On Jul 2, 2014, at 10:05 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 12:24 AM, David Welton wrote:
> > Closest I've seen in the 'free' area is licensing that forbids military
> > uses.
>
> Which is, once again, neither 'free software' nor open source because
> it goes against th
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 12:24 AM, David Welton wrote:
> > Closest I've seen in the 'free' area is licensing that forbids military
> > uses.
>
> Which is, once again, neither 'free software' nor open source because
> it goes against the definition. You can't have it both ways: you
> can't exclude
special Java disclaimer is not present. (See
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/file/2df45ac1bf49/LICENSE.
- Dennis
From: Dirk-Willem van Gulik [mailto:di...@webweaving.org]
Sent: Wednesday, July 2, 2014 01:46
To: community@apache.org
Cc: David Welton
Subject: Re: Government License
Op 2
Nope... Freedome #0 and OSD #6
On Jul 2, 2014, at 3:37 AM, Johannes Geppert wrote:
> Is it maybe possible not to exclude people or organisations, but concrete
> usage scenarios instead?
> Like cyber crime and/or spying
>
-
T
fraction of the cost).
>
> rgds
> jan I
>
>>
>>
>> Jan
>>
>>
>>
>> *Von:* Johannes Geppert [mailto:jo...@apache.org]
>> *Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 2. Juli 2014 09:37
>> *An:* community@apache.org
>> *Betreff:* Re: Go
Op 2 jul. 2014, om 10:33 heeft Greg Stein het volgende
geschreven:
> On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 2:24 AM, David Welton wrote:
> > Closest I've seen in the 'free' area is licensing that forbids military
> > uses.
>
> Which is, once again, neither 'free software' nor open source because
> it goes ag
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 2:24 AM, David Welton wrote:
> > Closest I've seen in the 'free' area is licensing that forbids military
> > uses.
>
> Which is, once again, neither 'free software' nor open source because
> it goes against the definition. You can't have it both ways: you
> can't exclude p
ittwoch, 2. Juli 2014 09:37
> *An:* community@apache.org
> *Betreff:* Re: Government License
>
>
>
> Is it maybe possible not to exclude people or organisations, but concrete
> usage scenarios instead?
>
> Like cyber crime and/or spying
>
>
>
> Johann
Even if you could exclude cyber crime and spying from a legal use by your
license - do you really think that these users would follow your license?
Jan
Von: Johannes Geppert [mailto:jo...@apache.org]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 2. Juli 2014 09:37
An: community@apache.org
Betreff: Re: Government
Is it maybe possible not to exclude people or organisations, but concrete
usage scenarios instead?
Like cyber crime and/or spying
Johannes
#
web: http://www.jgeppert.com
twitter: http://twitter.com/jogep
2014-07-02 9:24 GMT+02:00 David Welton :
> Closest I've seen in the 'free' area is licensing that forbids military
> uses.
Which is, once again, neither 'free software' nor open source because
it goes against the definition. You can't have it both ways: you
can't exclude people from using it because they are military, gay,
Illinois nazi
Closest I've seen in the 'free' area is licensing that forbids military
uses.
Hen
On Monday, June 30, 2014, McGovern, James wrote:
> Has anyone ever explored creation of a license model that forbids the
> Federal Government in using its software? For example, you may want to
> create a new enc
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 10:40 AM, McGovern, James wrote:
> Has anyone ever explored creation of a license model that forbids the
> Federal Government in using its software? For example, you may want to
> create a new encryption algorithm but for whatever reasons, don’t want the
> NSA to have acces
Sure. But then it wouldn't be either an Open Source nor a Free Software
license.
On Jun 30, 2014, at 10:40 AM, McGovern, James wrote:
> Has anyone ever explored creation of a license model that forbids the Federal
> Government in using its software? For example, you may want to create a new
>
That wouldn't be an open source license. Remember freedom #1 - free to
be able to use in any manner for any purpose.
That said there are actually a number of licenses that 'no evil'
clauses in them; and IIRC there are licenses that forbid use by the US
government; though a quick google failed me. B
On 06/30/2014 09:40 AM, McGovern, James wrote:
> Has anyone ever explored creation of a license model that forbids the
> Federal Government in using its software? For example, you may want to
> create a new encryption algorithm but for whatever reasons, don’t want
> the NSA to have access to it.
I
Has anyone ever explored creation of a license model that forbids the Federal
Government in using its software? For example, you may want to create a new
encryption algorithm but for whatever reasons, don’t want the NSA to have
access to it.
http://facebook.com/McGovernForCT
17 matches
Mail list logo
