m2-staging-repository/url

Re: [vote] release commons jci RC1 as 1.0

2007-04-17 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 4/15/07, Torsten Curdt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Niall wrote: A number of components have done this recently and it means less chance of something going wrong after the vote passes as it simply becomes a case of copying the jars/distros that have been voted on rather than building a whole

Re: [logging] 1.1.1 release?

2007-03-09 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 3/9/07, Simon Kitching [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Option 1 is for the maven buildfile to ensure that all compilation and unit tests are done with an external jdk of version 1.2. That's tricky though. I researched this question earlier this week. There are some links on the compiler plugin

Re: svn commit: r498529 - /jakarta/commons/proper/dbcp/trunk/release-notes.jsl

2007-01-21 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 1/21/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: psteitz Date: Sun Jan 21 21:30:00 2007 New Revision: 498529 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=498529 Log: Added known issues section. Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/dbcp/trunk/release-notes.jsl ... +Known

Re: [Digester] Change of Maven Group Id

2006-11-24 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 11/24/06, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I presume that this is being done as part of some Commons-wide policy change? If so, it's incumbent on us to clearly document the impact of this change on downstream users, because it is going to be pretty disruptive until all downstream

Re: [Digester] Change of Maven Group Id

2006-11-24 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 11/24/06, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does that mean that you will be able to use commons-digester:commons-digester:1.8 *or* org.apache.commons:commons-digester:1.8 after Digester 1.8 is released? For a specific example, consider an app that uses, say, Shale and MyFaces 1.1.4.

Re: svn commit: r474943 - in /jakarta/commons/proper/digester/trunk: pom.xml src/assembly/ src/assembly/bin.xml src/assembly/src.xml

2006-11-19 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 11/19/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And now I remember why I wanted to retain 'bin' as the descriptor ID. The nightly script looks for a descriptor with ID 'bin' for assembling the binary distro (if we move to m2 for the nightlies). Looks like we need pack options in the

Re: [logging] Re: svn commit: r476429 - /jakarta/commons/proper/logging/trunk/pom.xml

2006-11-18 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 11/18/06, Simon Kitching [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It would be really nice if Maven would report an error if the scope value is invalid rather than silently ignoring the dependency completely (as 2.0.4 evidently does). I'll try to check with mvn trunk and request an enhancement if this

Re: svn commit: r474035 - /jakarta/commons/proper/commons-parent/trunk/pom.xml

2006-11-18 Thread Wendy Smoak
The release plugin removed the license header in this commit, and it's deployed to the Maven repo without one: http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/commons/commons-parent/1/ I wonder if moving the license inside the project element would help, since the rest of the comments weren't removed.

Re: svn commit: r474035 - /jakarta/commons/proper/commons-parent/trunk/pom.xml

2006-11-18 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 11/18/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The release plugin removed the license header in this commit, and it's deployed to the Maven repo without one: http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/commons/commons-parent/1/ I wonder if moving the license inside the project element would

Re: svn commit: r476429 - /jakarta/commons/proper/logging/trunk/pom.xml

2006-11-17 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 11/17/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: skitching Date: Fri Nov 17 19:41:32 2006 New Revision: 476429 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=476429 Log: Add comments about unusual dependency-handling approach. ... if we declare them optional then +- when

Re: [logging] Maven2 POM Question

2006-11-17 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 11/17/06, Simon Kitching [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry :-). That's exactly the purpose. I'll add a comment now. I saw the commit before the thread, so commented there. Marking a dependency 'optional' excludes it from transitive dependency resolution, nothing more. It should still be on

Re: svn commit: r476429 - /jakarta/commons/proper/logging/trunk/pom.xml

2006-11-17 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 11/17/06, Simon Kitching [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Are you saying that if you mark the dependencies optional, you get compilation errors? That doesn't sound right. Well, that's exactly what happens. Found it. Optional is not a scope, it's a separate element. Instead of

Re: [sandbox] Building openpgp

2006-09-14 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 9/14/06, Antoine Levy-Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have the whole commons-sandbox checked out. I try to build openpgp and I see : ... [INFO] Failed to resolve artifact. GroupId: org.apache.commons ArtifactId: commons Version: 1-SNAPSHOT Reason: Unable to download the artifact from

Re: Commons and Maven 2 (Was: VOTE: Migrate commons-fileupload to Maven 2)

2006-09-04 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 9/4/06, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OK - I guess that's why I couldn't find it ;-) I assume the latest (released) site plugin (2.0-beta-5) is OK to use, right? 2.0-beta-5 has some annoying issues... Shale and Struts are still using 2.0-beta-4 until there is another release. --

Re: Commons and Maven 2 (Was: VOTE: Migrate commons-fileupload to Maven 2)

2006-09-04 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 9/4/06, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks, Wendy. How do you force maven to use an earlier version? Adding a plugin element for the site plugin with a version spec did not seem to work for me - at least according to what I saw from -X. Where do you put the plugin element to

Re: [all][maven 2 configuration]

2006-08-31 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 8/29/06, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have one more question / concern with the current setup. Should we override the distributionManagement section to null out the releases section ... We've talked about this some on [EMAIL PROTECTED] IMO, we need to use a staging repository

Re: [all][maven 2 configuration]

2006-08-31 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 8/31/06, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Looks like something like this will actually work (so inline profiles can override distributionManagement): That looks great. A component can always override distributionManagement if necessary, so this is still flexible. How and where will

Re: [all][maven 2 configuration]

2006-08-27 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 8/27/06, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I suggest that we make the following changes: ... At the top of your pom hierarchy, you can inherit from org.apache:apache, and you'll pick up the m2 snapshot repo both in repositories and distributionManagement.

Re: Is Commons SCXML 0.5 published in a Maven repository somewhere?

2006-08-26 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 8/26/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks for that. You're welcome. And it's fixed, thanks to Carlos. :) http://www.ibiblio.org/maven2/commons-scxml/commons-scxml/0.5/ -- Wendy - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: Is Commons SCXML 0.5 published in a Maven repository somewhere?

2006-08-25 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 8/25/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I did put it in the m1-rsync repo [1] and it seems to have been mirrored on ibiblio [2] but last time I checked I couldn't get it into another m1 build so I might need to ping the Maven folks about that. And nothing m2 yet. That shouldn't

Re: [VFS] Snapshot timestamped version has disappeared from the m1 snapshot repo!

2006-07-27 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 7/27/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 7/26/06, Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: @phil: What do you think, can we have this? Or is it a bad idea to do this for all projects by default? I can setup my own cronjob to create the link then. +1. The jars we're deploying

Re: svn commit: r425929 - in /jakarta/commons/sandbox/js2j/trunk: maven.xml pom.xml project.properties project.xml src/ src/main/ src/main/java/ src/main/java/org/

2006-07-26 Thread Wendy Smoak
Should the groupId be org.apache.commons instead? -- Wendy On 7/26/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: mrdon Date: Wed Jul 26 19:01:57 2006 New Revision: 425929 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=425929view=rev Log: Adding Maven 2 build, seeding code from Struts flow

[VFS] Snapshot timestamped version has disappeared from the m1 snapshot repo!

2006-07-26 Thread Wendy Smoak
[moved to commons-dev instead of -user] On 7/26/06, Vincent Massol [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Someone just told me that Cargo is not building anymore because the 20060719 snapshot is no longer there! I checked and it's not there... It looks like there is an automated process to keep a week's

Re: [all] Splitting the mailing list

2006-07-20 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 7/20/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is it as important for contributors? If I understand it correctly, the idea of this change (a bunch of projects seem to be moving this way) is that the developers see exactly what they used to see and the contributors get a less spammy list

Re: [vfs][all] nightly build changed?

2006-06-19 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 6/19/06, Dion Gillard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Maybe we could ask to run on a Continuum server? Did anything ever happen with vmbuild.apache.org? * http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=jakarta-commons-devm=114947119511295w=2 -- Wendy

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Commons Collections 3.2 released

2006-06-05 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 5/15/06, Stephen Colebourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The Commons Collections team is pleased to announce the release of commons-collections-3.2. I see it in dist/java-repository, but the jar for Collections 3.2 hasn't been added to ibiblio yet:

Re: [logging] JCL 1.1 FC available for final checks

2006-05-09 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 5/9/06, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: so, please check that i have made no errors in cutting the candidate (ideally by dropping the jar in as a replacement for a RC or 1.0.4) and report back promptly if i have made any mistakes whilst cutting the distribution. The

Re: [logging] JCL 1.1 FC available for final checks

2006-05-09 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 5/9/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The Log4jFactory class appears to be missing. Never mind, it's in the release notes. Sorry, I expected 1.1 to be a drop-in replacement and was surprised by the error. I don't recall any deprecation warnings, though. I've had this in commons

Re: [logging] RC on ibiblio ?

2006-04-05 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 4/5/06, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Right. But is there any reason we couldn't create a Maven 2 parallel to the Maven 1 repo we have at http://cvs.apache.org/repository/? We could deploy RCs there. It's already there: http://cvs.apache.org/maven-snapshot-repository You can

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Commons Pool 1.3 Released

2006-04-02 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 4/2/06, Sandy McArthur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The Commons Pool team is pleased to announce the release of Pool 1.3. ... Download: http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/pool/downloads.html Sandy, I see it in www.apache.org/dist, but the download page still has links to version 1.2:

Re: [logging] testing JCL 1.1 RC6

2006-03-16 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 3/16/06, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 2006-03-15 at 16:29 -0700, Wendy Smoak wrote: If you haven't already, it might be good to invite the Spring folks. This caught my eye recently on springframework-user: * http://www.nabble.com/Can-Spring-work-without

Re: [logging] testing JCL 1.1 RC6

2006-03-15 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 3/15/06, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: we also need to contact downstream users and ask them if they can verify that JCL 1.1 works for them. that includes tomcat and jboss (i believe that they have a forked version served from a hacked classloader). If you haven't already,

Re: [all] Using maven dependency scope and comment properties WAS: Re: [pool] Dependency on Xerces

2006-03-05 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 3/5/06, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a question about the scope property, which I understand will not show up immediately, but I want to code it correctly. According to the docs here http://maven.apache.org/guides/introduction/introduction-to-dependency-mechanism.html the

[scxml] Stopwatch example (and Maven 2)

2006-03-02 Thread Wendy Smoak
I tried the StopWatchDisplay example, and with JDK 1.5.0_06 on WinXP Pro, it looks like this: http://people.apache.org/~wsmoak/commons-scxml/scxml-stopwatch.gif http://people.apache.org/%7Ewsmoak/commons-scxml/scxml-stopwatch.gif I changed it (around line 110) to get it to look right: -

Re: [all] Compile-Source-JDK and Compile-Target-JDK

2006-02-14 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 2/13/06, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Also exec and openpgp only have maven2 build files. I downloaded maven2 and got as far as working out how to add manifest entries - but I couldn't work out how to refernece the compile plugin configuration - so I've left the JDK bits

Re: [resources] 1.0.0 Release Candidate 1

2005-12-18 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 11/27/05, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Release Candidate 1 of Resources 1.0.0 is now available for download at: http://people.apache.org/~niallp/commons-resources/ Can someone please put the release candidate in the internal Maven repo?

Re: [all] Maven, help or hinderance?

2005-12-04 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 12/3/05, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You can get multiple jars by creating a multiproject. When it comes to non-standard contents, again the answer is that if you want it, probably some others do too, so opening tickets and submitting patches is the right thing to do. That's how

Re: [all] Maven, help or hinderance?

2005-12-04 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 12/4/05, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: NOTICE.txt still needs to be added explicity as a jar resource, IIRC. :::sigh::: Never mind. LICENSE.txt is working fine... it's NOTICE.txt that isn't getting included in the .jar file automatically. Thanks for the confirmation. :) -- Wendy

Re: svn commit: r349376 - /jakarta/commons/proper/fileupload/trunk/project.xml

2005-11-27 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 11/27/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: martinc Date: Sun Nov 27 21:26:02 2005 New Revision: 349376 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=349376view=rev Log: Fix a copy-paste-o and add a comment about the need for the portlet API dependency. In addition to a

[chain] dependencies

2005-11-15 Thread Wendy Smoak
I'm trying to sort out the dependencies for Chain-- right now the pom in the repository (for Maven 2) is bringing the Servlet and Portlet APIs plus a beta version of MyFaces into any project that depends on it. From the project home page, it looks like all three of these are optional. Can

[chain] Please change version number in project.xml

2005-10-23 Thread Wendy Smoak
number in project.xml, maybe 1.1-dev or 1.0.1-dev would be appropriate. Thanks, Wendy Smoak - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [validator] Commons Validator 1.2.0 beta test release

2005-09-19 Thread Wendy Smoak
. (And I've had last Wednesday's snapshot in production since then with no problems, but the most complicated thing I'm doing with it is a few 'requiredif' validations.) -- Wendy Smoak - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED

[validator] 1.2.0-dev missing JavaScript?

2005-09-14 Thread Wendy Smoak
/validateDouble.js -- Wendy Smoak - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [validator] 1.2.0-dev missing JavaScript?

2005-09-14 Thread Wendy Smoak
From: Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] The snapshots look messed up - theres no binary zip version and I can't unzip the tar.gz one. You mean the nightlies? There is a snapshot on cvs.apache.org, which is what I'm using (it's the one listed in the dependencies for Struts). It's working

Re: [validator] 1.2.0-dev missing JavaScript?

2005-09-14 Thread Wendy Smoak
From: Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] OK I've loaded a version here: http://people.apache.org/~niallp/validator/ Where is the snapshot then? Not where I thought it was... Don posted it: http://people.apache.org/~mrdon/repository/commons-validator/jars/ Can you duplicate that directory

Re: [validator] 1.2.0-dev missing JavaScript?

2005-09-14 Thread Wendy Smoak
From: Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] OK, its there: http://people.apache.org/~niallp/repository/commons-validator/jars/ Thank you! Sorry if I was not properly appreciative earlier. You probably think the .zip is sufficient and then you get the Maven users complaining that it's not

Re: [validator] 1.2.0-dev missing JavaScript?

2005-09-14 Thread Wendy Smoak
From: Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] I published the commons-validator snapshot to the apache cvs maven repository today and modified the build. Is it a problem with that jar? Long day at work... I think I looked under 'validator' and not 'commons-validator' on http://cvs.apache.org/repository.

Re: [digester][patch] Make NodeCreateRule available through xmlrules

2005-09-06 Thread Wendy Smoak
From: robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] How would we get a new SNAPSHOT up to the ibiblio repository? not sure :-/ (i'm unsure about the current ASF policy. i'll try to find out but it may take a while...) A recent post on infra@ suggests that anything placed here

Re: [httpclient] Sending serialized object from httpclient to servlet.

2005-02-08 Thread Wendy Smoak
' list is usually reserved for questions about the development of the libraries themselves, so I'm replying to commons-user (and copying dev). -- Wendy Smoak - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e

Re: [digester] initial code for Digester2.0

2005-02-04 Thread Wendy Smoak
Not sure if it's been discussed already, but I'm very much in favor of this (from the Wiki): - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [digester] initial code for Digester2.0

2005-02-04 Thread Wendy Smoak
actually listed as a possible enhancement for 1.7, but wherever it ends up, it will be appreciated. (Assuming it isn't there already and I missed it...) -- Wendy Smoak - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional

Re: [digester] initial code for Digester2.0

2005-02-04 Thread Wendy Smoak
. Much as I'd love to play with Digester instead, homework wins out (for the moment at least.) Let's see how long it takes me to write a small recursive-descent parser that reads in arithmetic expressions, parses each one into an abstract syntax tree, and evaluates it. :) -- Wendy Smoak

Re: [digester] initial code for Digester2.0

2005-01-31 Thread Wendy Smoak
of the available Action constructor signatures? Thanks, Wendy Smoak - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Having trouble with svn checkout

2005-01-30 Thread Wendy Smoak
checkout http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jakarta/commons/proper/current What am I doing wrong? -- Wendy Smoak - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[beanutils] Problem with indexed properties

2005-01-25 Thread Wendy Smoak
are attached to bug 28358. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28358 It was originally reported as a JVM problem, but even if the code would work under 1.3.1, that isn't going to help those of us who have long since moved up to 1.4 and 1.5. -- Wendy Smoak

[digester] Problem building javadoc w/ Ant on Windows

2005-01-17 Thread Wendy Smoak
://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33129#c3) so it appears to be a Windows-only thing. -- Wendy Smoak - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [digester] Problem building javadoc w/ Ant on Windows

2005-01-17 Thread Wendy Smoak
as with the original AS IS. Chalk this one up to annoying but easily fixable. Other than deleting the quotes around AS IS (which might annoy the lawyer types) I don't see what else to do with it. -- Wendy Smoak

Re: [vfs] download page for VFS has bad link

2005-01-12 Thread Wendy Smoak
and apply a patch? (If a patch would be useful, can little things like this be pasted into an email message, or do you always want them attached to bugs?) -- Wendy Smoak - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional